[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3587399.3587409acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseduchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Building “Design Empathy” for People with Disabilities: an Unsolved Challenge in HCI Education

Published: 28 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) education research strives to integrate inclusion and diversity in classroom teaching. We focus on a key demographic that has been historically underrepresented in design: people with multiple disabilities and/or severe motor disabilities. Since engaging directly with these populations is rarely feasible, we need other ways of teaching students how to consider the challenges, emotions, and lived experiences of these target users. While current approaches in HCI education do engage students in thinking about accessibility through curated disabled experiences (e.g., simulation or personas), these methods do not fully reflect the holistic experience of people with disabilities. We propose a new way of teaching design empathy: immersing students in the real-world experiences of people with disabilities through a curated set of their public social media posts.

References

[1]
Abreu 2018. Why I won’t try on disability to build empathy in the design process (and you should think twice about it). Retrieved February 13, 2023 from https://blog.prototypr.io/why-i-wont-try-on-disability-to-build-empathy-in-the-design-process-and-you-should-think-twice-7086ed6202aa
[2]
Cynthia L Bennett and Daniela K Rosner. 2019. The promise of empathy: Design, disability, and knowing the" other". In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528
[3]
Margaret Burnett, Simone Stumpf, Jamie Macbeth, Stephann Makri, Laura Beckwith, Irwin Kwan, Anicia Peters, and William Jernigan. 2016. GenderMag: A method for evaluating software’s gender inclusiveness. Interacting with Computers 28, 6 (2016), 760–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv046
[4]
Shaan Chopra, Rachael Zehrung, Tamil Arasu Shanmugam, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2021. Living with uncertainty and stigma: self-experimentation and support-seeking around polycystic ovary syndrome. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445706
[5]
Jennifer E Doble, Andrew J Haig, Christopher Anderson, and Richard Katz. 2003. Impairment, activity, participation, life satisfaction, and survival in persons with locked-in syndrome for over a decade: follow-up on a previously reported cohort. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation 18, 5 (2003), 435–444.
[6]
Harry Farmer, Lara Maister, and Manos Tsakiris. 2014. Change my body, change my mind: the effects of illusory ownership of an outgroup hand on implicit attitudes toward that outgroup. Frontiers in psychology 4 (2014), 1016.
[7]
Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media+ Society 4, 1 (2018), 2056305118763366.
[8]
Timothy P Hogan, Jennifer N Hill, Sara M Locatelli, Frances M Weaver, Florian P Thomas, Kim M Nazi, Barry Goldstein, and Bridget M Smith. 2016. Health information seeking and technology use among veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders. PM&R 8, 2 (2016), 123–130.
[9]
Kazi Sinthia Kabir, Ahmad Alsaleem, and Jason Wiese. 2021. The Impact of Spinal Cord Injury on Participation in Human-Centered Research. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1902–1914. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462122
[10]
Stephanie Ludi, Matt Huenerfauth, Vicki Hanson, Nidhi Rajendra Palan, and Paula Conn. 2018. Teaching inclusive thinking to undergraduate students in computing programs. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 717–722. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159512
[11]
Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Venkatesh Potluri, Maggie Xu, Jailyn Zabala, Jeffrey Bigham, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia Bennett. 2022. Anticipate and Adjust: Cultivating Access in Human-Centered Methods. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501882
[12]
Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807
[13]
Tuuli Mattelmäki and Katja Battarbee. 2002. Empathy probes. In PDC. 266–271.
[14]
Sarah McRoberts, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Tamara Peyton, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2016. Do it for the viewers! Audience engagement behaviors of young YouTubers. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930676
[15]
Johanna Mithen, Zoe Aitken, Anna Ziersch, and Anne M Kavanagh. 2015. Inequalities in social capital and health between people with and without disabilities. Social Science & Medicine 126 (2015), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.009
[16]
Tamanna Motahar, Isha Ghosh, and Jason Wiese. 2022. Identifying factors that inhibit self-care behavior among individuals with severe spinal cord injury. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517658
[17]
Tamanna Motahar and Jason Wiese. 2022. A Review of Personal Informatics Research for People with Motor Disabilities. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 2 (2022), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3534614
[18]
Michelle R Nario-Redmond, Dobromir Gospodinov, and Angela Cobb. 2017. Crip for a day: The unintended negative consequences of disability simulations.Rehabilitation psychology 62, 3 (2017), 324.
[19]
Alannah Oleson, Christopher Mendez, Zoe Steine-Hanson, Claudia Hilderbrand, Christopher Perdriau, Margaret Burnett, and Amy J Ko. 2018. Pedagogical content knowledge for teaching inclusive design. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230998
[20]
Alannah Oleson, Meron Solomon, and Amy J Ko. 2020. Computing students’ learning difficulties in HCI education. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376149
[21]
Alannah Oleson, Meron Solomon, Christopher Perdriau, and Amy J Ko. 2022. Teaching Inclusive Design Skills with the CIDER Assumption Elicitation Technique. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3549074
[22]
Perkinput 2012. Perkinput: Eyes-Free Text Entry on Smartphones and Tablets. Retrieved February 14, 2023 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot8_lObS1Lc
[23]
ScreenReader 2021. Screen Reader Accessibility Demo. Retrieved February 14, 2023 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMqVLyAZ3rk
[24]
Katta Spiel, Kathrin Gerling, Cynthia L Bennett, Emeline Brulé, Rua M Williams, Jennifer Rode, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2020. Nothing about us without us: Investigating the role of critical disability studies in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375150
[25]
Judith A Sutherland. 1993. The nature and evolution of phenomenological empathy in nursing: An historical treatment. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 7, 6 (1993), 369–376.
[26]
Joyce Thomas and Deana McDonagh. 2013. Empathic design: Research strategies. The Australasian medical journal 6, 1 (2013), 1.
[27]
Chia-En Tseng, Seoung Ho Jung, Yasmine N Elglaly, Yudong Liu, and Stephanie Ludi. 2022. Exploration on Integrating Accessibility into an AI Course. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499399
[28]
W3 2021. Making Content Usable for People with Cognitive and Learning Disabilities. Retrieved February 13, 2023 from https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/
[29]
WCAG 2018. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) international standard. Retrieved February 14, 2023 from https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/
[30]
Svetlana Yarosh, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Sarah McRoberts, and Tamara Peyton. 2016. YouthTube: Youth video authorship on YouTube and Vine. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 1423–1437. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819961

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Challenging Ableism: A Critical Turn Toward Disability Justice in HCIXRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students10.1145/366560230:4(50-55)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Toward Building Design Empathy for People with Disabilities Using Social Media Data: A New Approach for Novice DesignersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660687(3145-3160)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating a Multi-Component Classroom Intervention to Teach Accessibility in Higher Education: A Case Study With Persona CardsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.336013512(20299-20312)Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Building “Design Empathy” for People with Disabilities: an Unsolved Challenge in HCI Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EduCHI '23: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on HCI Education
    April 2023
    106 pages
    ISBN:9798400707377
    DOI:10.1145/3587399
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 April 2023

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Design empathy
    2. Spinal cord injury

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    EduCHI
    EduCHI: 5th Annual Symposium on HCI Education
    April 28, 2023
    Hamburg, Germany

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)127
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Challenging Ableism: A Critical Turn Toward Disability Justice in HCIXRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students10.1145/366560230:4(50-55)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Toward Building Design Empathy for People with Disabilities Using Social Media Data: A New Approach for Novice DesignersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660687(3145-3160)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Evaluating a Multi-Component Classroom Intervention to Teach Accessibility in Higher Education: A Case Study With Persona CardsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.336013512(20299-20312)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2023)ALL: Supporting Experiential Accessibility Education and Inclusive Software DevelopmentACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/362529233:2(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media