[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2079216.2079246acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cyranic contraptions: using personality surrogates to explore ontologically and socially dynamic contexts

Published: 19 October 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Understanding contexts is an important challenge that is made harder for designers by the increasing speed at which contexts change. To assist designers, three types of contextual dynamism are distinguished: physical, ontological and social. To inform understanding ontological dynamism and social dynamism, "social contraptions" - a form of socially interactive design experimentation is proposed. This paper focuses on cryanic social contraptions in which unseen users interact through a human surrogate that they guide via radio transmissions. Observations from initial trials are reported along with a discussion of themes arising for design and an appraisal of this approach's potential as a design tool.

References

[1]
Allen, J. F. (2003) Natural language processing. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
[2]
Andrew, I., & Fourney, D. (2006). The Range of Tactile Haptic Interaction Techniques. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 50, 676--679.
[3]
Antle, A. N. (2008) Inquiring materials for tangible prototyping. TEI '08. ACM, NY, NY, 139--140.
[4]
Archer, B. (1995). The nature of research. Co-design, interdisciplinary journal of design, 6--13.
[5]
Argyle, M. (1992). The Social Psychology of Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
[6]
Arnold, M. (2003). Intranets, Community, and Social Capital: The Case of Williams Bay. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 23(2), 78--87.
[7]
Arvola, M. (2004). Shades of use: The dynamics of interaction design for sociable use. Linköpings universitet, Linköping, Sweden. PhD Thesis.
[8]
Benford, S., Schnädelbach, H., Koleva, B., Anastasi, R., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., et al. (2005). Expected, sensed, and desired: A framework for designing sensing-based interaction. TOCCHI., 12(1), 3--30.
[9]
Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: defining customer centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann.
[10]
Binder, T., Brandt, E., Clarke, B., & Halse, J. (2010). Rehearsing the Future. Copenhagen: Danish Design School Press.
[11]
Blud, L. M. (1990). Social interaction and learning among family groups visiting a museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 9(1), 43.
[12]
Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Knudsen, J., Kyng, M., & Madsen, K. (1988). Computer support for cooperative design. CSCW (pp. 377--394). Portland, OR: ACM.
[13]
Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3--4), 167--175.
[14]
Brereton, M., & Buur, J. (2008). New challenges for design participation in the era of ubiquitous computing. CoDesign, 4(2), 101--113.
[15]
Brooks, F. P. (1987). No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE computer, 20(4), 10--19.
[16]
Buchenau, M., Suri, J. Experience Prototyping. Designing Interactive Systems 2000 (Brooklyn, NY, August 2000), ACM Press, 424--433
[17]
Bullivant, L. (2006). Responsive environments. London: V & A.
[18]
Burns, C., Dishman, E., Verplank, W., & Lassiter, B. (1994). Actors, hairdos, videotape & informance design. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 119--120). Boston, MA: ACM.
[19]
Buxton, B., & Buxton, W. (2007). Sketching user experiences. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
[20]
Chamberlain, T. (2005). Photo in the News: Ultra-Lifelike Robot Debuts in Japan. National Geographic News, 17 June 2005.
[21]
Crabtree, A. (2004). Design in the Absence of Practice: Breaching Experiments. DIS 2004, Cambridge, Massachusetts, August 2004, ACM Press, 59--68
[22]
Cui, Y., & Roto, V. (2008). How people use the web on mobile devices. In 17th international conference on World Wide Web 79 (pp. 905--914). Beijing, China.
[23]
Degenne, A. & Michel, F. (1999). Introducing Social Networks. London: SAGE.
[24]
Donovan, J., Pedersen, J., Jensen, M. V., Sperschneider, W., & Lorenzen, J. (2003). Exploratypes: Expressing & Provoking Actions. Danish HCI, (Roskilde, DK), 33.
[25]
Donovan, J. & Mitchell, R. (2010) Social contraptions and embodied faciliation UBICOMP'10. Copenhagen DK
[26]
Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian tales. Boston MA: MIT
[27]
Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1992). Cardboard computers: mocking-it-up or hands on the future. In Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 169--196). Hillsdale New York: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
[28]
Endsley, M. R., Bolté, B., & Jones, D. G. (2003). Designing for situtation awareness: an approach to user-centered design. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
[29]
England, D., Hornecker, E., Roast, C., Romero, P., Fergus, P., & Marshall, P. (2009). Whole body interaction. Human factors in computing systems (pp. 4815--4818). Boston, MA, USA: ACM.
[30]
Fernaeus, Y., Tholander, J. & Jonsson, M. (2008), Towards a new set of ideals: Consequences of the practice turn in tangible interaction. TEI, 223--230.
[31]
Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. DIS 2004 (pp. 261--268). Cambridge, MA, USA.
[32]
Forsythe, C., Berka, C., Matthews, R., & Wagner, J. (2007). Making the Giant Leap with Augmented Cognition Technologies". Foundations of Augmented Cognition (pp. 434--438). NY, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum
[33]
Fox, M., & Kemp, M. (2009). Interactive Architecture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
[34]
Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities. Social Problems, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Winter, 1964), pp. 225--250
[35]
Gedenryd, H., (1998) How designers work (Ph.D. Dissertation). Lund University.
[36]
Gilbert, J. K., & Stocklmayer, S. (2001). The Design of Interactive Exhibits to Promote the Making of Meaning. Museum Management and Curatorship, 19(1), 41.
[37]
Glynn R. (2005). Interactive Architecture dot Org. About. Retrieved May 24, 2011, from http://www.interactivearchitecture.org/about
[38]
Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199--220.
[39]
Hamilton, J., & Robinson, W. H. (1995). William Heath Robinson. Brighton: Pavilion.
[40]
Hausser, R. R. (2001). Foundations of computational linguistics. Berlin: Springer.
[41]
Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C., Vom Lehn, D., & Cleverly, J. (2005). Creating Assemblies in Public Environments: Social Interaction, Interactive Exhibits and CSCW. CSCW 2005, 14(1), 1--41.
[42]
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. TOCHI, 7(2), 196.
[43]
Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In CHI Vol. 1, p. 437.
[44]
Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., & Rogers, Y. (2007). From entry to access: how shareability comes about. In Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (pp. 328--342). Helsinki, Finland: ACM.
[45]
Jacquet, C., Bourda, Y., & Bellik, Y. (2005). An architecture for ambient computing. International Workshop on Intelligent Environments, IEE, June 2005.
[46]
Jensen, M. V., Buur, J., & Djajadiningrat, T. (2005). Designing the user actions in tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (p. 18).
[47]
Jessup, L. M., & Robey, D. (2002). The relevance of social issues in ubiquitous computing environments. Communications of the ACM, 45(12).
[48]
Kling, R., & Star, L. (1998). Human centered systems in the perspective of organizational and social informatics. Computers and Society, 28(1), 22--29.
[49]
Koskinen, I., Binder, T., Redstr\öm, J., & Helsinki, D. (2009). Lab, Field, Gallery, and Beyond1. Artifact: Journal of Virtual Design, 2, 46--57.
[50]
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn. London: Boca Raton.
[51]
Kronenburg, R., & Klassen, F. (2005). Transportable environments 3. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
[52]
Light, A., Blythe, M. & Reed, D. (2008). Defamilarising Design. Design Principles and Practices. Volume 1, Issue 4, pp. 63--72
[53]
Marti, P., Gabrielli, F., & Pucci, F. (2001). Situated Interaction in Art. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5(1), 71--74.
[54]
Messeter, J., Brandt, E., Halse, J., & Johansson, M. (2004). Contextualizing mobile IT. In 5th conference on Designing interactive systems (pp. 27--36).
[55]
Milgram, S. (1984) Cyranoids. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.
[56]
Minato, T., Shimada, M., Itakura, S., Lee, K., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). Evaluating the human likeness of an android by comparing gaze behaviors elicited by the android and a person. The international journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 20(10), 1147.
[57]
Mitchell, R. (2009). An in your face interface: revisiting cyranoids as a revealing medium for interpersonal interaction. Flirting With The Future, SIDER 09, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
[58]
Mitchell, R. (2009). Physical contraptions as social interaction catalysts. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Physicality (British HCI). Cambridge, UK.
[59]
Mitchell, R. (2010). Teaching via human avatar: enlivening delivery through students acting as proxies for remote lecturers. Proceedings of SOLSTICE 2010: Edge Hill University, Lancashire UK.
[60]
Mitchell, R. (2011) Physical social contraptions sparking inspiration for understanding interaction in and with dynamic contexts" CHI Sparks, Arnhem, Netherlands
[61]
Mogensen, P. (1992). Towards a provotyping approach in systems development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 5.
[62]
Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, 69--102.
[63]
Naughton, J., (2010) Chatroulette brings strangers together. So why all the fuss? The Observer, London. Newspaper article published 21st March 2010
[64]
Nye, D. E. (2006). Technology matters. MIT Press: Boston MA.
[65]
Oulasvirta, A., Kurvinen, E., & Kankainen, T. (2003). Understanding contexts by being there: case studies in bodystorming. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(2), 125--134.
[66]
Pantic, M., Pentland, A., Nijholt, A., & Huang, T. (2007). Human Computing and Machine Understanding of Human Behavior: A Survey. Artifical Intelligence for Human Computing (pp. 47--71).
[67]
Randall, D., Harper, R., & Rouncefield, M. (2007). Fieldwork for design. London: Springer-Verlag.
[68]
Reid, J. (2009). Keynote at Create Conference, London, 11--16.
[69]
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
[70]
Ross, D. (2007). Distributed cognition and the will. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
[71]
Rostand, E. (1898). Cyrano de Bergerac. Boston MA, Lamson, Wolffe and company.
[72]
Saffer, D. (2008). Designing Gestural Interfaces. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
[73]
Sanders, L. (2008). An evolving map of design practice and design research. interactions, 15(6), 13--17.
[74]
Schieck, A. F., Briones, C., & Mottram, C. (n.d.). A Sense of Place and Pervasive Computing within the Urban Landscape. 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, 133--138.
[75]
Schmorrow, D. D., & Kruse, A. A. (2004). Augmented cognition. Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group, 54--99.
[76]
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
[77]
Sharlin, E., Watson, B., Kitamura, Y., Kishino, F., & Itoh, Y. (2004). On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 338--346.
[78]
Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. NY, NY: Penguin Pr.
[79]
Sing, G. O., Wong, K. W., Fung, C. C., & Depickere, A. (2006). Towards a more natural and intelligent interface with embodied conversation agent. 2006 international conference on Game research and development (pp. 177--183). Perth, Australia: Murdoch University.
[80]
Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations. Routledge, London
[81]
Sterling, B. (2007). Presentation at the conference ≫Innovationsforum Interaktionsdesign≪ in Potsdam, Germany. 31. March 2007, Video retrieved May 24, 2011, from http://vimeo.com/769193
[82]
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr.
[83]
Tholander, J., & Jæænsson, T. (2009). Bodily interaction and communication in an Art Exhibition hall. Third Workshop on Physicality, Cambridge, UK.
[84]
Weiser, M. (1993). Ubiquitous Computing. COMPUTER (vol. 26 no. 10) 71--72.
[85]
Witt, H. (2008). User Interfaces for Wearable Computers. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag.
[86]
Wolfe, M. F., & Goldberg, R. (2000). Rube Goldberg. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Friendscope: Exploring In-the-Moment Experience Sharing on Camera Glasses via a Shared CameraProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129036:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Bridging the Socio-Technical Gaps in Body-worn Interpersonal Live-Streaming Telepresence through a Critical Review of the LiteratureProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34491945:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
  • (2019)Voices off: Stanley Milgram’s cyranoids in historical contextHistory of the Human Sciences10.1177/095269511986702132:5(28-55)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2019
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Cyranic contraptions: using personality surrogates to explore ontologically and socially dynamic contexts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DESIRE '11: Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design
    October 2011
    358 pages
    ISBN:9781450307543
    DOI:10.1145/2079216
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Industrial Design: Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Industrial Design
    • European Union: European Union

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 October 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. contextual design
    2. design experimentation
    3. design research
    4. interaction design
    5. interpersonal
    6. social interaction

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    DESIRE '11
    Sponsor:
    • Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Industrial Design
    • European Union
    DESIRE '11: Creativity and Innovation in Design
    October 19 - 21, 2011
    Eindhoven, Netherlands

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Friendscope: Exploring In-the-Moment Experience Sharing on Camera Glasses via a Shared CameraProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129036:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
    • (2021)Bridging the Socio-Technical Gaps in Body-worn Interpersonal Live-Streaming Telepresence through a Critical Review of the LiteratureProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34491945:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
    • (2019)Voices off: Stanley Milgram’s cyranoids in historical contextHistory of the Human Sciences10.1177/095269511986702132:5(28-55)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2019
    • (2017)We-Coupling!Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3024969.3025051(775-780)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2017
    • (2015)Sensing mine, yours, theirs, and oursAdjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/2800835.2806203(933-938)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2015
    • (2015)CyrafourProceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference10.1145/2735711.2735815(165-166)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2015
    • (2015)CyrafourProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702613.2726962(109-114)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
    • (2015)Offscreen and in the Chair Next to Your: Conversational Agents Speaking Through Actual Human BodiesIntelligent Virtual Agents10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_44(405-417)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015
    • (2014)Revisiting Milgram’s Cyranoid Method: Experimenting With Hybrid Human AgentsThe Journal of Social Psychology10.1080/00224545.2014.959885155:1(30-56)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2014
    • (2012)Social contraptions as breaching environmentsProceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction10.1145/2148131.2148230(393-394)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2012

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media