• Zhou Z, Cai L, Guo J, Zhang Y, Chang B, Xu T and Wang Y. (2024). ExeVis: concept-based visualization of exercises in online learning. Journal of Visualization. 10.1007/s12650-024-00956-4. 27:2. (235-254). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024.

    https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12650-024-00956-4

  • Llanos Mosquera J, Hidalgo Suarez C and Bucheli Guerrero V. (2021). Una revisión sistemática sobre aula invertida y aprendizaje colaborativo apoyados en inteligencia artificial para el aprendizaje de programación. Tecnura. 10.14483/22487638.16934. 25:69. (196-214).

    https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/Tecnura/article/view/16934

  • Grover S. Toward A Framework for Formative Assessment of Conceptual Learning in K-12 Computer Science Classrooms. Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. (31-37).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432460

  • Hwang R, Lin H, Sun J and Wu J. (2021). Improving Learning Achievement in Science Education for Elementary School Students via Blended Learning. Research Anthology on Developing Effective Online Learning Courses. 10.4018/978-1-7998-8047-9.ch074. (1494-1514).

    http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-7998-8047-9.ch074

  • Koutsakas P, Karagiannidis C, Politis P and Karasavvidis I. (2020). A computer programming hybrid MOOC for Greek secondary education. Smart Learning Environments. 10.1186/s40561-020-0114-1. 7:1. Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020.

    https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-020-0114-1

  • Lundqvist K and Warburton S. (2019). Visualising Learning Pathways in MOOCs 2019 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS). 10.1109/LWMOOCS47620.2019.8939659. 978-1-7281-2549-7. (185-190).

    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8939659/

  • Hwang R, Lin H, Sun J and Wu J. Improving Learning Achievement in Science Education for Elementary School Students via Blended Learning. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design. 10.4018/IJOPCD.2019040104. 9:2. (44-62).

    http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJOPCD.2019040104

  • Falkner K and Sheard J. (2019). Pedagogic Approaches. The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research. 10.1017/9781108654555.016. (445-480).

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555%23CN-bp-15/type/book_part

  • Fincher S and Robins A. (2019). The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108654555/type/book

  • de Waard I and Demeulenaere K. (2017). The MOOC-CLIL project: using MOOCs to increase language, and social and online learning skills for 5th grade K-12 students. Beyond the language classroom: researching MOOCs and other innovations. 10.14705/rpnet.2017.mooc2016.669. (29-42). Online publication date: 28-Jun-2017.

    https://research-publishing.net/manuscript?10.14705/rpnet.2017.mooc2016.669

  • Lawanto K, Close K, Ames C and Brasiel S. (2017). Exploring Strengths and Weaknesses in Middle School Students’ Computational Thinking in Scratch. Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking. 10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_19. (307-326).

    http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_19

  • Grover S, Pea R and Cooper S. Factors Influencing Computer Science Learning in Middle School. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. (552-557).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844564

  • Spradling C, Linville D, Rogers M and Clark J. (2015). Are MOOCs an appropriate pedagogy for training K-12 teachers computer science concepts?. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges. 30:5. (115-125). Online publication date: 1-May-2015.

    /doi/10.5555/2752981.2753010

  • Stephens-Martinez K, Hearst M and Fox A. Monitoring MOOCs. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference. (79-88).

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566246