Abstract
Existing literature about constructing composite indicators (CIs) mainly depend on weighting sub-indicators. In this paper, we first use a state-of-the-art MCDM method with mild weights restrictions to aggregate sub-indicators, without determining exact values of weights. We take into consideration of all possible importance rankings of sub-indicators to construct CIs. Two alternative approaches, namely, minimizing the total deviation from the ideal point and minimizing the mean absolute deviation, are then proposed to develop weighting schemes with respect to all sub-indicators sequences. The proposed approaches are applied to construct a Sustainable Energy Index for eighteen APEC economies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura R (2008) A survey of composite indices measuring country performance: 2008 update. A UNDP/ODS working paper, office of development studies, United Nations Development Programme, New York
Booysen F (2002) An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Soc Indic Res 59(2):115–151
Chercheye L, Moesen W, Rogge N, Van Puyenbroeck T, Saltelli A, Liska R, Tarantola S (2008) Creating composite indictors with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index. J Oper Res Soc 59:239–251
Esty DC, Levy MA, Srebotnjak T, De Sherbinin A, Kim CH, Anderson B (2006) Pilot environment performance index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven
Freudenberg M (2003) Composite indicators of country performance. OECD science, technology and industry working papers
Fu Y, Lai KK, Miao Y, Leung JWK (2015) A distance-based decision-making method to improve multiple criteria ABC inventory classification. Int Trans Oper Res. doi:10.1111/itor.12193
Gomez-Limon JA, Riesgo L (2009) Alternative approaches to the construction of a composite indicator of agricultural sustainability: an application to irrigated agriculture in the Duero basin in Spain. J Environ Manage 90(11):3345–3362
Guardiola J, Picazo-Tadeo AJ (2014) Building weighted-domain composite indices of life satisfaction with data envelopment analysis. Soc Indic Res 117(1):257–274
Hatefi SM, Torabi SA (2010) A common weight MCDA–DEA approach to construct composite indicators. Ecol Econ 70(1):114–120
Hoskins BL, Mascherini M (2009) Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Soc Indic Res 90(3):459–488
Jefferson M (2006) Sustainable energy development: performance and prospects. Renew Energy 31(5):571–582
Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008) Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Int J Prod Econ 113(2):1025–1030
Luzzati T, Gucciardi G (2015) A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: an illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU countries. Ecol Econ 113:25–38
Ma J, Fan ZP, Huang LH (1999) A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur J Oper Res 112(2):397–404
Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffmann A, Giovannini E (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Ng WL (2007) A simple classifier for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Eur J Oper Res 177(1):344–353
Ng WL (2008) An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. Eur J Oper Res 186(3):1059–1067
OECD (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing, Paris
Soylu B, Akyol B (2014) Multi-criteria inventory classification with reference items. Comput Ind Eng 69:12–20
Wang YM, Wang S (2013) Approaches to determining the relative importance weights for cross-efficiency aggregation in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 64:60–69
Zanella A, Camanho AS, Dias TG (2015) Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 245(2):517–530
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2006) Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environment index: an objective measure. Ecol Econ 59(3):305–311
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2007) A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators. Ecol Econ 62(2):291–297
Zhou P, Fan LW, Zhou DQ (2010a) Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: a multiplicative optimization approach. Soc Indic Res 96(1):169–181
Zhou P, Fan LW, Zhou DQ (2010b) Data aggregation in constructing composite indicators: a perspective of information loss. Expert Syst Appl 37(1):360–365
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, C., Wu, X., Fu, Y. et al. Alternative approaches to constructing composite indicators: an application to construct a Sustainable Energy Index for APEC economies. Oper Res Int J 17, 747–759 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0235-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0235-z