Article

Free access

Cognitive function analysis for human-centered automation of safety-critical systems

Author:

Guy A. BoyAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '98: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 265 - 272

https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274682

Published: 01 January 1998 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

Billings, C.E. (1991). Human-centered aircra~ automation philosphy. NASA TM 103885, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA

Google Scholar

[2]

Boehm, B.W. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. 1EEE Computer, Vol. 21, no. 5, May, pp. 61-72.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Boy, G.A. (1997). Active design documents. Proceedings of ACM DIS'97 Conference. ACM Press, New York.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Boy, G.A. (1998). Cognitive Function Analysis. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Greenwich, CT.

Google Scholar

[5]

Bmdshaw, J. (1997). Software Agents. MITIAAAI Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Google Scholar

[6]

Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. & NeweU, A. (1983). The P~,chology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Carroll, J.M. and Moran, T. (1991). Introduction to this special issue on design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc., Vol. 6.

Google Scholar

[8]

Carroll, J.M. & Rosson, M.B. (1991). Deliberated Evolution: Stalking the View Matcher in Design Space. Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc., Volume 6, pp. 281-318.

Google Scholar

[9]

Carroll, J.M., Alpert, S.R., Karat, J., Van Deusen, M.S. & Rosson, M.B. (1994). Raison d'Etre: Capturing design history and rationale in multimedia narratives. Proceech'ngs of the A CM CHI'94 Conference. (Boston, April 24-28). New York: ACM Press, pp. 192-197, 478.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

De Brito, G., Pinet, J. & Boy, G. (1997). Checklist use in new generation aircraft. EURISCO Technical Report no. T-97-042.

Google Scholar

[11]

FCOM-A320 (1997). Flight Crew Operation Manual A320. Airbus Industrie, Toulouse-Blagnae, France.

Google Scholar

[12]

Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K. & Oswald, J. (1995). Supporting the evolution of design artifacts with representations of context and intent. Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'95). ACM Press, pp. 7-15.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

Hutchins, E. (1995). How a Cockpit Remembers its Speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, pp. 265-288.

Google Scholar

[14]

Irving, S., Poison, P. & Irving, I.E. (1994). A GOMS analysis of the advanced automated cockpit. Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI'94 Conference Proceedings. ACM Press, pp. 344-350.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

Langley, P.W., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G. & Zytkow, J.M. (1987). Scientific dicovery; An account of the creative process. MIT Press. Boston, MA.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

MuUer, M. (1991). Participatory design in Britain and North America: Responding to the <<Scandinavian Challenge>>. In Reading Through Technology, CHI'91 Conference Proceedings. S.P. Robertson, G.M. Ohlson and J.S. Ohlson Eds. ACM, pp. 389-392.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[17]

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Acadenfie Press. London.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[18]

Norman, D.A. (1992). Turn Signals are the Facial Expressions of Automobiles. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.

Google Scholar

[19]

Sarter, N.B. & Woods, D.D. (1994). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots' mental model and awareness of the Flight Management System. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, pp. 1-28.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[20]

Sheridan, T.B. (1984). Supervisory control of remote manipulators, vehicules and dynamic processes: experiment in command and display aiding. Advances in Man-Machine Systems Research, J.A.I. Press, 1, pp. 49- 137.

Google Scholar

[21]

Shneiderman, B. & Maes, P. (1997). Dkeet manipulation vs. Interface agents, interactions, November-December, volume IV.6.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[22]

Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans rout situated actions. The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

Terveeen, L.G, Selfridge, P.G. & Long, M.D. (1995). Living design memory: Framework, implementation and lesson learned. Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 10, pp. 1-37.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

Vicente, IC J., & Pejtersen, A. M. (in preparation). Cognitive work analysis: Towards, safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

Wiener, E.L. (1995). The focus of automation: Which tasks should be automated. EURISCO Industrial Summer School on Human-Centered Automation. Saint- Lary, France.

Google Scholar

[26]

Zimmermann, B. & Selvin, A.M. (1997). A framework for assessing group memory approaches for software design projects. Proceedings of DIS'97. August 18-20, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Camara Dit Pinto SVilleneuve ÉMasson DBoy GUrfels L(2024)Reality anchor methodology: how to design a digital twin to support situation awarenessJournal of Engineering Design10.1080/09544828.2024.233683835:6(775-799)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2336838
Flathmann CSchelble BMcNeese NKnijnenburg BGramopadhye AChalil Madathil K(2023)The Purposeful Presentation of AI Teammates: Impacts on Human Acceptance and PerceptionInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.225498440:20(6510-6527)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2254984
Schmitz-Hübsch ABecker RWirzberger M(2023)Personality Traits in the Emotion-Performance-Relationship in Intelligent Tutoring SystemsAdaptive Instructional Systems10.1007/978-3-031-34735-1_5(60-75)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34735-1_5
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Cognitive function analysis for human-centered automation of safety-critical systems

Recommendations

On Safety--Critical Computer Control Systems
CBMS '97: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS '97)

In the paper, safety critical computer control systems are dealt with, which can be employed in medical applications. Safety licensing of such systems, especially of their software parts, is extremely difficult and for the time being almost impossible ...
Using dynamic adaptive systems in safety-critical domains
SEAMS '16: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems

The development of safety-critical Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) is expanding due to the Internet of Things' promise to make high-integrity applications and services part of everyday life. This expansion is seen in the dependencies some connected ...
A Framework for Assessing Standards for Safety Critical Computer-Based Systems
ISESS '99: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium and Forum on Software Engineering Standards

This paper presents a framework for assessing different standards for computer-based safety-critical systems. Key attributes of standards forming a basis for comparison are described. Three examples of standards are described using this framework: MIL-...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

CHI '98: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

January 1998

650 pages

ISBN:0201309874

Chairman:
Michael E. Atwood
Bell Atlantic Science and Technology
,
Editors:
Clare-Marie Karat
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, NY
,
Arnold Lund
US West Advanced Technologies
,
Joëlle Coutaz
CLIPS-IMAG
,
John Karat
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, NY

Publisher

ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 1998

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CHI98

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI98: ACM Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems

April 18 - 23, 1998

California, Los Angeles, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI '98 Paper Acceptance Rate 81 of 351 submissions, 23%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

45
Total Citations
View Citations
2,089
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)283
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36

Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Camara Dit Pinto SVilleneuve ÉMasson DBoy GUrfels L(2024)Reality anchor methodology: how to design a digital twin to support situation awarenessJournal of Engineering Design10.1080/09544828.2024.233683835:6(775-799)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2336838
Flathmann CSchelble BMcNeese NKnijnenburg BGramopadhye AChalil Madathil K(2023)The Purposeful Presentation of AI Teammates: Impacts on Human Acceptance and PerceptionInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.225498440:20(6510-6527)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2254984
Schmitz-Hübsch ABecker RWirzberger M(2023)Personality Traits in the Emotion-Performance-Relationship in Intelligent Tutoring SystemsAdaptive Instructional Systems10.1007/978-3-031-34735-1_5(60-75)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34735-1_5
Hein PGönültas DBernhagen MDettmann ABullinger A(2022)Mid-Air Haptic Cues for Safety-Critical Communication: (Re-)Exploring Air-Vortex Rings in Human-Machine InteractionProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202210.1145/3543758.3543949(41-51)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543758.3543949
Camara Dit Pinto SMasson DVilleneuve EBoy GUrfels L(2021)FROM REQUIREMENTS TO PROTOTYPING: APPLICATION OF HUMAN-SYSTEM INTEGRATION METHODOLOGY TO DIGITAL TWIN DESIGNProceedings of the Design Society10.1017/pds.2021.4231(1617-1626)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.423
Dit Pinto SVilleneuve EMasson DBoy GBaron TUrfels L(2021)Digital twin design requirements in downgraded situations managementIFAC-PapersOnLine10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.10254:1(869-873)Online publication date: 2021
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.102
Sawyer BMiller DCanham MKarwowski W(2021) HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN OF A 3 : AUTOMATION, AUTONOMY, AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HANDBOOK OF HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS10.1002/9781119636113.ch52(1385-1416)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119636113.ch52
Silva JAraujo L(2020)Android App Development Applied to Remote Tasks Simplification2020 20th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA)10.1109/ICCSA50381.2020.00017(33-39)Online publication date: Jul-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSA50381.2020.00017
Iuskevich IHein AAmokrane-Ferka KDoufene AJankovic M(2020)A DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION MODEL FOR DRIVER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT: APPLICATION TO AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE COCKPIT DESIGN OPTIMIZATIONProceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference10.1017/dsd.2020.1571(2521-2530)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2020
https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.157
Bouzekri ECanny AMartinie CPalanque PGris C(2019)Using Task Descriptions with Explicit Representation of Allocation of Functions, Authority and Responsibility to Design and Assess AutomationHuman Work Interaction Design. Designing Engaging Automation10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_3(36-56)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_3
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

On Safety--Critical Computer Control Systems

Using dynamic adaptive systems in safety-critical domains

A Framework for Assessing Standards for Safety Critical Computer-Based Systems