[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Download PDF

Staging of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus in experimental rodents: an update

Fertility Research and Practice volume 6, Article number: 5 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Determination of the phases of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus (heat) in experimental animals remains useful, especially in reproductive function research.

Main body of the abstract

This review provides a detailed description and discusses extensively the variations observed in different phases of the estrous cycle in laboratory animals using rats and mice as examples. It also illustrates how these phases can be determined and how to induce estrus ‘heat’ when required. The phases of the estrous cycle can be determined using various methods such as visual assessment, vaginal smear/cytology, histology of female reproductive organs (vagina, uterus and ovaries), vaginal wall impedance assessment and determination of urine biochemical parameters. Female animals can be artificially brought to estrus phase ‘heat’ to make them receptive to male counterparts.

Conclusion

Determination of the length and phases of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus are useful in teaching and research and evaluating the effects of drugs/chemicals on the reproductive functions.

Background

The importance of experimental animals in teaching and research cannot be over-emphasised. Studies using animal models have advantages such as the availability of experimental subjects, ability to perform invasive tests, extensive tissue sampling, and standardisation of disease severity and the possibility of prophylaxis [1]. Other advantages include secure handling of subjects, elimination of attrition from the study (except in cases of mortality), and controlled experimental conditions. Although, the choice of animal in biomedical research for a particular investigation may be controversial and highly opinionated, experimental animals commonly used include mice, rats, and rabbits. Small rodents like mice and rats are more preferred to larger animals like rabbits, dogs, cats, pigs and monkeys [2].

In reproductive function research, particularly those involving the use of female animals, mice and rats are commonly used, possibly due to their well characterized estrous cycle and secure handling. The short and precise length of estrous in these rodents [3, 4] also makes them very suitable. Determining the estrous phase is essential for selecting a female animal that will mate when paired with a male counterpart to achieve timed-pregnancy or tracking of estrous as a variable that may affect research [5]. Assessment of the estrous cycle in experimental animals is a useful measure of the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and the functioning reproductive status of the female reproductive system [4]. It can also be used to investigate the effects of drugs and chemicals on reproductive function [6] frequently expressed as a disruption in the typical morphology, cytology and histology of reproductive organs and alteration in the duration of particular phases of the estrous cycle.

The estrous cycle

The estrous cycle refers to the reproductive cycle in rodents. It is similar to the human reproductive cycle, commonly called the menstrual cycle (ovarian and uterine cycles). The estrous cycle has four phases, namely proestrus, estrus, metestrus and diestrus and lasts for 4 to 5 days [4] (Table 1). The reproductive period and estrous cycle of mice commences about the 26th day after birth with the opening of the vagina, which is about 10 days before vaginal cornification [7]. The apoptosis-mediated vaginal opening is an essential secondary character in mice, which is used as a predictor of puberty [8]. The vaginal unfolding is associated with an increase in oestradiol concentration. In rats, a vaginal opening occurs during the first ovulation [4].

Table 1 Length of various phases of the oestrous cycle
Full size table

In female rats, puberty is preceded by the pulsatile release of luteinizing hormone (LH) after the 4th postnatal week, approximately 30 days old [9]. This period is the anestrus and occurs about 8 to 9 days before the first proestrus [10]. The first proestrus, estrus, metestrus and diestrus then follow. Metestrus only occurs in the absence of conception [6].

On the other hand, in humans, there are three phases of the menstrual cycle; the menstrual, proliferative (follicular), and secretory (luteal) phases. This cycle begins at puberty. On the average, it lasts about 28 days from the start of one menstrual period to the start of the next. At mid cycle, between the proliferative and secretory phases, is the ovulatory phase during which ovulation occurs following LH surge. The proliferative phase is primarily associated with high estrogen levels while the secretory phase is associated with high progesterone levels [11].

The proestrus phase corresponds to the human follicular stage, which is associated with a rise in circulating estradiol concentrations and little surge in prolactin, this leads to a rise in LH and Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) release. The peak in FSH concentration with an associated rapid decline in estradiol levels correlates to ovulation and estrus phase. Metestrus and diestrus are homologous to human early and late secretory stages of the reproductive cycle, respectively, with high levels of progesterone [12].

Historical perspective

The word “estrus” was first used by Heape [13]. This is a Latin adaptation of the Greek word “oistros” which means “sexual season”, “gadfly”, “frenzy”, “sting” or “madness” [14]. Heape further named and defined the phases of the mammalian estrous cycle into proestrus, metestrus, diestrus and anestrus. Proestrus is the preparatory stage for an animal coming into heat, metestrus which is a brief period characterized with decline of corpus luteum functions in the absence of conception when the activities of reproductive organs gradually subside, diestrus which is a period of short rest during the breeding season, and anestrus which a non-breeding period when reproductive organs are quiescent [15]. Behavioural changes, as well as morphological, cytological and histological changes in the reproductive tract, describe these phases.

In the early days, macroscopic changes in the vulva (such as vulva swelling), vaginal secretions (such as bleeding, and mucous), and uterus (such as congestion) as well as microscopic changes in the reproductive tract were used to define estrous cycle phases. However, macroscopic findings were unreliable in small rodents, and histological analysis was and remains an invasive procedure which is not suitable for estrous cycle staging in live animals. Stockard and Papanicolaou [16] later characterized the vagina changes during the estrous cycle through histology and cytology; this circumvented the earlier problems of unreliability and invasiveness. Over time, various studies have approved of Stockard and Papanicolaou’s assessment; this led to the existing definitions of the phases of the estrous cycle. The Pap smear by Papanicolaou is still used today as a screening for cervical cancer [17].

Techniques for estrous cycle assessment

Several studies have proffered various methods of evaluating the estrous cycle based on the changes in the animal’s physiology and anatomy. These methods include visual assessment, [4, 5, 18] vaginal cytology, [3,4,5, 15, 19] histological examination of the reproductive organs, [6, 20] vaginal wall impedance, [21,22,23] and urine biochemistry [24].

Visual assessment

The visual method of evaluating the estrous cycle is widely acceptable. It is non-invasive, simple, cheap, fast, less stressful to animals and researchers, and can be carried out anywhere and at any time provided the illumination is adequate. This method is as accurate and reliable as the vaginal smear [18]. It has been reported to be the fastest method to determine the estrus phase [5]. However, most of the studies that reported this method used mice; this could suggest that this technique is more suitable for small animals such as mice and rats. Findings from this technique are also observer-dependent.

In visual assessment of estrous phase, the mouse should be held in the non-dominant hand and laid in the restraint with the forepaws resting on a surface, lift the tail gently, then examine and evaluate the vulva based on the criteria of Champlin et al. [18] A digital image for documentation is essential. It is also important to avoid hasty examinations to prevent misinterpretations.

The appearance of the vagina at various phases of the oestrous cycle is summarized in Table 2. In the proestrus phase, the vaginal opening appears full, swollen and moist. The tissues are pink, with striations in both the dorsal and ventral lips of the vulva. In estrus, the vagina appears similar to that in the proestrus, but it is less pink, less swollen and less moist with more prominent striations. In metestrus, the vagina opening is pale and dry with a slough of white cellular debris. The features of diestrus include a very wet vaginal opening, which is sometimes too small and closed in some mice with no tissue swelling [4, 5] (Figs. 1, 2 and 3).

Table 2 Appearance of the vagina at different phases of the oestrous cycle (Champlin et al., [7])
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Appearance of the vagina in different phases of estrous cycle of a Swiss albino strain mouse. a-Proestrus, b-Estrus, c- Metestrus, d- Diestrus (Ekambaram et al., [9])

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Appearance of the vagina in different phases of estrous cycle of an agouti strain mouse. a-Proestrus, b-Estrus, c- Metestrus, d- Diestrus (Byers et al., [6])

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Appearance of the vagina in different phases of estrous cycle of a non-agouti strain mouse. a-Proestrus, b-Estrus, c- Metestrus, d- Diestrus (Byers et al., [6])

Full size image

Vaginal smear/cytology

Similar to the visual assessment, vaginal cytology is also widely accepted. It seems to be the most common technique used to determine the phases of the estrous cycle. It is non-invasive and relatively inexpensive. Although this method requires some measure of skill for microscopic examination of the vaginal secretion cells, it is accurate and reliable. However, this method has also been reported to be tedious and time-consuming [22].

During assessment, the animal and its forepaws are restrained. The tail is elevated to visualize the vagina. The vaginal cells are flushed by gently introducing a little amount (100 μl) of distilled water or saline using a pipette or sterile latex bulb. Phosphate-buffered saline can be an alternative fluid. Slowly release the liquid into the vaginal and draw it back into the tip; this should be repeated about 4 to 5 times in the same sterile latex bulb. It is essential to ensure that the pipette or sterile latex bulb is placed at the entrance of the vaginal canal and does not penetrate the vaginal orifice. The fluid containing few drops of cell suspension is after that introduced on a glass slide, air-dried and stained accordingly. 0.1% crystal violet stain (0.1 g of crystal violet powder in 100 ml of double distilled water) may be used [4]. Alternative stains are Romanowsky-type stains (such as Modified Wright’s, Wright’s Giemsa) and Toluidine blue O [15]. The slide should then be overlaid with a coverslip and examined under a light microscope immediately at 200 X magnification.

Alternatively, a vaginal swab can be obtained using cotton-tipped swab wetted with ambient temperature physiological saline and introduced into the vagina of the restrained mouse [5]. The swab should be gently turned and rolled against the vaginal wall and then removed. Cells collected are then transferred to a dry glass slide by moving the swab across the slide. The slide is air-dried, stained, and viewed under the microscope [5].

The vaginal secretion is made up of three types of cells. They include leucocytes, cornified epithelial cells and nucleated epithelial cells. Estimation of the phase of estrous cycle is based on the proportion of these cells in the vaginal secretion [4] (Table 3 and Fig. 4).

Table 3 Classification of the phases of oestrous cycle based on the cell types and relative number of these cells in vaginal smears (Cora et al., [8])
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Oestrous cycle wheel

Full size image

Numerous round nucleated cells which are uniform in size and appearance characterize the proestrus phase. They appear in clusters or individually. There are also few anucleated cornified epithelial cells. Some white blood cells may be present in the female in early proestrus (Fig. 5). The estrus phase shows abundant anucleated cornified epithelial cells. The cytoplasm is granular, and the cells are irregular in shape. Also observed are numerous bacteria and occasionally, nucleated epithelial cells (Figs. 6 and 7). At metestrus, a large number of leucocytes and a small number of large, non-granular and anucleated cornified epithelial cells are seen. The formation of corpus luteum which fails to fully luteinize due to lack of progesterone and results in sloughing off of the uterine lining accounts for the cornified epithelial cells and polymorphonuclear leukocytes present in vaginal swabs. Some nucleated epithelial cells may also be present in late metestrus (Figs. 8 and 9). Diestrus shows prominent polymorphonuclear leukocytes and a few epithelial and cornified cells. Leukocytes remain the predominant cell type having removed cellular debris [4, 5, 15] (Fig. 10).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Vaginal smears at proestrus in Sprague-Dawley rats

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Vaginal smears at estrus in mice

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Vaginal smears at estrus in Sprague Dawley rats

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Vaginal smears at metestrus in mice

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Vaginal smears at metestrus in Sprague Dawley rats

Full size image
Fig. 10
figure 10

Vaginal smears at diestrus in mice (a-e) and Sprague Dawley rats (f)

Full size image

Histological examination of the reproductive organs

Although the determination of the phases of the estrous cycle by this technique is very reliable and accurate, it comes with many drawbacks. This technique is invasive and not useful for estrous assessment in life laboratory animals. It is also costly and requires a high measure of skill. Also, it is too tedious and time-consuming. This method is not readily available, hence not feasible particularly in remote areas of the tropical region.

The minimal requirement for estrous cycle evaluation by histology is the complete longitudinal sections of the vagina and cervix, transverse sections of the mid-portion of both uterine horns, and middle sections of both ovaries [6]. The presence of ovarian follicles cannot be used to determine the phase of estrous in rats and mice with short estrous cycles. Follicles are almost always present in the ovaries at all stages. However, the appearance of particular morphologies of corpus luteum can help in staging even though it may not be definitive [25]. The excised organs are fixed with 10% formalin, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and examined microscopically.

Histological appearances of the reproductive organs at various estrous phases are shown in Table 4 and Figs. 11, 12, 13 and 14.

Table 4 Histological features of the rat reproductive tract during different phases of oestrous cycle (Westwood, 2008)
Full size table

Vaginal wall impedance

Although the use of electrical impedance on the vaginal wall to determine the phase of estrous is controversial and is rarely cited in the literature [22], it is seemingly gaining more attention. This method is convenient, readily available, and requires less skill. It is much less amenable to subjective interpretation on the part of the technical operator than the more conventional vaginal smear methodology [22]. However, it is also expensive and not widely accepted, possibly due to its unreliability. This technique rather differentiates estrus from non-estrus animals.

An impedance monitor used for this technique is made up of a meter and vaginal probe (Fig. 15). One person restrains the animal while another person inserts the vaginal probe for about 30 s to take impedance measurements [23] on the display screen of the meter. The probe is made clean with 70% alcohol before each analysis. Alternatively, a simple, cheap, and portable battery-operated electrical meter that measures resistance over a wide range, which is commonly used by electricians can be employed as described by Ramos et al. [22] When using this alternative device, leads fabricated from the internal wiring of a typical inexpensive shielded audio cable should be attached to it, and a male terminal used as a vaginal probe (Fig. 16).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Histology of the rat reproductive organs at proestrus (West wood, 2008)

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

Histology of rat reproductive organs at estrus (West wood, 2008)

Full size image
Fig. 13
figure 13

Histology of the rat reproductive organs at Metestrus (Westwood, 2008)

Full size image
Fig. 14
figure 14

Histology of the rat reproductive organs at diestrus (Westwood, 2008)

Full size image
Fig. 15
figure 15

A standard impedance monitor

Full size image
Fig. 16
figure 16

Male terminal of a standard stereo audiocable used as a resistance-measuring probe (Ramos et al., [20])

Full size image

Animals in estrus have higher vaginal impedance than those in non-estrus phase. Jaramillo et al. [21] revealed that pairing of a female with male animals based on vaginal wall impedance resulted in higher rates of confirmed mating as well as pregnancy when compared to pairing based on the vaginal smear. On the other hand, Singletary et al. [23] observed that rats in estrus phase as determined by vaginal cytology had higher vaginal impedance than those in non-estrus, but vaginal impedance and estrous cycle phase as determined by vaginal cytology did not correlate. Most authors who documented the use of vaginal wall impedance verified their findings with vaginal cytology; hence, no benchmark value has been reported to indicate whether or not an animal is in estrus.

Urine biochemistry

Although this method of estrous assessment is yet to gain popularity and universal acceptance, it is a useful tool. This technique is simple, relatively cheap and not tedious. Since the levels of urine carbohydrates, proteins and fatty acids are usually in response to oestradiol and progesterone; this could vary across species and strains. This method is non-specific and unreliable because some animals have consistently high protein levels in their urine, which serve as chemical signals in these animals [24].

During assessment, the experimental animal should be held over a watch glass, and a gentle abdominal massage applied to stimulate micturition. The urine sample is collected and screened through a cheesecloth or nylon mesh (16-120 μm) at the time of collection. Sample should be stored at − 20 °C if not analysed immediately [24]. Urine carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids/fatty acids should be analysed using standard methods.

Urine protein and lipid levels are significantly higher in proestrus and estrus phases. The concentration of fatty acids in the urine is also very higher in estrus. Urine carbohydrate level is similar throughout the estrous cycle [24]. Like the vaginal wall impedance, there is no report of standard values for urine biochemical at each phase of the estrous cycle for commonly used laboratory animals.

Induction of estrus

When assessing sexual behaviour, particularly in male animals, or the aphrodisiac potentials of a particular agent/drug, it is essential to bring the female animals to artificial estrus (phase)/heat. This increases their receptivity and readiness to mate the male counterparts. This practice is common in animal husbandry. It is achieved by administering suspension of ethinylestradiol at 100 μg/animal per oral 48 h before pairing with male counterpart and progesterone at 1 mg/animal subcutaneously 6 h before matching [26]. Alternatively, estradiol benzoate at 10 μg/100 g body weight and progesterone at 0.5 mg/100 g body weight are administered subcutaneously 48 h and 4–6 h respectively before pairing [27,28,29] (Table 5). Estrus phase is confirmed commonly by vaginal smear [30]. A combination of visual assessment with vaginal smear can establish estrous. Confirmation of the estrous phase of the induced female animal is by the assessment of its receptivity. This is done by exposing them to a male counterpart (not used for the study) prior to the experiment/test. Female animals with maximum receptivity are allowed to mate.

Table 5 Induction of estrus phase (heat)
Full size table

Conclusions

Summing up, it is worth to know that various techniques can determine the phases of estrous cycles. Careful selection of the method to employ is essential. Vaginal smear/cytology remains the gold standard in life animals upon which other methods are verified. Although histological examinations of reproductive organs are as specific and reliable as vaginal smear/cytology, it is not useful in live animals. Improvement of the available techniques to enhance their reliability and specificity is pertinent. Studies to achieve benchmark values for vaginal wall impedance and urine biochemical parameters at different phases of estrous in commonly used experimental animals is also essential.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Achiraman S, Archunan G, SankarGanesh D, Rajagopal T, Rengarajan RL, Kokilavani P, Kamalakkannan S, Kannan S. Biochemical analysis of female mice urine with reference to endocrine function: a key tool for estrus detection. Zool Sci. 2011;28:600–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amin KMY, Khan MN, Rahman SZ, Khan NA. Sexual function improving effect of Mucuna pruriens in sexually normal male rats. Fitoterapia. 1996;67(1):53–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews WW, Ojeda SR. A detailed analysis of the serum LH secretory profiles of conscious free-moving female rats during the time of puberty. Endocrinology. 1981;109:2032–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Auta T, Hassan AT. Alteration in oestrus cycle and implantation in Mus musculus administered aqueous wood ash extract of Azadirachta indica (neem). Asian Pacific J Reproduction. 2016;5(3):188–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barret KE, Barman SM, Boitano S, Brooks HL. Reproductive development and function of the female reproductive system. In: Ganong’s review of medical physiology. 24th edition, McGraw Hill Education.

  6. Byers SL, Wiles MV, Dunn SL, Taft RA. Mouse estrous cycle identification tool and images. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Champlin AK, Dorr DL, Gates AH. Determining the stage of the estrous cycle in the mouse by the appearance of the vagina. Biol Reprod. 1973;8(4):491–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cora MC, Kooistra L, Travlos G. Vaginal cytology of the laboratory rat and mouse: review and criteria for the staging of the estrous cycle using stained vaginal smears. Toxicol Pathol. 2015;43:776–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ekambaram G, SKS K, Joseph LD. Comparative Study on the Estimation of Estrous Cycle in Mice by Visual and Vaginal Lavage Method. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(1):AC05–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foitzik T, Hotz HG, Eibl G, Buhr HJ. Experimental models of acute pancreatitis: are they suitable for evaluating therapy? Int J Color Dis. 2000;15:127–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman ME. The neuroendocrine control of the ovarian cycle of the rat. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. The physiology of Reproduction. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heape W. The “sexual season” of mammals and the relation of the “pro-oestrum” to menstruation. Q J Microsc Sci. 1990;44:1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jaramillo LM, Balcazar IB, Duran C. Using vaginal wall impedance to determine estrous cycle phase in Lewis rats. Lab Animal. 2012;41:122–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcondes FK, Bianchi FJ, Tanno AP. Determination of the estrous cycle phases of rats: some helpful considerations. Braz J Biol. 2002;62(4A):609–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McLean AC, Valenzuela N, Fai S, Bennet SA. Performing vaginal lavage, crystal violet staining, and vaginal cytological evaluation or mouse estrous cycle staging identification. J Vis Exp. 2012;15(67):e4389.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merwid-LadA TM, Ksiadzyna D, Sozanski T, Szelag A. Animal models for the gastrointestinal motility evaluation. Gastroenterologia Polska. 2009;16(3):201–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson JF, Felico LS, Randall PK, Sims C, Finch CE. A longitudinal study of oestrous cyclicity in aging C57BL/6J mice. I cycle frequency, length and vaginal cytology. Biol Reprod. 1982;27:327–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. OECD. Guidance or genetic document histological evaluation of endocrine and reproductive tests in rodents. Preparation, reading and reporting of vaginal smears; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paccola CC, Resende CG, Stumpp T, Miraglia SM, Cipriano I. The rat estrous cycle revisited: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Anim Reprod. 2013;10(4):677–83.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramos SD, Lee JM, Peuler JD. An inexpensive meter to measure differences in electrical resistance in the rat vagina during the ovarian cycle. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:667–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez I, Araki K, Khatib K, Martinou JC, Vassali P. Vaginal opening in an apoptosis-dependant process which can be prevented by the overexpression of Bcl2. Dev Biol. 1997;184:115–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahoo HB, Nandy S, Senapati AK, Sarangi SP, Sahoo SK. Aphrodisiac activity of polyherbal formulation in experimental models on male rats. Pharm Res. 2014;6:120–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Singh R, Ali A, Jeyabalan G, Jaikishan AS. An overview of the current methodologies used for evaluation of aphrodisiac agents. J Acute Disease. 2013;2(2):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-6189(13)60105-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singletary SJ, Kirsch AJ, Watson J, Karim BO, Huso DL, Hurn PD, Murphy SJ. Lack of Correlation of Vaginal Impedance Measurements with Hormone Levels in the Rat. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2005;44(6):37–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stockard CR, Papanicolaou GN. The existence of a typical oestrous cycle in the Guinea pig with a study of its histological and physiological changes. Am J Anat. 1917;22:225–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang X, Olatunji OJ, Zhou Y, Hou X. In vitro and in vivo aphrodisiac properties of the seed extract from Allium tuberosum on corpus cavernosum smooth muscle relaxation and sexual behavior parameters in male Wistar rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;17:510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Urbanski HF, Ojeda SR. The juvenile-peripubertal transition period in the female rat: Establishment of a diurnal pattern of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion. Endocrinology. 1985;117:644–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vilos GA. After office hours: the history of the Papanicolaou smear and the odyssey of George and Andromache Papanicolaou. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:479–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Westwood FR. The female rat reproductive cycle: a practical histological guide to staging. Toxicol Pathol. 2008;36:375–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yuan Y, Foley GL. Female reproductive system. In: Haschek WM, Rousseaux CG, Wallig MS, editors. Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology 2002, vol. 2. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press. p. 847–94.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology, College of Medicinek, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Oyo, Nigeria

    Ayodeji Folorunsho Ajayi & Roland Eghoghosoa Akhigbe

Authors
  1. Ayodeji Folorunsho Ajayi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roland Eghoghosoa Akhigbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AFA and REA conceptualized the review study. REA did the first draft. AFA reviewed the first draft. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Eghoghosoa Akhigbe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to the publication of this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ajayi, A.F., Akhigbe, R.E. Staging of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus in experimental rodents: an update. Fertil Res and Pract 6, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00074-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00074-3

Keywords

Fertility Research and Practice

ISSN: 2054-7099

Contact us