[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2493102.2493107acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Intent-driven model synthesis

Published: 17 August 2013 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents an intent-driven model synthesis method. The method introduces an interactive straight prismatic construction space to realize the structure and shape variation of the example model simultaneously. The construction space defines the global size and the local shape feature of the desired model. Users can draw a closed curve and some skeleton lines by a sketch-based interface to design the construction space. Our algorithm first uses a quadrangulation algorithm to create a subdivision plane with the same contour as the closed curve. And the drawn skeleton lines control the local orientation of split units in the plane. Then it creates the construction space by sweeping the subdivision plane. Finally, it fills the construction space with the deformed model pieces while maintaining the generalized adjacent constraints, which are defined according to the example model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach on large-scale complex models such as architecture, mountains.

References

[1]
M. Bessmeltsev, C. Wang, A. Sheffer, and K. Singh. Design-driven quadrangulation of closed 3d curves. ACM Trans. Graph., 31(6):178:1--11, Nov. 2012.
[2]
M. Bokeloh, M. Wand, V. Koltun, and H.-P. Seidel. Pattern-aware shape deformation using sliding dockers. ACM Trans. Graph., 30(6):123:1--10, Dec. 2011.
[3]
M. Bokeloh, M. Wand, and H.-P. Seidel. A connection between partial symmetry and inverse procedural modeling. ACM Trans. Graph., 29:104:1--10, July 2010.
[4]
M. Bokeloh, M. Wand, H.-P. Seidel, and V. Koltun. An algebraic model for parameterized shape editing. ACM Trans. Graph., 31(4):78:1--10, July 2012.
[5]
M. Brewer, L. F. Diachin, P. M. Knupp, T. Leurent, and D. J. Melander. The mesquite mesh quality improvement toolkit. In 12th International Meshing Roundtable, pages 239--250, 2003.
[6]
S. Chaudhuri, E. Kalogerakis, L. Guibas, and V. Koltun. Probabilistic reasoning for assembly-based 3d modeling. ACM Trans. Graph., 30(4):35:1--10, July 2011.
[7]
S. Chaudhuri and V. Koltun. Data-driven suggestions for creativity support in 3d modeling. ACM Trans. Graph., 29(6):183:1--10, Dec. 2010.
[8]
P. Company, A. Piquer, M. Contero, and F. Naya. A survey on geometrical reconstruction as a core technology to sketch-based modeling. Computers Graphics, 29(6):892--904, 2005.
[9]
M. T. Cook and A. Agah. A survey of sketch-based 3-d modeling techniques. Interacting with Computers, 21(3):201--211, 2009.
[10]
T. Funkhouser, M. Kazhdan, P. Shilane, P. Min, W. Kiefer, A. Tal, S. Rusinkiewicz, and D. Dobkin. Modeling by example. ACM Trans. Graph., 23(3):652--663, Aug. 2004.
[11]
W. Jiang and Z.-X. Sun. Hmm-based on-line multi-stroke sketch recognition. In Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2005. Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on, volume 7, pages 4564--4570, aug. 2005.
[12]
J. Lin, D. Cohen-Or, H. Zhang, C. Liang, A. Sharf, O. Deussen, and B. Chen. Structure-preserving retargeting of irregular 3d architecture. ACM Trans. Graph., 30(6):183:1--10, Dec. 2011.
[13]
P. Merrell. Example-based model synthesis. In Proceedings of the 2007 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games, I3D '07, pages 105--112, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[14]
P. Merrell and D. Manocha. Continuous model synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph., 27(5):158:1--7, Dec. 2008.
[15]
P. Merrell and D. Manocha. Model synthesis: A general procedural modeling algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(6):715--728, June 2011.
[16]
A. Milliez, M. Wand, M.-P. Cani, and H.-P. Seidel. Mutable elastic models for sculpting structured shapes. Computer Graphics Forum, page to be appear.
[17]
P. Müller, P. Wonka, S. Haegler, A. Ulmer, and L. Van Gool. Procedural modeling of buildings. ACM Trans. Graph., 25(3):614--623, July 2006.
[18]
L. Olsen, F. F. Samavati, M. C. Sousa, and J. A. Jorge. Sketch-based modeling: A survey. Computers Graphics, 33(1):85--103, 2009.
[19]
Y. I. H. Parish and P. Müller. Procedural modeling of cities. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH '01, pages 301--308, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
[20]
T. W. Sederberg and S. R. Parry. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 20(4):151--160, Aug. 1986.
[21]
J. O. Talton, Y. Lou, S. Lesser, J. Duke, R. Měch, and V. Koltun. Metropolis procedural modeling. ACM Trans. Graph., 30(2):11:1--14, Apr. 2011.
[22]
K. Xu, H. Zhang, D. Cohen-Or, and B. Chen. Fit and diverse: set evolution for inspiring 3d shape galleries. ACM Trans. Graph., 31(4):57:1--10, July 2012.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
VINCI '13: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
August 2013
133 pages
ISBN:9781450319881
DOI:10.1145/2493102
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • TU: Tianjin University

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 August 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. construction space
  2. generalized adjacent constraints
  3. structure variation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

VINCI '13
Sponsor:
  • TU

Acceptance Rates

VINCI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 12 of 30 submissions, 40%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 193 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 120
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media