[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

To Clean or Not to Clean: Document Preprocessing and Reproducibility

Published: 29 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Web document collections such as WT10G, GOV2, and ClueWeb are widely used for text retrieval experiments. Documents in these collections contain a fair amount of non-content-related markup in the form of tags, hyperlinks, and so on. Published articles that use these corpora generally do not provide specific details about how this markup information is handled during indexing. However, this question turns out to be important: Through experiments, we find that including or excluding metadata in the index can produce significantly different results with standard IR models. More importantly, the effect varies across models and collections. For example, metadata filtering is found to be generally beneficial when using BM25, or language modeling with Dirichlet smoothing, but can significantly reduce retrieval effectiveness if language modeling is used with Jelinek-Mercer smoothing. We also observe that, in general, the performance differences become more noticeable as the amount of metadata in the test collections increase. Given this variability, we believe that the details of document preprocessing are significant from the point of view of reproducibility. In a second set of experiments, we also study the effect of preprocessing on query expansion using RM3. In this case, once again, we find that it is generally better to remove markup before using documents for query expansion.

References

[1]
Giambattista Amati. 2003. Probability Models for Information Retrieval Based on Divergence from Randomness. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Glasgow.
[2]
Gianni Amati and Cornelis Joost Van Rijsbergen. 2002. Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring the divergence from randomness. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 20, 4 (Oct. 2002), 357--389.
[3]
Yael Anava, Anna Shtok, Oren Kurland, and Ella Rabinovich. 2016. A probabilistic fusion framework. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’16). ACM, New York, NY, 1463--1472.
[4]
Jaime Arguello, Matt Crane, Fernando Diaz, Jimmy Lin, and Andrew Trotman. 2016. Report on the SIGIR 2015 workshop on reproducibility, inexplicability, and generalizability of results (RIGOR). ACM SIGIR Forum 49, 2 (2016), 107--116.
[5]
Timothy G. Armstrong, Alistair Moffat, William Webber, and Justin Zobel. 2009. Improvements that don’t add up: Ad-hoc retrieval results since 1998. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, (CIKM’09), David Wai-Lok Cheung, Il-Yeol Song, Wesley W. Chu, Xiaohua Hu, and Jimmy J. Lin (Eds.). ACM, 601--610.
[6]
Hosein Azarbonyad, Mostafa Dehghani, Maarten Marx, and Jaap Kamps. 2015. Time-aware authorship attribution for short text streams. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’15). ACM, New York, NY, 727--730.
[7]
Leif Azzopardi, Yashar Moshfeghi, Martin Halvey, Rami S. Alkhawaldeh, Krisztian Balog, Emanuele Di Buccio, Diego Ceccarelli, Juan M. Fernández-Luna, Charlie Hull, Jake Mannix, and Sauparna Palchowdhury. 2017. Lucene4IR: Developing information retrieval evaluation resources using Lucene. SIGIR Forum 50, 2 (Feb. 2017), 58--75.
[8]
Peter Bailey, Nick Craswell, and David Hawking. 2003. Engineering a multi-purpose test collection for web retrieval experiments. Inf. Process. Manage. 39, 6 (Nov. 2003), 853--871.
[9]
Saeid Balaneshin-kordan and Alexander Kotov. 2016. Sequential query expansion using concept graph. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’16). ACM, New York, NY, 155--164.
[10]
Stefan Büttcher, Charles L. A. Clarke, and Ian Soboroff. {n.d.}. The TREC 2006 terabyte track. Retrieved from https://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec15/papers/TERA06.OVERVIEW.pdf.
[11]
Deng Cai, Shipeng Yu, Ji-Rong Wen, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2003. Extracting content structure for web pages based on visual representation. In Proceedings of the 5th Asia-Pacific Web Conference on Web Technologies and Applications (APWeb’03). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 406--417.
[12]
Carlos Castillo and Brian D. Davison. 2011. Adversarial web search. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 4, 5 (May 2011), 377--486.
[13]
Carlos Castillo, Debora Donato, Luca Becchetti, Paolo Boldi, Stefano Leonardi, Massimo Santini, and Sebastiano Vigna. 2006. A reference collection for web spam. SIGIR Forum 40, 2 (Dec. 2006), 11--24.
[14]
Charles L. A. Clarke, Nick Craswell, and Ian Soboroff. {n.d.}. Overview of the TREC 2004 terabyte track. Retrieved from https://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec13/papers/TERA.OVERVIEW.ps.
[15]
Charles L. A, Clarke, Falk Scholer, and Ian Soboroff. {n.d.}. The TREC 2005 terabyte track.
[16]
Charles L. A. Clarke, Nick Craswell, and Ian Soboroff. 2009. Overview of the TREC 2009 web track. In Proceedings of the 18th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’09). http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec18/papers/WEB09.OVERVIEW.pdf.
[17]
Charles L. A. Clarke, Nick Craswell, Ian Soboroff, and Ellen M. Voorhees. 2011. Overview of the TREC 2011 web track. In Proceedings of the 20th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’11). http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec20/papers/WEB.OVERVIEW.pdf.
[18]
Charles L. A. Clarke, Nick Craswell, and Ellen M. Voorhees. 2012. Overview of the TREC 2012 web track. In Proceedings of the 21st Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’12). http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec21/papers/WEB12.overview.pdf.
[19]
Charles L. A. Clarke, Ian Soboroff Nick Craswell, and Gordon V. Cormack. 2010. Overview of the TREC 2010 web track. In Proceedings of the 18th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’10). http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec19/papers/WEB.OVERVIEW.pdf.
[20]
Stéphane Clinchant and Eric Gaussier. 2013. A theoretical analysis of pseudo-relevance feedback models. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR’13). ACM, New York, NY.
[21]
Gordon V. Cormack, Mark D. Smucker, and Charles L. A. Clarke. 2011. Efficient and effective spam filtering and re-ranking for large web datasets. Inf. Retr. 14, 5 (2011), 441--465.
[22]
Nick Craswell and David Hawking. 2004. Overview of the TREC 2004 web track. In Proceedings of the 13th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’04). http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec13/papers/WEB.OVERVIEW.pdf.
[23]
Nick Craswell, David Hawking, Ross Wilkinson, and Mingfang Wu. 2003. Overview of the TREC 2003 web track. In Proceedings of the 12th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’03). 78--92.
[24]
Ronan Cummins. 2017. Improved query-topic models using pseudo-relevant Pólya document models. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR’17). http://dcs.gla.ac.uk/ronanc/papers/cumminsICTIR17.pdf. To appear.
[25]
Ronan Cummins, Jiaul H. Paik, and Yuanhua Lv. 2015. A Pólya Urn document language model for improved information retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 33, 4 (2015), 21:1--21:34.
[26]
Zhuyun Dai, Chenyan Xiong, and Jamie Callan. 2016. Query-biased partitioning for selective search. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’16). ACM, New York, NY, 1119--1128.
[27]
Mostafa Dehghani, Samira Abnar, and Jaap Kamps. 2016. The healing power of Poison: Helpful non-relevant documents in feedback. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’16). ACM, New York, NY, 2065--2068.
[28]
Mostafa Dehghani, Hamed Zamani, Aliaksei Severyn, Jaap Kamps, and W. Bruce Croft. 2017. Neural ranking models with weak supervision. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’17). ACM, New York, NY, 65--74.
[29]
Emanuele Di Buccio, Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Nicola Ferro, DK Harman, Maria Maistro, and Gianmaria Silvello. 2015. Unfolding off-the-shelf IR systems for reproducibility. In Proceedings of the SIGIR Workshop on Reproducibility, Inexplicability, and Generalizability of Results (RIGOR’15).
[30]
Faezeh Ensan and Ebrahim Bagheri. 2017. Document retrieval model through semantic linking. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’17). ACM, New York, NY, 181--190.
[31]
Nicola Ferro. 2017. Reproducibility challenges in information retrieval evaluation. J. Data Inf. Qual. 8, 2 (2017), 8:1--8:4.
[32]
N. Ferro, F. Crestani, M. F. Moens, J. Mothe, F. Silvestri, G. M. Di Nunzio, C. Hauff, and G. Silvello (Eds.). 2016. In Proceedings of the 38th European Conference on IR Research: Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR’16). LNCS, Vol. 9626. Springer.
[33]
Nicola Ferro, Norbert Fuhr, Kalervo Järvelin, Noriko Kando, Matthias Lippold, and Justin Zobel. 2016. Increasing reproducibility in IR: Findings from the Dagstuhl seminar on reproducibility of data-oriented experiments in e-science. ACM SIGIR Forum 50, 1 (2016), 68--82.
[34]
Nicola Ferro and Gianmaria Silvello. 2016. A general linear mixed models approach to study system component effects. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’16). ACM, New York, NY, 25--34.
[35]
Krishnendu Ghosh, Plaban Kumar Bhowmick, and Pawan Goyal. 2017. Using re-ranking to boost deep learning based community question retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 807--814.
[36]
Mona Golestan Far, Scott Sanner, Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek, Gabriela Ferraro, and David Hawking. 2015. On term selection techniques for patent prior art search. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’15). ACM, New York, NY, 803--806.
[37]
Jiafeng Guo, Yixing Fan, Qingyao Ai, and W. Bruce Croft. 2016. A deep relevance matching model for ad-hoc retrieval. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’16). ACM, New York, NY, 55--64.
[38]
Suhit Gupta, Gail Kaiser, David Neistadt, and Peter Grimm. 2003. DOM-based content extraction of HTML documents. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’03). ACM, New York, NY, 207--214.
[39]
Zoltan Gyongyi and Hector Garcia-Molina. 2005. Web spam taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb’05).
[40]
A. Hanbury, G. Kazai, A. Rauber, and N. Fuhr (Eds.). 2015. Proceedings of the 37th European Conference on IR Research: Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR’15). LNCS, Vol. 9022. Springer.
[41]
Donna Harman and Chris Buckley. 2009. Overview of the reliable information access workshop. Inf. Retriev. 12, 6 (Jul. 2009), 615--641.
[42]
David Hawking. 2000. Overview of the TREC-9 web track. In Proceedings of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’00).
[43]
David Hawking and Nick Craswell. 2001. Overview of the TREC-10 web track. In Proceedings of the 10th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’01).
[44]
Hussein Hazimeh and ChengXiang Zhai. 2015. Axiomatic analysis of smoothing methods in language models for pseudo-relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR’15). 141--150.
[45]
Ben He and Iadh Ounis. 2004. A query-based pre-retrieval model selection approach to information retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Coupling Approaches, Coupling Media and Coupling Languages for Information Retrieval (RIAO’04). 706--719. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2816272.2816336
[46]
Nasreen Abdul Jaleel, James Allan, W. Bruce Croft, Fernando Diaz, Leah S. Larkey, Xiaoyan Li, Mark D. Smucker, and Courtney Wade. 2004. UMass at TREC 2004: Novelty and HARD. In Proceedings of the Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’04).
[47]
Wessel Kraaij and Thijs Westerveld. 2000. TNO-UT at TREC-9: How different are web documents?. In Proceedings of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC’00).
[48]
Victor Lavrenko and W. Bruce Croft. 2001. Relevance based language models. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’01). ACM, New York, NY, 120--127.
[49]
Jimmy J. Lin, Matt Crane, Andrew Trotman, Jamie Callan, Ishan Chattopadhyaya, John Foley, Grant Ingersoll, Craig MacDonald, and Sebastiano Vigna. 2016. Toward reproducible baselines: The open-source IR reproducibility challenge. In Proceedings of the 38th European Conference on IR Research,: Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR’16)). 408--420.
[50]
David E. Losada and Leif Azzopardi. 2008. An analysis on document length retrieval trends in language modeling smoothing. Inf. Retriev. 11, 2 (2008), 109--138.
[51]
Yuanhua Lv and Cheng Xiang Zhai. 2009. A comparative study of methods for estimating query language models with pseudo feedback. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’09). ACM, New York, NY, 1895--1898.
[52]
Saptaditya Maiti, Deba P. Mandal, and Pabitra Mitra. 2011. Tackling content spamming with a term weighting scheme. In Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Workshop on Multilingual OCR and Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data. ACM, New York, NY, Article 6, 5 pages.
[53]
Alexandros Ntoulas, Marc Najork, Mark Manasse, and Dennis Fetterly. 2006. Detecting spam web pages through content analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’06). ACM, New York, NY, 83--92.
[54]
Jiaul H. Paik. 2015. A probabilistic model for information retrieval based on maximum value distribution. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’15). ACM, New York, NY, 585--594.
[55]
Dae Hoon Park, Hyun Duk Kim, ChengXiang Zhai, and Lifan Guo. 2015. Retrieval of relevant opinion sentences for new products. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’15). ACM, New York, NY, 393--402.
[56]
A. F. R. Rahman, H. Alam, and R. Hartono. 2001. Content extraction from html documents. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Web Document Analysis (WDA’01). 1--4.
[57]
Fiana Raiber. 2012. Adversarial content manipulation effects. In Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’12). ACM, New York, NY, 993--993.
[58]
Fiana Raiber and Oren Kurland. 2017. Kullback-leibler divergence revisited. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR’17). ACM, New York, NY, 117--124.
[59]
Fiana Raiber, Oren Kurland, and Moshe Tennenholtz. 2012. Content-based relevance estimation on the web using inter-document similarities. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’12). ACM, New York, NY, 1769--1773.
[60]
Stephen Robertson and Hugo Zaragoza. 2009. The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 3, 4 (Apr. 2009), 333--389.
[61]
S. E. Robertson and S. Walker. 1994. Some simple effective approximations to the 2-Poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’94). Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 232--241. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=188490.188561.
[62]
Gerard Salton and Chris Buckley. {n.d.}. SMART Stopword list. Retrieved from http://www.lextek.com/manuals/onix/stopwords2.html.
[63]
Amit Singhal, Chris Buckley, and Mandar Mitra. 1996. Pivoted document length normalization. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 21--29.
[64]
Amit Singhal, Gerard Salton, Mandar Mitra, and Chris Buckley. 1996. Document length normalization. Inf. Process. Manage. 32, 5 (1996), 619--633.
[65]
Mark D. Smucker and James Allan. 2005. An Investigation of Dirichlet Prior Smoothing’s Performance Advantage. Technical Report. CIIR, U. Mass., Amherst.
[66]
Ian Soboroff. 2013. Information retrieval evaluation demo. Retrieved from https://github.com/isoboroff/trec-demo.
[67]
Nikita Spirin and Jiawei Han. 2012. Survey on web spam detection: Principles and algorithms. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 13, 2 (May 2012), 50--64.
[68]
Fei Sun, Dandan Song, and Lejian Liao. 2011. DOM based content extraction via text density. In Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’11). ACM, New York, NY, 245--254.
[69]
Tim Weninger, William H. Hsu, and Jiawei Han. 2010. CETR: Content extraction via tag ratios. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’10). ACM, New York, NY, 971--980.
[70]
Craig Willis. 2017. Evaluation Framework, National Data Service—Confluence. Retrieve from https://opensource.ncsa.illinois.edu/confluence/display/NDS/Evaluation+Framework.
[71]
Chenyan Xiong and Jamie Callan. 2015. Query expansion with freebase. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR’15). ACM, New York, NY, 111--120.
[72]
Peilin Yang and Hui Fang. 2016. A reproducibility study of information retrieval models. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR’16). ACM, New York, NY, 77--86.
[73]
Hamed Zamani and W. Bruce Croft. 2016. Estimating embedding vectors for queries. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR’16). ACM, New York, NY, 123--132.
[74]
Hamed Zamani and W. Bruce Croft. 2017. Relevance-based word embedding. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’17). ACM, New York, NY, 505--514.
[75]
ChengXiang Zhai. 2008. Statistical Language Models for Information Retrieval A Critical Review. Vol. 2. Now Publishers Inc., Hanover, MA. 137--213 pages.
[76]
Chengxiang Zhai and John Lafferty. 2001. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on the Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval (SIGIR’01). ACM, New York, NY, 334--342.
[77]
Chengxiang Zhai and John Lafferty. 2004. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to information retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22, 2 (Apr. 2004), 179--214.
[78]
Guoqing Zheng and Jamie Callan. 2015. Learning to reweight terms with distributed representations. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’15). ACM, New York, NY, 575--584.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Query-Based Weighted Document Partitioning Method for Load Balancing in Search EnginesWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-023-10176-y129:3(1489-1511)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
  • (2022)The Problem of Semantic Shift in Longitudinal Monitoring of Social MediaProceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 202210.1145/3501247.3531566(208-218)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2022
  • (2022)ir_metadata: An Extensible Metadata Schema for IR ExperimentsProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3531738(3078-3089)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Data and Information Quality
Journal of Data and Information Quality  Volume 10, Issue 4
Reproducibility in Information Retrieval:Tools and Infrastructures
December 2018
106 pages
ISSN:1936-1955
EISSN:1936-1963
DOI:10.1145/3289400
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 October 2018
Accepted: 01 July 2018
Revised: 01 July 2018
Received: 01 October 2017
Published in JDIQ Volume 10, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Reproducibility
  2. metadata preprocessing
  3. noise
  4. relevance feedback
  5. selecting indexable content
  6. web data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 27 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Query-Based Weighted Document Partitioning Method for Load Balancing in Search EnginesWireless Personal Communications: An International Journal10.1007/s11277-023-10176-y129:3(1489-1511)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
  • (2022)The Problem of Semantic Shift in Longitudinal Monitoring of Social MediaProceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 202210.1145/3501247.3531566(208-218)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2022
  • (2022)ir_metadata: An Extensible Metadata Schema for IR ExperimentsProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3531738(3078-3089)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
  • (2021)Evaluating Elements of Web-Based Data Enrichment for Pseudo-relevance Feedback RetrievalExperimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction10.1007/978-3-030-85251-1_5(53-64)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2021
  • (2020)ON THE USEFULNESS OF HTML META ELEMENTS FOR WEB RETRIEVALEskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering10.18038/estubtda.61510321:1(182-198)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2020
  • (2020)A Review of Tools and Techniques for Preprocessing of Textual DataComputational Methods and Data Engineering10.1007/978-981-15-6876-3_31(407-422)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2020
  • (2019)Text Normalization for Indonesian Abbreviated Word Using Crowdsourcing Method2019 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT)10.1109/ICOIACT46704.2019.8938463(529-532)Online publication date: Jul-2019

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media