Implementation and Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a Flexible Environment

• Barak, M.: 2002, ‘Learning Good Electronics or Coping with Challenging Tasks: The Priorities of Excellent Students', Journal of Technology Education 14(1), 20–34.

  Google Scholar 

• Barak, M. & Doppelt, Y.: 2000, ‘Using Portfolios to Enhance Creative Thinking', Journal of Technology Studies 26(2), 16–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Barak, M. & Doppelt, Y.: 1999, ‘Integrating the CoRT Program for Creative Thinking into a Project-based Technology Curriculum', Research in Science and Technological Education 17(2), 139–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Barak, M., Eisenberg, E. & Harel O.: 1995, ‘What's in the Calculator?’ An Introductory Project for Technology Studies', Research in Science & Technological Education 12(2), 147–154.

  Google Scholar 

• Barak, M. & Maymon, T.: 1998, ‘Aspects of Teamwork Observed in a Technological Task in Junior High Schools', Journal of Technology Education 9(2), pp. 3–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Barak, M., Pearlman-Avnion, S. & Glanz, J.: 1997, ‘Using Developmental Supervision to Improve Science and Technology Instruction in Israel', Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 12(4), 367–382.

  Google Scholar 

• Barak, M. & Raz, E.: 1998, ‘Hot Air Balloons: Project Centered Study as a Bridge between Science and Technology Education', Science Education 84, 27–42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barak, M., Waks, S. & Doppelt, Y.: 2000, ‘Majoring in Technology Studies at High School and Fostering Learning', Learning Environment Research 3, 135–158.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barak, M., Yehiav, R. & Mendelson, N.: 1994, ‘Advancement of Low Achievers Within Technology Studies at High School', Research in Science & Technological Education 12(2), 175–186.

  Google Scholar 

• Barlex, D.: 1994, ‘Organizing Project Work', in F. Banks (ed.), Teaching Technology, Routledge, London, 124–143.

  Google Scholar 

• Barth, R. S.: 1972, ‘Open Education and American School, Shoken Books, NY.

  Google Scholar 

• Denton, H.: 1994, ‘The Role of Group/Team Work in Design and Technology: Some Possibilities and Problems', in F. Banks (ed.), Teaching Technology, Routledge, London, 145–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Dewey, J.: 1916, Democracy and Education, The Free Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Doppelt, Y. & Armon, U.: 1999, August, ‘LEGO-Logo (Multi-Techno-Logo) as an Authentic Environment for Improving the Learning Skills of Low-achievers', Proceedings of EUROLOGO 99 Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria, 197–205.

  Google Scholar 

• Doppelt, Y. & Barak, M.: 2002, ‘Pupils Identify Key Aspects and Outcomes of a Technological Learning Environment', Journal of Technology Studies 28(1), 12–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Doppelt, Y.: 2003, Accepted, ‘Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a MECHATRONICS Context, Submitted to the Journal of Technology Education.

• Fraser, J. B.: 1998, ‘Science Learning Environments: Assessment, Effects and Determinants', in J. B. Fraser & G. K. Tobin (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 527–564.

  Google Scholar 

• Fraser, J. B., Giddings, J. G. & McRobbie, J. C.: 1995, ‘Evolution and Validation Form of an Instrument for Assessing Science Laboratory Classroom Environments', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32(4), 399–422.

  Google Scholar 

• Fraser, J. B. & Tobin, K.: 1991, ‘Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Classroom Environment Research', in J. B. Fraser & J. H. Walberg (eds.), Educational Environments: Evaluation, Antecedents and Consequences, Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 271–292.

  Google Scholar 

• Gardner, H.: 1991, The Unschooled Mind, Basic Books, NY.

  Google Scholar 

• Gardner, H.: 1993, Multiple Intelligences/The Theory in Practice, Basic Books, NY.

  Google Scholar 

• Holt, J.: 1965, How Children Fail, Penguin Education, Harmondsworth.

  Google Scholar 

• Jarvela, S.: 1995, ‘The Cognitive Apprenticeship Model in a Technological Rich Learning Environment: Interpreting the Learning Interaction', Learning and Instruction 5, 237–259.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jarvinen, E.: 1998, ‘The LEGO-Logo Learning Environment in Technology Education: An Experiment in a Finnish Context', Journal of Technology Education 9(2), 47–59.

  Google Scholar 

• Kromholtz, N.: 1998, ‘Simulating Technology Processes to Foster Learning', The Journal of Technology Studies 24(1), 6–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Kolb, D.A.: 1985, Learning Styles Inventory, McBer and Company, Boston, MA.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, H.: 1992, May, ‘Accelerating the Education of all Students', Restructuring Brief, A publication of the North Coast Professional Development Consortium. Retrieved from: http://www.smcoe.k12.ca.us./pdc/PDS/restruct2.html.

• Papert, S.: 1980, Mindstorms, Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books Inc., New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Papert, S.: 1991, ‘Perestroika and Epistemological Politics', in I. Harel & S. Papert (eds.), Constructionism, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 13–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Perkins, N. D.: 1992, ‘Technology Meets Constructivism: Do They Make a Marriage?', in T. M. Duffy & H. D. Jonassen (eds.), Constructivizim and Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, Chap. 4, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 45–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.: 1969, The Psychology of the Child, Basic Books, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Resnick, M., & Ocko, S.: 1991, ‘LEGO-Logo: Learning through and About Design', in I. Harel & S. Papert (eds.), Constructionism, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 141–150.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, C.: 1994, Freedom to Learn, 3rd ed., Merril, New Yord.

  Google Scholar 

• Sternberg, J. R. & Grigirenko, E. L.: 1995, ‘Styles of Thinking in the School', European Journal for High Ability 6, 201–219

  Google Scholar 

• Sternberg, J. R.: 1998, January, ‘Teaching and Assessing for Successful Intelligence', The School Administrator, 26–31.

• Waks, S.: 1995, Novmber, ‘Why Technology Education in the New South Africa', Technology for All, 5.

Download references