What Explains Racial/Ethnic Inequality in Job Quality in the Service Sector?

Adam Storer, Daniel Schneider and Kristen Harknett
Additional contact information
Adam Storer: UC Berkeley - University of California [Berkeley] - UC - University of California
Daniel Schneider: Harvard University
Kristen Harknett: UC San Francisco - University of California [San Francisco] - UC - University of California

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Precarious work in the United States is defined by economic and temporal dimensions. A large literature documents the extent of low wages and limited fringe benefits, but research has only recently examined the prevalence and consequences of unstable and unpredictable work schedules. Yet practices such as on-call shifts, last minute cancellations, and insufficient work hours are common in the retail and food-service sectors. Little research has examined racial/ethnic inequality in this temporal dimension of job quality, yet precarious scheduling practices may be a significant, if mostly hidden, site for racial/ethnic inequality, because scheduling practices differ significantly between firms and because front-line managers have substantial discretion in scheduling. We draw on innovative matched employer-employee data from The Shift Project to estimate racial/ethnic gaps in these temporal dimensions of job quality and to examine the contribution of firm-level sorting and intra-organizational dynamics to these gaps. We find significant racial/ethnic gaps in exposure to precarious scheduling that disadvantage non-white workers. We provide novel evidence that both firm segregation and racial discordance between workers and managers play significant roles in explaining racial/ethnic gaps in job quality. Notably, we find that racial/ethnic gaps are larger for women than for men.

Keywords: inequality; organizations; precarious work; race/ethnicity; racial/ethnic discrimination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-08-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in American Sociological Review, 2020, 85 (4), 537-572 p. ⟨10.1177/0003122420930018⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04742803

DOI: 10.1177/0003122420930018

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().