[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
Skip header Section
Curve and Surface Reconstruction: Algorithms with Mathematical Analysis (Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics)October 2006
Publisher:
  • Cambridge University Press
  • 40 W. 20 St. New York, NY
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-521-86370-4
Published:01 October 2006
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025Bibliometrics
Abstract

No abstract available.

Cited By

  1. ACM
    Zhao T, Busé L, Cohen-Steiner D, Boubekeur T, Thiery J and Alliez P Variational Shape Reconstruction via Quadric Error Metrics ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings, (1-10)
  2. Ding D, Zhang M, Feng F, Huang Y, Jiang E and Yang M Black-box adversarial attack on time series classification Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, (7358-7368)
  3. ACM
    Yin J, Liu C, Lin R, Vining N, Rhodin H and Sheffer A (2022). Detecting viewer-perceived intended vector sketch connectivity, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 41:4, (1-11), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022.
  4. MOUSA M and HUSSEIN M (2022). Surface approximation using GPU-based localized fourier transform, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34:4, (1431-1438), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022.
  5. ACM
    Huang Z, Carr N and Ju T (2019). Variational implicit point set surfaces, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 38:4, (1-13), Online publication date: 31-Aug-2019.
  6. Yan K, Cheng H and Huang J (2019). Representing implicit surfaces satisfying Lipschitz conditions by 4-dimensional point sets, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 354:C, (42-57), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019.
  7. Hu Z, Tang J, Wang Z, Zhang K, Zhang L and Sun Q (2018). Deep learning for image-based cancer detection and diagnosis − A survey, Pattern Recognition, 83:C, (134-149), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018.
  8. Aamari E and Levrard C (2018). Stability and Minimax Optimality of Tangential Delaunay Complexes for Manifold Reconstruction, Discrete & Computational Geometry, 59:4, (923-971), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018.
  9. ACM
    Xu K, Zheng L, Yan Z, Yan G, Zhang E, Niessner M, Deussen O, Cohen-Or D and Huang H (2017). Autonomous reconstruction of unknown indoor scenes guided by time-varying tensor fields, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36:6, (1-15), Online publication date: 20-Nov-2017.
  10. Boltcheva D and Lévy B (2022). Surface reconstruction by computing restricted Voronoi cells in parallel, Computer-Aided Design, 90:C, (123-134), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017.
  11. Liu Y, Song Y, Yang Z and Deng J (2017). Implicit surface reconstruction with total variation regularization, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 52:C, (135-153), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.
  12. Dey T, Dong Z and Wang Y Parameter-free topology inference and sparsification for data on manifolds Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, (2733-2747)
  13. Berger M, Tagliasacchi A, Seversky L, Alliez P, Guennebaud G, Levine J, Sharf A and Silva C (2017). A Survey of Surface Reconstruction from Point Clouds, Computer Graphics Forum, 36:1, (301-329), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017.
  14. ACM
    Xu K, Kim V, Huang Q, Mitra N and Kalogerakis E Data-driven shape analysis and processing SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 Courses, (1-38)
  15. Ohrhallinger S, Mitchell S and Wimmer M Curve reconstruction with many fewer samples Proceedings of the Symposium on Geometry Processing, (167-176)
  16. ACM
    Mandad M, Cohen-Steiner D and Alliez P (2015). Isotopic approximation within a tolerance volume, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 34:4, (1-12), Online publication date: 27-Jul-2015.
  17. Nagai Y, Ohtake Y and Suzuki H (2018). Tomographic surface reconstruction from point cloud, Computers and Graphics, 46:C, (55-63), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015.
  18. Peethambaran J and Muthuganapathy R (2015). Reconstruction of water-tight surfaces through Delaunay sculpting, Computer-Aided Design, 58:C, (62-72), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015.
  19. ACM
    Xiong S, Zhang J, Zheng J, Cai J and Liu L (2014). Robust surface reconstruction via dictionary learning, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 33:6, (1-12), Online publication date: 19-Nov-2014.
  20. Patkar S, Aanjaneya M, Bartle A, Lee M and Fedkiw R Efficient denting and bending of rigid bodies Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, (87-96)
  21. Skraba P and Wang B Approximating local homology from samples Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, (174-192)
  22. Boissonnat J and Ghosh A (2014). Manifold Reconstruction Using Tangential Delaunay Complexes, Discrete & Computational Geometry, 51:1, (221-267), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.
  23. ACM
    Taubin G Non-convex hull surfaces SIGGRAPH Asia 2013 Technical Briefs, (1-4)
  24. ACM
    Dey T, Fan F and Wang Y Graph induced complex on point data Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual symposium on Computational geometry, (107-116)
  25. ACM
    Berger M, Levine J, Nonato L, Taubin G and Silva C (2013). A benchmark for surface reconstruction, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32:2, (1-17), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013.
  26. Dey T and Wang Y (2013). Reeb Graphs, Discrete & Computational Geometry, 49:1, (46-73), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013.
  27. ACM
    Kim Y, Mitra N, Yan D and Guibas L (2012). Acquiring 3D indoor environments with variability and repetition, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31:6, (1-11), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2012.
  28. Dey T, Ge X, Que Q, Safa I, Wang L and Wang Y (2012). Feature-Preserving Reconstruction of Singular Surfaces, Computer Graphics Forum, 31:5, (1787-1796), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2012.
  29. ACM
    Cheng S, Jin J and Lau M A fast and simple surface reconstruction algorithm Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual symposium on Computational geometry, (69-78)
  30. Aronov B and Dulieu M How to cover a point set with a V-shape of minimum width Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Algorithms and data structures, (61-72)
  31. ACM
    Li Y, Wu X, Chrysathou Y, Sharf A, Cohen-Or D and Mitra N GlobFit ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 papers, (1-12)
  32. Biedl T, Durocher S and Snoeyink J (2019). Reconstructing polygons from scanner data, Theoretical Computer Science, 412:32, (4161-4172), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011.
  33. ACM
    Attali D, Lieutier A and Salinas D Vietoris-rips complexes also provide topologically correct reconstructions of sampled shapes Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry, (491-500)
  34. ACM
    Acar U, Hudson B and Türkoglu D Kinetic mesh refinement in 2D Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry, (341-350)
  35. ACM
    Cheng S and Jin J Edge flips and deforming surface meshes Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry, (331-340)
  36. ACM
    Miller G, Phillips T and Sheehy D Beating the spread Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry, (321-330)
  37. ACM
    Dey T and Wang Y Reeb graphs Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry, (226-235)
  38. Olson M, Dyer R, Zhang H and Sheffer A (2011). SMI 2011, Computers and Graphics, 35:3, (500-509), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.
  39. Dey T, Dyer R and Wang L (2011). SMI 2011, Computers and Graphics, 35:3, (483-491), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.
  40. ACM
    Boissonnat J and Ghosh A Manifold reconstruction using tangential Delaunay complexes Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual symposium on Computational geometry, (324-333)
  41. Zomorodian A Computational topology Algorithms and theory of computation handbook, (3-3)
  42. ACM
    Dyer R, Zhang H and Möller T Gabriel meshes and Delaunay edge flips 2009 SIAM/ACM Joint Conference on Geometric and Physical Modeling, (295-300)
  43. ACM
    Busaryev O, Dey T and Levine J Repairing and meshing imperfect shapes with Delaunay refinement 2009 SIAM/ACM Joint Conference on Geometric and Physical Modeling, (25-33)
  44. Dey T, Li K, Ramos E and Wenger R Isotopic reconstruction of surfaces with boundaries Proceedings of the Symposium on Geometry Processing, (1371-1382)
  45. ACM
    Luo C, Sun J and Wang Y Integral estimation from point cloud in d-dimensional space Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual symposium on Computational geometry, (116-124)
  46. ACM
    Dey T, Li K, Sun J and Cohen-Steiner D Computing geometry-aware handle and tunnel loops in 3D models ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 papers, (1-9)
  47. ACM
    Dey T, Li K, Sun J and Cohen-Steiner D (2008). Computing geometry-aware handle and tunnel loops in 3D models, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 27:3, (1-9), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008.
  48. ACM
    Belkin M, Sun J and Wang Y Discrete laplace operator on meshed surfaces Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry, (278-287)
  49. Cheng S and Dey T Maintaining deforming surface meshes Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, (112-121)
  50. ACM
    Franklin W, Inanc M, Xie Z, Tracy D, Cutler B and Andrade M Smugglers and border guards Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems, (1-8)
  51. Alberti L and Mourrain B Regularity criteria for the topology of algebraic curves and surfaces Proceedings of the 12th IMA international conference on Mathematics of surfaces XII, (1-28)
  52. Attali D, Edelsbrunner H, Harer J and Mileyko Y Alpha-beta witness complexes Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Algorithms and Data Structures, (386-397)
  53. Erten H and Üngör A Triangulations with locally optimal Steiner points Proceedings of the fifth Eurographics symposium on Geometry processing, (143-152)
  54. Alliez P, Cohen-Steiner D, Tong Y and Desbrun M Voronoi-based variational reconstruction of unoriented point sets Proceedings of the fifth Eurographics symposium on Geometry processing, (39-48)
  55. Ramos E and Sadri B Geometric and topological guarantees for the WRAP reconstruction algorithm Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, (1086-1095)
Contributors
  • Purdue University

Reviews

Joseph J. ORourke

This is a worthy successor to Edelsbrunner's 2001 book [1], published in the same "Cambridge Monographs" series, tracking that book in digestible length, mathematical rigor, clarity, and focus on Voronoi diagrams and Delaunay triangulations. Although the title is accurate, 20 percent of the book is on curve reconstruction, while the remaining 80 percent addresses the more challenging surface reconstruction. All major results described were obtained within the last decade, many in collaboration with the author of this book. The goal is reconstruction of a curve Γ or surface Σ from a discrete set of unorganized sample points P , as might be obtained from a laser scanner, for example. Throughout, results are based on η-samples: those whose density guarantees that every sample point x has a another sample point p "nearby," in that | x - p | is no more than η times the distance of x from the medial axis of Γ or Σ. The reason the Delaunay triangulation Del P plays a role for a curve Γ is that all "correct edges" (those we want to reconstruct) are in Del P . This leads to the crust algorithm, later improved to the nearest neighbor (NN) crust algorithm, which guarantees correct reconstruction of Γ for η < 1/3 by using both Del P and NN. The reason the Voronoi diagram Vor P plays a central role for a surface Σ is that the Voronoi cell containing a sample point p is long and thin, with the direction of elongation approximating (for dense samples) the surface normal direction n p at p . Indeed, it is a remarkable result that for η < 0.18, the dual subset of Del P of the cells of Vor P that intersect Σ is homeomorphic (deformable) to Σ. Unfortunately, Σ is the unknown, and so this does not immediately yield an algorithm. However, the approximate normal n p can be used to define a "cocone," which spreads out rays rougly perpendicular to n p (within ± 22.5°), capturing the triangles of Del P closest to Σ. Carefully extracting a manifold from these triangles ultimately leads to one of the major achievements of this field (and the core of this book): the cocone algorithm, which guarantees reconstruction of Σ?point-wise, normal-wise, homeomorphic, and isotopic?for η < 0.05. Note the progressively smaller η values as problem difficulty increases. The second half of the book extends this surface reconstruction algorithm to handle the practical situations that arise from real data: undersampling, surfaces with boundary, noisy samples, hole-filling (watertight reconstructions), and smoothing via moving least squares (MLS) surfaces. One MLS theorem requires η < 0.004, reflecting the intricacy of the proof. A final chapter presents the novel wrap algorithm of Edelsbrunner, which reconstructs by peeling away simplices of Del P based on the Morse flow complex. The book is based on a computer science graduate course and demands graduate-level sophistication, especially in mathematics. Many wonderful Computational Geometry Algorithms Library (CGAL) computed figures are used to illustrate the performance of the algorithms on real data sets. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Recommendations