• Q. Cowit N and Barker L. Designing for Interdisciplinary Transfer to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load, Increase Self-Efficacy, and Promote Conceptual Understanding in Introductory Programming. Proceedings of the 24th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. (1-13).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3699538.3699553

  • Perlmutter L, Salac J and Ko A. "A field where you will be accepted": Belonging in student and TA interactions in post-secondary CS education. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1. (356-370).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3568813.3600128

  • Vrieler T and Salminen-Karlsson M. (2022). A Sociocultural Perspective on Computer Science Capital and Its Pedagogical Implications in Computer Science Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 22:4. (1-23). Online publication date: 31-Dec-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3487052

  • Hardin C. (2021). Gender Differences in Hackathons as a Non-traditional Educational Experience. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 21:2. (1-30). Online publication date: 30-Jun-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3433168

  • Riivari E, Kivijärvi M and Lämsä A. (2021). Learning teamwork through a computer game: for the sake of performance or collaborative learning?. Educational Technology Research and Development. 10.1007/s11423-021-10009-4.

    https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-021-10009-4

  • Oguamanam V, Lee T, McKlin T, Cochran Z, Abowd G and DiSalvo B. Cultural Clash. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. (1131-1142).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395544

  • de Bruin L, Williamson P and Wilson E. (2019). Apprenticing the jazz performer through ensemble collaboration: A qualitative enquiry. International Journal of Music Education. 10.1177/0255761419887209. 38:2. (208-225). Online publication date: 1-May-2020.

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0255761419887209

  • Solomon A, Oguamanam V, Guzdial M and DiSalvo B. Making CS Learning Visible. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. (161-167).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319791

  • Wilcox L, DiSalvo B, Henneman D and Wang Q. Design in the HCI Classroom. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. (871-883).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322381

  • Lewis C, Shah N and Falkner K. (2019). Equity and Diversity. The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research. 10.1017/9781108654555.017. (481-510).

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555%23CN-bp-16/type/book_part

  • Fincher S and Robins A. (2019). The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555/type/book

  • Recommendations for future research and interventions. Retention in Computer Science Undergraduate Programs in the U.S..

    /doi/10.5555/3406772.C5546928

  • A cross-section of promising interventions. Retention in Computer Science Undergraduate Programs in the U.S..

    /doi/10.5555/3406772.C5546927

  • Joshi A and Jain A. Reflecting on the Impact of a Course on Inclusive Strategies for Teaching Computer Science. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). (1-9).

    https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659237

  • Latulipe C, MacNeil S and Thompson B. (2018). Evolving a Data Structures Class Toward Inclusive Success 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659334. 978-1-5386-1174-6. (1-9).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8659334/

  • Lewis C. (2017). ACM RETENTION COMMITTEETwelve tips for creating a culture that supports all students in computing. ACM Inroads. 8:4. (17-20). Online publication date: 27-Oct-2017.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3148524

  • Deloatch R, Bailey B, Kirlik A and Zilles C. I Need Your Encouragement!. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (736-747).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025709

  • Lewis C. (2017). Good (and Bad) Reasons to Teach All Students Computer Science. New Directions for Computing Education. 10.1007/978-3-319-54226-3_2. (15-34).

    http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-54226-3_2

  • Edwards S and Li Z. Towards progress indicators for measuring student programming effort during solution development. Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. (31-40).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2999541.2999561

  • Latulipe C, Provencal S and Frevert T. (2016). Experience report: Workshopping alternate outcomes to Sexism through participatory classroom roleplay 2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 10.1109/RESPECT.2016.7836173. 978-1-5090-3419-2. (1-4).

    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7836173/

  • Aspray W. (2016). Building Educational Infrastructures for Broadening Participation in Computing. Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Computing. 10.1007/978-3-319-24811-0_10. (223-259).

    http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-24811-0_10

  • Denner J, Werner L and O’Connor L. (2015). Women in Community College: Factors Related to Intentions to Pursue Computer Science. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education. 10.1080/19407882.2015.1057166. 8:2. (156-171). Online publication date: 3-Jul-2015.

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19407882.2015.1057166

  • Barker L, O'Neill M and Kazim N. Framing classroom climate for student learning and retention in computer science. Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. (319-324).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538959

  • Titterton N, Lewis C and Clancy M. (2010). Experiences with lab-centric instruction. Computer Science Education. 10.1080/08993408.2010.486256. 20:2. (79-102). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010.

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08993408.2010.486256

  • Richards D. (2009). Designing Project-Based Courses with a Focus on Group Formation and Assessment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 9:1. (1-40). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2009.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1513593.1513595

  • Shah A, Agarwal V, Griswold W, Porter L and Soosai Raj A. In-Person vs Blended Learning: An Examination of Grades, Attendance, Peer Support, Competitiveness, and Belonging. Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1. (422-428).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3649217.3653604

  • Holmegaard H, Archer L, Godec S, Watson E, MacLeod E, Dewitt J and Moote J. (2024). Feeling the weight of the water: a longitudinal study of how capital and identity shape young people’s computer science trajectories over time, age 10–21. Computer Science Education. 10.1080/08993408.2024.2320009. (1-29).

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08993408.2024.2320009

  • Bhaskar N, Lewis A, Darabi R, Fang J, Liu J, Vaccaro K, Politz J and Minnes M. Welcoming Students to Undergraduate Computer Science Programs: On-ramps, Rest Areas, and Lane Changes. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. (109-115).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630964

  • Werner S and Chen Y. Evaluating Identity and Belonging in Computer Science Students: Instrument Adaptation and Analysis. Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. (1421-1427).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630840

  • Mejias M, Washington G, Burge L, Wilson D, Kouaho L and Marshall J. (2024). A Framework For Discussing Black Student Threats to Belonging in Computer Science 2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE). 10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011. 979-8-3503-7291-5. (15-20).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10605862/

  • Sharma M, McTavish H, Peng Z, Shah A, Agarwal V, Sih C, Hogan E, Molina I, Raj A and Vaccaro K. Engagement and Anonymity in Online Computer Science Course Forums. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1. (48-62).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3568813.3600121

  • Zavaleta Bernuy A, Ly A, Harrington B, Liut M, Sharmin S, Zhang L and Petersen A. "I Am Not Enough": Impostor Phenomenon Experiences of University Students. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1. (313-319).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3587102.3588779

  • Fulton K, Katcher S, Song K, Chetty M, Mazurek M, Messdaghi C and Votipka D. (2023). Vulnerability Discovery for All: Experiences of Marginalization in Vulnerability Discovery 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). 10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179478. 978-1-6654-9336-9. (1997-2014).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10179478/

  • Szabo C and Sheard J. (2022). Learning Theories Use and Relationships in Computing Education Research. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 23:1. (1-34). Online publication date: 31-Mar-2023.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3487056

  • Desportes K, McDermott K, Bergner Y and Payne W. (2022). “Go[ing] Hard...as a Woman of Color”: A Case Study Examining Identity Work within a Performative Dance and Computing Learning Environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 22:4. (1-29). Online publication date: 31-Dec-2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3531000

  • Fulton K, Votipka D, Abrokwa D, Mazurek M, Hicks M and Parker J. Understanding the How and the Why. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. (1141-1155).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3548606.3560569

  • Bahar A, Kaya E and Zhang X. (2022). Gender Disparities in AP Computer Science Exams: Analysis of Trends in Participation and top Achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics. 10.1177/1932202X221119499. 33:4. (574-603). Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022.

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1932202X221119499

  • Salguero A, Griswold W, Alvarado C and Porter L. Understanding Sources of Student Struggle in Early Computer Science Courses. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. (319-333).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469755

  • Peña J, Hanrahan B, Rosson M and Cole C. (2021). After-Hours Learning. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 21:2. (1-31). Online publication date: 30-Jun-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3446964

  • Oleson A, Wortzman B and Ko A. (2020). On the Role of Design in K-12 Computing Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 21:1. (1-34). Online publication date: 31-Mar-2021.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3427594

  • Decker A, Egert C and Cascioli E. (2020). Cohorting incoming students in a CS1 course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges. 35:8. (186-197). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020.

    /doi/10.5555/3417639.3417656

  • Rosenstein A, Raghu A and Porter L. Identifying the Prevalence of the Impostor Phenomenon Among Computer Science Students. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (30-36).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366815

  • Nguyen A and Lewis C. Competitive Enrollment Policies in Computing Departments Negatively Predict First-Year Students' Sense of Belonging, Self-Efficacy, and Perception of Department. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (685-691).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366805

  • Fincher S, Dziallas S and Knox D. Space, Place and Practice in Computing Education. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research. (1-7).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3351287.3351297

  • Lewis C, Clancy M and Vahrenhold J. (2019). Student Knowledge and Misconceptions. The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research. 10.1017/9781108654555.028. (773-800).

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555%23CN-bp-27/type/book_part

  • Tenenberg J. (2019). Qualitative Methods for Computing Education. The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research. 10.1017/9781108654555.008. (173-207).

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555%23CN-bp-7/type/book_part

  • Fincher S and Robins A. (2019). The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555/type/book

  • Mejias M, Jean-Pierre K, Washington G and Burge L. (2019). Underrepresented Groups Threats to Belonging in Computing 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985905. 978-1-7281-0821-6. (1-4).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8985905/

  • Mejias M, Jean-Pierre K, Burge L and Washington G. (2018). Culturally Relevant CS Pedagogy - Theory & Practice 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491699. 978-1-5386-1363-4. (1-5).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8491699/

  • Nasir N and Vakil S. (2017). STEM-Focused Academies in Urban Schools: Tensions and Possibilities. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 10.1080/10508406.2017.1314215. 26:3. (376-406). Online publication date: 3-Jul-2017.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10508406.2017.1314215

  • Wagner I. (2016). Gender and Performance in Computer Science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 16:3. (1-16). Online publication date: 27-Jun-2016.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2920173

  • DiSalvo B, Guzdial M, Bruckman A and McKlin T. (2014). Saving Face While Geeking Out: Video Game Testing as a Justification for Learning Computer Science. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 10.1080/10508406.2014.893434. 23:3. (272-315). Online publication date: 3-Jul-2014.

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508406.2014.893434

  • Dorn B and Elliott Tew A. Becoming experts. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. (183-188).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445252

  • Elliott Tew A, Dorn B and Schneider O. Toward a validated computing attitudes survey. Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research. (135-142).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2361276.2361303

  • Fincher S, Tenenberg J and Robins A. Research design. Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research. (27-32).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016919

  • Lewis C, Yasuhara K and Anderson R. Deciding to major in computer science. Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research. (3-10).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016915

  • Ehlert A and Schulte C. Comparison of OOP first and OOP later. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. (108-112).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822122

  • DiSalvo B and Bruckman A. Race and gender in play practices. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. (56-63).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1822348.1822356

  • Hewner M and Knobelsdorf M. Understanding computing stereotypes with self-categorization theory. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing Education Research. (72-75).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1595356.1595368

  • Knobelsdorf M. A typology of CS students' preconditions for learning. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing Education Research. (62-71).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1595356.1595366

  • Yardi S and Bruckman A. What is computing?. Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research. (39-50).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1288580.1288586

  • Cohoon J. (2007). Gendered experiences of computing graduate programs. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 39:1. (546-550). Online publication date: 7-Mar-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1227504.1227494

  • Turner E, Albert E, Turner R and Latour L. (2007). Retaining majors through the introductory sequence. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 39:1. (24-28). Online publication date: 7-Mar-2007.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1227504.1227321

  • Cohoon J. Gendered experiences of computing graduate programs. Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. (546-550).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1227310.1227494

  • Turner E, Albert E, Turner R and Latour L. Retaining majors through the introductory sequence. Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. (24-28).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1227310.1227321

  • Waite W, Jarrahian A, Jackson M and Diwan A. (2006). Design and implementation of a modern compiler course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 38:3. (18-22). Online publication date: 26-Sep-2006.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1140123.1140132

  • Waite W, Jarrahian A, Jackson M and Diwan A. Design and implementation of a modern compiler course. Proceedings of the 11th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. (18-22).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1140124.1140132

  • McKinney D and Denton L. (2006). Developing collaborative skills early in the CS curriculum in a laboratory environment. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 38:1. (138-142). Online publication date: 31-Mar-2006.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121387

  • McKinney D and Denton L. Developing collaborative skills early in the CS curriculum in a laboratory environment. Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. (138-142).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1121341.1121387

  • Walker H. (2005). What should be in a syllabus?. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 37:4. (19-21). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1113847.1113859

  • Lister R. (2005). Mixed methods. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 37:4. (18-19). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1113847.1113857

  • Chinn D. (2005). Peer assessment in the algorithms course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 37:3. (69-73). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1151954.1067468

  • Postner L and Stevens R. (2005). What resources do CS1 students use and how do they use them?. Computer Science Education. 10.1080/08993400500224252. 15:3. (165-182). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005.

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08993400500224252

  • Chinn D. Peer assessment in the algorithms course. Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. (69-73).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1067445.1067468

  • Turner E and Turner R. Teaching entering students to think like computer scientists. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. (307-311).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1047344.1047451

  • Bower M and Richards D. The impact of virtual classroom laboratories in CSE. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. (292-296).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1047344.1047447

  • Turner E and Turner R. (2005). Teaching entering students to think like computer scientists. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 37:1. (307-311). Online publication date: 23-Feb-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1047124.1047451

  • Bower M and Richards D. (2005). The impact of virtual classroom laboratories in CSE. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 37:1. (292-296). Online publication date: 23-Feb-2005.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1047124.1047447

  • Kirk M and Zander C. (2004). Narrowing the digital divide. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges. 20:2. (168-175). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.

    /doi/10.5555/1040151.1040169

  • McKinney D and Denton L. Houston, we have a problem. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. (236-239).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/971300.971386

  • Garvin-Doxas K and Barker L. (2004). Communication in computer science classrooms: understanding defensive climates as a means of creating supportive behaviors. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing. 4:1. (2-es). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2004.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1060071.1060073

  • McKinney D and Denton L. (2004). Houston, we have a problem. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 36:1. (236-239). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2004.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971386

  • Garvin-Doxas K and Barker L. (2003). Creating learning environments that support interaction. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 35:3. (276-276). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/961290.961641

  • Garvin-Doxas K and Barker L. Creating learning environments that support interaction. Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. (276-276).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/961511.961641

  • Phillips A, Stevenson D and Wick M. Implementing CC2001. Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. (238-242).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.611978

  • Phillips A, Stevenson D and Wick M. (2003). Implementing CC2001. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 35:1. (238-242). Online publication date: 11-Jan-2003.

    https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.611978