More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Collective Privacy Sensemaking on Social Media about Period and Fertility Tracking post Roe v. Wade

Authors:

Xinning GuiAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Article No.: 161, Pages 1 - 35

https://doi.org/10.1145/3641000

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which has led to full bans on most abortions in 14 states within one year. Many people in the U.S. use period and fertility tracking apps for reproductive healthcare and concerns have arisen about the privacy risks these apps might pose in the wake of Roe reversal. Existing literature on privacy risks of period and fertility tracking apps has primarily examined the privacy policies and practices of these apps. However, how users make sense of the privacy risks of these apps, especially in the post-Roe time, remains understudied. This study explores collective privacy sensemaking on social media, a practice in which people collectively make sense of a privacy situation. Our findings reveal how people contextualize privacy issues, speculate about the associated risks, as well as explore risk mitigation strategies. We conclude with privacy design implications for privacy design in period and fertility tracking apps and contribute insights that could inform policymaking and legal perspectives.

References

[1]

Alessandro Acquisti and Jens Grossklags. 2005. Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE security & privacy 3, 1 (2005), 26--33.

Digital Library

[2]

Manju Ahuja, Pankaj Patel, and Ayoung Suh. 2018. The influence of social media on collective action in the context of digital activism: An affordance approach. In Proceedings of the 51th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2018. 2203--2212. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.275

[3]

Shaden Al-Aqeeli, Mznah Al-Rodhaan, and Yuan Tian. 2017. Privacy preserving risk mitigation strategy for access control in e-healthcare systems. In 2017 International Conference on Informatics, Health & Technology (ICIHT), 2017. 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIHT.2017.7899150

[4]

Najd Alfawzan, Markus Christen, Giovanni Spitale, and Nikola Biller-Andorno. 2022. Privacy, Data Sharing, and Data Security Policies of Women's mHealth Apps: Scoping Review and Content Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 10, 5 (May 2022), e33735. https://doi.org/10.2196/33735

[5]

Roshonara Ali, Zeynep B. Gürtin, and Joyce C. Harper. 2021. Do fertility tracking applications offer women useful information about their fertile window? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 42, 1 (January 2021), 273--281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.005

[6]

Teresa Almeida, Madeline Balaam, and Rob Comber. 2020. Woman-Centered Design through Humanity, Activism, and Inclusion. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 4 (September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3397176

Digital Library

[7]

Teresa Almeida, Laura Shipp, Maryam Mehrnezhad, and Ehsan Toreini. 2022. Bodies Like Yours: Enquiring Data Privacy in FemTech. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2022 Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference (NordiCHI '22), 2022, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. . https://doi.org/10.1145/3547522.3547674

Digital Library

[8]

Hazim Almuhimedi, Florian Schaub, Norman Sadeh, Idris Adjerid, Alessandro Acquisti, Joshua Gluck, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2015. Your Location Has Been Shared 5,398 Times! A Field Study on Mobile App Privacy Nudging. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2015, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 787--796. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702210

Digital Library

[9]

Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Announcing Pregnancy Loss on Facebook: A Decision-Making Framework for Stigmatized Disclosures on Identified Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18), 2018, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173732

Digital Library

[10]

Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2016. Understanding Social Media Disclosures of Sexual Abuse Through the Lenses of Support Seeking and Anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 2016, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3906--3918. . https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858096

Digital Library

[11]

Nazanin Andalibi, Pinar Ozturk, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Sensitive Self-Disclosures, Responses, and Social Support on Instagram: The Case of #Depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), 2017, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1485--1500. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998243

Digital Library

[12]

Mark Andrejevic and Kelly Gates. 2014. Big data surveillance: Introduction. Surveillance & Society 12, 2 (2014), 185--196. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.5242

[13]

Cynthia Andrews, Elodie Fichet, Yuwei Ding, Emma S. Spiro, and Kate Starbird. 2016. Keeping Up with the Tweet-dashians. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 2016. ACM, 452--465. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819986

Digital Library

[14]

Shaden Aqeeli, Mznah Al-Rodhaan, Yuan Tian, and Abdullah Al-Dhelaan. 2018. Privacy Preserving Risk Mitigation Approach for Healthcare Domain. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks 07, (January 2018), 1--42. https://doi.org/10.4236/etsn.2018.71001

[15]

Arshad Humaira, Jantan Aman Bin, and Abiodun Oludare Isaac. 2018. Digital Forensics: Review of Issues in Scientific Validation of Digital Evidence. Journal of Information Processing Systems 14, 2 (April 2018), 346--376. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.03.0095

[16]

Terje Aven. 2016. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research 253, 1 (2016), 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023

[17]

James A. Banks. 1998. The Lives and Values of Researchers: Implications for Educating Citizens in a Multicultural Society. Educational Researcher 27, 7 (1998), 4--17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176055

[18]

Susan B Barnes. 2006. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday 11, (2006). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394

[19]

M Antonia Biggs and Corinne Rocca. 2022. Forecasting the mental health harms of overturning Roe v Wade. BMJ 378, (July 2022), o1890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1890

[20]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.

[21]

Andrew D. Brown, Ian Colville, and Annie Pye. 2015. Making Sense of Sensemaking in Organization Studies. Organization Studies 36, 2 (2015), 265--277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259

[22]

Elizabeth A. Brown. 2021. THE FEMTECH PARADOX: HOW WORKPLACE MONITORING THREATENS WOMEN'S EQUITY. Jurimetrics 61, 3 (2021), 289--329.

[23]

Nadia Campo Woytuk, Linette Nilsson, and Mingxing Liu. 2019. Your Period Rules: Design Implications for Period-Positive Technologies. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '19), 2019, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312888

Digital Library

[24]

Eoghan Casey. 2002. Error, uncertainty, and loss in digital evidence. International journal of digital evidence 1, 2 (2002), 1--45.

[25]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) | CDC. Retrieved April 15, 2023 from https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/hipaa.html

[26]

Hichang Cho and Anna Filippova. 2016. Networked Privacy Management in Facebook: A Mixed-Methods and Multinational Study. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 2016, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 503--514. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819996

Digital Library

[27]

Hichang Cho, Bart Knijnenburg, Alfred Kobsa, and Yao Li. 2018. Collective Privacy Management in Social Media: A Cross-Cultural Validation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 3 (June 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3193120

Digital Library

[28]

Clue. 2023. Period tracking can be a revelation. Retrieved June 27, 2023 from https://helloclue.com/

[29]

Karine Coen-Sanchez, Bassey Ebenso, Ieman Mona El-Mowafi, Maria Berghs, Dina Idriss-Wheeler, and Sanni Yaya. 2022. Repercussions of overturning Roe v. Wade for women across systems and beyond borders. Reproductive Health 19, 1 (August 2022), 184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01490-y

[30]

Judy Slome Cohain, Rina E Buxbaum, and David Mankuta. 2017. Spontaneous first trimester miscarriage rates per woman among parous women with 1 or more pregnancies of 24 weeks or more. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 17, 1 (2017), 1--7.

[31]

I. Glenn Cohen, Judith Daar, and Eli Y. Adashi. 2022. What Overturning Roe v Wade May Mean for Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the US. JAMA 328, 1 (July 2022), 15--16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.10163

[32]

Sarah Compton and Scott L. Greer. 2022. What overturning Roe v. Wade means for the United States. BMJ 377, (May 2022), o1255. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1255

[33]

Cynthia Conti-Cook. 2020. Surveilling the Digital Abortion Diary. U. Balt. L. Rev. 50, (2020), 1.

[34]

Bethany Corbin. 2022. Femtech Data Privacy and the Changing Abortion Landscape: What Femtech Companies and Founders Need to Know. Nixon Gwilt Law. Retrieved October 7, 2022 from https://nixongwiltlaw.com/nlg-blog/2022/5/16/femtech-data-privacy-and-the-chaning-abortion-landscape-what-femtech-companies-and-founders-need-to-know

[35]

Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.

[36]

Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Clara Caldeira, Elizabeth Victoria Eikey, Melissa Mazmanian, and Yunan Chen. 2018. Engaging with Health Data: The Interplay Between Self-Tracking Activities and Emotions in Fertility Struggles. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW (November 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274309

Digital Library

[37]

Mayara Costa Figueiredo, H. Irene Su, and Yunan Chen. 2021. Using Data to Approach the Unknown: Patients' and Healthcare Providers? Data Practices in Fertility Challenges. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW3 (January 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432926

Digital Library

[38]

David Cox. 2022. How overturning Roe v Wade has eroded privacy of personal data. BMJ 378, (August 2022), o2075. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2075

[39]

Joseph Cox. 2022. Data Broker Is Selling Location Data of People Who Visit Abortion Clinics. Vice. Retrieved January 14, 2023 from https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7vzjb/location-data-abortion-clinics-safegraph-planned-parenthood

[40]

Graeme Currie and Andrew D Brown. 2003. A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK hospital. Human Relations 56, 5 (2003), 563--586.

[41]

Bart Custers and Lonneke Stevens. 2021. The Use of Data as Evidence in Dutch Criminal Courts. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 29, 1 (April 2021), 25--46. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10015

[42]

Francis J. D'Addario. 2013. Chapter 4 - Prioritizing Risk Mitigation. In Influencing Global Risk Mitigation, Francis J. D'Addario (ed.). Elsevier, Boston, 47--58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0--12--417233--3.00004--8

[43]

Dharma Dailey and Kate Starbird. 2015. ?It's Raining Dispersants": Collective Sensemaking of Complex Information in Crisis Contexts. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion), 2015, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 155--158. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2698995

Digital Library

[44]

Sourya Joyee De and Daniel Le Métayer. 2016. PRIAM: a privacy risk analysis methodology. In Data privacy management and security assurance. Springer, 221--229.

[45]

Tamara Dinev and Paul Hart. 2006. An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research 17, 1 (March 2006), 61--80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080

Digital Library

[46]

Zikan Dong, Liu Wang, Hao Xie, Guoai Xu, and Haoyu Wang. 2023. Privacy Analysis of Period Tracking Mobile Apps in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE '22), 2023, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3551349.3561343

Digital Library

[47]

John Drury, Chris Cocking, and Steve Reicher. 2009. The nature of collective resilience: Survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters 27, 1 (2009), 66--95.

[48]

Duffy Jennifer Korn. 2022. Search histories, location data, text messages: How personal data could be used to enforce anti-abortion laws | CNN Business. CNN. Retrieved January 14, 2023 from https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/tech/abortion-laws-data-privacy/index.html

[49]

Charles Duhigg. 2012. How Companies Learn Your Secrets. The New York Times. Retrieved October 27, 2023 from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/magazine/shopping-habits.html

[50]

Guy Elcheroth and John Drury. 2020. Collective resilience in times of crisis: Lessons from the literature for socially effective responses to the pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology 59, 3 (2020), 703--713.

[51]

Kim VL England. 1994. Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The professional geographer 46, 1 (1994), 80--89.

[52]

Daniel A. Epstein, Nicole B. Lee, Jennifer H. Kang, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Laura R. Pina, James Fogarty, Julie A. Kientz, and Sean Munson. 2017. Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 2017, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6876--6888. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025635

Digital Library

[53]

Jacob Erickson, Jewel Y. Yuzon, and Tamara Bonaci. 2022. What You Do Not Expect When You Are Expecting: Privacy Analysis of Femtech. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 3, 2 (2022), 121--131. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2022.3160928

[54]

European Data Protection Supervisor. 2023. Health | European Data Protection Supervisor. Retrieved April 16, 2023 from https://edps.europa.eu/data-protection/our-work/subjects/health_en

[55]

Federal Trade Commission. 2022. FTC Sues Kochava for Selling Data that Tracks People at Reproductive Health Clinics, Places of Worship, and Other Sensitive Locations. Federal Trade Commission. Retrieved October 25, 2023 from https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/08/ftc-sues-kochava-selling-data-tracks-people-reproductive-health-clinics-places-worship-other

[56]

Eve C. Feinberg, Jennifer F. Kawwass, and Marcelle I. Cedars. 2022. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care. Obstetrics & Gynecology 140, 4 (2022), 557--559. https://doi.org/

[57]

Flo. 2023. Flo - ovulation calendar, period tracker, and pregnancy app. Flo.health - #1 mobile product for women's health. Retrieved June 27, 2022 from https://flo.health/

[58]

Luciano Floridi. 2017. Group Privacy: A Defence and an Interpretation. In Group Privacy. Springer International Publishing, 83--100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--46608--8_5

[59]

Eureka Foong, Darren Gergle, and Elizabeth M Gerber. 2017. Novice and expert sensemaking of crowdsourced design feedback. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--18.

Digital Library

[60]

Sarah Fox, Noura Howell, Richmond Wong, and Franchesca Spektor. 2019. Vivewell: Speculating Near-Future Menstrual Tracking through Current Data Practices. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19), 2019, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 541--552. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323695

Digital Library

[61]

Xavier Franch, Ron S. Kenett, Angelo Susi, Nikolas Galanis, Ruediger Glott, and Fabio Mancinelli. 2015. Chapter 14 - Community Data for OSS Adoption Risk Management. In The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data, Christian Bird, Tim Menzies and Thomas Zimmermann (eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 377--409. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0--12--411519--4.00014--8

[62]

Hannah K.; DeMuro Galvin Paul R. 2020. Developments in Privacy and Data Ownership in Mobile Health Technologies, 2016--2019. Yearb Med Inform 29, 01 (August 2020), 032--043. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040--1701987

[63]

Flora Garamvolgyi. 2022. Why US women are deleting their period tracking apps. The Guardian. Retrieved October 27, 2022 from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/28/why-us-woman-are-deleting-their-period-tracking-apps

[64]

Claudia García-Moreno, Henrica AFM Jansen, Mary Ellsberg, Lori Heise, and Charlotte Watts. 2005. WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women. World Health Organization.

[65]

Josh Gerstein and Alexander Ward. 2022. Exclusive: Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows. POLITICO. Retrieved November 1, 2022 from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473

[66]

Olivia Goldhill. 2019. "FemTech" is not and should not be a thing. Quartz. Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://qz.com/1586815/why-femtech-is-a-sexist-category/

[67]

Sarah Graham. 2022. We're horrified by the rejection of Roe v Wade-but abortion is not a universal right in the UK. BMJ 378, (August 2022), o1945. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1945

[68]

Hedy Greijdanus, Carlos A de Matos Fernandes, Felicity Turner-Zwinkels, Ali Honari, Carla A Roos, Hannes Rosenbusch, and Tom Postmes. 2020. The psychology of online activism and social movements: relations between online and offline collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology 35, (October 2020), 49--54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.003

[69]

David A Grimes, Jacqueline D Forrest, Alice L Kirkman, and Barbara Radford. 1991. An epidemic of antiabortion violence in the United States. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 165, 5 (1991), 1263--1268.

[70]

Alisha Haridasani Gupta and Natasha Singer. 2021. Your App Knows You Got Your Period. Guess Who It Told? The New York Times. Retrieved January 7, 2023 from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/us/period-apps-health-technology-women-privacy.html

[71]

Miren Gutierrez. 2018. Data Activism and Social Change. Palgrave Pivot Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--78319--2

[72]

Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 2015, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1176--1190. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675152

Digital Library

[73]

Keith N Hampton, Lauren Sessions Goulet, Lee Rainie, and Kristen Purcell. 2011. Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Internet & American Life Project Washington, DC.

[74]

Marian Harbach, Markus Hettig, Susanne Weber, and Matthew Smith. 2014. Using Personal Examples to Improve Risk Communication for Security & Privacy Decisions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 2014, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2647--2656. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556978

Digital Library

[75]

Alexander L. Hayes, Katie Siek, and Zaidat Ibrahim. 2022. No, submitting junk data to period tracking apps won't protect reproductive privacy. The Conversation. Retrieved June 28, 2023 from http://theconversation.com/no-submitting-junk-data-to-period-tracking-apps-wont-protect-reproductive-privacy-186257

[76]

Jonathan Herring and Jesse Wall. 2017. The nature and significance of the right to bodily integrity. The Cambridge Law Journal 76, 3 (2017), 566--588. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000605

[77]

Jacqueline Hicks. 2023. The future of data ownership: An uncommon research agenda. The Sociological Review 71, 3 (May 2023), 544--560. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221088120

[78]

Tammy C. Hoffmann and Chris Del Mar. 2017. Clinicians' Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests: A Systematic Review. JAMA Internal Medicine 177, 3 (March 2017), 407--419. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8254

[79]

Bryndl Hohmann-Marriott. 2023. Periods as powerful data: User understandings of menstrual app data and information. New Media & Society 25, 11 (2023), 3028--3046. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211040245

[80]

Sarah Homewood. 2018. Designing for the Changing Body: A Feminist Exploration of Self-Tracking Technologies. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18), 2018, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3173031

Digital Library

[81]

Sally Howard and Geetanjali Krishna. 2022. Roe v Wade: How its scrapping will affect women worldwide. BMJ 378, (August 2022), o1844. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1844

[82]

Shawn Hubler. 2022. Thousands Protest End of Constitutional Right to Abortion. The New York Times. Retrieved October 27, 2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/06/24/us/roe-wade-abortion-supreme-court

[83]

Patrik Hummel, Matthias Braun, and Peter Dabrock. 2021. Own Data? Ethical Reflections on Data Ownership. Philosophy & Technology 34, 3 (September 2021), 545--572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00404--9

[84]

Information Commissioner's Office. 2022. What is special category data? Retrieved April 16, 2023 from https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/special-category-data/what-is-special-category-data/

[85]

Intersoft Consulting. 2023. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) -- Official Legal Text. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Retrieved June 27, 2023 from https://gdpr-info.eu/

[86]

Lynn A. Isabella. 1990. Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events. AMJ 33, 1 (March 1990), 7--41. https://doi.org/10.5465/256350

[87]

Carlos Jensen and Colin Potts. 2004. Privacy Policies as Decision-Making Tools: An Evaluation of Online Privacy Notices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04), 2004, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 471--478. . https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985752

Digital Library

[88]

Haiyan Jia and Eric P.S. Baumer. 2022. Birds of a Feather: Collective Privacy of Online Social Activist Groups. Comput. Secur. 115, C (April 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102614

Digital Library

[89]

Haiyan Jia and Heng Xu. 2016. Autonomous and Interdependent: Collaborative Privacy Management on Social Networking Sites. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 2016, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4286--4297. . https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858415

Digital Library

[90]

Marc Jofre, Diana Navarro-Llobet, Ramon Agulló, Jordi Puig, Gustavo Gonzalez-Granadillo, Juan Mora Zamorano, and Ramon Romeu. 2021. Cybersecurity and Privacy Risk Assessment of Point-of-Care Systems in Healthcare-A Use Case Approach. Applied Sciences 11, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156699

[91]

Candace Johnson. 2022. Drafting injustice: overturning Roe v. Wade, spillover effects and reproductive rights in context. Feminist Theory (August 2022), 14647001221114611. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001221114611

[92]

Colleen P. Judge, Tierney E. Wolgemuth, Megan E. Hamm, and Sonya Borrero. 2017. ?Without bodily autonomy we are not free": exploring women's concerns about future access to contraception following the 2016 US presidential election. Contraception 96, 5 (November 2017), 370--377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.169

[93]

Aditya Karandikar, Agnieszka Solberg, Alice Fung, Amie Y Lee, Amina Farooq, Amy C Taylor, Amy Oliveira, Anand Narayan, Andi Senter, and Aneesa Majid. 2023. Radiologists staunchly support patient safety and autonomy, in opposition to the SCOTUS decision to overturn Roe v Wade. Clinical imaging 93, (2023), 117--121.

[94]

Robert N. Karrer. 2011. The Pro-Life Movement and Its First Years under ?Roe." American Catholic Studies 122, 4 (2011), 47--72. https://doi.org/10.1353/acs.2011.0047

[95]

WILL KENTON. 2021. Litigation Risk. Investopedia. Retrieved December 17, 2022 from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/litigation-risk.asp

[96]

KFF Survey. 2019. Health Apps and Information Survey. Retrieved October 27, 2022 from https://www.kff.org/other/poll-finding/kff-health-apps-and-information-survey/

[97]

Caroline Kitchener, Kevin Schaul, N. Kirkpatrick, Daniela Santamariña, and Lauren Tierney. 2022. Tracking the States Where Abortion Is Banned. The New York Times. Retrieved July 16, 2023 from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html

[98]

Thorin Klosowski. 2021. The State of Consumer Data Privacy Laws in the US (And Why It Matters). Wirecutter: Reviews for the Real World. Retrieved January 13, 2023 from https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/state-of-privacy-laws-in-us/

[99]

Spyros Kokolakis. 2017. Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & security 64, (2017), 122--134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002

Digital Library

[100]

Yubo Kou, Xinning Gui, Yunan Chen, and Kathleen Pine. 2017. Conspiracy talk on social media: collective sensemaking during a public health crisis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134696

Digital Library

[101]

Peter Krafft, Kaitlyn Zhou, Isabelle Edwards, Kate Starbird, and Emma S Spiro. 2017. Centralized, parallel, and distributed information processing during collective sensemaking. In (CHI '17), 2017, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2976--2987. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026012

Digital Library

[102]

Sandra Larsson. 2023. Examining Data Privacy and User Trust in Fertility-and Menstruation Technologies Using an Intersectional Feminist Perspective. Master's thesis. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

[103]

Angela Lashbrook. 2022. How Private and Protected Is Virtual Reproductive Care? Consumer Reports. Retrieved January 14, 2023 from https://www.consumerreports.org/health-privacy/how-private-and-protected-is-virtual-reproductive-care-a2459174110/

[104]

Karen EC Levy. 2014. Intimate surveillance. Idaho L. Rev. 51, (2014), 679.

[105]

David Lyon. 2014. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society 1, 2 (July 2014), 2053951714541861. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861

[106]

Lena Mamykina, Drashko Nakikj, and Noemie Elhadad. 2015. Collective sensemaking in online health forums. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2015, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3217--3226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702566

Digital Library

[107]

Kelly McCleary and Holly Yan. 2022. Abortion rights: Protests spread across the US after Supreme Court decision | CNN. Retrieved October 27, 2022 from https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/27/us/supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade-monday

[108]

Nora Mcdonald and Nazanin Andalibi. 2023. ?I Did Watch ?The Handmaid's Tale'": Threat Modeling Privacy Post-Roe in the United States. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (March 2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3589960

Digital Library

[109]

Julianne McShane. 2022. Abortion providers face significant increase in violence, report finds. NBC News. Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/abortion-providers-face-significant-increase-violence-report-finds-rcna35261

[110]

Maryam Mehrnezhad and Teresa Almeida. 2021. Caring for Intimate Data in Fertility Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '21), 2021, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445132

Digital Library

[111]

Maryam Mehrnezhad, Laura Shipp, Teresa Almeida, and Ehsan Toreini. 2022. Vision: Too Little Too Late? Do the Risks of FemTech Already Outweigh the Benefits? In Proceedings of the 2022 European Symposium on Usable Security (EuroUSEC '22), 2022, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 145--150. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549015.3554204

Digital Library

[112]

Stefania Milan and Lonneke Velden. 2016. The Alternative Epistemologies of Data Activism. Digital Culture & Society 2, (December 2016). https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205

[113]

Krys Mroczkowski, Colleen Ammerman, and Rembrand Koning. 2022. How Abortion Bans Will Stifle Health Care Innovation. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved November 21, 2022 from https://hbr.org/2022/08/how-abortion-bans-will-stifle-health-care-innovation

[114]

Alexios Mylonas, Vasilis Meletiadis, Lilian Mitrou, and Dimitris Gritzalis. 2013. Smartphone sensor data as digital evidence. Computers & Security 38, (2013), 51--75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2013.03.007

Digital Library

[115]

Nancy A. Naples. 1996. A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: The ?outsider phenomenon" in rural Iowa. Qualitative Sociology 19, 1 (March 1996), 83--106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393249

[116]

Farah Nayeri. 2021. Is ?Femtech' the Next Big Thing in Health Care? The New York Times. Retrieved October 23, 2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/07/health/femtech-women-health-care.html

[117]

ALFRED NG. 2022. Data brokers resist pressure to stop collecting info on pregnant people. POLITICO. Retrieved January 14, 2023 from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/01/data-information-pregnant-people-00048988

[118]

Sarah Ng, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2020. The Menstruating Entrepreneur Kickstarting a New Politics of Women's Health. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 4 (August 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3397158

Digital Library

[119]

Jack Nicas. 2021. What Data About You Can the Government Get From Big Tech? The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2023 from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/technology/personal-data-apple-google-facebook.html

[120]

Helen Nissenbaum. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash. L. Rev. 79, (2004), 119.

[121]

Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804772891

[122]

Charles Ornstein. 2022. Federal Patient Privacy Law Does Not Cover Most Period-Tracking Apps. ProPublica. Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://www.propublica.org/article/period-app-privacy-hipaa

[123]

Ovia Health. 2023. Will I have irregular menstruation after a miscarriage? Ovia Health. Retrieved January 13, 2023 from https://www.oviahealth.com/guide/102445/pregnancy-loss-when-will-cycle-return-normal/

[124]

Jessica A. Pater, Oliver L. Haimson, Nazanin Andalibi, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2016. ?Hunger Hurts but Starving Works": Characterizing the Presentation of Eating Disorders Online. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 2016, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1185--1200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820030

Digital Library

[125]

Michael Quinn Patton. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.

[126]

Michael Quinn Patton. 2014. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.

[127]

Planned Parenthood. 2023. What are the Side Effects of In-Clinic Abortions? Retrieved January 13, 2023 from https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/in-clinic-abortion-procedures/what-can-i-expect-after-having-an-in-clinic-abortion

[128]

Nicholas Proferes, Naiyan Jones, Sarah Gilbert, Casey Fiesler, and Michael Zimmer. 2021. Studying reddit: A systematic overview of disciplines, approaches, methods, and ethics. Social Media+ Society 7, 2 (2021), 20563051211019004. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019004

[129]

Dongxiao Qin. 2016. Positionality. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies. 1--2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss619

[130]

Lauren Rankin. 2020. How an online search for abortion pills landed this woman in jail. Fast Company. Retrieved November 1, 2022 from https://www.fastcompany.com/90468030/how-an-online-search-for-abortion-pills-landed-this-woman-in-jail

[131]

Marvin Rausand. 2013. Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

[132]

Reddit. 2020. Reddit's 2020 Year in Review - Upvoted. Retrieved October 7, 2022 from https://www.redditinc.com/blog/reddits-2020-year-in-review/

[133]

Stavroula Rizou, Eugenia Alexandropoulou-Egyptiadou, and Konstantinos E. Psannis. 2020. GDPR Interference With Next Generation 5G and IoT Networks. IEEE Access 8, (2020), 108052--108061. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000662

[134]

Catherine Roberts. 2022. Period Tracker Apps and Privacy. Consumer Reports. Retrieved January 13, 2023 from https://www.consumerreports.org/health-privacy/period-tracker-apps-privacy-a2278134145/

[135]

Celia Rosas. 2019. The Future is Femtech: Privacy and Data Security Issues Surrounding Femtech Applications. Business law journal 15, (2019), 319.

[136]

Donna Rosato. 2020. What Your Period Tracker App Knows About You. Consumer Reports. Retrieved October 27, 2022 from https://www.consumerreports.org/health-privacy/what-your-period-tracker-app-knows-about-you-a8701683935/

[137]

Melody Rose. 2011. Pro-life, pro-woman? Frame extension in the American antiabortion movement. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32, 1 (2011), 1--27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2011.537565

[138]

Daniel Joseph Ryan and Gal Shpantzer. 2002. Legal Aspects of Digital Forensics. In Proceedings: Forensics Workshop, 2002.

[139]

S. Das, W. K. Edwards, D. Kennedy-Mayo, P. Swire, and Y. Wu. 2021. Privacy for the People? Exploring Collective Action as a Mechanism to Shift Power to Consumers in End-User Privacy. IEEE Security & Privacy 19, 5 (October 2021), 66--70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2021.3093135

[140]

Safia Samee Ali. 2019. Missouri state health director tracked menstrual periods of Planned Parenthood patients. NBC News. Retrieved October 25, 2023 from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/missouri-health-director-tracked-menstrual-periods-planned-parenthood-patients-n1073701

[141]

Rüdiger Schmitt?Beck. 2015. Bandwagon effect. The international encyclopedia of political communication (2015), 1--5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc015

[142]

Justin Sherman. 2022. The Data Broker Caught Running Anti-Abortion Ads-to People Sitting in Clinics. Default. Retrieved July 18, 2023 from https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/data-broker-caught-running-anti-abortion-ads--people-sitting-clinics

[143]

Laura Shipp and Jorge Blasco. 2020. How private is your period?: A systematic analysis of menstrual app privacy policies. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2020, (2020), 491--510.

[144]

Irina Shklovski, Scott D. Mainwaring, Halla Hrund Skúladóttir, and Höskuldur Borgthorsson. 2014. Leakiness and Creepiness in App Space: Perceptions of Privacy and Mobile App Use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 2014, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2347--2356. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557421

Digital Library

[145]

Susheela Singh and Gilda Sedgh. 2022. Global implications of overturning Roe v Wade. BMJ 378, (August 2022), o2025. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2025

[146]

Ahmed Soliman, Jan Hafer, and Florian Lemmerich. 2019. A Characterization of Political Communities on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT '19), 2019, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 259--263. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342220.3343662

Digital Library

[147]

Daniel J Solove. 2006. A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania law review (2006), 477--564.

[148]

Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard. 2020. Troubling Design: A Design Program for Designing with Women's Health. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 4 (August 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3397199

Digital Library

[149]

Kayte Spector-Bagdady and Michelle M. Mello. 2022. Protecting the Privacy of Reproductive Health Information After the Fall of Roe v Wade. JAMA Health Forum 3, 6 (June 2022), e222656--e222656. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2656

[150]

Anna Cinzia Squicciarini, Mohamed Shehab, and Federica Paci. 2009. Collective Privacy Management in Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '09), 2009, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 521--530. . https://doi.org/10.1145/1526709.1526780

Digital Library

[151]

Stacey D, Légaré, F, Lewis, K, Barry, MJ, Bennett, CL, Eden, KB, Holmes?Rovner, M, Llewellyn?Thomas, H, Lyddiatt, A, Thomson, R and L Trevena. 2017. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5

[152]

State of California Department of Justice Office of The Attorney General. 2022. Attorney General Bonta Emphasizes Health Apps' Legal Obligation to Protect Reproductive Health Information. State of California - Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General. Retrieved April 15, 2023 from https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-emphasizes-health-apps-legal-obligation-protect

[153]

Jennifer Jiyoung Suh, Miriam J. Metzger, Scott A. Reid, and Amr El Abbadi. 2018. Distinguishing Group Privacy From Personal Privacy: The Effect of Group Inference Technologies on Privacy Perceptions and Behaviors. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW (November 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274437

Digital Library

[154]

Frost & Sullivan. 2018. Femtech-Time for a Digital Revolution in the Women's Health Market. Frost & Sullivan. Retrieved May 5, 2023 from https://www.frost.com/frost-perspectives/femtechtime-digital-revolution-womens-health-market/

[155]

Humphrey Taylor. 2003. Most people are ?privacy pragmatists" who, while concerned about privacy, will sometimes trade it off for other benefits. The Harris Poll 17, 19 (2003), 44.

[156]

Linnet Taylor. 2017. Safety in Numbers? Group Privacy and Big Data Analytics in the Developing World. In Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies, Linnet Taylor, Luciano Floridi and Bart van der Sloot (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13--36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--46608--8_2

[157]

Linnet Taylor, Luciano Floridi, and Bart van der Sloot. 2017. Introduction: A New Perspective on Privacy. In Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies, Linnet Taylor, Luciano Floridi and Bart van der Sloot (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--46608--8_1

[158]

The Associated Press. 2022. Abortion ruling prompts variety of reactions from states. AP NEWS. Retrieved October 27, 2022 from https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-abortion-ruling-states-a767801145ad01617100e57410a0a21d

[159]

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2022. Roe v. Wade | Summary, Origins, & Influence | Britannica. Retrieved October 26, 2022 from https://www.britannica.com/event/Roe-v-Wade

[160]

Ida Tin. 2016. The rise of a new category: Femtech. Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://helloclue.com/articles/culture/rise-new-category-femtech

[161]

Ariana M Traub, Kellen Mermin-Bunnell, Priyasha Pareek, Sonya Williams, Natalie B Connell, Jennifer F Kawwass, and Carrie Cwiak. 2022. The implications of overturning Roe v. Wade on medical education and future physicians. The Lancet Regional Health--Americas 14, (2022).

[162]

Anupriya Tuli, Surbhi Singh, Rikita Narula, Neha Kumar, and Pushpendra Singh. 2022. Rethinking Menstrual Trackers Towards Period-Positive Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22), 2022, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517662

Digital Library

[163]

Jessica Vitak. 2012. The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media 56, 4 (2012), 451--470.

[164]

Jessica Vitak, Nicholas Proferes, Katie Shilton, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2017. Ethics regulation in social computing research: Examining the role of institutional review boards. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 12, 5 (2017), 372--382.

[165]

Yu-Chih Wei, Wei-Chen Wu, Gu-Hsin Lai, and Ya-Chi Chu. 2020. pISRA: privacy considered information security risk assessment model. The Journal of Supercomputing 76, 3 (March 2020), 1468--1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018--2371-0

[166]

Karl E Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.

[167]

Cynthia O'Donoghue Wilde-Detmering Joana Becker, Friederike. 2022. CJEU rules on interpretation of EU GDPR special categories of data. Technology Law Dispatch. Retrieved April 16, 2023 from https://www.technologylawdispatch.com/2022/08/privacy-data-protection/cjeu-rules-on-interpretation-of-eu-gdpr-special-categories-of-data/

[168]

Ben Wolford. 2018. What is GDPR, the EU's new data protection law? GDPR.eu. Retrieved December 20, 2022 from https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/

[169]

Lauren Worsfold, Lorrae Marriott, Sarah Johnson, and Joyce C Harper. 2021. Period tracker applications: What menstrual cycle information are they giving women? Women's Health 17, (2021), 17455065211049905.

[170]

Yuxi Wu, W. Keith Edwards, and Sauvik Das. 2022. ?A Reasonable Thing to Ask For": Towards a Unified Voice in Privacy Collective Action. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22), 2022, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517467

Digital Library

[171]

Sijia Xiao, Coye Cheshire, and Amy Bruckman. 2021. Sensemaking and the Chemtrail Conspiracy on the Internet: Insights from Believers and Ex-believers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--28.

Digital Library

[172]

Cat Zakrzewski, Pranshu Verma, and Claire Parker. 2022. Police used texts, web searches for abortion to prosecute women - The Washington Post. Retrieved November 1, 2022 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/03/abortion-data-privacy-prosecution/

[173]

Christoph Zott, Raphael Amit, and Lorenzo Massa. 2011. The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of management 37, 4 (2011), 1019--1042.

Cited By

Nellore NMishra TZimmer M(2024)Unveiling User Perspectives: Exploring Themes in Femtech Mobile App Reviews for Enhanced Usability and PrivacyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765308:MHCI(1-21)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676530
Song YPitafi ZZeng ZChen JZhang YPhillips BBrainard BSong WShu YLiu JTan RHe YChen J(2024)Poster: A Contactless Health Monitoring System for Humans and AnimalsProceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems10.1145/3666025.3699412(869-870)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666025.3699412
Park JHsueh SCampo Woytuk NHuang XCiolfi Felice MBalaam M(2024)Critiquing Menstrual Pain Technologies through the Lens of Feminist Disability StudiesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642691(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642691

Index Terms

Collective Privacy Sensemaking on Social Media about Period and Fertility Tracking post Roe v. Wade
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing
  2. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

"I Deleted It After the Overturn of Roe v. Wade": Understanding Women's Privacy Concerns Toward Period-Tracking Apps in the Post Roe v. Wade Era
CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The overturn of Roe v. Wade has taken away the constitutional right to abortion. Prior work shows that period-tracking apps’ data practices can be used to detect pregnancy and abortion, hence putting women at risk of being prosecuted. It is unclear how ...
Privacy Analysis of Period Tracking Mobile Apps in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era
ASE '22: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

To help people manage their health, period tracking apps have become very popular in recent years. However, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022. Abortion will be banned in more and more states. Since the health data stored in ...
Disclosure, Privacy, and Stigma on Social Media: Examining Non-Disclosure of Distressing Experiences

Disclosures of distress and stigma on identified social media can be beneficial. Yet, many who may benefit from such disclosures do not engage in them. I examine factors that inform decisions to not disclose stigmatized experiences on identified social ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

CSCW

April 2024

6294 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3661497

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2024 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 April 2024

Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
310
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)310
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)95

Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Nellore NMishra TZimmer M(2024)Unveiling User Perspectives: Exploring Themes in Femtech Mobile App Reviews for Enhanced Usability and PrivacyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765308:MHCI(1-21)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676530
Song YPitafi ZZeng ZChen JZhang YPhillips BBrainard BSong WShu YLiu JTan RHe YChen J(2024)Poster: A Contactless Health Monitoring System for Humans and AnimalsProceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems10.1145/3666025.3699412(869-870)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666025.3699412
Park JHsueh SCampo Woytuk NHuang XCiolfi Felice MBalaam M(2024)Critiquing Menstrual Pain Technologies through the Lens of Feminist Disability StudiesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642691(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642691

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents