[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Report on the First HIPstIR Workshop on the Future of Information Retrieval

Published: 23 March 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The vision of HIPstIR is that early stage information retrieval (IR) researchers get together to develop a future for non-mainstream ideas and research agendas in IR. The first iteration of this vision materialized in the form of a three day workshop in Portsmouth, New Hampshire attended by 24 researchers across academia and industry. Attendees pre-submitted one or more topics that they want to pitch at the meeting. Then over the three days during the workshop, we self-organized into groups and worked on six specific proposals of common interest. In this report, we present an overview of the workshop and brief summaries of the six proposals that resulted from the workshop.

References

[1]
J. Allan, B. Croft, A. Moffat, and M. Sanderson. Frontiers, challenges, and opportunities for information retrieval: Report from swirl 2012 the second strategic workshop on information retrieval in lorne. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 46, pages 2--32. ACM, 2012.
[2]
P. Bajaj, D. Campos, N. Craswell, L. Deng, J. Gao, X. Liu, R. Majumder, A. McNamara, B. Mitra, T. Nguyen, et al. Ms marco: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09268, 2016.
[3]
M. Bendersky, D. Metzler, and W. B. Croft. Effective query formulation with multiple information sources. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 443--452. ACM, 2012.
[4]
L. Boytsov, D. Novak, Y. Malkov, and E. Nyberg. Off the beaten path: Let's replace term-based retrieval with k-nn search. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 1099--1108. ACM, 2016.
[5]
R. Child, S. Gray, A. Radford, and I. Sutskever. Generating long sequences with sparse transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.10509, 2019.
[6]
M. Crane, J. S. Culpepper, J. Lin, J. Mackenzie, and A. Trotman. A comparison of documentat-a-time and score-at-a-time query evaluation. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 201--210. ACM, 2017.
[7]
N. Craswell, B. Mitra, E. Yilmaz, and D. Campos. Overview of the trec 2019 deep learning track. 2019.
[8]
J. S. Culpepper, F. Diaz, and M. D. Smucker. Research frontiers in information retrieval: Report from the third strategic workshop on information retrieval in lorne (swirl 2018). In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 52, pages 34--90. ACM, 2018.
[9]
J. Dodge, S. Gururangan, D. Card, R. Schwartz, and N. A. Smith. Show your work: Improved reporting of experimental results. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.03004, 2019.
[10]
C. Middleton and R. Baeza-Yates. A comparison of open source search engines. 2007.
[11]
B. Mitra and N. Craswell. An introduction to neural information retrieval. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval (to appear), 2018.
[12]
B. Mitra, C. Rosset, D. Hawking, N. Craswell, F. Diaz, and E. Yilmaz. Incorporating query term independence assumption for efficient retrieval and ranking using deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.03693, 2019.
[13]
A. Moffat, J. Zobel, and D. Hawking. Recommended reading for ir research students. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 39, pages 3--14. ACM, 2005.
[14]
R. Nogueira and K. Cho. Passage re-ranking with bert. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.04085, 2019.
[15]
H. Owen. Opening space for emerging order. 1998. URL https://www.openspaceworld.com/brief_history.htm.
[16]
C. Rosset, D. Jose, G. Ghosh, B. Mitra, and S. Tiwary. Optimizing query evaluations using reinforcement learning for web search. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 1193--1196. ACM, 2018.
[17]
A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 5998--6008, 2017.
[18]
H. Zamani, M. Dehghani, W. B. Croft, E. Learned-Miller, and J. Kamps. From neural re-ranking to neural ranking: Learning a sparse representation for inverted indexing. In Proc. CIKM, pages 497--506. ACM, 2018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Report on the 1st Early Career Researchers' Roundtable for Information Access Research (ECRs4IR 2022) at CHIIR 2022ACM SIGIR Forum10.1145/3582524.358253356:1(1-10)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGIR Forum
ACM SIGIR Forum  Volume 53, Issue 2
December 2019
125 pages
ISSN:0163-5840
DOI:10.1145/3458553
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 March 2021
Published in SIGIR Volume 53, Issue 2

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Report on the 1st Early Career Researchers' Roundtable for Information Access Research (ECRs4IR 2022) at CHIIR 2022ACM SIGIR Forum10.1145/3582524.358253356:1(1-10)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media