[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/332040.332469acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Force-feedback improves performance for steering and combined steering-targeting tasks

Published: 01 April 2000 Publication History

Abstract

The introduction of a force-feedback mouse, which provides high fidelity tactile cues via force output, may represent a long-awaited technological breakthrough in pointing device designs. However, there have been few studies examining the benefits of force-feedback for the desktop computer human interface. Ten adults performed eighty steering tasks, where the participants moved the cursor through a small tunnel with varying indices of difficulty using a conventional and force-feedback mouse. For the force-feedback condition, the mouse displayed force that pulled the cursor to the center of the tunnel. The tasks required both horizontal and vertical screen movements of the cursor. Movement times were on average 52 percent faster during the force-feedback condition when compared to the conventional mouse. Furthermore, for the conventional mouse vertical movements required more time to complete than horizontal screen movements. Another ten adults completed a combined steering and targeting task, where the participants navigated through a tunnel and then clicked a small box at the end of the tunnel. Again, force-feedback improved times to complete the task. Although movement times were slower than the pure steering task, the steering index of difficulty dominated the steering-targeting relationship. These results further support that human computer interfaces benefit from the additional sensory input of tactile cues to the human user.

References

[1]
Accot J, Zhai S. Beyond Fitts' Law: Models for Trajectory-Based, Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI, 1997.
[2]
Akamatsu M, Sigeru S, MacKenzie IS. Multimodal Mouse: A mouse-type device with tactile and force display. Presence, 3(1): 73-80, 1994.
[3]
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for Human Factors Engineering of Visual Display Terminal Workstations. Standard No. 100-1988. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, California, 1988.
[4]
Armstrong TJ, Martin BJ, Franzblau A, Rempel DM, Johnson PW: Mouse input devices and work-related upper limb disorders. Working With Display Lr~its 94, Elsevier Science, 375-380, 1995
[5]
Dennerlein JT, Yang M, Perceived Musculoskeletal Loading during Use of A Force-Feedback Computer Mouse, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference, Houston, 1999.
[6]
Eberhardt S, Neverov M, West T, Sanders C. Force Reflection for WIMPs: A Button Acquisition Experiment, Sixth Annual Symposium on Haptic Interfaces, International Mechanical Engineer'ing Congress and Exposition, Dallas Texas, 1997.
[7]
Fitts PM. The Information Capacity of Human Motor Systems in Controlling the Amplitude of a Movement, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47: 381-391, 1954.
[8]
Hasser C, Goldenberg A, Martin K, Rosenberg L. User performance in a GUI pointing task with a lowcost force-feedback computer mouse. Seventh Annual Symposium on Haptic interfaces, International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, 1998.
[9]
Johnson PW, Dropkin J, Hewes J, Rempel D: Office ergonomics: motion analysis of computer mouse usage. In: Proceedings of the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Fairfax, VA: AIHA 12-13, 1993.
[10]
Keamey RE, Stein RB Parameswaran L: Identification of Intrinsic and Reflex Contributions to Human Ankle Stiffness Dynamics, 1EEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 44(6): 493-504, 1997.
[11]
Rosenberg L. Virtual Fixtures, Ph.D. Dissertation Stanford University, 1994.
[12]
Sheridan TB. Telerobotics, automation and human supervisory control. MIT Press, Cambridge, M.A, 1992.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing the Effects of Sensory Modality Conditions on Object Retention across Virtual Reality and Projected Surface Display EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981378:ISS(255-282)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The Effect of Latency on Movement Time in Path-steeringProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642316(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Evaluation of Interactive Slider Design Utilizing Haptic FeedbackHCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers10.1007/978-3-031-76803-3_16(289-298)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Force-feedback improves performance for steering and combined steering-targeting tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2000
    587 pages
    ISBN:1581132166
    DOI:10.1145/332040
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 April 2000

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Fitts' law
    2. force-feedback
    3. haptic
    4. index of difficulty
    5. mouse
    6. pointing devices
    7. steering task
    8. targeting task

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    CHI00
    Sponsor:
    CHI00: Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 1 - 6, 2000
    The Hague, The Netherlands

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '00 Paper Acceptance Rate 72 of 336 submissions, 21%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)108
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Assessing the Effects of Sensory Modality Conditions on Object Retention across Virtual Reality and Projected Surface Display EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981378:ISS(255-282)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
    • (2024)The Effect of Latency on Movement Time in Path-steeringProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642316(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Evaluation of Interactive Slider Design Utilizing Haptic FeedbackHCI International 2024 – Late Breaking Papers10.1007/978-3-031-76803-3_16(289-298)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Tactual Articulatory Feedback on Gestural InputArts10.3390/arts1204014612:4(146)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Varying Subjective Speed-accuracy Biases to Evaluate the Generalizability of Experimental Conclusions on Pointing-facilitation TechniquesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580740(1-13)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Predicting Success Rates in Steering Through Linear and Circular Paths by the Servo-Gaussian ModelInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.221222140:16(4300-4318)Online publication date: 18-May-2023
    • (2023)Advanced Investigation of Steering Performance with Error-Accepting DelaysInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.219258640:14(3622-3635)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Haptic Auditory Feedback for Enhanced Image Description: A Study of User Preferences and PerformanceHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202310.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_14(224-246)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
    • (2022)Improving Image Accessibility by Combining Haptic and Auditory FeedbackProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3550362(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Investigating the effect of electroadhesion tactile feedback on accuracy and efficiency of Steering tasksDisplays10.1016/j.displa.2022.10230975(102309)Online publication date: Dec-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media