[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Acta Gymnica 2016, 46(2):59-67 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2016.010

Physical activity and situational interest in mobile technology integrated physical education: A preliminary study

Xihe Zhu1, Loren A. Dragon2
1 Darden College of Education, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States;
2 Lynnhaven Middle School, Virginia Beach, VA, United States

Background: Mobile technology permeates every aspect of student lives. The question is whether mobile technology integration can produce desirable effects in the gymnasium.

Objective: This preliminary study aimed to investigate the effects of mobile technology integration on student situational interest and physical activity fluctuation in physical education lessons.

Methods: Sixth grade students (N = 53) were randomly placed into either an experiment group by class that utilized mobile technology-integrated resources (iPad and applications), or a comparison group that did not utilize technology. Both groups received five identical physical education lessons. Student physical activity was tracked with accelerometers, and they completed the Situational Interest Scale at the end of each lesson. The researchers analyzed the data using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with repeated measures.

Results: Students in the experiment group reported significantly lower physical activity and situational interest than their counterparts in the comparison group. A group × lesson interaction suggested that student step/min steadily increased throughout the lessons in the experiment group while remaining relative stable in the comparison group.

Conclusions: Mobile technologies such as iPad and applications with no direct physical activity prompt had little effect on increasing physical activity or situational interest in the short term. It is important to consider the classroom dynamics to realistically evaluate the constraints and strengths that mobile technology-integrated physical education lessons may pose in a traditional physical education environment.

Keywords: activity fluctuation, iPad application, middle school, adolescent, intervention

Received: March 14, 2016; Accepted: May 24, 2016; Prepublished online: June 2, 2016; Published: June 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zhu, X., & Dragon, L.A. (2016). Physical activity and situational interest in mobile technology integrated physical education: A preliminary study. Acta Gymnica46(2), 59-67. doi: 10.5507/ag.2016.010
Download citation

References

  1. Angers, J., & Machtmes, K. (2005). An ethnographic-case study of beliefs, context factors and practices of teachers integrating technology. Qualitative Report, 10, 771-794.
  2. Casey, A., & Jones, B. (2011). Using digital technology to enhance student engagement in physical education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2, 51-66. Go to original source...
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Strategies to improve the quality of physical education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  4. Chen, A., Darst, P., & Pangrazi, R. (1999). What constitutes situational interest? Validating a construct in physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3, 157-180. Go to original source...
  5. Chen, A., Sun, H., Zhu, X., & Ennis, C. D. (2012). Influence of personal and lesson factors on caloric expenditure inphysical education. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 1, 49-56. Go to original source...
  6. Culpepper, D. O., Tarr, S. J., & Killion, L. E. (2011). The role of various curriculum models on physical activity levels. Physical Educator, 68, 163-171.
  7. Flohr, J., Todd, M., & Tudor-Locke, C. (2006). Pedometer-assessed physical activity in young adolescents. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 309-315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Freedson, P., Pober, D., & Janz, K. F. (2005). Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Medicine & Science for Sports & Exercise, 37, S523-S530. Go to original source...
  9. Gao, Z., Lee, A. M., Solmon, M. A., Kosma, M., Carson, R. L., Tao, Z., … More, D. (2010). Validating pedometer-based physical activity time against accelerometer in middle school physical education. ICHPER-SD Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance, 5, 20-25.
  10. Hall, T. (2012). Emplotment, embodiment, engagement: Narrative technology in support of physical education, sport and physical activity. Quest, 64, 105-115. Go to original source...
  11. Hänggia, J., Phillips, L., & Rowlands, A. (2013). Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 16, 40-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127. Go to original source...
  13. Kervin, L., Verenikina, I., Jones, P., & Beth, O. (2013). Investigating synergies between literacy, technology and classroom practice. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36, 135-147. Go to original source...
  14. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2003). What constitutes a quality physical education program [Position statement]. Reston, VA: Author.
  15. Sasaki, J., John, D., & Freedson, P. (2011). Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14, 411-416. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Shen, B., & Chen, A. (2006). Examining the interrelations among knowledge, interests, and learning strategies. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 182-199. Go to original source...
  17. Strand, B., & Reeder, S. (1993). Analysis of heart rate levels during middle school physical education activities. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 64, 85-91. Go to original source...
  18. Sun, H. (2012). Exergaming impact on physical activity and interest in elementary school children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 212-220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Woods, M., Karp, G., Miao, H., & Perlman, D. (2008). Physical educators' technology competencies and usage. Physical Educator, 65, 82-99.
  20. Zhu, X. (2013). Exploring students' conception and expectations of achievement in physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 17, 62-73. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.