[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3501712.3529727acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Designing Interactive Contextual Cues for Children’s Video-Stimulated Writing

Published: 27 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Supporting children’s writing activities is a primary concern in elementary-school grades. Using embodied means such as visual stimuli through pictures or motion pictures has been shown effective in supporting children’s writing. To guide children during the writing activity, contextual cues are usually provided in face-to-face classroom practice with interactive instruction from a teacher. This paper explores the design of an interactive online system for video-scaffolded writing with contextual cues. In our online study with 13 children, we explored two approaches to designing contextual cues: temporally situated and visually situated. Participants were divided into two groups, each using a web-based interface to watch an animated video and write the story guided by one of the cue designs. We analyzed the children’s writing process and outcome in both groups. Our results show that temporally situated cues support a stronger overall story structure, while visually situated cues support more descriptive and interpretive writing.

References

[1]
Hamlet Autman and Stephanie Kelly. 2017. Reexamining the writing apprehension measure. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 80, 4 (2017), 516–529.
[2]
Lindy Bates. 1991. The Effects on the Structure of Young Children’s Written Narrative of Using a Sequence of Pictures or a Single Picture as a Stimulus.Reading 25, 3 (1991), 2–10.
[3]
Sandra Beam and Cheri Williams. 2015. Technology-mediated writing instruction in the early literacy program: Perils, procedures, and possibilities. Computers in the Schools 32, 3-4 (2015), 260–277.
[4]
David Bordwell, Kristin Thompson, and Jeff Smith. 1993. Film art: An introduction. Vol. 7. McGraw-Hill New York.
[5]
Jerome Seymour Bruner 1966. Toward a theory of instruction. Vol. 59. Harvard University Press.
[6]
Tracy KS Chan, Simpson WL Wong, Anita M-Y Wong, and Vina Wing-Hei Leung. 2019. The influence of presentation format of story on narrative production in Chinese children learning English-as-a-second-language: A comparison between graphic novel, illustration book and text. Journal of psycholinguistic research 48, 1 (2019), 221–242.
[7]
Michaela DeBeyer, Sarah Anderson, Tamaira Servant, Kristin Willerton, Alissa Marcinkow, and Sarah Scheffers. 2012. The Effect of Static versus Animated Story Stimuli on Children’s Ability to tell Stories. (2012).
[8]
Judy H Eaton, Glyn M Collis, and Vicky A Lewis. 1999. Evaluative explanations in children’s narratives of a video sequence without dialogue. Journal of Child Language 26, 3 (1999), 699–720.
[9]
Linda Flower and John R Hayes. 1984. Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. Written communication 1, 1 (1984), 120–160.
[10]
John Heilmann, Jon F Miller, Ann Nockerts, and Claudia Dunaway. 2010. Properties of the narrative scoring scheme using narrative retells in young school-age children. (2010).
[11]
CE Holdich and Paul WH Chung. 2003. A ‘computer tutor’to assist children develop their narrative writing skills: Conferencing with HARRY. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, 5 (2003), 631–669.
[12]
Katherine Howland, Judith Good, and Benedict du Boulay. 2008. A game creation tool which supports the development of writing skills: interface design considerations. Narrative and Interactive Learning Environments (NILE 08) (2008), 23–9.
[13]
Kate Howland, Judith Good, and Benedict Du Boulay. 2015. Narrative support for young game designers’ writing. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 178–187.
[14]
Byunghee Jung, Junehwa Song, and Yoonjoon Lee. 2007. A narrative-based abstraction framework for story-oriented video. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 3, 2 (2007), 11–es.
[15]
Kathleen Kopp. 2010. Everyday Content-Area Writing: Write-to-Learn Strategies for Grades 3-5. Maupin House Publishing, Inc.
[16]
Gunther Kress. 2005. Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. Routledge.
[17]
Alex Kuhn, Chris Quintana, and Elliot Soloway. 2009. StoryTime: a new way for children to write. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 218–221.
[18]
Mark Madden, Paul WH Chung, and Christian W Dawson. 2009. Cartoons beyond clipart: A computer tool for storyboarding and storywriting. Computers & Education 52, 1 (2009), 188–200.
[19]
Richard E Mayer. 2005. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 41 (2005), 31–48.
[20]
Richard E Mayer and Roxana Moreno. 2003. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist 38, 1 (2003), 43–52.
[21]
Lisa N Michaud, Kathleen F McCoy, and Christopher A Pennington. 2000. An intelligent tutoring system for deaf learners of written English. In Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies. 92–100.
[22]
Wendy M Pearce. 2003. Does the choice of stimulus affect the complexity of children’s oral narratives?Advances in Speech Language Pathology 5, 2 (2003), 95–103.
[23]
Rod D Roscoe, Laura K Allen, Jennifer L Weston, Scott A Crossley, and Danielle S McNamara. 2014. The Writing Pal intelligent tutoring system: Usability testing and development. Computers and Composition 34 (2014), 39–59.
[24]
Mark Sadoski, William A Kealy, Ernest T Goetz, and Allan Paivio. 1997. Concreteness and imagery effects in the written composition of definitions.Journal of Educational Psychology 89, 3 (1997), 518.
[25]
Marlene Scardamalia and Carl Bereiter. 1987. Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. Advances in applied psycholinguistics 2 (1987), 142–175.
[26]
Phyllis Schneider and Rita Vis Dubé. 2005. Story presentation effects on children’s retell content. (2005).
[27]
MG Serrato. 2016. Watch-Think-Write’and Other Proven Strategies for Using Video in the Classroom.
[28]
Lauren R Shapiro and Judith A Hudson. 1991. Tell me a make-believe story: Coherence and cohesion in young children’s picture-elicited narratives.Developmental psychology 27, 6 (1991), 960.
[29]
Janis Strasser and Holly Seplocha. 2007. Using picture books to support young children’s literacy. Childhood Education 83, 4 (2007), 219–224.
[30]
M Tan, J Randi, B Barbot, C Levenson, LK Friedlaender, and EL Grigorenko. 2012. Seeing, connecting, writing: Developing creativity and narrative writing in children. Writing: A mosaic of new perspectives(2012), 275–291.
[31]
Philip Yenawine. 1997. Thoughts on visual literacy. (1997).
[32]
Niloofar Zarei, Francis Quek, Sharon Lynn Chu, and Sarah Anne Brown. 2021. Towards Designing Enactment-Scaffolded Narrative Authoring Tools for Elementary-School Children. In Interaction Design and Children. 387–395.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IDC '22: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference
June 2022
718 pages
ISBN:9781450391979
DOI:10.1145/3501712
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Human-computer Interaction.
  2. Multimedia learning
  3. Narrative Writing
  4. Storytelling
  5. children

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

IDC '22
Sponsor:
IDC '22: Interaction Design and Children
June 27 - 30, 2022
Braga, Portugal

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 375
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)243
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media