[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

WebQuilt: A proxy-based approach to remote web usability testing

Published: 01 July 2001 Publication History

Abstract

WebQuilt is a web logging and visualization system that helps web design teams run usability tests (both local and remote) and analyze the collected data. Logging is done through a proxy, overcoming many of the problems with server-side and client-side logging. Captured usage traces can be aggregated and visualized in a zooming interface that shows the web pages people viewed. The visualization also shows the most common paths taken through the web site for a given task, as well as the optimal path for that task, as designated by the designer. This paper discusses the architecture of WebQuilt and describes how it can be extended for new kinds of analyses and visualizations.

References

[1]
BEDERSON,B.AND HOLLAN, J. 1994. Pad CC : A Zooming Graphical Interface for Exploring Alternative Interface Physics. In ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology: UIST '94. Marina del Rey, CA, November. 17-26.
[2]
BEYER,H.AND HOLTZBLATT, K. 1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
[3]
CHI, E., ET AL. 1998. Visualizing the Evolution of Web Ecologies. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 400-407.
[4]
CHOO,C.W.,DETLOR,B.,AND TURNBULL, D. 1998. A Behavioral Model of Information Seeking on the Web-Preliminary Results of a Study of How Managers and IT Specialists Use the Web. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting, 35, 290-302.
[5]
CUGINI,J.AND SCHOLTZ, J. 1999. VISVIP: 3D Visualization of Paths through Web Sites. In International Workshop on Web-Based Information Visualization (WebVis'99). Florence, Italy. 259-263.
[6]
DAVISON, B. 1999. Web Traffic Logs: An Imperfect Resource for Evaluation. In Ninth Annual Conference of the Internet Society (INET'99). San Jose, CA, June.
[7]
EDMONDS, A. 2001. http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucidity/.
[8]
Ergosoft Laboratories. 2001. ErgoBrowser. http://www.ergolabs.com/ergoBrowser/ergoBrowser. htm.
[9]
ETGEN,M.AND CANTOR, J. 1999. What Does Getting WET (Web Event-Logging Tool) Mean for Web Usability? In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Human Factors and the Web. Gaithersburg, MD, June.
[10]
GOULD,J.AND LEWIS, C. 1985. Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think. In Communications of the ACM, 28, 3, 300-311.
[11]
GUZDIAL, M., ET AL. 1994. Analyzing and visualizing event log files: A computational science of usability. Presented at Human Computer Interaction Consortium Workshop. Winter Park, CO, February.
[12]
HELFRICH,B.AND LANDAY, J. A. 1999. QUIP: Quantitative User Interface Profiling, http:// home.earthlink.net/>>bhelfrich/quip/.
[13]
HOCHHEISER,H.AND SHNEIDERMAN, B. 1999. Understanding Patterns of User Visits to Web Sites: Interactive Starfield Visualizations of WWW Log Data. Technical Report ncstrl.umcp/CS-TR-3989, University of Maryland. College Park, MD, February.
[14]
MYERS,B.A.AND ROSSON, M. B. 1992. Survey on User Interface Programming. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Monterey, CA, May. 195-202.
[15]
NetrakerCorporation. 2001. NetRaker Suite. http://netraker.com.
[16]
NIELSEN,J.AND LANDAUER, T. 1993. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In ACM INTERCHI'93. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April. 206-213.
[17]
NIST. 1999. WebVIP. http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/webmet/vip/webvip-process.html.
[18]
NORMAN, D. A. 1990. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, NY.
[19]
PITKOW,J.E.AND BHARAT, K. 1994. WebViz: A Tool for World-Wide Web Access Log Analysis. In First International Conference on the World-Wide Web. Geneva, Switzerland, May. 271-277.
[20]
PITKOW,J.E.AND PIROLLI, P. 1999. Mining Longest Repeated Subsequences to Predict World Wide Web Surfing. In Second USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems. Boulder, CO, October.
[21]
RUBIN, J. 1994. Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
[22]
SPOOL,J.M.,ET AL. 1998. Web Site Usability: A Designer's Guide. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
[23]
SPOOL,J.AND SCHROEDER, W. 2001. Testing Web Sites: Five Users is Nowhere Near Enough. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts. Seattle, WA, April.
[24]
Sun Microsystems. 2001. Java Secure Socket Extension. http://java.sun.com/products/jsse/index. html.
[25]
TAUSCHER, L. M. 1999. Evaluating History Mechanisms: An Empirical Study of Reuse Patterns in WWW Navigation. MS Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
[26]
TEDESCHI, B. 1999. Good Web Site Design Can Lead to Healthy Sales, http://www.nytimes.com/ library/tech/99/08/cyber/commerce/30commerce.html.
[27]
TSCHALAR, R. 2000. HTTPClient V0.3-2. http://www.innovation.ch/java/HTTPClient/index.htm.
[28]
VIRZI, R. A. 1992. Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough? Human Factors, 34, 4, 457-468.
[29]
VisualInsights. 2001. eBizinsights. http://www.visualinsights.com.
[30]
Vividence. 2000a. Vividence Browser. http://www.vividence.com/resources/public/solutions/demo/ demo-print.htm.
[31]
Vividence. 2000b. Vividence Clickstreams. http://www.vividence.com/resources/public/solutions/ demo/demo-print.htm.
[32]
WEXELBLAT,A.AND MAES, P. 1999. Footprints: History-Rich Tools for Information Foraging. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Pittsburgh, PA, May, 270-277.
[33]
ZonaResearch. 1999. Shop Until You Drop? A Glimpse into Internet Shopping Success. http:// www.zonaresearch.com/promotios/samples/zaps/Zap06.htm.
[34]
Zoomerang. 2001. http://www.zoomerang.com.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Asynchronous Remote Usability Tests Using Web-Based Tools Versus Laboratory Usability Tests: An Experimental StudyIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems10.1109/THMS.2023.328222553:4(731-742)Online publication date: Aug-2023
  • (2022)Web Usage Mining—Process, Tools and PracticesRecent Innovations in Computing10.1007/978-981-16-8248-3_37(449-457)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2022
  • (2021)A Technical Framework for Investigating the Impact of Design Elements in the Wild: Using Instagram as an ExampleProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202110.1145/3473856.3473987(490-493)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

James H. Bradford

Web browsing has become a significant activity throughout the developed world. It is an activity that underpins modern e-commerce, as well as facilitating access to the vast store of communal knowledge held in the World Wide Web. Research into the human factors of browsing behavior is important because Web browsing itself is important. This paper introduces an interesting new tool for the usability testing of Web pages. The authors point out that traditional transaction logging for user Web browsing behavior is either server-based or client-based. Both approaches have their drawbacks. The authors introduce a variation of the server-side technique that uses a proxy server to get around some of the traditional problems with server-side logging. This tool, called WebQuilt, represents a novel—and potentially very useful—approach to data collection. Much of the rest of the paper describes the implementation of the WebQuilt tool, in sufficient detail to guide other researchers in the development of their own proxy server monitoring tools. The paper concludes with a detailed discussion of action inferencing and visualization techniques that will be valuable to researchers in this area, no matter what data collection procedure is used. In summary, this is a good piece of applied research, which sets the groundwork for further experiments in an important area of human factors study. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 19, Issue 3
July 2001
119 pages
ISSN:1046-8188
EISSN:1558-2868
DOI:10.1145/502115
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2001
Published in TOIS Volume 19, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Usability evalution
  2. WebQuilt
  3. log file analysis
  4. web proxy
  5. web visualization

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Asynchronous Remote Usability Tests Using Web-Based Tools Versus Laboratory Usability Tests: An Experimental StudyIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems10.1109/THMS.2023.328222553:4(731-742)Online publication date: Aug-2023
  • (2022)Web Usage Mining—Process, Tools and PracticesRecent Innovations in Computing10.1007/978-981-16-8248-3_37(449-457)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2022
  • (2021)A Technical Framework for Investigating the Impact of Design Elements in the Wild: Using Instagram as an ExampleProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202110.1145/3473856.3473987(490-493)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2021
  • (2021)Intelligent monitor for typhoon in IoT system of smart cityThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-020-03381-077:3(3024-3043)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Usability Study of a Public Culture Website for Improvement: A Case of Guangzhou Museum of ArtDesign, User Experience, and Usability: Design for Contemporary Technological Environments10.1007/978-3-030-78227-6_40(563-583)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
  • (2019)ARAPID: Towards Integrating Crowdsourced Playtesting into the Game Development EnvironmentProceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3311350.3347163(121-133)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2019
  • (2019)Tools for Web Accessibility EvaluationWeb Accessibility10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_26(479-503)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2019
  • (2018)Multi-Agent-Based Information Retrieval System Using Information Scent in Query Log Mining for Effective Web SearchInformation Retrieval and Management10.4018/978-1-5225-5191-1.ch012(266-291)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2018)Inclusive Web Empirical Studies in Remote and In-Situ Settings: A User Evaluation of the RemoTest PlatformInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2018.1473941(1-16)Online publication date: 23-May-2018
  • (2018)A Taxonomy for Website Evaluation Tools Grounded on Semiotic FrameworkUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Methods, Technologies, and Users10.1007/978-3-319-92049-8_3(38-49)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media