Undergraduate-Led Survey Class to Improve CS Education for New Students
Authors: 
Nathan Zhang, Jacky Liang, Amanda Tomlinson, Frank Boensch, Anant SahaiAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 142 - 148
Abstract
Many first-year undergraduate students do not have sufficient breadth of technical knowledge about subjects in Electrical Engineering (EE) and Computer Science (CS) to make informed choices toward their education. By the time students are exposed to subjects they may be interested in, the cost of switching areas of focus may be too high. With undergraduate enrollment in CS more than doubling in the past decade, many institutions lack adequate staff and infrastructure to address students' needs. To help newly enrolled students make better decisions with limited departmental resources, we present a first-semester, low-overhead survey course that covers a wide variety of topics. The class has been offered for five consecutive semesters by upper-class undergraduate volunteers with minimal faculty involvement. We report the format, content, and student feedback for the course. Our results suggest that such a class can provide new students with valuable guidance and better prepare them for an education in CS and EE.
References
[1]
James L Bess and John A Bilorusky. 1970. Curriculum hypocrisies: Studies of student-initiated courses. Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 24, 3 (1970), 291--309.
[2]
Caitlin Cairncross, Tammy VanDeGrift, Sharon A Jones, and Zulema Naegele. 2015. Building an Academic Success Program for At-Risk Engineering Students. (2015).
[3]
Mark A Casteel and K Robert Bridges. 2007. Goodbye lecture: A student-led seminar approach for teaching upper division courses. Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 34, 2 (2007), 107--110.
[4]
Hannah C Chapin, Benjamin L Wiggins, and Linda E Martin-Morris. 2014. Undergraduate science learners show comparable outcomes whether taught by undergraduate or graduate teaching assistants. Journal of College Science Teaching, Vol. 44, 2 (2014), 90--99.
[5]
Charles Dierbach, Blair Taylor, Harry Zhou, and Iliana Zimand. 2005. Experiences with a CS0 course targeted for CS1 success. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 37. ACM, 317--320.
[6]
Kelsey Dietz. 2015. Predicting Undergraduate Passions: An Analysis of Major Migration at Carnegie Mellon. (2015).
[7]
Nadia Rahbek Dyrberg and Claus Michelsen. 2017. Mentoring First Year Study Groups--Benefits from the Mentors' Perspective. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 5, 1 (2017), 43--54.
[8]
Christopher J Felege. 2018. The Long-Term Significance Of Working As An Undergraduate Teaching Assistant. University of North Dakota. Theses and Dissertations (2018).
[9]
Channing R Ford, Emily B Wilkins, and James E Groccia. 2018. Students Engaged in Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 2018, 154 (2018), 33--43.
[10]
Stewart Green, Nick Plant, and Courtney Chan. 2016. Student at Risk Identification and Remedial Action System for Improving Retention on Computer Science Programmes. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences 11 (2016).
[11]
Eric Guizzo. 2008. The EE Gender Gap Is Widening. IEEE Spectrum (2008).
[12]
Michael Hewner. 2014. How CS undergraduates make course choices. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research. ACM, 115--122.
[13]
Sharon A Jones and Caitlin Cairncross. 2016. Two-Tiered Summer Bridge Programming for At-Risk Engineering and Computer Science Students. (2016).
[14]
Sandra Katz, David Allbritton, John Aronis, Christine Wilson, and Mary Lou Soffa. 2006. Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program. ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 37, 4 (2006), 42--57.
[15]
P"aivi Kinnunen and Lauri Malmi. 2006. Why students drop out CS1 course?. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on Computing education research. ACM, 97--108.
[16]
Külli Kori, Margus Pedaste, and Olev Must. 2018. The Academic, Social, and Professional Integration Profiles of Information Technology Students. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), Vol. 18, 4 (2018), 20.
[17]
Kathleen J Lehman, Linda J Sax, and Hilary B Zimmerman. 2017. Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique? Computer Science Education, Vol. 26, 4 (2017), 277--298.
[18]
Ásrún Matth'iasdóttir and Hrafn J Geirsson. 2011. The novice problem in computer science. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies. ACM, 570--576.
[19]
Elissa Meites, Joanna L Wagner, Michael KW Choy, and Mary Lake Polan. 2002. A student-initiated interactive course as a model for teaching reproductive health. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, Vol. 187, 3 (2002), S30--S33.
[20]
Alexis Peschot, Chuang Qian, and Tsu-Jae Liu. 2015. Nanoelectromechanical Switches for Low-Power Digital Computing. Micromachines, Vol. 6, 8 (Aug 2015), 1046--1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi6081046
[21]
Stephanie B Philipp. 2014. Strengthening STEM performance and persistence: Influence of undergraduate teaching assistants on entry-level STEM students .University of Louisville.
[22]
Stephanie B Philipp, Thomas R Tretter, and Christine V Rich. 2016. Development of undergraduate teaching assistants as effective instructors in STEM courses. (2016).
[23]
Bryan K Saville, Tracy E Zinn, and Marcus P Elliott. 2005. Interteaching versus traditional methods of instruction: A preliminary analysis. Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 32, 3 (2005), 161--163.
[24]
Bryan K Saville, Tracy E Zinn, Nancy A Neef, Renee Van Norman, and Summer J Ferreri. 2006. A comparison of interteaching and lecture in the college classroom. Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 39, 1 (2006), 49--61.
[25]
Kelly A Schalk, J Randy McGinnis, Jeffrey R Harring, Amy Hendrickson, and Ann C Smith. 2009. The undergraduate teaching assistant experience offers opportunities similar to the undergraduate research experience. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education: JMBE, Vol. 10, 1 (2009), 32.
[26]
Peter Sturmey, Samantha Dalfen, and Daniel M Fienup. 2015. Inter-teaching: a systematic review. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, Vol. 16, 1 (2015), 121--130.
[27]
Janet M Weidert, Angela R Wendorf, Regan AR Gurung, and Tonya Filz. 2012. A survey of graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants. College Teaching, Vol. 60, 3 (2012), 95--103.
[28]
Lindsay B Wheeler, Jennifer L Maeng, Jennie L Chiu, and Randy L Bell. 2017. Do teaching assistants matter? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 54, 4 (2017), 463--492.
Index Terms
- Undergraduate-Led Survey Class to Improve CS Education for New Students
Recommendations
Primarily Undergraduate Institution Faculty
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2In this session, we aim to foster a community of computer science faculty across many primarily undergraduate institutions. We will foster an inclusive environment through activities that allow for multiple forms of engagement (e.g. shows of hands, small ...
CS Education: Catching the Wave
SIGCSE '16: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science EducationComputer Science (CS) education has caught a wave -- of media attention, public support, public/private commitments, broad-based participation by educators, and a surge in student enrollments at the undergraduate level. It is a startling change over ...
Topics for an Introductory Data Science Course
SIGCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2Introductory data science courses are appearing at colleges, universities, and high schools around the country and the world. What topics do we cover in these courses, and how and why are these decisions made? How do we consider the background knowledge ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
February 2020
1502 pages
ISBN:9781450367936
DOI:10.1145/3328778
- General Chairs:
- Jian Zhang,
- Mark Sherriff,
- Program Chairs:
- Sarah Heckman,
- Pamela Cutter,
- Alvaro Monge
Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 26 February 2020
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Conference
SIGCSE '20
Sponsor:
SIGCSE '20: The 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
March 11 - 14, 2020
OR, Portland, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%
Upcoming Conference
SIGCSE TS 2025
- Sponsor:
- sigcse
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 605Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)135
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in