[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/Jump to content

Talk:Bini (group)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LionhearTV as a reliable source

[edit]

@Royiswariii recently raised concerns regarding the reliability of LionhearTV. This article currently relies on three cited source from LionhearTV (previously four), which needs to be addressed according to them. I have replaced one source with a reference to a press release by ABS-CBN Newsroom as LionhearTV's article was a complete copypaste from the said press release. See this diff for the revision. Other Bini-related articles also rely to this source.

Nevertheless, I'm opening this topic to gather feedback from interested editors whether to raise this concern to WP:RSN to further discuss its reliability as a source since 688 Philippine articles (based on a Wikipedia search query that returned 688 article entries) are also relying to LionhearTV. AstrooKai (TalkContributions) 15:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been a bit wary of the site since as far as I can remember, its connection to ABS-CBN is not that clearly defined, as compared to PEP and its relationship with GMA network (which explains why I am more comfortable with using it here and some related articles). Borgenland (talk) 15:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to their own about page, LionhearTV was established in 2008 as an independent entertainment blog, though I don't know if they're a "news blog" (which may pass WP:RS and WP:NEWSBLOG) or a "personal blog" (which fails WP:UGC). This is why I'm planning to raise this to WP:RSN to generate consensus regarding its reliability, or at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Sources, if its more appropriate there since the source is a Philippine website. AstrooKai (TalkContributions) 16:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi AstrooKai! I gathered some research on the AfD regarding LionhearTV being considered an unreliable source. They aren't accepting it as reliable. I came across a draft article (Draft:My Mother, My Story) where a review by SafariScribe (mentioned that they reviewed my article too on Maloi and wasn't approved, possibly due to sources like LionhearTV). I based it on their feedback and flagged it as an unreliable source. Royiswariii (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a statement from one editor, we need to generate a consensus from other editors on whether the source is, as SafarScribe mentioned, an unreliable source. Because I'm currently stuck between whether LionhearTV is a news blog or a personal blog, since news blogs are sometimes considered a reliable source, depending on how the article was written (see WP:NEWSBLOG). I will have this raised to WP:RSN to have a centralized discussion for it, since there are hundreds of Philippine articles using LionhearTV as a reference at some point. AstrooKai (TalkContributions) 10:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See parallel discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines. Borgenland (talk) 04:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that this issue has been raised to WP:RSN, feel free to drop feedback there if there is any. AstrooKai (TalkContributions) 19:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject for Bini

[edit]

Hello! I have thoughts here or a suggestion too, I was planning a WikiProject that dedicated only for Bini last month but the proposal for WikiProject are on hold (WP:WPPRO), but they stated that If your group can't wait for the new process, please only create group pages in the userspace of one of your members.. Any thoughts should I continue? Royiswariii Talk! 04:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, didn't know you proposed something like this for Bini last month. Can you directly link to the proposal? AstrooKai (Talk) 05:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't propose a Wikiproject because they're changing the process of the proposing of WikiProject, I bet that it will take longer to return of proposing a Wikiproject. But I'm planning to create a Wikiproject using my userspace since it's not allowed to propose a wikiproject. In their statment In 2024, we are changing the proposal process. We are trying to reduce the number of failed attempts to start groups. Royiswariii Talk! 05:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Although, I'm not quite familiar with a userspace WikiProject. How does it differ from mainspace WikiProjects? AstrooKai (Talk) 06:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know, there is no difference on WP mainspace and userspace, they just recommended to create a WikiProject if you are impatient to create (like me), maybe a limited to do in userspace i guess? But I think it's just same as WP mainspace. It's just a limited small group and can formalized if the proposal for WikiProject was okay.Royiswariii Talk! 06:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay. Though, I'm not quite sure if Bini needs a WikiProject right now. I mean, SB19, another P-pop group, has relatively the same stardom as Bini right now, but they don't seem to have a dedicated WikiProject or group of editors here. As far as I know, only a few of us editors regularly maintain Bini-related articles (me, you, and @Borgenland). @Orojackson56 was active before, but they stopped contributing in August. @Indo360 on the other hand, is active in improving other Philippine entertainment articles.
Though that is my opinion, I don't know about the others. It's up to them whether they agree with forming a Bini WikiProject since I'm okay with whatever the outcome of this. I pinged them for their feedback about this proposal. AstrooKai (Talk) 08:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think the time is ripe for an independent WikiProject. I think the best solution for now is helping the Music Task Force in Tambayan, but I do wish a Bloom badge is available for display in user pages. Borgenland (talk) 08:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The music task force is active, but we need additional participants who are active and able to address those items in the to-do list. In addition, Bini is already under this task force, so I think having a separate WikiProject for the group alone is too much.
For the Bloom userbox, I have been planning to create one for a long time now, but I just can't find any images or logo of the group that I can use without violating any policy or guidelines. AstrooKai (Talk) 09:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's a logo of File:BINI logo.svg, I will upload a new clearer logo. Royiswariii Talk! 09:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, but I'm concerned since it's a trademark of ABS-CBN. AstrooKai (Talk) 10:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello AstrooKai!
It's possible to use a logo is in the public domain but also trademarked in a userbox on Wikipedia provided certain conditions are met
Since the logo is in the public domain, there are no copyright restrictions on its use. However, trademark law still applies.
Since we're on Wikipedia and it's a Nonprofit organization, userboxes on logo are allowed on Wikipedia policies to use public domain logos even it's have a trademark, but it's essential to ensure that the use
  • Does not imply affiliation, sponsorship, or endorsement by the trademark holder.
  • Clearly identifies the logo's public domain and trademarked status using proper tags (e.g, {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademark}})
While using the logo in a userbox may allow, it's important to note that decorative or improper use of userboxed of trademarked material userboxes can lead to deletion or violating the Wikipedia policy. Royiswariii Talk! 11:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any flower would be fine on my part. Borgenland (talk) 11:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:AstrooKai/Bini. I've come up with this, just basic text but associated with Bini's colors. It can be used with {{User:AstrooKai/Bini}}. Let me know if you guys have any suggestions. AstrooKai (Talk) 13:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's great! I will add this on my userpage later. Royiswariii Talk! 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bini (group)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Royiswariii (talk · contribs) 06:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dxneo (talk · contribs) 14:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mates, coming from this review, I was like why not check this out too. Truth is I have read the article before even initiating this review so let's see what happens from here. dxneo (talk) 14:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At first glance

[edit]

I realised that the lead kind of go against WP:CITELEAD. The first paragraph is not referenced but the others are. Mind you, this is not that big of a deal, but the lead is often repeated in the body of the article so it already gives me the impression that the prose is not up to GA standard.


  • This is a very long article, to make it easy and simple, make sure that the lead is free of citations. Make sure the lead only summarize the body of the article to prepare readers and grab their attention.
  • Consistency is key. If you say the website is Vogue, you cannot move on to say others are grammy.com or x.com. Preferably, use domain name, not URLs.
  • Wiki link each and every |website= were possible.
  • Make sure every single reference is archived, to avoid linkrot. This is gonna be a problem since Wayback Machine is under cyber attack. You should use Archive.today or ghostarchive.org to archive websites.
  • Add alt text to each and every media file.
  • Why is there a non-free magazine cover on this article?
  • Primary sources such as YouTube, Facebook, or more social sites are very discouraged. I suggest you reduce the use of such sites unless stated otherwise.
  • That See also section is not necessary. Imagine doing that for someone like Lil Wayne who has been in the game for decades.
  • Merge short paragraphs.

Verdict

[edit]

Honestly, I think this article must be taken to WP:PR for a thorough review in terms of prose, media and citations (there are lots and lots of social sites here). Opinions from multiple viewpoints will definitely lead you into the right direction. A quick fail will do here. dxneo (talk) 14:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping:AstrooKai and Borgenland. dxneo (talk) 16:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Acknowledged. It is indeed a running battle to minimize WP:FANCRUFT not just here. Borgenland (talk) 16:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Please check out lint errors (here), scroll to the bottom and you'll see that bots have detected 21 duplicate errors, fix them. Royiswariii, AstrooKai and Borgenland, wish you all the best. I'll see you at WP:PR. You may request peer review now. dxneo (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Peer Review

[edit]

Hello! I just want to let you know all that I nom to Peer Review. Royiswariii Talk! 15:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Let us know if you need any assistance. AstrooKai (Talk) 15:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awit 2024

[edit]

Apparently, a confusing set of categories were inserted at the last minute which may visually compromise the awards box and that of "Pantropiko" and "Karera". See [1]. Borgenland (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If a consensus is reached on expanding the box in light of these developments, I would like to request additional help in doing so. Borgenland (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's actually my first time hearing these categories on Awit Awards, and I'm not sure on how they will be added to the table since I'm not entirely sure on how to approach these since they were not included in the final nominee lists released months ago. AstrooKai (Talk) 17:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I sent a message on Music TF for comments from other editors. Borgenland (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just WP:BOLD added it. Re-read again and there were People's Choice wins in 2023. Borgenland (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. I also want to let you know that I made some tweaks with the table, grouping the accolades for "Pantropiko" and "Karera" so that they're under one column span. AstrooKai (Talk) 16:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]