[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.5555/2999792.2999923guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnipsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data

Published: 05 December 2013 Publication History

Abstract

We consider the problem of embedding entities and relationships of multi-relational data in low-dimensional vector spaces. Our objective is to propose a canonical model which is easy to train, contains a reduced number of parameters and can scale up to very large databases. Hence, we propose TransE, a method which models relationships by interpreting them as translations operating on the low-dimensional embeddings of the entities. Despite its simplicity, this assumption proves to be powerful since extensive experiments show that TransE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in link prediction on two knowledge bases. Besides, it can be successfully trained on a large scale data set with 1M entities, 25k relationships and more than 17M training samples.

References

[1]
K. Bollacker, C. Evans, P. Paritosh, T. Sturge, and J. Taylor. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 2008.
[2]
A. Bordes, X. Glorot, J. Weston, and Y. Bengio. A semantic matching energy function for learning with multi-relational data. Machine Learning, 2013.
[3]
A. Bordes, J. Weston, R. Collobert, and Y. Bengio. Learning structured embeddings of knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2011.
[4]
X. Glorot and Y. Bengio. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS)., 2010.
[5]
R. A. Harshman and M. E. Lundy. Parafac: parallel factor analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 18(1):39-72, Aug. 1994.
[6]
R. Jenatton, N. Le Roux, A. Bordes, G. Obozinski, et al. A latent factor model for highly multi-relational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 25), 2012.
[7]
C. Kemp, J. B. Tenenbaum, T. L. Griffiths, T. Yamada, and N. Ueda. Learning systems of concepts with an infinite relational model. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2006.
[8]
T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 26), 2013.
[9]
G. Miller. WordNet: a Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39-41, 1995.
[10]
K. Miller, T. Griffiths, and M. Jordan. Nonparametric latent feature models for link prediction. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 22), 2009.
[11]
M. Nickel, V. Tresp, and H.-P. Kriegel. A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2011.
[12]
M. Nickel, V. Tresp, and H.-P. Kriegel. Factorizing YAGO: scalable machine learning for linked data. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2012.
[13]
A. P. Singh and G. J. Gordon. Relational learning via collective matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2008.
[14]
R. Socher, D. Chen, C. D. Manning, and A. Y. Ng. Learning new facts from knowledge bases with neural tensor networks and semantic word vectors. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 26), 2013.
[15]
I. Sutskever, R. Salakhutdinov, and J. Tenenbaum. Modelling relational data using bayesian clustered tensor factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 22), 2009.
[16]
J. Weston, A. Bordes, O. Yakhnenko, and N. Usunier. Connecting language and knowledge bases with embedding models for relation extraction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2013.
[17]
J. Zhu. Max-margin nonparametric latent feature models for link prediction. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Generalizing knowledge graph embedding with universal orthogonal parameterizationProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3693194(28040-28059)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Complex-Path: Effective and Efficient Node Ranking with Paths in Billion-Scale Heterogeneous GraphsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3685800.368582017:12(3973-3986)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)A Survey on Intent-aware Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/37008903:2(1-32)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
NIPS'13: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2
December 2013
3236 pages

Publisher

Curran Associates Inc.

Red Hook, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 December 2013

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Generalizing knowledge graph embedding with universal orthogonal parameterizationProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3693194(28040-28059)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Complex-Path: Effective and Efficient Node Ranking with Paths in Billion-Scale Heterogeneous GraphsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3685800.368582017:12(3973-3986)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)A Survey on Intent-aware Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/37008903:2(1-32)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Multimodal Sign Language Knowledge Graph and Representation: Text Video KeyFrames and Motion TrajectoriesProceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Multimedia in Asia10.1145/3696409.3700208(1-7)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Log File Anomaly Detection Using Knowledge Graph CompletionProceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Deep Learning Technologies10.1145/3695719.3695726(42-48)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Structure-Information-Based Reasoning over the Knowledge Graph: A Survey of Methods and ApplicationsACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/367114818:8(1-42)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2024
  • (2024)A pruning-based word-centered context fragment extraction method for relation extractionProceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3670085.3670104(97-104)Online publication date: 10-May-2024
  • (2024)DHyper: A Recurrent Dual Hypergraph Neural Network for Event Prediction in Temporal Knowledge GraphsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/365301542:5(1-23)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
  • (2024)3VFP: Three-View Feature Propagation Entity AlignmentProceedings of the 2024 16th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing10.1145/3651671.3651777(347-354)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Machine Learning for Refining Knowledge Graphs: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/364031356:6(1-38)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media