Bridging Query Languages in Semantic and Graph Technologies

1. Kurtev, I., Bézivin, J., Aksit, M.: Technological Spaces: an Initial Appraisal. In: International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, pp. 1–6 (2002)

   Google Scholar 

2. Klyne, G., Carroll, J.J. (eds.): Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax – W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210

3. Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B. (eds.): OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax – W3C Recommendation (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027

4. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification, Version 2.0 (2006), http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.0/PDF

5. Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2008)

   Google Scholar 

6. Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A. (eds.): SPARQL Query Language for RDF – W3C Recommendation (January 15, 2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdf-sparql-query-20080115

7. Ebert, J., Bildhauer, D.: Reverse Engineering Using Graph Queries. In: Graph Transformations and Model Driven Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (to appear, 2010)

   Google Scholar 

8. Schwarz, H., Ebert, J., Lemcke, J., Rahmani, T., Zivkovic, S.: Using Expressive Traceability Relationships for Ensuring Consistent Process Model Refinement. In: Proc. of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (2010)

   Google Scholar 

9. Object Management Group: Object Constraint Language, Version 2.2 (2010), http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.2/PDF

10. Manola, F., Miller, E. (eds.): RDF Primer – W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210

11. Hayes, P. (ed.): RDF Semantics – W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210

12. Biron, P.V.B., Malhotra, A. (eds.): XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes – W3C Recommendation (May 2, 2001), http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502

13. Brickley, D., Guha, R. (eds.): RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema – W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210

14. Malhotra, A., Melton, J., Walsh, N. (eds.): XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators – W3C Recommendation (January 23, 2007), http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath-functions-20070123

15. Ebert, J., Süttenbach, R., Uhe, I.: Meta-CASE in Practice: a Case for KOGGE. In: Olivé, À., Pastor, J.A. (eds.) CAiSE 1997. LNCS, vol. 1250, pp. 203–216. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Ebert, J., Kullbach, B., Riediger, V., Winter, A.: GUPRO. Generic Understanding of Programs - An Overview. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 72(2) (2002), http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/entcs/volume72.html

17. Schwarz, H., Ebert, J., Winter, A.: Graph-based traceability: a comprehensive approach. Software and Systems Modeling (2009), http://springerlink.metapress.com/link.asp?id=109378

18. Bry, F.B., Furche, T., Linse, B.: The Perfect Match: RPL and RDF Rule Languages. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2009), pp. 227–241 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

19. Holland, D.A.: PQL Language Guide and Reference. Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (2009)

    Google Scholar 

20. Berglund, A., Boag, S., Chamberlin, D., Fernández, M.F., Kay, M., Robie, J., Siméon, J. (eds.): XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0 – W3C Recommendation (January 23, 2007), http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath20-20070123

21. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 30–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

22. Witte, R., Zhang, Y., Rilling, J.: Empowering Software Maintainers with Semantic Web Technologies. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 37–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

23. Schwarz, H.: Program Slicing - Ein dienstorientiertes Modell. Vdm Verlag Dr. Mller (2007), http://www.vdm-verlag.de/

24. Weiser, M.: Program Slicing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10(4), 352–357 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

25. Ebert, J.: Software Engineering with Models and Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 9th Ninth International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems, Riga, Latvia (to appear, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

26. Cranefield, S., Pan, J.: Bridging the gap between the model-driven architecture and ontology engineering. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65, 595–609 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Object Management Group: Ontology Definition Metamodel, Version 1.0 (2009), http://www.omg.org/spec/ODM/1.0/PDF

28. Silva Parreiras, F., Staab, S., Winter, A.: TwoUse: Integrating UML Models and OWL Ontologies. Technical Report 16/2007, Institut für Informatik, Universät Koblenz-Landau, Arbeitsberichte aus dem Fachbereich Informatik (2007)

    Google Scholar 

29. Corno, W., Corcoglioniti, F., Celino, I., Valle, E.: Exposing Heterogeneous Data Sources as SPARQL Endpoints through an Object-Oriented Abstraction. In: Proc. of the 3rd Asian Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web (2008)

    Google Scholar 

30. Hillairet, G., Bertrand, F., Lafaye, J.Y.: Rewriting Queries by Means of Model Transformations from SPARQL to OQL and Vice-Versa. In: Paige, R.F. (ed.) ICMT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5563, pp. 116–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

31. Alkhateeb, F., Baget, J.F., Euzenat, J.: Extending SPARQL with regular expression patterns (for querying RDF). Journal of Web Semantics 7, 57–73 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references