More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

article

A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources

Author:

Shirley Ann BeckerAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Volume 11, Issue 4

Pages 387 - 406

https://doi.org/10.1145/1035575.1035578

Published: 01 December 2004 Publication History

Abstract

The Web offers older adult users immediate access to health resources that might not otherwise be available. Older adult users, however, may encounter Web barriers associated with normal aging and lower education. The National Institute on Aging Web guidelines were used to assess the usability of 125 Web sites offering health resources. Performance, translation, and reading complexity were also assessed. Results showed that many of the sampled sites were not senior-friendly. Only 12% of the sites offered a Spanish version, many containing nontranslated text. Approximately a third of sampled sites required a college education to comprehend extracted health information.

References

[1]

Administration on Aging. 2002. A profile of older Americans: 2002. Administration on Aging, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.aoa.gov/prof/Statistics/profile/2002profile.pdf.

[2]

American Academy of Family Physicians. 2002. Patient education in your practice: A handbook for the office setting. http://www.aafp.org/publications (Retrieved Dec. 16, 2003).

[3]

American Foundation for the Blind. 2004. Normal changes in the aging eye. http://www.afb.org/ Section.asp?SectionID=35&TopicID=212&SubTopicID=39 (Retrieved April 26, 2004).

[4]

Berkman, N. D., Dewalt, D. A., Pignone, M. P., Sheridan, S. L., Lohr, K. N, Lux, L. Sutton, S. F., Swinson, T., and Bonito, A. J. 2004. Literacy and health outcomes, summary, evidence report. Technology Assessment 87. North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, Publication No. 04-E007-1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Rockville, MD).

[5]

Bernard, M., Liao, C., and Mills, M. 2001. Determining the best online font for older adults. Usability News 3, 1. http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/fontSR.htm (Retrieved Aug. 20, 2003).

[6]

Chadwick-Dias, A., McNulty, M., and Tullis, T. 2003. Web usability and age: How design changes can improve performance. 2003 Conference on Universal Usability, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 30--36.

[7]

Chaparro, A., Bohan, M., Fernandez, J. E., Choi, S. D., and Kattel, B. 1999. The impact of age on computer input device use: Psychophysical and physiological measures. Int. J. Indust. Ergonomics 24, 503--513.

[8]

Charness, N. 2001. Aging and communication: Human factors issues. In Communication, Technology, and Aging: Opportunities and Challenges for the Future, N. Charness, D. C. Park, and B. A. Sabel, Eds. Springer Publishing Co., New York, NY. 1--29.

[9]

Charness, N. and Holley, P. 2001. Cognitive and perceptual constraints. In Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults, W. A. Rogers and A. D. Fisk, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ. 239--254.

[10]

Chisnell, D., Lee, A., and Redish, J. 2004. Designing Web sites for older users: Comparing AARP's studies to earlier findings. Older, Wiser, Wired. http://www.aarp.org/olderwiserwired/oww-features/Articles/a2004-03-03-comparison-studies.html (Retrieved April 30, 2004).

[11]

Craik, F. I. M. and Salthouse, T. A. 2000. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ.

[12]

Davis, T. C., Michielutte, R. M., Askov, E. N., Williams, M. V., and Weiss, B. D. 1998. Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Educ. Behav. 25, 613--624.

[13]

Doak, C., Doak, L., and Root, J. 1996. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills, 2nd Ed. J. B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, PA.

[14]

Echt, K. V. 2002. Designing Web-based health information for older adults: Visual considerations and design directives. In Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web, R. W. Morrell, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ. 61--88.

[15]

Ellis, R. D. and Kurniawan, S. H. 2000. Increasing the usability of online information for older users: A case study in participatory design. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 12, 2, 263--276.

[16]

Fox, S. 2002. Wired seniors. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Wired_Seniors_Report.pdf (Retrieved Dec. 16, 2003).

[17]

Fox, S. and Fallows, D. 2003. Internet health resources. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=95 (Retrieved December 16, 2003).

[18]

Fox, S. 2004. Older Americans and the Internet. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Seniors_Online_2004.pdf (Retrieved April 28, 2004).

[19]

Gazmararian, J., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., Parker, R. M., Scott, T. L., Green D. C., Fehrenbach, S. N., Ren, J., and Koplan, J. P. 1999. Health literacy among medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 281, 545--551.

[20]

Greenspan, R. 2003. Your speed may vary. http://cyberatlas.internet.com/markets/broadband/article/0,10099_2196961,00.html&table1 (Retrieved Dec. 9, 2003).

[21]

Hawthorne, D. 2000. Possible implication of aging for interface designers. Interact. With Comput. 12, 5, 507--528.

[22]

Healthy People 2001. 2000. Health Communication. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/html/volume1/11healthcom.htm (Retrieved April 28, 2004).

[23]

Holt, B. J. and Morrell, R. W. 2002. Guidelines for Web site design for older adults: The ultimate influence of cognitive factors. In Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web, R. W. Morrell, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 109--132.

[24]

Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., and Chissom, B. S. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, Fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Rep. 8--75, Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.

[25]

Kincaid, J. P. and McDaniel, W. C. 1974. An inexpensive automated way of calculating Flesch Reading Ease scores. Patient Disclosure Document 031350, US Patent Office,Washington, DC.

[26]

Kinsella, K. and Velkoff, V. A. 2001. An aging world: 2001. International Population Reports, US Department of Health and Human Services, and US Department of Commerce. http://www. census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p95-01-01.pdf.

[27]

Kirsch, I., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., and Kolstad, A. 1993. Adult literacy in America: A first look at the National Adult Literacy Survey. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.

[28]

Koyanl, S. J., Balley, R. W., and Nall J. R. 2004. Research-based Web design and usability guidelines. National Cancer Institute. http://usability.gov/pdfs/guidelines_book.pdf.

[29]

Mead, S. E., Batsakes, P. J., Fisk, A. D., and Mykityshyn, A. 1999. Application of cognitive theory to training and design solutions for age-related computer use. Int. J. Behav. Develop. 23, 553--573.

[30]

Mead, S. E., Spaulding, V. A., Sit, R. A., Meyer, B., and Walker, N. 1997. Effects of Age and training on World Wide Web navigation strategies. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA. 152--156.

[31]

Miller, R. B. 1968. Response time in user-system conversational transactions. In Proceedings of the AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference 33, 267--277.

[32]

Morrell, R. W., Dailey, S. R., Feldman, C., Mayhorn, C. B., Echt, K. V., Holt, B. J., and Podany, K. I. 2004. Older adults and information technology: A compendium of scientific research and Web site accessibility guidelines. National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD.

[33]

National Work Group On Literacy and Health.1998. Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills. J. Family Prac. 46, 168--175.

[34]

Nia and Nlm. 2002. Making your Web site senior-friendly: A checklist. National Institute on Aging and National Library of Medicine. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf.

[35]

Nielsen, J. 1996. Top ten mistakes in Web design. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html (Retrieved December 13, 2003).

[36]

Nielsen, J. 1999. Designing Web Usability: The Art of Simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.

[37]

Nielsen, J. and Coyne P. K. 2002. Web usability for senior citizens: 46 Design guidelines based on usability studies with people age 65 and older. Nielsen Normal Group Report.

[38]

Nielsen, J. and Tahir, M. 2002. Homepage usability: 50 Websites deconstructed. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.

[39]

Nielsen-Bohlman, L. Panzer, A. M., and Kindig, D. A. 2004. Health literacy a prescription to end confusion. Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Science. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The National Academies Press, Washington DC.

[40]

Qualls, C. D., Harris, J. L., and Rogers, W. A. 2001. Cognitive-linguistic aging: Considerations for home health care environments. In Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults, W. A. Rogers and A. D. Fisk, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ. 47--68.

[41]

Rose, G., Khoo, H., and Straub, D. 1999. Current technological impediments to business-to-consumer electronic commerce. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 2, 1--74.

[42]

Salthouse, T. A. 1991. Theoretical Perspectives on Cognitive Aging. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ.

[43]

Schneiderman, B. 1984. Response time and display rate in human performance with computers. Comput. Surveys 16, 265--285.

[44]

Schneiderman, B. 1998. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd Ed., Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.

[45]

Seidler, R. and Stelmach, G. 1996. Motor control. Encyclopedia of Gerontology: Age, Aging, and the Aged. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA. 177--185.

[46]

Seniornet, Inc. 1998. Research on senior's computer and Internet usage. Commissioned by Charles Schwab and Co., Inc.

[47]

Strong, A. J., Walker, N., and Rogers, W. A. 2001. Searching the World Wide Web: Can older adults get what they need? In Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults, W. A. Rogers and A. D. Fisk, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ. 255--269.

[48]

Tullis, T. S., Boynton, J. L., and Hersh, H. 1995. Readability of fonts in the windows environment. In Proceedings of Computer Human Interactions (CHI) '95. Denver, CO. 127--128.

[49]

University of Utah Health Sciences Center. 1997. Patient Education Materials An Author's Guide. Office of Patient Education, University of Utah Health Sciences Center. http://www.med.utah.edu/pated/authors/literacy.html (Retrieved Dec. 15, 2003).

[50]

U.S. Department of Commerce. 1999. Americans in the information age---falling through the net. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html (Retrieved Dec. 16, 2003).

[51]

U. S. Department of Commerce. 2002. A nation online. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/index.html (Retrieved Dec. 16, 2003).

[52]

Walker, N. Millians, J., and Worden, A. 1996. Mouse accelerations and performance of older computer users. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA. 151--154.

[53]

Westerman, S. J., Davies, D. R., Glendon, A. I., Stammers, R. B., and Matthews, G. 1995. Age and cognitive ability as predictors of computerized information retrieval. Behav. Inform. Technol. 14, 313--326.

[54]

Wickens, C. D. and Holland, J. G. 1999. Engineering psychology and human performance, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

[55]

Worden, A., Walker, N. Bharat, K., and Hudson, S. 1997. Making computers easier for older adults to use: Area cursors and sticky icons. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, GA. 266--271.

[56]

Xiao, B., Lunsford, R., Coulston, R., Wesson, M., and Oviatt, S. 2003. Modeling multimodal integration patterns and performance in seniors: Toward adaptive processing of individual differences. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. Vancouver, B.C. 265--272.

Cited By

Shou MZhou Y(2025)Reduce the digital divide in China: From the perspective of public library constructionsJournal of Librarianship and Information Science10.1177/09610006251321484Online publication date: 2-Mar-2025
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006251321484
Zhou CZhang ZHuang TGu WKaner J(2024)A Bibliometric Analysis of Interaction Interface Aging Research: From 2003 to 2022Sage Open10.1177/2158244024125222514:3Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241252225
Figueira ICha YBranham S(2024)Intersecting Liminality: Acquiring a Smartphone as a Blind or Low Vision Older AdultProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675622(1-14)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663548.3675622
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
    2. Interaction paradigms
      1. Graphical user interfaces

Recommendations

A support to evaluate web accessibility and usability issues for older adults
DSAI '18: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion

The constant evolution of the Web has enabled that new online services in various segments be offered. Following this evolution, it is crucial that its content allows access to the different user's profiles. Older adults (age 60+) are users who typically ...
Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance

We conducted two usability studies that included a total of 49 participants ranging in age from 20 to 82. The goal of Study 1 was to learn whether there were differences in how older adults interact with the Web and whether changes in text size would ...
Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance
CUU '03: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Universal usability

We conducted two usability studies that included a total of 49 participants ranging in age from 20 to 82. The goal of Study 1 was to learn whether there were differences in how older adults interact with the Web and whether changes in text size would ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Volume 11, Issue 4

December 2004

143 pages

ISSN:1073-0516

EISSN:1557-7325

DOI:10.1145/1035575

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2004 ACM.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2004

Published in TOCHI Volume 11, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

186
Total Citations
View Citations
7,773
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)77
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Shou MZhou Y(2025)Reduce the digital divide in China: From the perspective of public library constructionsJournal of Librarianship and Information Science10.1177/09610006251321484Online publication date: 2-Mar-2025
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006251321484
Zhou CZhang ZHuang TGu WKaner J(2024)A Bibliometric Analysis of Interaction Interface Aging Research: From 2003 to 2022Sage Open10.1177/2158244024125222514:3Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241252225
Figueira ICha YBranham S(2024)Intersecting Liminality: Acquiring a Smartphone as a Blind or Low Vision Older AdultProceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3663548.3675622(1-14)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3663548.3675622
Vuong TJacucci GRuotsalo T(2024)Naturalistic Digital Behavior Predicts Cognitive AbilitiesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/366034131:3(1-32)Online publication date: 7-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3660341
Weisz JHe JMuller MHoefer GMiles RGeyer W(2024)Design Principles for Generative AI ApplicationsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642466(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642466
Shou MJia FYu J(2024)Developing urban infrastructure constructions for increasing e-commerce sales: the moderating roles of aging populationIndustrial Management & Data Systems10.1108/IMDS-03-2023-0175124:5(1971-1990)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2023-0175
Castro JMadrigal GRojas L(2024)Eye Tracking to Evaluate Usability with the Older Adults: A Secondary StudySocial Computing and Social Media10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_9(131-145)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-61281-7_9
Aouici SGallou R(2023)L’autonomie administrative à l’épreuve de la dématérialisationRevue des sciences sociales10.4000/revss.10501(42-53)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.4000/revss.10501
McCrae CCurtis AStearns MNair NGolzy MShenker JBeversdorf DCottle ARowe M(2023)Development and Initial Evaluation of Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Rural Family Caregivers of People With Dementia (NiteCAPP): Mixed Methods StudyJMIR Aging10.2196/458596(e45859)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.2196/45859
Lowndes AConnelly D(2023)User experiences of older adults navigating an online database of community-based physical activity programsDIGITAL HEALTH10.1177/205520762311670049(205520762311670)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231167004
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents