When Materials Meet Sound: Discovering the Meaning of Deformable Materials in Musical Interaction
Pages 312 - 325
Abstract
Research on Digital Musical Instruments (DMIs) design highlights that materiality plays an important role in DMI design and musical interaction. However, DMI design research often focuses on technology-oriented factors, with less exploration of the meaning of materials in design practice. In this paper, we explore how DMI designers understand deformable sensor materials and how they use these as a resource for creative aesthetic design. Eleven DMI designers were invited to use a selection of deformable sensor materials to create prototype DMIs with them in a design activity. Three design approaches emerged, determined by how designers perceived and explored sensor materials. We discuss the potential of the methodology for exploring strongly entangled elements, such as material, gesture, and sound, in DMI design. The results contribute to the design practice for DMI designers and to further exploration of material-based design research in Human-Computer Interaction.
References
[1]
Kristina Andersen, Laura Devendorf, James Pierce, Ron Wakkary, and Daniela K Rosner. 2018. Disruptive improvisations: Making use of non-deterministic art practices in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170630
[2]
Kristina Andersen and Ron Wakkary. 2019. The magic machine workshops: making personal design knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300342
[3]
Abby Aresty and Rachel Gibson. 2021. Crafting Sound: Simple Sonic Interfaces for Education and Creation. In Interaction Design and Children. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 692–694. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3464485
[4]
Derek Bailey. 1975. Improvisation. Ampersand.
[5]
Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2014. “A great and troubling beauty”: cognitive speculation and ubiquitous computing. Personal and ubiquitous computing 18, 4 (2014), 779–794.
[6]
Bela.io. 2016. Frequency Modulation Synthesis. Retrieved September 13, 2022 from https://learn.bela.io/tutorials/pure-data/synthesis/fm-synthesis/
[7]
David M Birnbaum. 2007. Musical vibrotactile feedback. Ph. D. Dissertation. McGill University.
[8]
Mark Blythe, Kristina Andersen, Rachel Clarke, and Peter Wright. 2016. Anti-Solutionist Strategies: Seriously Silly Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4968–4978. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858482
[9]
Alberto Boem and Giovanni Maria Troiano. 2019. Non-Rigid HCI: A Review of Deformable Interfaces and Input. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 885–906. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322347
[10]
Alberto Boem, Giovanni Maria Troiano, Giacomo Lepri, and Victor Zappi. 2020. Non-Rigid Musical Interfaces: Exploring Practices, Takes, and Future Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on New interfaces for musical expression. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4813288
[11]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[12]
Filipe Calegario, Marcelo M Wanderley, Stéphane Huot, Giordano Cabral, and Geber Ramalho. 2017. A method and toolkit for digital musical instruments: generating ideas and prototypes. IEEE MultiMedia 24, 1 (2017), 63–71.
[13]
Sena Çerçi, Marta E. Cecchinato, and John Vines. 2021. How Design Researchers Interpret Probes: Understanding the Critical Intentions of a Designerly Approach to Research. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445328
[14]
Angela Chang and Hiroshi Ishii. 2007. Zstretch: a stretchy fabric music controller. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on New interfaces for musical expression. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 46–49. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1177067
[15]
Tanja Döring. 2016. The interaction material profile: Understanding and inspiring how physical materials shape interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2446–2453. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892516
[16]
Tanja Döring, Axel Sylvester, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2012. Exploring material-centered design concepts for tangible interaction. In CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1523–1528. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223666
[17]
Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press.
[18]
Georg Essl and Sile O’modhrain. 2006. An enactive approach to the design of new tangible musical instruments. Organised sound 11, 3 (2006), 285–296.
[19]
Christopher Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI The Next Wave?ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 1, Article 2 (nov 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364998
[20]
J.W. Frens, J.P. Djajadiningrat, and C.J. Overbeeke. 2003. Form, interaction and function : an exploratorium for interactive products. In Integration of knowledge, kansei, and industrial power : 6th Asian design international conference, Tsukuba, 14-17 October, 2003(Journal of the Asian Design International Conference). Science Council of Japan (SCJ). conference; The 6th Asian Design International Conference (6th ADC), Tsukuba, 14-17 October, 2003 ; Conference date: 14-10-2003 Through 17-10-2003.
[21]
William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653
[22]
Mick Grierson and Chris Kiefer. 2013. NoiseBear: A Wireless Malleable Instrument Designed In Participation with Disabled Children. In New Interfaces For Musical Expression. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1178536
[23]
Sarah-Indriyati Hardjowirogo. 2017. Instrumentality. on the construction of instrumental identity. In Musical instruments in the 21st century. Springer, 9–24.
[24]
Ian Hattwick, Joseph Malloch, and Marcelo Wanderley. 2014. Forming Shapes to Bodies: Design for Manufacturing in the Prosthetic Instruments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Goldsmiths, University of London, London, United Kingdom, 443–448. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1178792
[25]
Sarah Hayes, Trevor Hogan, and Kieran Delaney. 2017. Exploring the Materials of TUIs: A Multi-Method Approach. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3079119
[26]
Amelie Hinrichsen, S Hardjowirogo, D Hildebrand Marques Lopes, and TILL Bovermann. 2014. Pushpull. reflections on building a musical instrument prototype. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Life Interfaces. 196–207.
[27]
Linda Hirsch, Beat Rossmy, and Andreas Butz. 2021. Shaping Concrete for Interaction. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Salzburg, Austria) (TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440625
[28]
Eva Hornecker. 2012. Beyond Affordance: Tangibles’ Hybrid Nature. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (Kingston, Ontario, Canada) (TEI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2148131.2148168
[29]
CCM Hummels and CJ Overbeeke. 2000. Actions speak louder than words: shifting from buttons and icons to aesthetics of interaction. In Design plus Research. Proceedings of the Politechnico di Milano conference. 284–290.
[30]
Tim Ingold. 2010. The textility of making. Cambridge journal of economics 34, 1 (2010), 91–102.
[31]
Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715
[32]
Alexander Refsum Jensenius and Arve Voldsund. 2012. The music ball project: Concept, design, development, performance. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on New interfaces for musical expression. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 300–303. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1180579
[33]
Heekyoung Jung and Erik Stolterman. 2010. Material probe: exploring materiality of digital artifacts. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935731
[34]
Heekyoung Jung and Erik Stolterman. 2011. Form and materiality in interaction design: a new approach to HCI. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979619
[35]
Heekyoung Jung, Heather Wiltse, Mikael Wiberg, and Erik Stolterman. 2017. Metaphors, materialities, and affordances: Hybrid morphologies in the design of interactive artifacts. Design Studies 53 (2017), 24–46.
[36]
Elvin Karana, Bahareh Barati, Valentina Rognoli, Anouk Zeeuw Van Der Laan, 2015. Material driven design (MDD): A method to design for material experiences. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DESIGN 9, 2 (2015), 35–54.
[37]
Chris Kiefer. 2010. A Malleable Interface for Sonic Exploration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Sydney, Australia, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1177823
[38]
Sasha Leitman. 2020. Sound Based Sensors for NIMEs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Romain Michon and Franziska Schroeder (Eds.). Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK, 182–187. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4813309
[39]
Giacomo Lepri and Andrew McPherson. 2019. Making up instruments: Design fiction for value discovery in communities of musical practice. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322353
[40]
An Liang, Rebecca Stewart, and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2019. Analysis of sensitivity, linearity, hysteresis, responsiveness, and fatigue of textile knit stretch sensors. Sensors 19, 16 (2019), 3618.
[41]
Paul Locher, Kees Overbeeke, and Stephan Wensveen. 2010. Aesthetic interaction: A framework. Design Issues 26, 2 (2010), 70–79.
[42]
Martin Marier. 2010. The Sponge A Flexible Interface. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Sydney, Australia, 356–359. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1177839
[43]
Mark Marshall. 2009. Physical interface design for digital musical instruments. Ph. D. Dissertation. McGill University.
[44]
Mark T Marshall and Marcelo M Wanderley. 2006. Vibrotactile feedback in digital musical instruments. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on New interfaces for musical expression. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 226–229. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1176973
[45]
Brigid Mary Costello. 2021. Paying Attention to Rhythm in HCI: Some Thoughts on Methods. In Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Sydney, NSW, Australia) (OzCHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000.3441005
[46]
Andrew McPherson and Giacomo Lepri. 2020. Beholden to our tools: negotiating with technology while sketching digital instruments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Romain Michon and Franziska Schroeder (Eds.). Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK, 434–439. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4813461
[47]
Andrew McPherson and Victor Zappi. 2015. An environment for submillisecond-latency audio and sensor processing on BeagleBone Black. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 138. Audio Engineering Society.
[48]
Carolina Brum Medeiros and Marcelo M Wanderley. 2014. A comprehensive review of sensors and instrumentation methods in devices for musical expression. Sensors 14, 8 (2014), 13556–13591.
[49]
Lia Mice and Andrew McPherson. 2020. From miming to NIMEing: the development of idiomatic gestural language on large scale DMIs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Romain Michon and Franziska Schroeder (Eds.). Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK, 570–575. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4813200
[50]
Lia Mice and Andrew P McPherson. 2022. Super Size Me: Interface Size, Identity and Embodiment in Digital Musical Instrument Design. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517626
[51]
Eduardo Reck Miranda and Marcelo M Wanderley. 2006. New digital musical instruments: control and interaction beyond the keyboard. Vol. 21. AR Editions, Inc.
[52]
Camille Moussette. 2012. Learn to make, make to learn: Reflections from sketching haptics workshops. Design and semantics of form and movement 180 (2012).
[53]
Camille Moussette and Richard Banks. 2010. Designing through Making: Exploring the Simple Haptic Design Space. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Funchal, Portugal) (TEI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 279–282. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935763
[54]
Tom Mudd. 2017. Nonlinear dynamics in musical interactions. Open University (United Kingdom).
[55]
Tom Mudd. 2019. Material-oriented musical interactions. In New Directions in Music and Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 123–133.
[56]
Tom Mudd, Simon Holland, and Paul Mulholland. 2019. Nonlinear dynamical processes in musical interactions: Investigating the role of nonlinear dynamics in supporting surprise and exploration in interactions with digital musical instruments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 128 (2019), 27–40.
[57]
Charlotte Nordmoen, Jack Armitage, Fabio Morreale, Rebecca Stewart, and Andrew McPherson. 2019. Making Sense of Sensors: Discovery Through Craft Practice With an Open-Ended Sensor Material. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322368
[58]
Joseph A Paradiso. 1997. Electronic music: new ways to play. IEEE spectrum 34, 12 (1997), 18–30.
[59]
Hannah Perner-Wilson, Leah Buechley, and Mika Satomi. 2010. Handcrafting Textile Interfaces from a Kit-of-No-Parts. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Funchal, Portugal) (TEI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935715
[60]
Jonathan Pigrem, Andrew Mcpherson, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Robert Jack. 2022. Sound -> Object -> Gesture: Physical Affordances of Virtual Materials. In Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference (St. Pölten, Austria) (AM ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3561212.3561230
[61]
Jon Pigrem and Andrew P. McPherson. 2018. Do We Speak Sensor? Cultural Constraints of Embodied Interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Thomas Martin Luke Dahl, Douglas Bowman (Ed.). Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, 382–385. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302633
[62]
Miller Puckette 1996. Pure Data: another integrated computer music environment. Proceedings of the second intercollege computer music concerts (1996), 37–41.
[63]
Courtney N. Reed, Sophie Skach, Paul Strohmeier, and Andrew P. McPherson. 2022. Singing Knit: Soft Knit Biosensing for Augmenting Vocal Performances. In Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 2022. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1145/3519391.3519412
[64]
Jean P Retzinger. 2008. Speculative visions and imaginary meals: Food and the environment in (post-apocalyptic) science fiction films. Cultural Studies 22, 3-4 (2008), 369–390.
[65]
Erica Robles and Mikael Wiberg. 2010. Texturing the "Material Turn" in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709911
[66]
Mika Satomi and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2007. How to Get What You Want: THE KOBAKANT DIY WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY DOCUMENTATION. Retrieved April 28, 2022 from https://www.kobakant.at/DIY/
[67]
Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (University Park, PA, USA) (DIS ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142422
[68]
Eric Singer. 2003. Sonic Banana: A Novel Bend-Sensor-Based MIDI Controller. In NIME. Citeseer, National University of Singapore, SGP, 220–221.
[69]
Rebecca Stewart, Sophie Skach, and Astrid Bin. 2018. Making Grooves with Needles: Using e-Textiles to Encourage Gender Diversity in Embedded Audio Systems Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196716
[70]
Giovanni Maria Troiano, Esben Warming Pedersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Deformable interfaces for performing music. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702492
[71]
Anna Vallgårda and Ylva Fernaeus. 2015. Interaction design as a bricolage practice. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680594
[72]
Anna Vallgårda and Tomas Sokoler. 2009. A material focus: exploring properties of computational composites. In CHI’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4147–4152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520631
[73]
Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Sabrina Hauser, Garnet Hertz, and Henry Lin. 2015. Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus N, 97–108.
[74]
Marcelo M Wanderley. 2001. Gestural control of music. In International Workshop Human Supervision and Control in Engineering and Music. Citeseer, Routledge, McGill University, Canada, 632–644.
[75]
Simon Waters. 2021. The entanglements which make instruments musical: Rediscovering sociality. Journal of New Music Research 50, 2 (2021), 133–146.
[76]
Stephen Wensveen, Kees Overbeeke, and Tom Djajadiningrat. 2000. Touch Me, Hit Me and I Know How You Feel: A Design Approach to Emotionally Rich Interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (New York City, New York, USA) (DIS ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347661
[77]
Valtteri Wikström, Simon Overstall, Koray Tahiroğlu, Johan Kildal, and Teemu Ahmaniemi. 2013. MARSUI: Malleable Audio-Reactive Shape-Retaining User Interface. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3151–3154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479633
[78]
Peter Worth. 2011. Technology and ontology in electronic music: Mego 1994-present. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of York.
[79]
Mei Zhang, Rebecca Stewart, and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2022. Integrating Interactive Technology Concepts With Material Expertise in Textile Design Disciplines. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1277–1287. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533535
[80]
Jianing Zheng and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2022. Squeeze, Twist, Stretch: Exploring Deformable Digital Musical Interfaces Design Through Non-Functional Prototypes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Association for Computing Machinery, The University of Auckland, New Zealand, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.21428/92fbeb44.41da9da5
[81]
Jianing Zheng, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Andrew P. McPherson. 2022. Material Matters: Exploring Materiality in Digital Musical Instruments Design. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 976–986. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533523
[82]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
[83]
John Zimmerman, Erik Stolterman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. An Analysis and Critique of Research through Design: Towards a Formalization of a Research Approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858228
Index Terms
- When Materials Meet Sound: Discovering the Meaning of Deformable Materials in Musical Interaction
Recommendations
Material Matters: Exploring Materiality in Digital Musical Instruments Design
DIS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceResearch on the design of Digital Musical Instruments (DMIs) has highlighted the importance of musical gestures and embodied interaction in DMI design. However, this research often focuses on technical and sonic factors of design, with less attention on ...
Understanding agency in interaction design materials
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe draw on the concept of agency in order to understand the process of how design materials 'talk back' to designers. In so doing, we illustrate the various levels at which agency can emerge in the context of intensive short-time prototyping sessions. ...
Participatory Design Tools: Leveraging Materiality and Familiarity to Adapt Unconventional Materials into Design Tools
C&C '23: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and CognitionAs participatory design approaches proliferate into mainstream industry practice, it becomes important for designers to consider how design tools, methods and practices can be made more accessible for non-designers — fostering participatory mindsets. We ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2023
2717 pages
ISBN:9781450398930
DOI:10.1145/3563657
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 10 July 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- China Scholarship Council
- EPSRC and AHRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Media and Arts Technology
Conference
DIS '23
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 307Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)144
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format