[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Toward a shape-performance integrated digital twin based on hybrid reduced-order modeling for engineering structures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing demand for structural visualization, health monitoring, and fault diagnosis, the requirements for real-time and highly accurate digital twins (DTs) to realize interactions between the physical and digital spaces have increased. However, the real-time requirements of DT have become an obstacle to their applications in practical engineering. In this work, a hybrid reduced-order modeling (HROM) method was proposed to improve calculation efficiency and ensure the accuracy of the shape-performance integrated DT (SPI-DT). The proposed method is driven by dynamic sensor data and consisted of the reduced-order model (ROM), the Kriging (KRG) model, and the isoparametric element formulation. It also introduces an iterative infilling strategy to select master degrees of freedom (MDOFs) in this method. In addition, the main beam of a gantry crane was used as a numerical example to verify the accuracy and efficiency of the HROM method. The results show that the online computationally cost online of the HROM method is lower than the KRG and ROM methods, which can improve the computational efficiency of the SPI-DT for complex-large structures by significantly reducing the delay time. Moreover, the HROM method had higher prediction accuracy (R-squared = 0.8986) compared with the KRG method (R-squared = 0.8599) and closer to the ROM method (R-squared = 0.9052) since the HROM method based on the ROM data and the data-driven method. This research provides a feasible method for realizing the applications of DT in major engineering equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Liu S, Bao J, Lu Y, Li J, Lu S, Sun X (2021) Digital twin modeling method based on biomimicry for machining aerospace components. J Manuf Syst 58:180–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Toso F, Favato A, Torchio R, Carbonieri M, De Soricellis M, Alotto P, Bolognani S (2020) Digital Twin Software for Electrical Machines (Doctoral dissertation, Universita’Degli Studi di Padova)

  3. Grieves M (2014) Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White paper 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grieves M, Vickers J (2017) Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Kahlen F, Flumerfelt S, Alves A (eds) Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems. Springer, Cham, pp 85–113

  5. He X, Qiu Y, Lai X, Li Z, Shu L, Sun W, Song X (2021) Towards a shape-performance integrated digital twin for lumbar spine analysis. Digit Twin 1(8):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganguli R, Adhikari S (2020) The digital twin of discrete dynamic systems: Initial approaches and future challenges. Appl Math Model 77:1110–1128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, Nee AY (2018) Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 15(4):2405–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Glaessgen E, Stargel D (2012) The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA, p 1818

  9. Tuegel EJ, Ingraffea AR, Eason TG, Spottswood SM (2011) Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int J Aerosp Eng, 2011: 14-27.

  10. Haag S, Anderl R (2018) Digital twin–Proof of concept. Manuf Lett 15:64–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guivarch D, Mermoz E, Marino Y, Sartor M (2019) Creation of helicopter dynamic systems digital twin using multibody simulations. CIRP Ann 68(1):133–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Honghong S, Gang Y, Haijiang L, Tian Z, Annan J (2023) Digital twin enhanced BIM to shape full life cycle digital transformation for bridge engineering. Autom Constr 147:104736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee S, Park S, Kim T, Lieu QX, Lee J (2021) Damage quantification in truss structures by limited sensor-based surrogate model. Appl Acoust 172:107547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moi T, Cibicik A, Rølvåg T (2020) Digital twin based condition monitoring of a knuckle boom crane: an experimental study. Eng Fail Anal 112:104517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu J, Song Y, Tang D, Dai J (2021) A Digital Twin approach based on nonparametric Bayesian network for complex system health monitoring. J Manuf Syst 58:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. García-Macías E, Ubertini F (2022) Real-time Bayesian damage identification enabled by sparse PCE-Kriging meta-modelling for continuous SHM of large-scale civil engineering structures. J Build Eng 59:105004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lai X, Wang S, Guo Z, Zhang C, Sun W, Song X (2021) Designing a shape-performance integrated digital twin based on multiple models and dynamic data: a boom crane example. J Mech Des 143(7):071703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang S, Lai X, He X, Qiu Y, Song X (2021) Building a trustworthy product-level shape-performance integrated digital twin with multifidelity surrogate model. J Mech Des 144(3):031703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rasheed A, San O, Kvamsdal T (2020) Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. Ieee Access 8:21980–22012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hartmann D, Herz M, Wever U (2018) Model order reduction a key technology for digital twins. In: Keiper W, Milde A, Volkwein S (eds) Reduced-order modeling (ROM) for simulation and optimization. Springer, Cham, pp 167–179

  21. Lee K, Carlberg KT (2020) Model reduction of dynamical systems on nonlinear manifolds using deep convolutional autoencoders. J Comput Phys 404:108973

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kapteyn MG, Knezevic DJ, Huynh DBP, Tran M, Willcox KE (2020) Data‐driven physics‐based digital twins via a library of component‐based reduced‐order models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 123(13): 2986-3003

  23. Abbaszadeh M, Dehghan M, Navon IM (2020) A POD reduced-order model based on spectral Galerkin method for solving the space-fractional Gray–Scott model with error estimate. Eng Comput 38:pp 1–24

  24. Qu ZQ (2004) Model order reduction techniques with applications in finite element analysis: with applications in finite element analysis. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guyan RJ (1965) Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA J 3(2):380–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O'Callahan J (1989) A procedure for an improved reduced system (IRS) model. In: Proceedings of 7th IMAC, Las Vegas, NV., 1989

  27. Castanier MP, Tan YC, Pierre C (2001) Characteristic constraint modes for component mode synthesis. AIAA J 39(6):1182–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stabile G, Matthies HG, Borri C (2018) A novel reduced order model for vortex induced vibrations of long flexible cylinders. Ocean Eng 156:191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang B, Li Y, Hao P, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Wang B (2017) Free vibration analysis of beam-type structures based on novel reduced-order model. AIAA J 55(9):3143–3152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kleijnen JP (2009) Kriging metamodeling in simulation: a review. Eur J Oper Res 192(3):707–716

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu H, Zhang W, Zhou N, Xiao L, Zhang J (2022) An active learning Kriging model with adaptive parameters for reliability analysis. Eng Comput, pp 1–18

  32. Qian J, Yi J, Cheng Y, Liu J, Zhou Q (2020) A sequential constraints updating approach for Kriging surrogate model-assisted engineering optimization design problem. Eng Comput 36:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Feng S, Hao P, Liu H, Wang B, Wang B, Yue C (2023) A collaborative model calibration framework under uncertainty considering parameter distribution. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 404:115841

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Bachoc F (2013) Cross validation and maximum likelihood estimations of hyper-parameters of Gaussian processes with model misspecification. Comput Stat Data Anal 66:55–69

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Xi C, Zheng H (2021) Improving the generalized Bloch mode synthesis method using algebraic condensation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 379:113758

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Boschert S, Rosen R (2016) Digital twin—the simulation aspect. In: Hehenberger P, Bradley D (eds) Mechatronic futures. Springer, Cham, pp 59–74

  37. Chakraborty S, Adhikari S, Ganguli R (2021) The role of surrogate models in the development of digital twins of dynamic systems. Appl Math Model 90:662–681

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Kwon K, Frangopol DM (2010) Bridge fatigue reliability assessment using probability density functions of equivalent stress range based on field monitoring data. Int J Fatigue 32(8):1221–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Benasciutti D (2014) Some analytical expressions to measure the accuracy of the “equivalent von Mises stress” in vibration multiaxial fatigue. J Sound Vib 333(18):4326–4340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sidebottom OM (1972) Evaluation of finite-plasticity theories for nonproportionate loading of torsion-tension members: Finite-incremental and total-strain von Mises theories are derived for nonproportionate loading of solid circular torsion-tension members and are compared with test data obtained from members made of either SAE 1045 steel or 7075–76 aluminum alloy. Exp Mech 12:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Roy MJ, Stoyanov N, Moat RJ, Withers PJ (2020) pyCM: An open-source computational framework for residual stress analysis employing the Contour Method. SoftwareX 11:100458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sowa L, Saternus Z, Kubiak M (2017) Numerical modelling of mechanical phenomena in the gantry crane beam. Proc Eng 177:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Qi Q, Tao F, Hu T, Anwer N, Liu A, Wei Y, Nee AYC (2021) Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J Manuf Syst 58:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. He X, Lai X, Yang L, Zhang F, Zhou D, Song X, Sun W (2022) M-LFM: a multi-level fusion modeling method for shape-performance integrated digital twin of complex structure. Front Mech Eng 17(4):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Keane A, Forrester A, Sobester A (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Newton RE (1973) Degeneration of brick-type isoparametric elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 7(4):579–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFB1700704) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52075068).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China

    Xiwang He, Xiaonan Lai, Kunpeng Li, Shuo Wang, Xueguan Song & Wei Sun

Authors
  1. Xiwang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaonan Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kunpeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shuo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xueguan Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xueguan Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

This section introduces the derived formula of the strain transformation matrix. As shown in Fig. 14, combining adjacent nodes can degenerate into a 4 nodes 3D tetrahedral element for a linear 3D hexahedron element with 8 nodes. The processing of equation deducing as follows:

Fig. 14
figure 14

The 8-node spatial elements degenerate into tetrahedral elements

Full size image

First, the shape functions of linear 3D hexahedron elements as an example can be expressed as follows:

$$N_{K} \left( {\xi ,\eta ,\zeta } \right) = \frac{1}{8}\left( {1 + \xi_{K} \xi } \right)\left( {1 + \eta_{K} \eta } \right)\left( {1 + \zeta_{K} \zeta } \right),$$
(33)

where \(\xi_{1} = - 1,\eta_{1} = - 1,\zeta_{1} = - 1, \ldots ,\xi_{8} = - 1,\eta_{8} = 1,\zeta_{8} = 1\), \(\xi_{K} ,\eta_{K} ,\zeta_{K}\) are the element coordinates system of the node [46]. The coordinates of the node in the linear 3D tetrahedral element can be expressed by the shape function:

$$\begin{aligned} u & = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{8} {N_{i} u_{i} } = \left( {N_{1} + N_{2} + N_{3} + N_{4} } \right)u_{3} + \left( {N_{5} + N_{6} } \right)u_{6} + N_{7} u_{7} + N_{8} u_{8} \\ v & = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{8} {N_{i} v_{i} } = \left( {N_{1} + N_{2} + N_{3} + N_{4} } \right)v_{3} + \left( {N_{5} + N_{6} } \right)v_{6} + N_{7} v_{7} + N_{8} v_{8} \\ w & = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{8} {N_{i} w_{i} } = \left( {N_{1} + N_{2} + N_{3} + N_{4} } \right)w_{3} + \left( {N_{5} + N_{6} } \right)w_{6} + N_{7} w_{7} + N_{8} w_{8} . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(34)

The shape function is given in the local coordinate system and according to differentiation:

$$\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \xi } = \frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial u}\frac{\partial u}{{\partial \xi }} + \frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial v}\frac{\partial v}{{\partial \xi }} + \frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial w}\frac{\partial w}{{\partial \xi }}.$$
(35)

Similarly, \(\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \eta }\) and \(\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \zeta }\) can be combined as follows:

$$\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \xi }} \\ {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \eta }} \\ {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \zeta }} \\ \end{array} } \right\} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{\partial u}{{\partial \xi }}} & {\frac{\partial v}{{\partial \xi }}} & {\frac{\partial w}{{\partial \xi }}} \\ {\frac{\partial u}{{\partial \eta }}} & {\frac{\partial v}{{\partial \eta }}} & {\frac{\partial w}{{\partial \eta }}} \\ {\frac{\partial u}{{\partial \zeta }}} & {\frac{\partial v}{{\partial \zeta }}} & {\frac{\partial w}{{\partial \zeta }}} \\ \end{array} } \right]\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial u}} \\ {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial v}} \\ {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial w}} \\ \end{array} } \right\} = [{\mathbf{J}}]\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial u}} \\ {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial v}} \\ {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial w}} \\ \end{array} } \right\},$$
(36)

where \([{\mathbf{J}}]\) denotes the Jacobian matrix,

$$[{\mathbf{J}}] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{\partial u}{{\partial \xi }}} & {\frac{\partial v}{{\partial \xi }}} & {\frac{\partial w}{{\partial \xi }}} \\ {\frac{\partial u}{{\partial \eta }}} & {\frac{\partial v}{{\partial \eta }}} & {\frac{\partial w}{{\partial \eta }}} \\ {\frac{\partial u}{{\partial \zeta }}} & {\frac{\partial v}{{\partial \zeta }}} & {\frac{\partial w}{{\partial \zeta }}} \\ \end{array} } \right].$$
(37)

The strain transformation matrix can be expressed as:

$$[{\mathbf{B}}_{i} ] = \left[ {{\mathbf{J}}^{ - 1} } \right]\left[ \begin{gathered} \begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \xi }} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \eta }} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \zeta }} \\ \end{array} \hfill \\ \begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \eta }} & {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \xi }} & 0 \\ 0 & {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \zeta }} & {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \eta }} \\ {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \zeta }} & 0 & {\frac{{\partial N_{i} }}{\partial \xi }} \\ \end{array} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right].$$
(38)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, X., Lai, X., Li, K. et al. Toward a shape-performance integrated digital twin based on hybrid reduced-order modeling for engineering structures. Engineering with Computers 40, 1157–1175 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01862-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01862-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation