Students’ perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning

• Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. ECAR, 3, 1–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

  Google Scholar 

• Buhay, D., Best, L., & McGuire, K. (2010). The effectiveness of library instruction: Do student response systems (clickers) enhance learning? The Canadian Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(1): Retrieved May 23, 2011 from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol1/iss1/5/.

• Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Direction for Teaching, no.47, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• DeBourgh, G. (2008). Use of classroom “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nursing Education in Practice, 8, 76–87.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• DeBourgh, G. (2007). Use of classroom “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 8, 76–87.

  Google Scholar 

• DeCaprariis, P. P. (1997). Impediments to providing scientific literacy to students in introductory survey courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45(3), 207–210.

  Google Scholar 

• Dolinsky, B. (2001). An active learning approach to teaching statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 55–56.

  Google Scholar 

• Draper, S. W., & Brown, W. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81–94.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Draper, S. W., Cargill, J., & Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 13–23.

  Google Scholar 

• Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology for learning and instruction. Boston: Pearson Education.

  Google Scholar 

• Duncan, D. (2005). Clickers in the classroom: How to enhance science teaching using classroom response systems. San Francisco: Pearson Education/Addison Wesley/Benjamin Cummings.

  Google Scholar 

• Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101–109.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glaser, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research. American Psychologist, 45(1), 29–39.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Greer, L., & Heaney, P. J. (2004). Real time analysis of student comprehension: an assessment of electronic student response technology in an introductory earth science course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 52(4), 345–351.

  Google Scholar 

• Guthrie, R., & Carlin, A. (2004). Waking the dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom. New York: Proceedings of the tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, J. T. (2005). Creating learner centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education. Journal of Dental Education, 69(3), 378–381.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, K., & Lillis, C. (2010). Clickers in the laboratory: student thoughts and views. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 139–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Computers as cognitive tools: learning with technology and not from technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 6, 40–73.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167–181.

  Google Scholar 

• Kyei-Blankson, L. (2009). Enhancing student learning in a graduate research methods and statistics course with clickers. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 32(4). Retrieved May 23, 2011 from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/EnhancingStudentLearninginaGra/192963.

• Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (learning in doing: social, cognitive and computational perspectives). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• MacGeorge, E. L., Homan, S. R., Dunning, J. B., Elmore, D., Bodie, G. D., & Evans, E. (2007). Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9053-6.

• Majerich, D., Stull, J., Varnum, S. J., & Ducette, J. P. (2011). Facilitation of formative assessments using clickers in a university physics course. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7, 12–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Maletiou-Mavrotheris, M. (2003). Technological tools in the introductory statistics classroom: effects on student understanding of inferential statistics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8(3), 265–297.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Paparistodemou, E., & Stylianou, D. (2009). Enhancing statistics instruction in elementary schools: integrating technology in professional development. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6, 57–58.

  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 226–232.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McConnell, D., Steer, D., & Owens, K. (2003). Assessment and active learning strategies for introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(2), 205–216.

  Google Scholar 

• Moredich, C., & Moore, E. (2007). Engaging students through the use of classroom response system. Nurse Educator, 32(3), 113–116.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morling, B., McAuliffe, M., Cohen, L., & DiLorenzo, T. (2008). Efficacy of personal response systems (‘clickers’) in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 45–50.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pan, W., & Tang, M. (2004). Examining the effectiveness of innovative instructional methods on reducing Statistics anxiety for graduate students in the social sciences. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(2), 149–159.

  Google Scholar 

• Perry, N., VandeKamp, K., Mercer, L., & Nordby, C. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulating learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15.

  Google Scholar 

• Pinet, P. R. (1995). Rediscovering geological principles by collaborative learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 43, 371–376.

  Google Scholar 

• Stagg, A., & Lane, M. (2010). Using clickers to support information literacy skills development and instruction in first-year business students. Journal of Information Technology Education, 9, 197–215.

  Google Scholar 

• Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 253–258.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson: Research Corporation.

  Google Scholar 

• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: MIT.

  Google Scholar 

• Wit, E. (2003). Who wants to be … the use of a personal response system in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections, 3(2), 14–20.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references