A quantitative approach to recommend promising technologies for SME innovation: a case study on knowledge arbitrage from LCD to solar cell

• Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(6), 734–749.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Almeida, P., Dokko, G., & Rosenkopf, L. (2003). Start-up size and the mechanism of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Research Policy, 32(2), 301–315.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Avancini, H., Candela, L., & Straccia, U. (2007). Recommenders in a personalized, collaborative digital library environment. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 28(3), 253–283.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bengisu, M., & Nekhili, R. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies with the aid of science and technology databases. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 835–844.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Callon, M. J., & Rip, L. A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology, sociology of science in the real world. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

  Google Scholar 

• Carayannis, E. G. (2007). Knowledge-driven creative destruction, or leveraging knowledge for competitive advantage: strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity as real options drivers triggered by co-opetition, co-evolution, and co-specialization. Industry and Higher Education, 22(6), 343–353.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., & Givens, N. (2011). Knowledge arbitrage, serendipity, and acquisition formality: their effects on sustainable entrepreneurial activity in regions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(3), 564–577.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen, Y. H., Chen, C. Y., & Lee, S. C. (2010). Technology forecasting of new clean energy: the example of hydrogen energy and fuel cell. African Journal of Business Management., 4(7), 1372–1380.

  Google Scholar 

• Chen, K. Y., Luesukprasert, L., & Chou, S. (2007). Hot topic extraction based on timeline analysis and multidimensional sentence modeling. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(8), 1016–1025.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cozzens, S., Gatchair, S., Kim, K. S., Ordóñez, G., & Porter, A. (2005). Emerging technologies: Quantitative identification and measurement. A report prepared for the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. Atlanta: Technology Policy and Assessment Center, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology. http://smartech.gatech.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1853/41851/100091_TPAC_final_report_51366g3.pdf.

• Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Das, A.S., Datar, M., Garg A., & Rajaram, S. (2007). Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web.

• Dibrell, C., Davis, P. S., & Craig, J. (2008). Fueling innovation through information technology in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(2), 203–218.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fiscus, J. G., & Doddington, G. R. (2002). Topic detection and tracking evaluation overview. Boston: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Gordon, G. L., Schoenbachler, D. D., Kaminski, P. F., & Brouchous, K. A. (1997). New product development: using the salesforce to identify opportunities. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 12(1), 33–49.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gordon, S., Tarafdar, M., Cook, R., Maksimoski, R., & Rogowitz, B. (2008). Improving the front end of innovation with information technology. Research Technology Management, 51(3), 50–58.

  Google Scholar 

• Hage, J. (2005). Organizations and innovation: contributions from organizational sociology and administrative science. In S. Casper & F. V. Waarden (Eds.), Innovation and institutions: A multidisciplinary review of the study of innovation systems. Edward Elgar.

• Hamel, G. (2002). Leading the revolution: how to thrive in turbulent times by making innovation a way of life. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  Google Scholar 

• He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133–159.

  Google Scholar 

• Hughes, A. (1997). Small firms and employment. WP71. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

• Jun, S. P. (2012). An empirical study of users’ hype cycle based on search traffic: the case study on hybrid cars. Scientometrics, 91(1), 81–99.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kontostathis, A., Galitsky, L. M., Pottenger, W. M., Roy, S., & Phelps, D. J. (2003). A survey of emerging trend detection in textual data mining. In Michael. Berry (Ed.), A Comprehensive Survey of Text Mining. Berlin: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Kontostathis, A., Holzman, L.E., & Pottenger, W.M. (2004). Use of term clusters for emerging trend detection. Technical report.

• Lee, W. H. (2008). How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: an example in the field of Information Security. Scientometrics, 76(3), 503–525.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Liu, C. Y., & Wang, J. C. (2010). Forecasting the development of the biped robot walking technique in Japan through S-curve model analysis. Scientometrics, 82(1), 21–36.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lukács, E. (2005). The economic role of SMEs in world economy, especially in Europe. Journal of European Integration Studies, 4(1), 3–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Makkonen, J., Ahonen-Myka, H., & Salmenkivi, M. (2004). Simple semantics in topic detection and tracking. Information Retrieval, 7(3–4), 347–368.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mathioudakis, M., & Koudas, N. (2010). Twitter monitor: Trend detection over the twitter stream. SIGMOD Conference, pp. 1155–1158.

• Mcadam, R., & McClelland, J. (2002). Source of new product idea and creative practices in the UK textile industry. Technovation, 22(2), 113–121.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McNee, S.M., Kapoor, N., & Konstan, J.A. (2006). Don’ look stupid: Avoiding pitfalls when recommending research papers. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2006), Banff, Canada.

• Meyer, P. S., Yung, J. W., & Ausubel, J. H. (1999). A primer on logistic growth and substitution: the mathematics of the Loglet Lab software. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 61(3), 247–271.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• NISTEP (2005) Japanese website: http://www.nistep.go.jp/index-j.html.

• Okuwada, K. (2008). Elements of Converging Technologies. CACCI Journal, 1, 1–6.

  Google Scholar 

• Pasca, M., & Durme, B.V. (2007). What you seek is what you get: Extraction of class attributes from query logs. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-07), pp. 2832–2837.

• Popper, R. (2008). Foresight methodology. In L. Georghiou, H. J. Cassingena, M. Keenan, I. Miles, & R. Popper (Eds.), The handbook of technology foresight: concepts and practice (pp. 44–88). UK: Edward Elgar.

  Google Scholar 

• PROMTECH. (2007). Identification and assessment of promising emerging technological fields in Europe, final report. Vienna: AIT.

  Google Scholar 

• Ravichandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 237–276.

  Google Scholar 

• Rech, J. (2007). Discovering trends in software engineering with google trend. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 32(2), 1–2.

  Google Scholar 

• Roche, I., Besagni, D., Francois, C., Horlesberger, M., & Schiebel, E. (2010). Identification and characterisation of technological topics in the field of molecular biology. Scientometrics, 82(3), 663–676.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salton, G. (1989). Automatic text processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

• Schmidt, T., & Vosen, S. (2009). Forecasting private consumption: survey-based indicators vs. google trends. Ruhr Economic Papers, p. 155.

• Smeaton, A. F., & Callan, J. (2005). Personalisation and recommender systems in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 57(4), 299–308.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tseng, Y. H., Lin, Y. I., Lee, Y. Y., Hung, W. C., & Lee, C. H. (2009). A comparison of methods for detecting hot topics. Scientometrics, 8(1), 73–90.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Webb, G.K. (2009). Forecasting US home foreclosures with an index of internet keyword searches. In: Value creation in E-business management. Lecture notes in business information processing, 36(3), 196–203.

• Yoon, J. H., & Kim, K. S. (2011). Identifying rapidly evolving technological trends for R&D planning using SAO-based semantic patent networks. Scientometrics, 88(1), 213–228.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yoon, J. H., & Kim, K. S. (2012). Detecting signals of new technological opportunities using SAO-based semantic patent analysis and outlier detection. Scientometrics, 90(2), 445–461.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(2), 145–160.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references