[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Original Articles
  • Published:

Amyloid-β Induces Chemokine Secretion and Monocyte Migration across a Human Blood-Brain Barrier Model

Molecular Medicine volume 4, pages 480–489 (1998)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Aside from numerous parenchymal and vascular deposits of amyloid β (Aβ) peptide, neurofibrillary tangles, and neuronal and synaptic loss, the neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease is accompanied by a subtle and chronic inflammatory reaction that manifests itself as microglial activation. However, in Alzheimer’s disease, alterations in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and chemotaxis, in part mediated by chemokines and cytokines, may permit the recruitment and transendothelial passage of peripheral cells into the brain parenchyma.

Materials and Methods

Human monocytes from different donors were tested for their capacity to differentiate into macrophages and their ability to secrete cytokines and chemokines in the presence of Aβ 1–42. A paradigm of the blood-brain barrier was constructed utilizing human brain endothelial and astroglial cells with the anatomical and physiological characteristics observed in vivo. This model was used to test the ability of monocytes/macrophages to transmigrate when challenged by Aβ 1–42 on the brain side of the blood-brain barrier model.

Results

In cultures of peripheral monocytes, Aβ 1–42 induced the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-12, as well as CC chemokines MCP-1, MIP-1α;, and MIP-1β, and CXC chemokine IL-8 in a dose-related fashion. In the blood-brain barrier model, Aβ 1–42 and monocytes on the brain side potentiated monocyte transmigration from the blood side to the brain side. Aβ 1–42 stimulated differentiation of monocytes into adherent macrophages in a dose-related fashion. The magnitude of these proinflammatory effects of Aβ 1–42 varied dramatically with monocytes from different donors.

Conclusion

In some individuals, circulating monocytes/macrophages, when recruited by chemokines produced by activated microglia and macrophages, could add to the inflammatory destruction of the brain in Alzheimer’s disease.

Introduction

The neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the presence of numerous neuritic plaques containing cores and wisps of fibrillar amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide; these plaques are surrounded by activated microglia, reactive astrocytes, and dystrophic neurites (1). Fibrillar Aβ is also deposited in the vascular walls of intracerebral and leptomeningeal vessels (2). In addition, numerous neurons in the cerebral cortex and subcortical nuclei accumulate neurofibrillary tangles made of paired helical filaments (PHF) derived from the cytoskeletal protein tau (3). These neurons endure apoptotic death that may result from complex interactions between Alzheimer’s presenilin mutation, trophic factor withdrawal, and Aβ (4). The extracellular and intracellular presence of these insoluble, nondegradable, and possibly irritating fibrillar structures appears to provoke a sustained inflammatory-like reaction, which is considered contributory to neurodegeneration (5). A large number of inflammatory components have been identified in AD lesions, among them the activated complement proteins (from C1q to C5b-C9 membrane attack complex), acute-phase reactants, cytokines, and chemokines (6). The principal cell involved in this response appears to be activated microglia (7–9). The potential contribution of circulating monocytes/macrophages to the inflammatory process of AD, however, remains to be elucidated.

Under normal circumstances, the brain parenchyma is separated from the circulation by a selective and efficient blood-brain barrier (BBB). Nevertheless, circulating monocytes could traverse the BBB if attracted by powerful chemotactic stimuli, as occurs in some experimental inflammatory states of the brain (10,11) or following intraparenchymal injections of chemokines (12). A breached BBB may also occur as a complication of hypoxic and ischemic episodes resulting from infarctions commonly observed in AD brains (13). A disturbed BBB in AD is also supported by gross anatomical and functional alterations of the cerebral microvessels (14,15) and by the occasional absence or attenuation of endothelial cells (16). In AD, the large number of amyloid deposits often associated with microvessels (17) [in relation to damaged smooth muscle and endothelial cells (16)], and the presence of multiple inflammatory molecules lend support to the possibility of monocytes transmigrating into the vicinity of Aβ deposits. In the present investigation, we used a model of the human BBB that displays physiological regulation of molecular permeability and permits monocyte transmigration (18,19). We used this paradigm to explore the possibility of transmigration of peripheral monocytes that is facilitated by inflammatory cytokines and chemokines induced by Aβ in macrophages, endothelial cells, and astrocytes in the model.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Synthetic Aβ 1–42 peptide was obtained from California Peptide Research Inc., (Napa, CA). The Aβ was dissolved as 1.0 mM stock in concentrated dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland) and kept at −75°C. The solution was negative for endotoxin (< 10 pg/ml) by the Limulus Lysate Test (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The stock solution was diluted in RPMI 1640 medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) with 10% fetal calf serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT) as indicated. As a control medium, the tissue culture medium was used alone or with 1% DMSO.

Differentiation of Monocytes into Macrophages

Human blood monocytes were obtained from peripheral blood of healthy donors by a modification of the Recalde procedure (20). In 1 ml of RPMI medium with 10% autologous serum, 1 × 106 monocytes were incubated for 8 days alone or in the presence of Aβ 1–42 at indicated concentrations or control medium. The adherent cell density was estimated using the 3-(4–5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5, diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma) assay. In this assay, the medium was removed from the cultures and the remaining nonadherent cells removed by two washes with RPMI medium. To each well, 400 µl of RPMI and 20 µl of MTT solution were added and incubated at 37°C for 4 hr. After removing the medium, 200 µl of acid isopropanol was added to each well and the purple solution was transferred to an ELISA microtiter plate and read at 540 nm. The optical density of medium and cells without MTT was subtracted from the optical density of MTT containing solutions.

Cultures of Peripheral Monocytes

Monocytes (1 × 106) were cultured in 24-well plates using 1 ml of RPMI medium with 10% autologous serum and various concentrations of Aβ 1–42. After 48 hr incubation, the medium was harvested for cytokine assays. RPMI media containing 10% autologous serum with or without DMSO at 1% or 0.1% were used as controls.

ELISA Assays of Cytokines and Chemokines

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, and IL-12 levels in the culture media were determined by a sandwich ELISA as previously described (21). Interleukin-1β, human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and IL-8 levels were determined using Quantikine ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Human macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) and MIP-1β levels were determined by specific sandwich ELISA protocols as described previously (22). Standards were prepared as a 2-fold serial dilution series of recombinant human MIP-1α and MIP-1β (R&D Systerns). These chemokine sandwich ELISAs consistently detect concentrations of human MIP-1α or human MIP-1β >50 pg/ml.

Blood-Brain Barrier Model

The endothelial-astrocytic BBB model was constructed in 24-well tissue culture plate inserts with a CycloporeR polyethylene terephthalate membrane bottom with 2 × 106 pores/cm2 measuring 3 µm in diameter (Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA). The surfaces of the membrane were coated with rat tail collagen type I and with human fibronectin (Collaborative Biomedical Products) as previously described (19). Brain microvascular endothelial cells were isolated from nonepileptogenic lateral temporal cortex obtained during surgical ablation of epileptogenic foci in the medial temporal lobe. Human astrocytes were isolated as described previously (23). To prepare the model, 3 × 104 human astrocytes (HFA) in 300 µl of DME-S medium containing Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F12 (DME/F-12, Sigma), 10% fetal bovine serum, 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 0.14% bicarbonate, 50 mg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (H-Neurext, Upstate Biotechnology), 100 µg/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 250 µg/ml fungizone were plated on the lower surface of the membrane (representing the brain side) with the insert oriented in an upside-down position and the cell suspension contained on the insert by a cut-off bulb from a transfer pipette. After a 4-hr incubation, the insert was placed in the correct position in a 24-well tray and a 310-µl aliquot of 0.4 × 104 brain endothelial cells in DME-S medium was plated in the upper chamber of the insert (representing the blood side of the model). Then 1 ml of DME-S medium was added to the lower chamber. The BBB model has been shown to have a low permeability coefficient to insulin (0.001 ± 0.0002 cm/min) and a restricted transmigration of monocytes (19).

Transmigration of Monocytes

To assess the monocyte/macrophage migration through the BBB model, 160 µg of Aβ 1–42 in 35 µl of medium was placed in the bottom of the lower chamber of six wells and air dried. Another six wells without Aβ were used as null controls. To three of the Aβ containing wells and three of the null control wells, 2 × 104 monocytes in 1 ml DME-S medium were added. After 16 hr of incubation, 5 × 105 monocytes in DME-S medium were added to each of the 12 upper chambers. After a period of 24 hr incubation, the number of monocytes present in each of the chambers was determined using a hemocytometer chamber.

Results

Aβ 1–42 Elicits the Differentiation of Monocytes into Macrophages

Human peripheral blood monocytes were cultured in the presence of Aβ 1–42 and evaluated by the MTT method with respect to differentiation into macrophages. The macrophages were stained positively with CD68 antibody (clone KP-1) using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase technique (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) (data not shown). Monocytes exposed to various doses of Aβ ranging from 1.5 to 12.5 µg/ml differentiated into adherent macrophages with maximum effect at 3–6 µg/ml, whereas higher doses were increasingly toxic (Fig. 1A). This response was also time dependent (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Aβ induces differentiation of monocytes into macrophages. (A) Dose-dependent induction of macrophage differentiation by Aβ 1–42. Monocytes (5 × 105) were incubated for 7 days in the presence of different concentrations of Aβ 1–42, and the adherent macrophage population was estimated using the MTT assay. a, significantly different (p < 0.001) from DMSO control and 0 µl/ml Aβ. (B) Time kinetics of monocyte differentiation into adherent macrophages induced by Aβ 1–42. *, 1.5 µg/ml Aβ, significantly different from 3.0 and 6.0 µg/ml Aβ, p < 0.05.

Full size image

Aβ 1–42 Induces Secretion of Cytokines by Cultured Monocytes

Human monocytes were cultured in the presence of increasing concentrations of Aβ to induce secretion of cytokines. At 0.25 µg/ml, Aβ had no effect on cytokine secretion. However, significant secretion of cytokines was noticed at 2.5 µg/ml, with the largest response at 25 µg/ml (Fig. 2). At this concentration, the secretion of TNF-α by 1 × 106 monocytes amounted to 1400 pg/ml, three times more than that stimulated by the control media containing DMSO (Fig. 2A). At the same concentration of Aβ (25 µg/ml), the secretions of IL-6 and IL-12 were significantly increased, representing 140 pg/ml and 10.5 pg/ml, which is equivalent to about 7 and 20 times more than those observed in control values, respectively (Fig. 2B, C). Aβ 1–42 had no significant effect on the secretion of IL-10 up to 25 µg/ml (Fig. 2D). Aβ 1–42 had only small effect on monocyte secretion of IL-1β: 9.7 pg/ml in control medium, 8.1 pg/ml in medium with 8 µg/ml Aβ 1–42, and 25 pg/ml in medium with 25 µg/ml Aβ 1–42. On the other hand, bacterial lipopoly-saccharide (LPS) (1 µM) stimulated monocytes to release 293 pg/ml of IL-1β, whereas LPS with Aβ 1–42 (25 µg/ml) stimulated the secretion of 211 pg/ml of IL-1β by monocytes.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Aβ induces monocyte secretion of cytokines. Monocytes (5 × 105) were cultivated in RPMI medium with 10% autologous serum in the presence of indicated concentrations of Aβ or DMSO. Media were harvested 48 hr later and the concentrations of (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-6, (C) IL-12, and (D) IL-10 were determined by the cytokine ELISA assay. a, significantly different from DMSO control and 0.25 µg/ml of Aβ, p < 0.05; b, significantly different from 2.5 µg/ml of Aβ, p < 0.05; c, significantly different from 0.25 µg/ml of Aβ, p < 0.05.

Full size image

During the course of this investigation, we noticed individual donor fluctuations in the amount of cytokine secretion when the monocytes were stimulated with Aβ 1–42. Therefore, we investigated these variations in eight individual donors whose monocytes were treated by 2.5 µM Aβ 1–42 (Table 1). With respect to TNF-α, monocyte cultures from five out of eight individuals showed a significant elevation of this cytokine, but cultures of two individuals showed an inhibition. Interleukin-6 and IL-12 demonstrated a substantial increase in seven and four donors, respectively. Interestingly, four individual cultures showed significant depression of IL-12 secretion. In the case of IL-10, only one out of eight individuals exhibited a profound rise in Aβ 1–42-induced secretion (Table 1).

Table 1 Effects of A β 1–42 on monocyte cytokine secretion
Full size table

Aβ 1–42 Induces Secretion of CC and CXC Chemokines by Cultured Monocytes

As with cytokine induction, in comparison to DMSO control, Aβ 1–42 induced secretion of CXC and CC chemokines in a dose-responsive fashion, but with striking heterogeneity among donors (Table 2). The largest inductions of MIP-lα and MIP-1β were 2278-fold and 529-fold greater when compared with the smallest induction, respectively. The responses to Aβ 1–42 of monocyte MIP-1α, MCP-1, and IL-8 secretion were dose related in the range of 0.5 to 50 µg/ml (Fig. 3).

Table 2 Effects of A β 1–42 on chemokine secretion by cultured monocytes from different donors
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Aβ induces monocyte secretion of chemokines. Monocytes (5 × 105) were cultivated in RPMI medium with 10% autologous serum in the presence of indicated concentrations of Aβ. Media were harvested 48 hr later and the concentrations of (A) MIP-1α, (B) MCP-1, and (C) IL-8 were determined by the chemokine ELISA assay. *, post-hoc analysis (Fisher’s LSD) significantly different from Aβ 0.5 and 5 µg/ml, p < 0.05.

Full size image

Aβ 1–42 with Monocytes Stimulate Monocyte Transmigration Across the BBB Model

The BBB model was utilized to test the potential transmigration of monocytes. As described in detail in Materials and Method, the BBB model consists of a monolayer of human endothelial cells derived from cerebral microvessels and human astrocytes separating the vascular side (upper chamber) from the brain parenchymal side (lower chamber). In a control experiment, 5 × 105 human monocytes were placed in the upper chamber and only medium in the lower chamber. After 24 hr an average of 700 monocytes was found in the lower chamber (Fig. 4). When 2 × 104 monocytes were introduced into the lower chamber prior to the experiment, the migration of monocytes from the upper to the lower chamber increased to an average of 3000. Addition of Aβ 1–42 (10 µl, 25 µM) at the bottom of the lower chamber, followed by medium, resulted in the transmigration of 20,000 monocytes in 24 hr. The transmigration of monocytes increased to 63,000 when the lower chamber contained both Aβ 1–42 and 20,000 monocytes (Fig. 4). The monocytes remaining in the upper chamber were correspondingly reduced. The increase in the proportion of transmigrated monocytes in the presence of Aβ and a small number of monocytes varied with different donors (data not shown). Examination of the model by transmission electron microscopy revealed monocyte activation and endothelial cell retraction. Phase contrast microscopy showed macrophages within the holes of the Aβ dot on the bottom (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of Aβ 1–42 on monocyte migration across the blood-brain barrier model. The BBB models were prepared for migration by placing control medium, a dot of Aβ (160 µg), monocytes (2 × 104), or both Aβ and monocytes in the lower chamber, and incubated overnight. The next day, 5 × 105 monocytes were added into the upper chamber and 24 hr later, cell counts in each chamber were determined using a hemocytometer chamber. *, 2 × 104 of monocytes in the lower chamber; #, 160 µg of Aβ 1–42 in the lower chamber; a, significantly different from medium control (p < 0.05); b, significantly different from monocyte groups (p < 0.05); c, significantly different from Aβ alone (p < 0.001).

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Microscopic features of monocyte migration across the blood-brain barrier model. The models were constructed with human brain microvascular endothelial cells on the upper surface and human astrocytes on the lower surface of a porous terephthalate membrane. Monocytes (2.5 × 105) were placed in the upper chamber at the onset of migration. Either Aβ dot with 10,000 monocytes (M) (A and B; transmission electron micrographs, X 9,000) or no Aβ and no monocytes (C; transmission electron micrograph, X 9,000) was placed in the lower chamber. Note monocyte “activation” with abundant endoplasmic reticulum and adhesion to endothelial cells (E) and engagement for migration after retraction of endothelial cells (A and B). TM, terephthalate membrane; AP, astrocytic process. In the model without Aβ or monocytes in the lower chamber, the monocyte in the upper chamber appeared much smaller and without extensive endoplasmic reticulum (C). After transmigration into the lower chamber, the monocytes were seen as differentiated macrophages within the holes of the Aβ dot. Transmigrating monocyte/macrophages adhere to and lyse Aβ 1–42 dot on the bottom of the lower chamber (D; phase contrast, X 200).

Full size image

Discussion

A subtle and chronic local inflammatory reaction involving reactive glial cells is one of the major pathological events in the AD brain (5,6). Microglial activation and numerous proinflammatory molecules, including major histocompatibility complex type I and type II cell-surface glycoproteins, proinflammatory cytokines, chemokine MCP-1, protease inhibitors, eicosanoids, coagulation factors, cell adhesion molecules, advanced glycation end products, and complement components, have been identified in association with the amyloid deposits and the neurofibrillary tangles (24–29). Recent evidence based on clinical-pathological correlation has suggested that inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of AD and the development of dementia. In a small number of individuals with the number and distribution of histopathological lesions necessary to fulfill the diagnosis of AD (30) but without symptoms of dementia, inflammatory markers and microgliosis were absent (31). In the transgenic mice overexpressing the human amyloid-β precursor protein, despite an impressive number of cortical amyloid deposits, the inflammatory reaction was initially not recognized (32), but it has been recently identified. In another transgenic mouse model expressing the human APP with a familial AD gene mutation, the animals showed microglial activation related to Aβ deposits, and the microglial activation preceded the onset of neurodegeneration (33). In the AD brain, microglial activation has been shown to be associated with apolipoprotein E (APO E) ϵ-4 gene dosage (34), suggesting that the well-known association of APO E allele ϵ4 with sporadic AD (35) may be related to the chronic inflammatory reaction in the AD brain.

In vitro cultures of human microglia obtained from rapid autopsies from individuals with AD secreted 100-fold or more C1q, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α than those cells from nonde-mented subjects (36). The secretion of these molecules showed a substantial dose-dependent elevation when the cells were exposed to nM quantities of Aβ 1–42 (37). In a similar experiment, human microglia demonstrated the ability to secrete large quantities of C1q following active phagocytosis of Aβ 1–42 plated at the bottom of the culture well (37).

In this study we have demonstrated the proinflammatory effects of Aβ 1–42 on peripheral monocytes. In a dose- and time-dependent manner, Aβ induced the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages and the hypersecretion of inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12, and chemokines IL-8, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β. Interestingly, among the different donors, there were wide fluctuations in the amount of cytokine and chemokine secretion elicited by Aβ, which may be a reflection of the individual’s immunological responsiveness.

In the AD brain, a large number of amyloid cores are intimately associated with the endothelial basal lamina and in many instances they appear to totally obliterate the lumen of the vessel (17,38). These cores of fibrillar Aβ are surrounded by reactive microglia (5,24). MIP-1α, MIP-1β, MCP-1, and IL-8 are induced in monocyte cultured in the medium with Aβ 1–42. The elevated concentration of chemokines in the brain could permit the transmigration of monocytes from the circulation, as illustrated in our BBB model. It is possible that some of the reactive microglia-like cells surrounding the amyloid plaque cores may be derived from peripheral monocytes/macrophages. Transformation of peripheral monocytes into microglia-like cells has been demonstrated in vitro on monolayers of astrocytes (39) and recently in vivo during autoimmune inflammation of the axotomized rat facial nucleus (11). Nonetheless, human microglia isolated postmortem from patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis appeared identical to spine-bearing microglia derived from normal adult brain (40).

Transmigration of hematogenous cells through the BBB has been documented in inflammatory processes of the brain, such as infections triggered by bacterial (41) or viral diseases (42,43), as well as by autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (44). A breach of the BBB has been induced experimentally after injection of IL-8 and MIP-2 into rodent hippocampus, resulting in the transmigration of leukocytes (12). Gross disruptions in the BBB are also observed in head trauma, hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke (45), acute hypertensive (46) and hypotensive (47) crisis, neurodegenerative diseases (48), and in a variety of toxic conditions. It has been contended that the physical integrity of the cerebral microvasculature and the capacity to repair the BBB may be impaired as a result of aging (49). It has also been proposed that a breakdown of the BBB may be directly responsible for the pathogenesis of sporadic AD or at least synergistically participate with other pathogenetic mechanisms in the development of this dementia (15,50). Chronic monocyte transmigration could also result in subtle damage to the BBB. Interestingly, under normal circumstances a limited amount of Aβ, bound to a variety of transporter molecules such as the APO J and APO E, crosses the BBB (51,52). Perturbations in the BBB would also allow the passage of larger quantities of circulating Aβ linked to other already demonstrated carriers such as albumin (53), α2-macroglobulin (54), transthyretin (55), and amyloid-P component.

In conclusion, numerous studies have shown that Aβ can invoke the secretion of proinflammatory factors by monocytic cells. In AD, increased chemokine and cytokine concentrations in brain parenchyma may attract circulating monocytes/macrophage to migrate across the BBB. The recruitment of peripheral monocytic cells into the cerebral cortex could further intensify the already existing inflammatory reaction, but this may be limited to individuals whose peripheral monocytes are hyperreactive to Aβ. Identification of such individuals among AD patients and the general population may shed light on the role played by the chronic inflammatory reaction in AD.

References

  1. Wisniewski HM, Wegiel J, Wang KC, Kujawa M, Lach B. (1989) Ultrastructural studies of the cells forming amyloid fibers in classical plaques. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 16: 535–542.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glenner GG, Wang CW. (1984) Alzheimer’s disease: Initial report of the purification and characteristics of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 120: 885–890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kidd M. (1963) Paired helical filaments in electron microscopy of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 197: 192–193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo Q, Sopher BL, Furukawa K, Pham DG, Robinson N, Martin GM, Mattson MP. (1997) Alzheimer’s presenilin mutation sensitizes neural cells to apoptosis induced by trophic factor withdrawal and amyloid-β-peptide: Involvement of calcium and oxyradicals. J. Neurosci. 17: 4212–4222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McGeer PL, McGeer EG. (1995) The inflammatory response system of the brain: Implications for therapy of Alzheimer and other neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res. Rev. 21: 195–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers J, O’Barr S. (1997) Inflammatory mediators in Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Wasco W, Tanzi RE (eds). Molecular Mechanisms of Dementia. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 177–198.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Haga S, Akai K, Ishii T. (1989) Demonstration of microglial cells in and around senile (neuritic) plaques in the Alzheimer brain. Acta Neuropathol. 77: 569–575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mackenzie IRA, Hao CH, Munoz DG. (1995) Role of microglia in senile plaque formation. Neurobiol. Aging 16: 797–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perlmutter LS, Scott SA, Barron E, Chui HC. (1992) MHC class II-positive microglia in human brain: Association with Alzheimer lesions. J. Neurosci. Res. 33: 549–558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Butter C, Baker D, O’Neill JK, Turk JL. (1991) Mononuclear cell trafficking and plasma protein extravasation into the CNS during chronic relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in Biozzi AB/H mice. J. Neurol. Sci. 104: 9–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fluegel A, Kreutzberg GW, Graeber MB. (1998) Transformation of bone marrow-derived macrophages into ramified microglia during autoimmune inflammation of the axotomized rat facial nucleus. Presented at the Fifth International Congress of Neuroimmunology, Montreal, Canada.

  12. Bell MD, Taub DD, Perry VH. (1996) Overriding the brain’s intrinsic resistance to leukocyte recruitment with intraparenchymal injections of recombinant chemokines. Neuroscience 74: 283–292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petito CK. (1979) Early and late mechanisms of increased vascular permeability following experimental cerebral infarction. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 38: 222–234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plateel M, Teissier E, Cecchelli R. (1997) Hypoxia dramatically increases the nonspecific transport of blood-borne proteins to the brain. J. Neurochem. 68: 874–877.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buee L, Hof PR, Delacourte A. (1997) Brain microvascular changes in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 826: 7–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalaria RN. (1997) Cerebrovascular degeneration is related to amyloid-beta protein deposition in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 826: 263–271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roher AE, Lowenson JD, Clarke S, Woods AS, Cotter RJ, Gowing E, Ball MJ. (1993) β-Amyloid-(1–42) is a major component of cerebrovascular amyloid deposits: Implications for the pathology of Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90: 10836–10840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Persidsky Y, Stins M, Way D, Witte MH, Weinand M, Kim KS, Bock P, Gendelman HE, Fiala M. (1997) A model for monocyte migration through the blood-brain barrier during HIV-1 encephalitis. J. Immunol. 158: 3499–3510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fiala M, Looney DJ, Stins M, Way D, Zhang L, Gan X, Chiappelli F, Shapshak P, Weinand M, Graves M, Witte M, Kim K-S. (1997) TNF-α opens a paracellular route for HIV-1 invasion across the blood-brain barrier. Mol. Med. 3: 553–564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fogelman AM, Elahi F, Sykes K, Van Lenten BJ, Territo MC, Berliner JA. (1988) Modification of the Recalde method for the isolation of human monocytes. J. Lipid Res. 29: 1243–1247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gan X-H, Robin JP, Huerta JMM, Braquet P, Bonavida B. (1994) Inhibition of TNF-α and IL-1β secretion but not IL-6 from activated human peripheral blood monocytes by a new synthetic demethylpodophyllotoxin derivative. Clin. Immunol. 14: 280–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidtmayerova N, Nottet HSLM, Nuovo G, Raabe T, Flanagan CR, Dubrovsky L, Gendelman HE, Cerami A, Bukrinsky M, Sherry B. (1996) HIV-1 infection alters chemokine β peptide expression in human monocytes: Implications for recruitment of leukocytes into brain and lymph nodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 700–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fiala M, Rhodes RH, Shapshak P, Nagano I, Martinez OM, Diagne A, Baldwin G, Graves M. (1996) Regulation of HIV infection in astrocytes: Expression of Nef, TNF-alpha and IL-6 is enhanced in coculture of astrocytes with macrophages. J. Neurovirol. 2: 158–166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uchihara T, Akiyama H, Kondo H, Ikeda K. (1997) Activated microglial cells are colocalized with perivascular deposits of amyloid-beta protein in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Stroke 28: 1948–1950.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheng JG, Mrak RE, Griffin WS. (1997) Neuritic plaque evolution in Alzheimer’s disease is accompanied by transition of activated microglia from primed to enlarged to phagocytic forms. Acta Neuropathol. 94: 1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ishizuka K, Kimura T, Igata-yi R, Katsuragi S, Takamatsu J, Miyakawa T. (1997) Identification of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in senile plaques and reactive microglia of Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 51: 135–138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dickson DW, Sinicropi S, Yen SH, Ko LW, Mattiace LA, Bucala R, Vlassara H. (1996) Glycation and microglial reaction in lesions of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 17: 733–743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eikelenboom P, Veerhuis R. (1996) The role of complement and activated microglia in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 17: 673–680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalaria RN, Harshbarger-Kelly M, Cohen DL, Premkumar DR. (1996) Molecular aspects of inflammatory and immune responses in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 17: 687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mirra SS, Hart MN, Terry RD. (1993) Making the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. A primer for practicing pathologists. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 117: 132–144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lue LF, Brachova L, Civin WH, Rogers J. (1996) Inflammation, Aβ deposition, and neurofibrillary tangle formation as correlates of Alzheimer’s disease neurodegeneration. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 55: 1083–1088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Games D, Adams D, Alessandrini R, Barbour R, Berthelette P, Blackwell C, Carr T, Clemens J, Donaldson T, Gillespie F, et al. (1995) Alzheimertype neuropathology in transgenic mice overex-pressing V717F β-amyloid precursor protein. Nature 373: 523–527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Frautschy SA, Yang F, Irrizarry M, Hyman B, Saido TC, Hsiao K, Cole GM. (1998) Microglial response to amyloid plaques in APPsw transgenic mice. Am. J. Pathol. 152: 307–317.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Egensperberger R, Koesel S, von Eitzen U, Graeber MB. (1998) Microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: Association with APOE genotype. Brain Pathol. 8: (in press).

  35. Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel D, St Geoge-Hyslop PH, Pericak-Vance MA, Joo SH, Rosi BL, Gusella JF, Crapper-MacLachlan DR, Alberts MJ, Hulette C, Crain B, Golgaber D, Roses AD. (1993) Association of apolipoprotein E allele ϵ-4 with late onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 43: 1467–1472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brachova L, Walker D, Rogers, J. (1996) Alzheimer’s disease and nondemented elderly glial cultures: Constitutive and stimulated expression of complement, cytokines, and apolipoprotein E. Neurobiol Aging (Suppl.) 17: S20.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lue LF, Brachova L, Rogers, J. (1997) Modeling Aβ deposition in cultures of Alzheimer’s glia and HNT neurons. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 23: 533.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miyakawa T, Uehara Y. (1979) Observations of amyloid angiopathy and semile plaques by the scanning electron microscope. Acta Neuropathol. 48: 153–156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sievers J, Parwaresch R, Wottge H-U. (1994) Blood monocytes and spleen macrophages differentiate into microglia-like cells on monolayers of astrocytes: Morphology. Glia 12: 245–258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Giulian D, Li J, Bartel S, Broker J, Li X, Kirkpatrick JB. (1995) Cell surface morphology identifies microglia as a distinct class of mononuclear phagocyte. J. Neurosci. 15: 7712–7726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Seebach J, Bartholdi D, Frei K, Spanaus KS, Ferrero E, Widmer U, Isenmann S, Strieter RM, Schwab M, Pfister H, et al. (1995) Experimental Listeria meningoencephalitis. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha and -2 are produced intrathecally and mediate chemotactic activity in cerebrospinal fluid of infected mice. J. Immunol. 155: 4367–4375.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Nottet HS, Persidsky Y, Sasseville VG, Nukuna AN, Bock P, Zhai QH, Sharer LR, McComb RD, Swindells S, Soderland C, Gendelman HE. (1996) Mechanisms for the transendothelial migration of HIV-1-infected monocytes into brain. J. Immunol. 156: 1284–1295.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Persidsky Y, Gendelman HE. (1997) Development of laboratory and animal model systems for HIV-1 encephalitis and its associated dementia. J. Leukoc. Biol. 62: 100–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hickey WF. (1991) Migration of hematogenous cells through the blood-brain barrier and the initiation of CNS inflammation. Brain Pathol. 1: 97–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Belayev L, Busto R, Zhao W, Ginsberg MD. (1996) Quantitative evaluation of blood-brain barrier permeability following middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Brain Res. 739: 88–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shaver SW, Wall KM, Wainman DS, Gross PM. (1992) Regional quantitative permeability of blood-brain barrier lesions in rats with chronic renal hypertension. Brain Res. 579: 99–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Barzo P, Marmarou A, Fatouros P, Corwin F, Dunbar JG. (1997) Acute blood-brain barrier changes in experimental closed head injury as measured by MRI and Gd-DTPA. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 70: 243–246.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. de la Torre JC, Mussivand T. (1993) Can disturbed brain microcirculation cause Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol. Res. 15: 146–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shah GN, Mooradian AD. (1997) Age-related changes in the blood-brain barrier. Exp. Gerontol. 32: 501–519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hardy JA, Mann DMA, Wester P, Winblad B. (1986) An integrative hypothesis concerning the pathogenesis and progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 7: 489–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zlokovic BV, Martel CL, Matsubara E, McComb JG, Zheng G, McCluskey RT, Frangione B, Ghiso J. (1996) Glycoprotein 330/megalin: Probable role in receptor-mediated transport of apolipoprotein J alone and in a complex with Alzheimer disease amyloid beta at the blood-brain and blood-cere-brospinal fluid barriers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 4229–4234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zlokovic BV. (1996) Cerebral vascular transport of Alzheimer’s amyloid β and apolipoproteins J and E: Possible anti-amyloidogenic role of the blood-brain barrier. Life Sci. 59: 1483–1497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Biere AL, Ostaszewski B, Stimson ER, Hyman BT, Maggio JE, Selkoe DJ. (1996) Amyloid β-peptide is transported on lipoproteins and albumin in human plasma. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 32916–32922.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hughes SR, Khorkova O, Goyal S, Knaeblein J, Heroux J, Riedel NG, Sahasrabudhe S. (1998) α2-macroglobulin associates with β-amyloid peptide and prevents fibril formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95: 3275–3280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tsuzuki K, Fukatsu R, Hayashi Y, Yoshida T, Sasaki N, Takamaru Y, Yamaguchi H, Tateno M, Fujii N, Takahata N. (1997) Amyloid β protein and transthyretin, sequestrating protein colocalize in normal human kidney. Neurosci. Lett. 222: 163–166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Manuel B. Graber for critical reading of the manuscript and MaryAnn Ackers and Harry V. Vinters for examination of the model by transmission electron microscopy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Milan Fiala & Suzan Hama

  2. Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, California, 90095-1769, USA

    Ling Zhang, Xiaohu Gan & Michael C. Graves

  3. The Picower Institute, Manhasset, New York, USA

    Barbara Sherry

  4. National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    Dennis Taub

  5. Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

    Dennis Way, Martin Weinand & Marlys Witte

  6. Haldeman Laboratory for Alzheimer Disease Research, Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, Arizona, USA

    Diane Lorton, Yu-Min Kuo & Alex E. Roher

Authors
  1. Milan Fiala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ling Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaohu Gan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Barbara Sherry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dennis Taub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael C. Graves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Suzan Hama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dennis Way
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Martin Weinand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Marlys Witte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Diane Lorton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yu-Min Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Alex E. Roher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milan Fiala.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Bucala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiala, M., Zhang, L., Gan, X. et al. Amyloid-β Induces Chemokine Secretion and Monocyte Migration across a Human Blood-Brain Barrier Model. Mol Med 4, 480–489 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03401753

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03401753

Keywords

Molecular Medicine

ISSN: 1528-3658