[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1148170.1148179acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Contextual search and name disambiguation in email using graphs

Published: 06 August 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Similarity measures for text have historically been an important tool for solving information retrieval problems. In many interesting settings, however, documents are often closely connected to other documents, as well as other non-textual objects: for instance, email messages are connected to other messages via header information. In this paper we consider extended similarity metrics for documents and other objects embedded in graphs, facilitated via a lazy graph walk. We provide a detailed instantiation of this framework for email data, where content, social networks and a timeline are integrated in a structural graph. The suggested framework is evaluated for two email-related problems: disambiguating names in email documents, and threading. We show that reranking schemes based on the graph-walk similarity measures often outperform baseline methods, and that further improvements can be obtained by use of appropriate learning methods.

References

[1]
M. Aery and S. Chakravarthy. EmailSift: Email classification based on structure and content. In ICDM, 2005.
[2]
A. Balmin, V. Hristidis, and Y. Papakonstantinou. ObjectRank: Authority-based keyword search in databases. In VLDB, 2004.
[3]
R. Bekkerman, R. El-Yaniv, and A. McCallum. Multi-way distributional clustering via pairwise interactions. In ICML, 2005.
[4]
H. Berger, M. Dittenbach, and D Merkl. An adaptive information retrieval system. based on associative networks. In APCCM, 2004.
[5]
V. R. Carvalho and W. W. Cohen. On the collective classification of email "speech acts". In SIGIR, 2005.
[6]
W. W. Cohen. Data integration using similarity joins and a word-based information representation language. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 18(3):288--321, 2000.
[7]
W. W. Cohen, P. Ravikumar, and S. Fienberg. A comparison of string distance metrics for name-matching tasks. In IIWEB, 2003.
[8]
W. W. Cohen, R. E. Schapire, and Y. Singer. Learning to order things. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 10:243--270, 1999.
[9]
M. Collins. Ranking algorithms for named-entity extraction: Boosting and the voted perceptron. In ACL, 2002.
[10]
M. Collins and T. Koo. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):25--69, 2005.
[11]
K. Collins-Thompson and J. Callan. Query expansion using random walk models. In CIKM, 2005.
[12]
W. B. Croft and J. Lafferty. Language Modeling for Information Retrieval. Springer, 2003.
[13]
C. P. Diehl, L. Getoor, and G. Namata. Name reference resolution in organizational email archives. In SIAM, 2006.
[14]
M. Diligenti, M. Gori, and M. Maggini. Learning web page scores by error back-propagation. In IJCAI, 2005.
[15]
S. Haykin. Neural Networks. Macmillan College Publishing Company, 1994.
[16]
M. Hearst. Texttiling: Segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics, 23(1):33--64, 1997.
[17]
G. Jeh and J. Widom. Simrank: A measure of structural-context similarity. In SIGKDD, 2002.
[18]
D. Kalashnikov, S. Mehrotra, and Z. Chen. Exploiting relationship for domain independent data cleaning. In SIAM, 2005.
[19]
B. Klimt and Y. Yang. The enron corpus: A new dataset for email classification research. In ECML, 2004.
[20]
O. Kurland and L. Lee. Pagerank without hyperlinks: Structural re-ranking using links induced by language models. In SIGIR, 2005.
[21]
D. E. Lewis and K. A. Knowles. Threading electronic mail: A preliminary study. Information Processing and Management, 1997.
[22]
B. Malin, E. M. Airoldi, and K. M. Carley. A social network analysis model for name disambiguation in lists. Journal of Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 11(2), 2005.
[23]
E. Minkov, R. C. Wang, and W. W. Cohen. Extracting personal names from emails: Applying named entity recognition to informal text. In HLT-EMNLP, 2005.
[24]
Z. Nie, Y. Zhang, J.-R. Wen, and W.-Y. Ma. Object-level ranking: Bringing order to web objects. In WWW, 2005.
[25]
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. In Technical Report, Computer Science department, Stanford University, 1998.
[26]
G. Salton and C. Buckley. On the use of spreading activation methods in automatic information retrieval. In SIGIR, 1988.
[27]
G. Salton and C. Buckley. Global text matching for information retrieval. Science, 253:1012--1015, 1991.
[28]
G. Salton, A. Singhal, M. Mitra, and C. Buckley. Automatic text structuring and summarization. Information Processing and Management, 33(2):193--208, 1997.
[29]
R. E. Schapire and Y. Singer. Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions. Machine Learning, 37(3):297--336, 1999.
[30]
K. Toutanova, C. D. Manning, and A. Y. Ng. Learning random walk models for inducing word dependency distributions. In ICML, 2004.
[31]
W. Xi, E. A. Fox, W. P. Fan, B. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Yan, and D. Zhuang. Simfusion: Measuring similarity using unified relationship matrix. In SIGIR, 2005.
[32]
Y. Yang and C. Chute. An example-based mapping method for text classification and retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(3), 1994.
[33]
D. Zhou, B. Scholkopf, and T. Hofmann. Semi-supervised learning on directed graphs. In NIPS, 2005.
[34]
X. Zhu, Z. Ghahramani, and J. Lafferty. Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. In ICML, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Robust Chinese Short Text Entity Disambiguation Method Based on Feature Fusion and Contrastive LearningInformation10.3390/info1503013915:3(139)Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Adaptive deep learning for entity disambiguation via knowledge-based risk analysisExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122342238:PEOnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2021)It Runs in the Family: Unsupervised Algorithm for Alternative Name Suggestion Using Digitized Family TreesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2021.3096670(1-1)Online publication date: 2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Contextual search and name disambiguation in email using graphs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      August 2006
      768 pages
      ISBN:1595933697
      DOI:10.1145/1148170
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 06 August 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. email
      2. graph-based retrieval
      3. name disambiguation
      4. threading

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Conference

      SIGIR06
      Sponsor:
      SIGIR06: The 29th Annual International SIGIR Conference
      August 6 - 11, 2006
      Washington, Seattle, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Robust Chinese Short Text Entity Disambiguation Method Based on Feature Fusion and Contrastive LearningInformation10.3390/info1503013915:3(139)Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
      • (2024)Adaptive deep learning for entity disambiguation via knowledge-based risk analysisExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122342238:PEOnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
      • (2021)It Runs in the Family: Unsupervised Algorithm for Alternative Name Suggestion Using Digitized Family TreesIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2021.3096670(1-1)Online publication date: 2021
      • (2021)Information ExtractionText Data Mining10.1007/978-981-16-0100-2_10(227-283)Online publication date: 21-Jan-2021
      • (2019)Morphological Disambiguation of Turkish with Free-order Co-occurrence StatisticsGümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi10.17714/gumusfenbil.430034Online publication date: 31-Jan-2019
      • (2019)Debiasing Vandalism Detection Models at WikidataThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313507(670-680)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
      • (2018)A conditional random field model for name disambiguation in National Natural Science Foundation of China fundJournal of Algorithms & Computational Technology10.1177/174830181775148112:2(91-100)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2018
      • (2018)GraPUProceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing10.1145/3267809.3267811(301-312)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2018
      • (2018)Ontology-based Adaptive e-Textbook Platform for Student and Machine Co-Learning2018 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2018.8491480(1-7)Online publication date: Jul-2018
      • (2018)A Smart Email Client Prototype for Effective Reuse of Past RepliesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2018.28785236(69453-69471)Online publication date: 2018
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media