Estimating Sense of Agency from Behavioral Logs: Toward a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention System

1. Gallagher, S.: Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas Psychol. 30(1), 15–31 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Moore, J.W.: What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Front. Psychol. 7 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

3. Haggard, P.: Sense of agency in the human brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18(4), 196–207 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Legaspi, R., Xu, W., Konishi, T., Wada, S., Ishikawa, Y.: Multidimensional analysis of sense of agency during goal pursuit. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 34–47 (2022)

   Google Scholar 

5. Victor, T.W., Tivesten, E., Gustavsson, P., Johansson, J., Sangberg, F., Ljung Aust, M.: Automation expectation mismatch: incorrect prediction despite eyes on threat and hands on wheel. Hum. Factors 60(8), 1095–1116 (2018)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Legaspi, R., et al.: The sense of agency in human–AI interactions. Knowl.-Based Syst. 286 (2024)

   Google Scholar 

7. Legaspi, R., Xu, W., Konishi, T., Wada, S.: Positing a sense of agency-aware persuasive AI: its theoretical and computational frameworks. In: Ali, R., Lugrin, B., Charles, F. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2021. LNCS, vol. 12684, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79460-6_1

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

8. Hardeman, W., Houghton, J., Lane, K., Jones, A., Naughton, F.: A systematic review of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to promote physical activity. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Activity 16(1) (2019)

   Google Scholar 

9. Nahum-Shani, I., et al.: Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: Key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann. Behav. Med. 52(6) (2018)

   Google Scholar 

10. Damen, T.G.E., Müller, B.C.N., Baaren, R.B., Van, Dijksterhuis, A.: Re-examining the agentic shift: the sense of agency influences the effectiveness of (self) persuasion. PLoS ONE 10(6) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

11. Legaspi, R., Fukui, K.I., Moriyama, K., Kurihara, S., Numao, M., Suarez, M.: Ad-dressing the problems of data-centric physiology-affect relations modeling. In: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI, pp. 21–30 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

12. Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., Voss, M.: The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction. Front. Psychol. 4(127) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

13. Gentsch, A., Synofzik, M.: Affective coding: the emotional dimension of agency. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

14. Christensen, J.F., Costa, S.D., Beck, B., Haggard, P.: I just lost it! Fear and anger reduce the sense of agency: a study using intentional binding. Exp. Brain Res. 237(5), 1205–1212 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Fukazawa, Y., Ito, T., Okimura, T., Yamashita, Y., Maeda, T., Ota, J.: Predicting anxiety state using smartphone-based passive sensing. J. Biomed. Inform. 93 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

16. Javed, A.R., Sarwar, M.U., Khan, S., Iwendi, C., Mittal, M., Kumar, N.: Analyzing the effectiveness and contribution of each axis of tri-axial accelerometer sensor for accurate activity recognition. Sensors (Switzerland) 20(8) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

17. Garfinkel, S.N., Seth, A.K., Barrett, A.B., Suzuki, K., Critchley, H.D.: Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biol. Psychol. 104, 65–74 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Koreki, A., et al.: The relationship between interoception and agency and its modulation by heartbeats: an exploratory study. Sci. Rep. 12(1) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

19. Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., Newen, A.: Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Conscious. Cogn. 17(1), 219–239 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Tapal, A., Oren, E., Dar, R., Eitam, B.: The sense of agency scale: a measure of consciously perceived control over one’s mind, body, and the immediate environment. Front. Psychol. 8 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

21. Namikawa, T., Tani, I., Wakita, T., Kumagai, R., Nakane, A., Noguchi, H.: Development of a short form of the Japanese Big- Five scale, and a test of its reliability and validity. Japan. J. Psychol. 83(2), 91–99 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Cioffi, M.C., Cocchini, G., Banissy, M.J., Moore, J.W.: Ageing and agency: age-related changes in susceptibility to illusory experiences of control. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 4(5) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

23. Schwarz, K.A., Klaffehn, A.L., Hauke-Forman, N., Muth, F.V., Pfister, R.: Never run a changing system: action-effect contingency shapes prospective agency. Cognition 229, 1–9 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Ke, G., et al.: LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 2017-December (2017)

    Google Scholar 

25. Mienye, I.D., Sun, Y.: A survey of ensemble learning: concepts, algorithms, applications, and prospects. IEEE Access 10 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

26. Naughton, F., et al.: A context-sensing mobile phone app (Q sense) for smoking cessation: a mixed-methods study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 4(3) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

27. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24(28), 485–500 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

28. David, N., Newen, A., Vogeley, K.: The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Conscious. Cogn. 17(2), 523–534 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references