[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
RFC2993: Architectural Implications of NAT2000 RFC
Publisher:
  • RFC Editor
  • United States
Published:01 November 2000
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

In light of the growing interest in, and deployment of network address translation (NAT) RFC-1631, this paper will discuss some of the architectural implications and guidelines for implementations. It is assumed the reader is familiar with the address translation concepts presented in RFC-1631.

RFC Downloads

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Olson K, Wampler J and Keller E (2023). Doomed to Repeat with IPv6? Characterization of NAT-centric Security in SOHO Routers, ACM Computing Surveys, 55:14s, (1-37), Online publication date: 31-Dec-2024.
  2. ACM
    Zúquete A and Frade C (2012). A new location layer for the TCP/IP protocol stack, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 42:2, (16-27), Online publication date: 29-Mar-2012.
  3. ACM
    Maassen J and Bal H Smartsockets Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on High performance distributed computing, (1-10)
  4. ACM
    Guha S and Francis P An end-middle-end approach to connection establishment Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, (193-204)
  5. ACM
    Guha S and Francis P (2007). An end-middle-end approach to connection establishment, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37:4, (193-204), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2007.
  6. Bi J, Zhang M and Zhao L Security enhancement by detecting network address translation based on instant messaging Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Emerging Directions in Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, (962-971)
  7. Walfish M, Stribling J, Krohn M, Balakrishnan H, Morris R and Shenker S Middleboxes no longer considered harmful Proceedings of the 6th conference on Symposium on Operating Systems Design & Implementation - Volume 6, (15-15)
  8. ACM
    Turányi Z, Valkó A and Campbell A (2003). 4+4, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 33:5, (43-54), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2003.
  9. ACM
    Bellovin S A technique for counting natted hosts Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurment, (267-272)
  10. Osman S, Subhraveti D, Su G and Nieh J The design and implementation of Zap Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Operating systems design and implementation (Copyright restrictions prevent ACM from being able to make the PDFs for this conference available for downloading), (361-376)
  11. ACM
    Osman S, Subhraveti D, Su G and Nieh J (2002). The design and implementation of Zap, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 36:SI, (361-376), Online publication date: 31-Dec-2003.
  12. ACM
    Kravets R, Carter C and Magalhães L (2001). A cooperative approach to user mobility, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31:5, (57-69), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2001.
Contributors
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Recommendations