[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Urgency Analysis of Learners’ Comments: An Automated Intervention Priority Model for MOOC

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12677))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, the growing number of learners in Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) environments generate a vast amount of online comments via social interactions, general discussions, expressing feelings or asking for help. Concomitantly, learner dropout, at any time during MOOC courses, is very high, whilst the number of learners completing (completers) is low. Urgent intervention and attention may alleviate this problem. Analysing and mining learner comments is a fundamental step towards understanding their need for intervention from instructors. Here, we explore a dataset from a FutureLearn MOOC course. We find that (1) learners who write many comments that need urgent intervention tend to write many comments, in general. (2) The motivation to access more steps (i.e., learning resources) is higher in learners without many comments needing intervention, than that of learners needing intervention. (3) Learners who have many comments that need intervention are less likely to complete the course (13%). Therefore, we propose a new priority model for the urgency of intervention built on learner histories – past urgency, sentiment analysis and step access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kay, J., et al.: MOOCs: so many learners, so much potential. IEEE Intell. Syst. 28(3), 70–77 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hone, K.S., El Said, G.R.: Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: a survey study. Comput. Educ. 98, 157–168 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrasekaran, M.K., Kan, M.-Y.: When to reply? context sensitive models to predict instructor interventions in mooc forums. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10851 (2019)

  4. Mazzolini, M., Maddison, S.: Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Comput. Educ. 40(3), 237–253 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandrasekaran, M.K., Kan, M.-Y.: Countering position bias in instructor interventions in MOOC discussion forums. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Natural Language Processing Techniques for Educational Applications (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sokolovskaya, A.: Connectivist Knowledge Building, Collaborative Learning, and Social Presence in a Connectivist Massive Open Online Course: A Study of PLENK2010. Concordia University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chandrasekaran, M.K., et al.: Using discourse signals for robust instructor intervention prediction. In: Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, S.X., et al.: Attention-based character-word hybrid neural networks with semantic and structural information for identifying of urgent posts in MOOC discussion forums. IEEE Access 7, 120522–120532 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun, X., et al.: Identification of urgent posts in MOOC discussion forums using an improved RCNN. In: 2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., Rangwala, H.: Needle in a haystack: identifying learner posts that require urgent response in MOOC discussion forums. Comput. Educ. 118, 1–9 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, F.-R., Hsieh, L.-S., Chuang, F.-T.: Discovering genres of online discussion threads via text mining. Comput. Educ. 52(2), 481–495 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adnan, M., et al.: Predicting at-risk students at different percentages of course length for early intervention using machine learning models. IEEE Access 9, 7519–7539 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alrajhi, L., Alharbi, K., Cristea, A.I.: A multidimensional deep learner model of urgent instructor intervention need in MOOC forum posts. In: Kumar, V., Troussas, C. (eds.) ITS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12149, pp. 226–236. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavié, B., Gal, K.: EduBERT: pretrained deep language models for learning analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.00690 (2019)

  15. Wei, X., et al.: A convolution-LSTM-based deep neural network for cross-domain MOOC forum post classification. Information 8(3), 92 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bakharia, A.: Towards cross-domain MOOC forum post classification. In: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chaturvedi, S., Goldwasser, D., Daumé III, H.: Predicting instructor’s intervention in MOOC forums. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chandrasekaran, M.K., et al.: Learning instructor intervention from MOOC forums: early results and issues. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.07206 (2015)

  19. Chandrasekaran, M., et al.: Towards feasible instructor intervention in MOOC discussion forums (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chandrasekaran, M.K., et al.: Using discourse signals for robust instructor intervention prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.00944 (2016)

  21. FutureLearn. https://www.futurelearn.com. Last Accessed 24 June 2021

  22. Cristea, A.I., et al.: Earliest predictor of dropout in MOOCs: a longitudinal study of FutureLearn courses. Association for Information Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alamri, A., et al.: Predicting MOOCs dropout using only two easily obtainable features from the first week’s activities. In: Coy, A., Hayashi, Y., Chang, M. (eds.) ITS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11528, pp. 163–173. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Agrawal, A., Paepcke. A.: The stanford MOOC posts data set. https://datastage.stanford.edu/StanfordMoocPosts/.

  25. Antoine, J.-Y., Villaneau, J., Lefeuvre, A.: Weighted Krippendorff's alpha is a more reliable metrics for multi-coders ordinal annotations: experimental studies on emotion, opinion and coreference annotation. In: EACL 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sunar, A.S., et al.: How learners’ interactions sustain engagement: a MOOC case study. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(4), 475–487 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Devlin, J., et al.: Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)

  28. Bonta, V., Janardhan, N.K.A.N.: A comprehensive study on lexicon based approaches for sentiment analysis. Asian J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 8(S2), 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Min, W.N.S.W., Zulkarnain, N.Z.: Comparative evaluation of lexicons in performing sentiment analysis. JACTA 2(1), 14–20 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. North, M.A.: A method for implementing a statistically significant number of data classes in the Jenks algorithm. In: 2009 Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Saadatdoost, R., et al.: Understanding MOOC learners: insights from participation in coursera MOOC. Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol. (IJWLTT) 14(1), 93–112 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wong, J.-S., Pursel, B., Divinsky, A., Jansen, B.J.: An analysis of MOOC discussion forum interactions from the most active users. In: Agarwal, N., Xu, K., Osgood, N. (eds.) SBP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9021, pp. 452–457. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laila Alrajhi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alrajhi, L., Alamri, A., Pereira, F.D., Cristea, A.I. (2021). Urgency Analysis of Learners’ Comments: An Automated Intervention Priority Model for MOOC. In: Cristea, A.I., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80420-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80421-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics