[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2145204.2145329acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

To stay or leave?: the relationship of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups

Published: 11 February 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Today many people with serious diseases use online support groups to seek social support. For these groups to be sustained and effective, member retention and commitment is important. Our study examined how different types and amounts of social support in an online cancer support group are associated with participants' length of membership. We first built machine learning models to automatically identify the extent to which messages contained emotional and informational support. Agreement with human judges was high (r > 0.76). We then used these models to measure the support exchanged in 1.5 million messages. Finally, we applied quantitative event history analysis to assess how exposure to emotional and informational support predicted group members' length of subsequent participation. The results demonstrated that the more emotional support members were exposed to, the lower the risk of dropout. In contrast, informational support did not have the same strong effects on commitment. We speculate that emotional support enhanced members' relationships with one another or the group as a whole, whereas informational support satisfied members' short-term information needs.

References

[1]
Alpers, G. W., Winzelberg, A. J., Classen, C., Roberts, H., Dev, P., Koopman, C., et al. (2005). Evaluation of computerized text analysis in an Internet breast cancer support group. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), 361--376.
[2]
Ashforth, B. E., & Saks, A. M. (1996). Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 149--178.
[3]
Bambina, A. (2007). Online social support: the interplay of social networks and computer-mediated communication. NY: Cambria Press.
[4]
Bauer, T. N., Morrison, E. W., & Callister, R. R. (1998). Organizational socialization: A review and directions for future research. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 16, pp. 149--214). Greenwich CT: JAI Press Inc.
[5]
Blei, David M., Ng, Andrew Y., & Jordan, Michael I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Jan), 993--1022.
[6]
Bruckman, Amy. (2006). Teaching students to study online communities ethically. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 82--98.
[7]
Buis, L. R. (2008). Emotional and informational support messages in an online hospice support community. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 26(6), 358--367.
[8]
Chou, W. Y. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: Implications for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(4), e48.
[9]
Chou, W. S., Liu, B., Post, S., & Hesse, B. (2011). Health-related Internet use among cancer survivors: Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003-2008. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 5(3), 263--270.
[10]
Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1994). Social support communication in the context of marriage: An analysis of couples' supportive interactions. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 113--135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[11]
Davison, K. P., Pennebaker, J. W., & Dickerson, S. S. (2000). Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. American Psychologist, 55(2), 205--217.
[12]
Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1984). Social support and cancer: Findings based on patient interviews and their implications. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 77--98.
[13]
Dunkel-Schetter, C., Feinstein, L. G., Taylor, S. E., & Falke, R. L. (1992). Patterns of coping with cancer. Health Psychology, 11(2), 79--87.
[14]
Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 328(7449), 1166--1171.
[15]
Fisher, C. D. (1986). Organizational socialization: An integrative review. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 4, pp. 101--145). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
[16]
Han, J. Y., Shaw, B. R., Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., Mctavish, F., & Gustafson D. H. (2008). Expressing positive emotions within online support groups by women with breast cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(8), 1002--1007.
[17]
Hardey, M. (2002). 'The story of my illness': Personal accounts of illness on the Internet. Health, 6(1), 31--46.
[18]
Helgeson, V. S., Cohen, S., Schulz, R., & Yasko, J. (2000). Group support interventions for women with breast cancer: Who benefits from what? Health Psychology, 19(2), 107--114.
[19]
Helgeson, V. S. & Cohen, S. (2001). Long-term effects of educational and peer discussion group interventions on adjustment to breast cancer. Health Psychology, 20(5), 387--392.
[20]
Jacobs C., Ross, R. D., Walker, I. M., & Stockdale, R. E. (1983). Behavior of cancer patients: A randomized study of the effects of education and peer support groups. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 6(3), 347--353.
[21]
Koch, Gary G. (1982). Intraclass correlation coefficient. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (pp. 213--217). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[22]
Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 305--336.
[23]
Meier, A., Lyons, E. J., Frydman, G., Forlenza, M., Rimer, B. K. (2007). How cancer survivors provide support on cancer-related Internet mailing lists. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(2), e12.
[24]
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2001). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 69--112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[25]
Owen, J. E., Giese-Davis, J., Cordova, M., Kronenwetter, C., Golant, M., & Spiegel, D. (2006). Self-report and linguistic indicators of emotional expression in narratives as predictors of adjustment to cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(4), 335--345.
[26]
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC2007). Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
[27]
Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2009). The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 13--32.
[28]
Rodgers, S. & Chen, Q. (2005). Internet community group participation: Psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(4), np.
[29]
Shaw, B. R., McTavish, F., Hawkins, R., Gustafson, D. H., & Pingree, S. (2000). Experiences of women with breast cancer: Exchanging social support over the chess computer network. Journal of health communication, 5(2), 135--59.
[30]
Singer, J. D. & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
[31]
Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008). Cheap and fast - but is it good? Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 254--263). Stroudsburg. PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[32]
Toutanova, K. & Manning, C. D. (2000). Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 63--70). Stroudsburg. PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[33]
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 347--354). Stroudsburg. PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[34]
Witten, I. H. & Frank, E. (2005). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Elsevier.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Emotional and Informational Dynamics in Question-Response Pairs in Online Health Communities: A Multimodal Deep Learning ApproachInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-024-10566-yOnline publication date: 3-Jan-2025
  • (2024)How Do Care Partners of People with Rare Dementia Use Language in Online Peer Support Groups? A Quantitative Text Analysis StudyHealthcare10.3390/healthcare1203031312:3(313)Online publication date: 25-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Impact of Concurrent Media Exposure on Professional Identity: Cross-Sectional Study of 1087 Medical Students During Long COVIDJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/5005726(e50057)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
February 2012
1460 pages
ISBN:9781450310864
DOI:10.1145/2145204
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 February 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. applied machine learning
  2. commitment
  3. natural language analysis
  4. online communities
  5. social support

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CSCW '12
Sponsor:
CSCW '12: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
February 11 - 15, 2012
Washington, Seattle, USA

Acceptance Rates

CSCW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 164 of 415 submissions, 40%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)234
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Emotional and Informational Dynamics in Question-Response Pairs in Online Health Communities: A Multimodal Deep Learning ApproachInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-024-10566-yOnline publication date: 3-Jan-2025
  • (2024)How Do Care Partners of People with Rare Dementia Use Language in Online Peer Support Groups? A Quantitative Text Analysis StudyHealthcare10.3390/healthcare1203031312:3(313)Online publication date: 25-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Impact of Concurrent Media Exposure on Professional Identity: Cross-Sectional Study of 1087 Medical Students During Long COVIDJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/5005726(e50057)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Rehab-Diary: Enhancing Recovery Identity with an Online Support Group for Middle Aged and Older Ovarian Cancer PatientsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765208:MHCI(1-25)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Rocks Coding, Not Development: A Human-Centric, Experimental Evaluation of LLM-Supported SE TasksProceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering10.1145/36437581:FSE(699-721)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
  • (2024)What Makes Digital Support Effective? How Therapeutic Skills Affect Clinical Well-BeingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410298:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)A Game of Love for Women: Social Support in Otome Game Mr. Love: Queen’s Choice in ChinaProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642306(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Interaction dynamics of social support expressions predict future support-seeking behaviors in online support groupsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108224156:COnline publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Talk more about yourself: a data-driven extended theory of reasoned action for online health communitiesInformation Technology and Management10.1007/s10799-022-00376-625:3(233-246)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Understanding Mental Health Issues in Different Subdomains of Social Networking Services: Computational Analysis of Text-Based Reddit PostsJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4907425(e49074)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media