Abstract
One major criticism of direct or active perception (and other forms of embodied action) from the perspective of cognitive psycology is that, according to common sense, there are some actions that require strictly symbolic information — for example, to stop a car in response to a red traffic light — which fall outside the realm of a perception-action cycle. Although such cognitive responses are not necessarily a goal of artificial life, they must necessarily be included within the embodied paradigm if it is to encompass the cognisant individual, the self-aware individual, or, potentially, the conscious individual. This paper will address the question, ‘can an animat appreciate art?’ Although this may seem very different to the example of a prosaic response to a traffic light, it will be argued that a common framework for establishing the meaning of an object is needed. It will also be argued that clarification to previous philosophical models of artistic engagement is required: in particular that the process of understanding is not a dialogue between an autopoietic artwork and animat, but that there is either a unity of object (artwork-animat) which becomes self-maintaining, or a more classical Gibsonian interpretation as a fixed set of affordances offered by an object to the subject, both of which lead to the conclusion that the process of understanding becomes a resonance in the unity or animat.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wheeler, M.: From robots to Rothko: The bringing forth of worlds. In: Boden, M.A. (ed.) The Philosophy of Artificial Life, pp. 209–236. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
Turner, A.: Reversing the process of living: Generating ecomorphic environments. In: Hanson, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Space Syntax, pp. 15.1–15.12. UCL Press, London (2003)
Bird, J., Stokes, D.: Evolving fractal drawings. In: Soddu, C. (ed.) Generative Art 2006, Milan, Italy (2006)
Luhmann, N.: Social Systems. Standford University Press, Stanford (1984)
Gadamer, H.G.: Truth and Method. Continuum Impacts, London (2004)
Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J.: Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living. D. Reidel, London (1980)
Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)
Husbands, P., Harvey, I., Cliff, D.: An evolutionary approach to situated artificial intelligence. In: Sloman, A., et al. (eds.) Prospects for Artificial Intelligence, IOS Press, Amsterdam (1993)
Clancy, W.J.: Situated Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J.: The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Shambhala Publications, Boston (1987)
Boden, M.A.: Autopoiesis and life. Cognitive Science Quarterly 1, 117–145 (2000)
Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge Classics, London (2002)
Turner, A.: Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30, 657–676 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Turner, A. (2007). Hermeneutic Resonance in Animats and Art. In: Almeida e Costa, F., Rocha, L.M., Costa, E., Harvey, I., Coutinho, A. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4648. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74913-4_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74913-4_50
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74912-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74913-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)