[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Lipid accumulation product and type 2 diabetes risk: a population-based study

Abstract

Background

The Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP) is a measure that indicates excessive fat accumulation in the body. LAP has been the focus of research in epidemiological studies aimed at forecasting chronic and metabolic diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LAP and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among adults in western Iran.

Methods

The study involved 9,065 adults who participated in the initial phase of the Ravansar non-communicable diseases study (RaNCD) cohort. To investigate the association between LAP and T2DM, multiple logistic regressions were employed. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate LAP’s predictive ability concerning T2DM.

Results

The participants had an average age of 47.24 ± 8.27 years, comprising 49.30% men and 50.70% women. The mean LAP was 53.10 ± 36.60 for the healthy group and 75.51 ± 51.34 for the diabetic group (P < 0.001). The multiple regression analysis revealed that the odds of T2DM in the second quartile of LAP were 1.69 (95% CI: 1.25, 2.29) times greater than in the first quartile. Furthermore, the odds in the third and fourth quartiles were 2.67 (95% CI: 2.01, 3.55) and 3.73 (95% CI: 2.83, 4.92) times higher, respectively. The ROC analysis for predicting T2DM showed that the LAP index had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.68).

Conclusion

A strong association was identified between elevated LAP levels and T2DM in the adult population of western Iran. LAP is recommended as a potential tool for screening diabetes susceptibility.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) states that non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the main cause of global mortality [1]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a significant NCD, contributing to 2.74% of all deaths worldwide. In Iran, T2DM is linked to 3% of total fatalities [2]. The age-standardized mortality rate for T2DM in Iran has been consistently rising since 2015 and is projected to increase slightly by 2030 [3]. Diabetes is a chronic condition that may lead to microvascular and microvascular complications, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetic nephropathy. Additionally, T2DM can cause disability and reduce quality of life [4]. Early stages of T2DM often present no specific symptoms, making it easily overlooked [5].

Early diagnosis of T2DM is crucial as it allows for timely intervention, which can help reduce or prevent complications related to diabetes. This can ultimately lessen the burden of the disease for individuals and healthcare systems [5]. Obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, is a significant risk factor for T2DM, resulting from fat accumulation in the central body area [6,7,8]. Metabolic disorders in adipose tissue directly impact lipid and glucose balance [9]. It is proposed that T2DM may stem from complex metabolic disturbances caused by excessive abnormal lipid or liver fat accumulation [10,11,12]. Additionally, research shows that waist circumference (WC), a common measure of abdominal obesity, and elevated triglyceride (TG) levels are linked to a higher risk of developing T2DM [13,14,15,16].

New indicators that combine anthropometric measurements with blood lipid levels and liver enzyme values have been developed for the early detection of metabolic disorders. These indicators are simple, cost-effective, and suitable for large population studies [17,18,19]. One such indicator is the lipid accumulation product (LAP) index, which assesses visceral fat by combining WC and TG levels. Research in various populations indicates that the LAP index is a reliable predictor of chronic conditions like metabolic syndrome, CVD, hypertension, and T2DM [20,21,22,23].

However, there has not been a comprehensive study in Iran to evaluate LAP’s effectiveness in predicting T2DM. If LAP proves to be a good predictor in Iranian populations, it could serve as a simple and accurate tool for T2DM screening. Establishing an appropriate cut-off point for LAP in this population could significantly aid in the early diagnosis of diabetes, allowing for timely preventive and control strategies. Given the high prevalence of obesity (27%) and overweight (42%) in the studied population, this research is particularly important. Thus, the present study aims to investigate the association between LAP and T2DM in a large adult population in western Iran.

Methods

Study design and participants

The current study is a cross-sectional analysis based on data from the baseline phase of the Ravansar non-communicable diseases (RaNCD) cohort study [24], which is part of the PERSIAN (Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran) studies [25]. Pregnant women and cancer patients were excluded due to significant physical and physiological changes, such as weight gain, hormonal fluctuations, and lifestyle alterations. To minimize potential biases, any missing data was removed before analysis. Individuals with liver conditions were also excluded, as they might affect triglyceride synthesis. Ultimately, the study included 9,065 participants (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study participants

Data collection and measurements

All data was gathered at the RaNCD cohort center in accordance with the standard protocol of Persian studies [24]. The socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed through principal component analysis (PCA), considering factors like education level, welfare facilities and wealth [26].

Anthropometric indices were measured using a Bio-Impedance Analyzer BIA (Inbody 770, Inbody Co, Seoul, Korea). In addition, WC was measured using a flexible measuring tape at a point midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest, with measurements recorded to the nearest 0.5 cm. The study evaluated various biomarkers from fasting blood samples, including glucose, liver enzymes, and lipid profile.

Diabetic patients in the study were considered as individuals with a Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS) level of 126 mg/dL and/or a history of using medication to manage T2DM [24]. The LAP was calculated using the following formula: [waist circumference (cm) – 65] × Triglyceride concentration (mmol/L) for men, and [waist circumference (cm) – 58] × Triglyceride concentration (mmol/L) for women [27]. Additionally, participants’ blood pressure and physical activity levels were assessed according to the RaNCD study protocol [24, 28].

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis for the study was conducted using Stata version 14.2 software (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). Descriptive statistics were presented with quantitative variables reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables as frequency (percentage). To compare the basic characteristics between diabetic and non-diabetic groups, T-tests and Chi-square tests were utilized. One-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests were employed to analyze participant characteristics across different quartiles of the LAP.

Binary logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between T2DM and quartiles of LAP. The multiple model incorporated adjustments for age, family history of T2DM, Body Mass Index (BMI), physical activity, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and SES variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive ability of LAP, WC, and TG for T2DM, using the area under the curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval. The ROC curves illustrate the overall diagnostic ability of a test across its entire range of values. The AUC is a measure of the diagnostic power of a test, and it is a widely used metric to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a test or model. The AUC serves as an indicator of a test’s diagnostic effectiveness and is a commonly used measure for evaluating diagnostic performance. It ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values signifying better discriminatory ability. An AUC below 0.60 is deemed to indicate poor diagnostic performance [29, 30]. All p-values reported below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 9,065 participants, comprising 49.30% men and 50.70% women, with an average age of 47.24 ± 8.27 years, were included in the study. Among these participants, 7.82% had T2DM, 11.97% were smokers, and 5.02% reported consuming alcohol. Anthropometric indices, such as BMI, WC, and visceral fat area (VFA), were significantly higher in diabetic individuals (p < 0.001). Additionally, liver enzymes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly higher in diabetic subjects (p < 0.001). Except for LDL, all lipid profile indices were significantly different between the two diabetic and non-diabetic groups (p < 0.001). The average LAP was 53.10 ± 36.60 in the healthy group and 75.51 ± 51.34 in the diabetic group (p < 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants this study, (n = 9,065)

The results indicated that with increasing LAP quartiles, there was a significant increase in the mean BMI, rising from 23.63 ± 3.48 in the first quartile to 30.17 ± 4.31 in the fourth quartile (p-trend < 0.001). Similarly, WC, TG, LDL and total cholesterol levels also increased across the LAP quartiles (p-trend < 0.001). The average FBS in the fourth quartile of LAP was significantly higher compared to the first quartile (89.80 ± 24.20 vs. 103.85 ± 34.78, p-trend < 0.001). Across the quartiles of LAP, vigorous physical activity has decreased and low physical activity has increased. Additionally, the study reported that liver enzymes were significantly higher in the participants belonging to the fourth quartile of the LAP compared to the first quartile (p < 0.001).

The crude model revealed that the odds of developing T2DM were 1.9 times higher in the second quartile of LAP, 3.20 times higher in the third quartile, and 4.77 times higher in the fourth quartile, compared to the first quartile (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex and history of diabetes in first-degree relatives, the odds of diabetes were 1.78 (95%CI: 1.32, 2.40) times higher in the second quartile of LAP, 2.90 (95% CI: 2.19, 3.85) times higher in the third quartile, and 4.17 (95% CI: (3.18, 5.49) times higher in the fourth quartile compared to the first quartile. The multiple regression model showed that, the odds of T2DM were 1.69 (95% CI: 1.25, 2.29) times higher in the second quartile of LAP compared to the first quartile. Additionally, the odds of T2DM were 2.67 (95% CI: 2.01, 3.55) times higher in the third quartile, and 3.73 (95% CI: 2.83, 4.92) times higher in the fourth quartile, compared to the first quartile (Table 2).

Table 2 Association of lipid accumulation product and type 2 diabetes mellitus by logistic regression analysis

The ROC curve in Fig. 2 illustrates the predictive performance of the LAP, TG, and WC for the diagnosis of T2DM in the study population. The results of the ROC analysis for predicting T2DM indicated that the LAP has a higher predictive power, with an AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.68) compared to TG (AUC: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.66) and WC (AUC:0.60, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.62). These findings, summarized in Table 3, indicate that LAP has superior diagnostic value for predicting T2DM compared to TG and WC in the studied population.

Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve analysis of lipid accumulation product and its components for predicting of type 2 diabetes mellitus risk

Table 3 ROC curve analysis of lipid accumulation product and its components for predicting of type 2 diabetes mellitus risk

Discussion

This population-based study found that higher levels of the LAP were significantly associated with increased odds of T2DM among adults in western Iran. Specifically, individuals in the second, third, and fourth LAP quartiles had 1.60, 2.43-, and 3.36-times higher odds of T2DM, respectively, compared to those in the first quartile.

The positive association between LAP and T2DM has been observed in various demographic and ethnic subgroups. For instance, in the Japanese population, high LAP levels were found to increase the risk of T2DM by 76% over time [23]. Similar results have been reported in studies involving Chinese adults and middle-aged Koreans [31, 32]. This is consistent with the well-established finding that obesity is a significant risk factor for the development of T2DM [33].

The excessive accumulation of lipids, or liver fat, leads to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and insulin resistance (IR), which are significant contributors to the development and progression of T2DM [11, 12, 34]. Additionally, WC is a more accurate measure than BMI for assessing excess visceral fat, although it does not clearly differentiate between subcutaneous and visceral fat in the abdominal area [34]. Moreover, dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL cholesterol levels are associated with T2DM [35]. The LAP, as a composite index of WC and TG, reflects the state of visceral fat and blood lipids. Research has shown a strong correlation between higher LAP levels and an increased risk of metabolic diseases such as CVD and hypertension [22, 36].

The positive relationship between LAP and diabetes is well-established. In overweight individuals, excessive fat tissue, overeating, and chronic inflammation can lead to IR and disrupt glucose metabolism [37]. IR is a critical stage in the progression of T2DM [38], and chronic inflammation, along with impaired mitochondrial function due to obesity, can exacerbate IR [39,40,41]. Prolonged exposure to fatty acids can diminish insulin secretion, disrupt insulin gene expression, and increase β-cell death [42, 43]. Given the gradual onset of T2DM, early diagnosis and prevention are crucial. With the rising prevalence of T2DM and its serious complications, there is a need for a low-cost, easy-to-calculate index for early identification. Previous studies have indicated that LAP has a higher diagnostic value for predicting T2DM compared to BMI, WC, A Body Shape Index (ABSI), Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), and waist/height ratio (WHtR) [23, 44]. The current study also demonstrates that LAP (AUC = 0.66) outperforms WC (AUC = 0.60) and TG (AUC = 0.64) in predicting T2DM. Additionally, a cross-sectional study of 744 Chinese adults found that LAP had the highest predictive power for early T2DM, with an AUC of 0.742 [45].

Furthermore, LAP has been identified as a useful indicator for predicting metabolic diseases like hypertension and CVD [21, 22]. These findings suggest that LAP is a more accurate and comprehensive index for predicting T2DM compared to other commonly used indicators, such as WC and TG, in the studied populations.

The study had several limitations. Firstly, it was a cross-sectional analysis, meaning that the observed relationships cannot be assumed to be causal. However, causal relationships have been noted in longitudinal studies conducted in other population groups. Secondly, the study focused on adults in western Iran, so caution is advised when generalizing the results to other populations. It is recommended that similar studies be conducted in diverse population subgroups. Additionally, the study did not measure HbA1c levels or oral glucose tolerance test variables, which could provide further insights. However, a significant advantage of this study is its large sample size. Furthermore, the comprehensive collection of lifestyles, anthropometric, and biochemical variables, along with the adjustment for numerous confounding factors, strengthens the findings.

Conclusion

The study found a significant increase in the risk of T2DM with rising LAP levels in the adult population of western Iran. According to the ROC curve analysis, LAP was identified as an accessible and cost-effective tool for screening diabetes in adults, with a higher predictive value compared to triglyceride levels and obesity.

The key takeaway is that the LAP index shows promise as a useful screening and monitoring tool for T2DM, potentially outperforming traditional markers like TG levels and obesity. Further research in diverse populations is recommended to validate these findings.

Data availability

The data analyzed in the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

LAP:

Lipid Accumulation Product

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

RaNCD:

Ravansar non-communicable diseases study

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

WHO:

World Health Organization

NCDs:

Non-communicable diseases

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

WC:

Waist circumference

PERSIAN:

Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran

SES:

Socioeconomic status

BMI:

Body mass index

VFA:

Visceral fat area

FBS:

Fasting blood sugar

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

GGT:

Gamma-glutamyl transferase

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

TG:

Triglyceride

TC:

Total cholesterol

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

ABSI:

A Body Shape Index

VAI:

Visceral adiposity index

WHtR:

Waist/height ratio

References

  1. Budreviciute A, et al. Management and prevention strategies for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. Front Public Health. 2020;8:788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). GBD Compare Seattle, WA: IHME,University of Washington2015 [https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/

  3. Khosravi Shadmani F, Farzadfar F, Larijani B, Mirzaei M, Haghdoost AA. Trend and projection of mortality rate due to non-communicable diseases in Iran: a modeling study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0211622.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Valencia WM, Florez H. How to prevent the microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes beyond glucose control. BMJ 356 (2017).

  5. Gong Q, et al. Morbidity and mortality after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance: 30-year results of the Da Qing diabetes Prevention Outcome Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:452–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Klein S, et al. Weight management through lifestyle modification for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: rationale and strategies. A statement of the American Diabetes Association, the North American Association for the Study of Obesity, and the American Society for Clinical Nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:257–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang F-L et al. Strong Association of waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) with diabetes: A population-based cross-sectional study in Jilin province, China. Journal of diabetes research 2021 (2021).

  8. Wei J, Liu X, Xue H, Wang Y, Shi Z. Comparisons of visceral adiposity index, body shape index, body mass index and waist circumference and their associations with diabetes mellitus in adults. Nutrients. 2019;11:1580.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guilherme A, Virbasius JV, Puri V, Czech MP. Adipocyte dysfunctions linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:367–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahn HS, Cheng YJ, Thompson TJ, Imperatore G, Gregg EW. Two risk-scoring systems for predicting incident diabetes mellitus in US adults age 45 to 64 years. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:741–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sattar N, Wannamethee S, Forouhi N. Novel biochemical risk factors for type 2 diabetes: pathogenic insights or prediction possibilities? Diabetologia. 2008;51:926–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Unger RH. Reinventing type 2 diabetes: pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention. JAMA. 2008;299:1185–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cassano PA, Rosner B, Vokonas PS, Weiss ST. Obesity and body fat distribution in relation to the incidence of non-lnsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of men in the normative aging study. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136:1474–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schulze MB, et al. Comparison of anthropometric characteristics in predicting the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the EPIC-Potsdam study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1921–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang W, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1090–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Reviews Endocrinol. 2018;14:88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cai X et al. Hepatic Steatosis Index and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: Insights from a General Population-Based Cohort Study. Disease markers 2022, 3150380 (2022).

  18. Cai X-T et al. Associations between the metabolic score for insulin resistance index and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-obese adults: insights from a population-based cohort study. Int J Gen Med, 7729–40 (2021).

  19. Hamzeh B, et al. Visceral adiposity index and atherogenic index of plasma as useful predictors of risk of cardiovascular diseases: evidence from a cohort study in Iran. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ray L, Ravichandran K, Nanda SK. Comparison of lipid accumulation product index with body mass index and waist circumference as a predictor of metabolic syndrome in Indian population. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2018;16:240–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Muheiyati G, Mei Y, Tao N. Association of lipid accumulation product and visceral adiposity index with the risk of hypertension among oil workers in Xinjiang, China. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vieira JN, et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment using the lipid accumulation product index among primary healthcare users: a cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2019;137:126–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu T, et al. Relationship between lipid accumulation product and new-onset diabetes in the Japanese population: a retrospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1181941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pasdar Y, et al. Cohort profile: Ravansar Non-communicable Disease cohort study: the first cohort study in a kurdish population. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48:682–f683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Poustchi H, et al. Prospective epidemiological research studies in Iran (the PERSIAN Cohort Study): rationale, objectives, and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187:647–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Najafi F, et al. Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in dental caries in Iran: cross-sectional results from the PERSIAN cohort study. Archives Public Health. 2020;78:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ching YK, Chin YS, Appukutty M, Gan WY, Chan YM. Comparisons of conventional and novel anthropometric obesity indices to predict metabolic syndrome among vegetarians in Malaysia. Sci Rep. 2020;10:20861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chobanian AV. National heart, lung, and blood institute joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure; national high blood pressure education program coordinating committee. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Glaser AN. High-yield biostatistics, epidemiology, and public health. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

  30. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yan G, et al. Association of lipid accumulation product trajectories with 5-year incidence of type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults: a cohort study. Nutr Metabolism. 2019;16:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee J-W, Lim N-K, Park H-Y. The product of fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides improves risk prediction of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged koreans. BMC Endocr Disorders. 2018;18:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rohm TV, Meier DT, Olefsky JM, Donath MY. Inflammation in obesity, diabetes, and related disorders. Immunity. 2022;55:31–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kang PS, Neeland IJ. Body Fat distribution, diabetes Mellitus, and Cardiovascular Disease: an update. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023;25:1555–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kane JP, Pullinger CR, Goldfine ID, Malloy MJ. Dyslipidemia and Diabetes Mellitus: role of lipoprotein species and interrelated pathways of lipid metabolism in diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2021;61:21–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Song J, et al. The effect of lipid accumulation product and its interaction with other factors on hypertension risk in Chinese Han population: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0198105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu J, Zhao J, Meng H, Zhang X. Adipose tissue-resident immune cells in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hanson P, Weickert MO, Barber TM. Obesity: novel and unusual predisposing factors. Therapeutic Adv Endocrinol Metabolism. 2020;11:2042018820922018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Di Meo S, Iossa S, Venditti P. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance: role of mitochondria and other ROS sources. J Endocrinol. 2017;233:R15–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim O-K, Jun W, Lee J. Mechanism of ER stress and inflammation for hepatic insulin resistance in obesity. Annals Nutr Metabolism. 2015;67:218–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shoelson SE, Herrero L, Naaz A. Obesity, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2169–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jacqueminet S, Briaud I, Rouault C, Reach G, Poitout V. Inhibition of insulin gene expression by long-term exposure of pancreatic β cells to palmitate is dependent on the presence of a stimulatory glucose concentration. Metabolism. 2000;49:532–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Maedler K, et al. Distinct effects of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids on β-cell turnover and function. Diabetes. 2001;50:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang SH, Yoon J, Lee Y-J, Park B, Jung D-H. Lipid accumulation product index predicts new-onset type 2 diabetes among non-obese koreans: a 12-year longitudinal study. Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome Obesity: Targets Therapy, 3729–37 (2022).

  45. Lin C-Y, et al. Comparison of lipid accumulation product and visceral adiposity index with traditional obesity indices in early-onset type 2 diabetes prediction: a cross-sectional study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023;15:111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the PERSIAN cohort Study collaborators and of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.

Funding

This research was supported by Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (grant number: 92472). The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education has also contributed to the funding used in the PERSIAN Cohort through Grant no 700/534.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Authors’ contributionsSS and AA conceived the idea of the study. FN developed the statistical analysis plan and conducted statistical analyses. YP, SS and AA contributed to the interpretation of the results. SS and AA drafted the original manuscript. AA, YP and FN supervised the conduct of this study. All authors reviewed the manuscript draft and revised it critically on intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Azizi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (KUMS.REC.1394.318). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All the participants were provided oral and written informed consent. This study was conducted by the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadafi, S., Azizi, A., Najafi, F. et al. Lipid accumulation product and type 2 diabetes risk: a population-based study. BMC Endocr Disord 24, 147 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01682-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01682-6

Keywords