[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

IT leadership from a problem solving perspective

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information Technology (IT) leadership is a domain in need of investigation and development. Here, we present a general model for problem solving leadership and describe our application of that model to IT organizations, with special attention to the role of the Chief Information Officer (CIO). We tested the real-world value of this model through intensive interviews with 26 senior IT executives of major organizations, from which we identified four key leadership challenges facing CIOs today: (1) bridging cognitive gaps; (2) building and managing problem solving diversity; (3) shifting focus to process; and (4) solving problems and managing change. Integrating problem solving concepts with insights gained from the interviews, we offer practical approaches for aligning IT with business objectives, transforming the image of IT, and managing change, among other recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It has also been referred to as “IS strategic leadership” [42].

References

  1. Applegate LM, Elam JJ (1992) New information systems leaders: a changing role in a changing world. MIS Q 16(4):460–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bass BM (1990) Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boynton AC, Zmud RW, Jacobs GC (1994) The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations. MIS Q 18(3):299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broadbent M, Kitzis ES (2005) The new CIO leader: setting the agenda and delivering results. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brodeur CW (2007) Measuring team performance: using changing theory to improve problem solving outcomes. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida

  6. Buffington KW, Jablokow KW, Martin KA (2002) Project team dynamics and cognitive style. Eng Manage J 14(3):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buttner EH, Gryskiewicz N (1993) Entrepreneurs’ problem-solving styles: an empirical study using the Kirton adaption/innovation theory. J Small Bus Manag 31(1):22–31

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buttner EH, Gryskiewicz N, Hidore SC (1999) The relationship between styles of creativity and management skills assessment. Br J Manag 10:228–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrd TA, Davidson NW (2006) An empirical examination of a process-oriented IT business success model. Inf Technol Manage 7:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chatterjee D, Richardson VJ, Zmud RW (2001) Examining the shareholder wealth effects of announcements of newly created CIO positions. MIS Q 25(1):43–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen DQ, David SP (2007) Understanding CIO role effectiveness: the antecedents and consequents. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, p 237a

  12. Chilton MA, Hardgrave WC (2005) Person-job cognitive style fit for software developers. J Inf Manage Syst 22(2):193–226

    Google Scholar 

  13. Church AH, Waclawski J (1998) The relationship between individual personality orientation and executive leadership behaviour. J Occup Organ Psychol 71:99–125

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clapp RG (1990) The fate of ideas that aim to stimulate change in a large organization. Teorie Vedy (Theory of Science) 1(2):53–60

    Google Scholar 

  15. Earl MJ, Feeny DF (1994) Is your CIO adding value? Sloan Manage Rev 35(3):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  16. Earl MJ, Feeny DF (2000) How to be a CEO for the information age. Sloan Manage Rev 41(2):11

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emery JC (1991) What role for the CIO? MIS Q 15(2):vii–x

    Google Scholar 

  18. Enns HG, Huff SL, Higgins CA (2003) CIO lateral influence behaviors: gaining peers’ commitment to strategic information systems. MIS Q 27(1):155–176

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feeny DF, Edwards BR, Simpson KM (1992) Understanding the CEO/CIO relationship. MIS Q 16(4):435–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feeny DF, Willcocks LP (1998) Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Manage Rev 39(3):9–21

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foxall GR, Bhate S (1991) Cognitive style, personal involvement, and situation as determinants of computer use. Technovation 11(3):183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Foxall GR, Bhate S (1993) Cognitive styles and use-innovativeness for applications software in home computing: implications for new product strategy. Technovation 13:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foxall GR, Bhate S (1999) Computer use-innovativeness: cognition and context. Int J Technol Manage 17:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Foxall GR, Hackett PMW (1994) Styles of managerial creativity: a comparison of adaption-innovation in the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. Br J Manag 4:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Friedel CR, Irani T, Rhoades E, Fuhrman NE, Gallo M (2008) It’s in the genes: exploring relationships between critical thinking and problem solving in undergraduate agri-science students’ solutions to problems in mendelian genetics. J Agric Educ 49(4):25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Galbraith JR (1977) Organizational design. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gilbert AH Jr, Pick RA, Ward SG (1999) The role of the CIO: enduring MIS issues. J Comput Inf Syst 40(1):8–16

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goldsmith RE, Kerr JR (1991) Entrepreneurship and adaption-innovation theory. Technovation 11(6):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grover V, Jeong S-R, Kettinger WJ, Lee CC (1993) The chief information officer: a study of managerial roles. J Manage Inf Syst 10(2):107–130

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guilford JP (1950) Creativity. Am Psychol 5:444–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hammerschmidt P (1996) The Kirton adaption-innovation inventory and group problem solving success rates. J Creat Behav 30:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hammerschmidt P, Jennings AC (1992) The impact of personality characteristics on leadership effectiveness ratings. In: Clark KE, Clark MB, Campbell DP (eds) Impact of leadership. Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC, pp 469–475

  33. Huang CD, Hu Q (2007) Achieving IT-Business strategic alignment via enterprise-wide implementation of balanced scorecards. Inf Syst Manage 24:173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Isaksen SG, Babij BJ, Lauer KJ (2003) Cognitive styles in creative leadership practices: exploring the relationship between level and style. Psychol Rep 93:983–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jablokow KW (2005) The catalytic nature of change: implications for scientific problem solving in the 21st century. Technol Soc 27:531–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jablokow KW (2007) Engineers as problem-solving leaders: embracing the humanities. IEEE Technol Soc 26(4):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jablokow KW (2008) Developing problem solving leadership: a cognitive approach. Int J Eng Educ 24(3):936–954

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jablokow KW, Booth DE (2006) The impact and management of cognitive gap in high performance product development organizations. J Eng Technol Manage 23(4):313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jablokow KW, Michael JK (2009) Problem solving, creativity, and the level-style distinction. In: Zhang L-F, Sternberg RJ (eds) Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles. Springer, New York, NY, pp 137–168

  40. Jarvenpaa SL, Ives B (1991) Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology. MIS Q 15(2):205–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnson AM, Lederer AL (2010) “CEO/CIO mutual understanding, strategic alignment, and the contribution of IS to the organization. Inf Manage 47:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Karahanna E, Watson RT (2006) Information systems leadership. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 53(2):171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Karimi J, Gupta YP, Somers TM (1996) The congruence between a firm’s competitive strategy and information technology leader’s rank and role. J Manage Inf Syst 13(1):63–88

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kelly GA (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. Norton, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kirton M (1976) Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. J Appl Psychol 61:622–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kirton M (1984) Adaptors and innovators—why new initiatives get blocked. Long Range Plann 17(2):137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kirton M (2003) Adaption-innovation in the context of diversity and change. Routledge, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lapointe L, Rivard S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Q 29(3):461–491

    Google Scholar 

  49. Larson EW, Gobeli DH (1988) Organizing for product development projects. J Prod Innov Manage 5:180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Li Y, Tan C-H, Teo H-H, Bernard CYT (2006) Innovative usage of information technology in singapore organizations: do CIO characteristics make a difference? IEEE Trans Eng Manage 53(2):177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Loftin D (2006) Problem solving style and the inventive process. M.S. Thesis, Penn State University

  52. Lopez-Mesa B, Thompson G (2006) On the significance of cognitive style and the selection of appropriate design methods. J Eng Des 17(4):371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Love JA (1985) Design engineering success in a high technology environment: its prediction and rewards. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California-Berkeley

  54. Luftman J, Brier T (1999) Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. Calif Manage Rev 42(1):109

    Google Scholar 

  55. Marakas G, O’Brien JA (2005) Management information systems. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  56. Moynihan T (1990) What chief executives and senior managers want from their IT departments. MIS Q 14(1):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mullany MJ (2004) The impact of the analyst-user cognitive gap on an information system’s development life cycle: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the national advisory committee on computing qualifications, Christchurch, New Zealand

  58. Mullany MJ (2006) The use of analyst-user cognitive style differentials to predict aspects of user satisfaction with information systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Auckland University of Technology

  59. Palmer J (1991) Scientists and information: II. Personal factors in information behaviour. J Doc 47(3):254–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  61. Polansky M, Inuganti T, Wiggins S (2004) The 21st century CIO. Bus Strategy Rev 15(2):29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Prato Previde G, Rotondi P (1996) Leading and managing change through adaptors and innovators. J Leadersh Stud 3(3):120–134

    Google Scholar 

  63. Preston DS (2004) Shared mental models between the chief information officer and top management team: toward information systems strategic alignment. Dept. of MIS, University of Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  64. Preston DS, Elena K (2004) Mechanisms for the development of shared mental models between the CIO and top management team. In: Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on information systems, Washington, D.C.

  65. Puccio GJ, Talbot RJ, Joniak AJ (2000) Examining creative performance in the workplace though a person-environment fit model. J Creat Behav 34(4):227–247

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rhodes JM (1961) An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 42:305–310

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rickards T, Moger S (1994) Felix and oscar revisited: an exploration of the dynamics of a real-life odd couple work relationship. J Appl Behav Sci 30(1):108–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Rickards T, Moger S (2000) Creative leadership processes in project team development: an alternative to Tuckman’s stage model. Br J Manag 11:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rieple A (2004) Understanding why your new design ideas get blocked. Design Manage Rev 15(1):36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Rosenfeld RB, Winger-Bearskin M, Marcic D, Braun CL (1993) Delineating entrepreneurs’ styles: application of adaption-innovation subscales. Psychol Rep 72:287–298

    Google Scholar 

  71. Samuel R (2010) Trust in technology and cognitive style: a study of a mandated information system in contact centers. Ph.D. Thesis, Robert Morris University

  72. Schiesser R, IT Systems Management (2001) Designing, implementing, and managing world-class infrastructures. Prentice Hall, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  73. Scott S (2007) Team performance and the problem solving approach. J Ind Technol 23(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shields PM (2003) A pragmatic teaching philosophy. J Public Aff Educ 9(1):7–12

    Google Scholar 

  75. Silvius AJG (2009) Business and IT alignment: what we know and what we don’t know. In: Proceedings of 2009 international conference on information management and engineering, IEEE computer society. pp 558–563

  76. Sim ER, Wright G (2002) A comparison of adaption-innovation styles between information science majors and computer science majors. J Inf Syst Educ 13(1):29–35

    Google Scholar 

  77. Smaltz DH, Sambamurthy V, Agarwal R (2006) The antecedents of CIO role effectiveness in organizations: an empirical study in the healthcare sector. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 53(2):207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Smith H, Peter F (2002) Business process management: the third wave. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa, FL

  79. Spanyi A (2003) Business process management is a team sport: play it to win! Anclote Press, Anclote Keys, FL

  80. Stephens CS, Ledbetter WN, Mitra A, Ford FN (1992) Executive or functional manager? The nature of the CIO’s job. MIS Q 16(4):449–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Sternberg RJ, Elena LG (2001) A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In: Sternberg RJ, Zhang L-F (eds) Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Routledge, London, United Kingdom, pp 1–22

  82. Stoyanov S, Kirschner P (2007) Effect of problem solving support and cognitive style on idea generation: implications for technology-enhanced learning. J Res Technol Educ 40(1):49–63

    Google Scholar 

  83. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  84. Stum J (2009) Kirton’s adaption-innovation theory: managing cognitive styles in times of diversity and change. Emerging Leadersh Journeys 2(1):66–78

    Google Scholar 

  85. Tan FB, Brent Gallupe R (2006) Aligning business and information systems thinking: a cognitive approach. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 53(2):223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Travers M (2001) Qualitative research through case studies. Sage Publications, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  87. Tuckman BW, Mary Ann CJ (1977) Stages of small group development revisited. Group Organ Stud 2:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Tullett AD (1996) The thinking style of the managers of multiple projects: implications for problem solving and decision making when managing change. Int J Project Manage 14:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Watson RT (1990) Influences on information systems managers’ perceptions of key issues: information scanning and relationship with the CEO. MIS Q 14(2):217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Weiss JW, Anderson D Jr (2004) CIOs and IT professionals as change agents, risk and stakeholder managers: a field study. Eng Manage J 16(2):13–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere thanks to all the participants in this study for sharing their time, experience, and insights with us so generously. We also gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments of M. J. Kirton and four anonymous reviewers in the completion and revision of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Graduate Professional Studies, Pennsylvania State University, Malvern, PA, 19355, USA

    K. W. Jablokow

  2. Deptartment of Mechanical Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    A. G. Jablokow

  3. CTS Partners, Conshohocken, PA, 19428, USA

    C. T. Seasock

Authors
  1. K. W. Jablokow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. G. Jablokow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. T. Seasock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. W. Jablokow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jablokow, K.W., Jablokow, A.G. & Seasock, C.T. IT leadership from a problem solving perspective. Inf Technol Manag 11, 107–122 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-010-0071-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-010-0071-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation