[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Opponent Modeling for Virtual Human Negotiators

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9238))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Negotiation is a challenging domain for virtual human research. One aspect of this problem, known as opponent modeling, is discovering what the other party wants from the negotiation. Research in automated negotiation has yielded a number opponent modeling techniques but we show that these methods do not easily transfer to human-agent settings. We propose a more effective heuristic for inferring preferences both from a negotiator’s pattern of offers and verbal statements about their preferences. This method has the added advantage that it can detect negotiators that lie about their preferences. We discuss several ways the method can enhance the capabilities of a virtual human negotiator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim, J.M., Hill, R.W., Technologies, C., Lane, H.C., Forbell, E., Core, M., Marsella, S., Pynadath, D., Hill Jr, R.W., Durlach, P.J., Hart, J.: BiLAT: A game-based environment for practicing negotiation in a cultural context. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 19, 289–308 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Traum, D.R., Marsella, S.C., Gratch, J., Lee, J., Hartholt, A.: Multi-party, multi-issue, multi-strategy negotiation for multi-modal virtual agents. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 117–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenfeld, A., Segal-halevi, E., Drein, O., Kraus, S., Zuckerman, I.: NegoChat: a chat-based negotiation agent. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, International Foundation of Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baarslag, T., Hendrikx, M., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.: Predicting the performance of opponent models in automated negotiation, vol. 2, pp. 59–66. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT 2013) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gratch, J., Devault, D., Lucas, G., Marsella, S.: Negotiation as a challenge problem for virtual humans. Paper presented at the 15th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Delft (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Krimpen, T., Looije, D., Hajizadeh, S.: HardHeaded. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Matsuo, T. (eds.) Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions. SCI, vol. 435, pp. 225–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hindriks, K.V., Tykhonov, D.: Towards a quality assessment method for learning preference profiles in negotiation. In: Ketter, W., La Poutré, H., Sadeh, N., Shehory, O., Walsh, W. (eds.) AMEC 2008. LNBIP, vol. 44, pp. 46–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelley, H.: A classroom study of dilemmas in interpersonal negotiations. Strategic Interaction and Conflict, pp. 49–73. Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism - experimental evidence and new theories. Handb. Econ. Giving Altruism Reciprocity 1(6), 615–691 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, R., Kraus, S.: Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? Commun. ACM 53, 78 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Devault, D., Mell, J., Gratch, J.: Toward natural turn-taking in a virtual human negotiation agent. In: Paper Presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium on Turn-taking and Coordination in Human-Machine Interaction. Stanford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boutilier, C., Sandholm, T., Shields, R.: Eliciting bid taker non-price preferences in (combinatorial) auctions, pp. 204–211. In: Proceedings of Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the US Army. The content does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of any Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Nazari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nazari, Z., Lucas, G.M., Gratch, J. (2015). Opponent Modeling for Virtual Human Negotiators. In: Brinkman, WP., Broekens, J., Heylen, D. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21995-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21996-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics