Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:56:32.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Importance of Open Access to Chronological Information: The IntChron Initiative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Christopher Bronk Ramsey Open the ORCID record for Christopher Bronk Ramsey [Opens in a new window] ,
Maarten Blaauw Open the ORCID record for Maarten Blaauw [Opens in a new window] ,
Rebecca Kearney  and
Richard A Staff
Christopher Bronk Ramsey*
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 1 South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom
Maarten Blaauw
Affiliation:
14CHRONO Centre, Queen’s University Belfast, 42 Fitzwilliam Street, Belfast BT9 6AX, United Kingdom
Rebecca Kearney
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 1 South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom
Richard A Staff
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride G75 0QF, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author. Email: christopher.ramsey@rlaha.ox.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of chronologies relies on integrating information from a number of different sources. In addition to direct dating evidence, such as radiocarbon dates, researchers will have contextual information which might be an environmental sequence or the context in an archaeological site. This information can be combined through Bayesian or other types of age-model. Once a chronology has been developed, this information can be used to estimate, for example, chronological uncertainties, rates of change, or the age of material which has not been directly dated.

Dealing with the information associated with chronology building is complicated and re-evaluation of chronologies often requires structured information which is hard to access. Although there are many databases with primary dating information, these often do not contain all of the information needed for a chronology. The Chronological Query Language (CQL) developed for OxCal was intended to be a convenient way of pulling such information together for Bayesian analysis. However, even this does not include much of the associated information required for reusing data in other analyses.

The IntChron initiative builds on the framework set up for the INTIMATE (Integrating Ice core, Marine and Terrestrial Records) chronological database (Bronk Ramsey et al. 2014) and is primarily an information exchange format and data visualization tool which enables users to pull together the types of information needed for chronological analysis. It is intended for use with multiple dating methodologies and while it will be integrated with OxCal, is intended to be an open format suitable for use with other software tools. The file format is JSON which is easily readable in software such as R, Python and MatLab. IntChron is not primarily intended to be a data depository but rather an index of sites where information is stored in the relevant format. As an initial step, databases of radiocarbon dates from the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (including those for the NERC radiocarbon facility), the RESET tephra database, the INTIMATE chronological database and regional radiocarbon databases for Egypt and Southern Africa are all linked. The intention is that users of OxCal will also be able to make published data accessible to others and to store working data, visible only to the user, to be used with the associated analysis tools. The IntChron site allows data from third party sources to be accessed through a representational state transfer (REST) application programming interface (API) in a number of different formats (JSON, csv, txt, oxcal) and associated bibliographic information in BibTeX format.

The aim of the IntChron initiative is to make it easy for users to provide data (in the single JSON format with limited minimum requirements) as well as to access data and tools, while promoting robust chronologies including realistic estimates of uncertainties. It is hoped that this will help to bring the chronological research communities to a point where data access is as easy as it is in some other fields. This is particularly important for Early Career Researchers and for those seeking to use large datasets in novel ways.

Keywords

data analysisdatabasesopen access
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 61 , Issue 5: Radiocarbon 2018 Conference Proceedings Trondheim, Norway, June 17–22, 2018 Part 1 of 2 , October 2019 , pp. 1121 - 1131
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 23rd International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim, Norway, 17–22 June, 2018

References

REFERENCES

Blaauw, M, Christen, JA. 2005. Radiocarbon peat chronologies and environmental change. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C-Applied Statistics 54(4):805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaauw, M, Christen, JA. 2011. Flexible paleoclimate age-depth models using an autoregressive gamma process. Bayesian Analysis 6(3):457–474.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2008. Deposition models for chronological records. Quaternary Science Reviews 27(1–2):42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Albert, P, Blockley, S, Hardiman, M, Lane, C, Macleod, A, Matthews, IP, Muscheler, R, Palmer, A, Staff, RA. 2014. Integrating timescales with time-transfer functions: a practical approach for an INTIMATE database. Quaternary Science Reviews 106:67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Housley, RA, Lane, CS, Smith, VC, Pollard, MA. 2015. The RESET tephra database and associated analytical tools. Quaternary Science Reviews 118:33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Lee, S. 2013. Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):720–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanos, P, Philippe, A. 2017. Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for combining dates in archaeological context. Journal de la Soeciete Francaise de Statistique 158(2):72–88.Google Scholar
Loftus, E, Mitchell, P, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2019. An archaeological radiocarbon database for southern Africa. Antiquity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, AR. 2014. Conventions for reporting radiocarbon determinations. Radiocarbon 56(2):555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Brown, TA, Reimer, RW. 2004. Discussion: reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14C data. Radiocarbon 46(3):1299–1304.Google Scholar
Rowland, JM, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2011. Online 14C database for Egypt. Egyptian Archaeology 38:33–34.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar