[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/Jump to content

Talk:1973–74 in English football

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ellipsis

[edit]

What's with the ellipsis? "..." appears 127 times in the article, mostly when it looks like it should just be a new sentence.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  18:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Knowledeayton: I just looked at 1972–73 in English football and 1974–75 in English football and they've had the ellipsis added recently too by you. I don't know squat about football, but I've never seen this style of writing before. Any objection if I start taking them out? Thanks,  SchreiberBike | ⌨  01:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


@SchreiberBike: Ah, the ellipses...reproduced as per the source material, basically. It was a "Rothmans thing" for many, many years. The author(s) tended to use them to separate different news items, in the same way you or I might use a paragraph break, for example. FWIW I have judiciously left some of them out already (e.g. if a news item has a specific link to the one preceding it), but in most cases I find the diary entries read better with them in place and would be rather cluttered and cumbersome otherwise.

So, I personally wouldn't go so far as to get rid of them, wholesale - but I'm proofreading these pages on virtually a daily basis, so in all probability you'll see more of them disappear before too long anyway...  Knowledeayton | ⌨  17:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Knowledeayton and SchreiberBike: I think using ellipses in this way isn't recommended in the Style Manual.

More generally, do the recent additions to the 'Diary of the season' section follow the original Rothmans source verbatim? The writing style, including some idioms that are characteristic of this section of Rothmans, certainly suggests this is the case. This needs to be avoided. See for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing Tffff (talk) 08:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tffff: Fair point. Updates removed and entries restored. Knowledeayton (talk) 11:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1973–74 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1973–74_in_English_football&oldid=1196080494"