[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Mutex Propagation for SAT-based Multi-agent Path Finding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRIMA 2020: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2020)

Abstract

Multi-agent path finding (MAPF) is the problem of planning a set of non-colliding paths for a set of agents so that each agent reaches its individual goal location following its path. A mutex from classical planning is a constraint forbidding a pair of facts to be both true or a pair of actions to be executed simultaneously. In the context of MAPF, mutexes are used to rule out the simultaneous occurrence of a pair of agents in a pair of locations, which can prune the search space. Previously mutex propagation had been integrated into conflict-based search (CBS), a major search-based approach for solving MAPF optimally. In this paper, we introduce mutex propagation into the compilation-based (SAT-based) solver MDD-SAT, an alternative to search-based solvers. Our experiments show that, despite mutex propagation being computationally expensive, it prunes the search space significantly so that the overall performance of MDD-SAT is improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    No operation actions (noops) are usually assumed for each atom q where \( noop(q) =(\{q\}, \{q\}, \emptyset )\).

References

  1. Audemard, G., Lagniez, J.-M., Simon, L.: Improving glucose for incremental SAT solving with assumptions: application to MUS extraction. In: Järvisalo, M., Van Gelder, A. (eds.) SAT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7962, pp. 309–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_23

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Audemard, G., Simon, L.: Predicting learnt clauses quality in modern SAT solvers. In: IJCAI 2009, Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pasadena, California, USA, July 11–17, 2009, pp. 399–404 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailleux, O., Boufkhad, Y.: Efficient CNF encoding of boolean cardinality constraints. In: Rossi, F. (ed.) CP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2833, pp. 108–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45193-8_8

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blum, A., Furst, M.L.: Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artif. Intell. 90(1–2), 281–300 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dowling, W.F., Gallier, J.H.: Linear-time algorithms for testing the satisfiability of propositional horn formulae. J. Logic Program. 1(3), 267–284 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Felner, A., Li, J., Boyarski, E., Ma, H., Cohen, L., Kumar, T.K.S., Koenig, S.: Adding heuristics to conflict-based search for multi-agent path finding. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2018, Delft, The Netherlands, 24–29 June, 2018, pp. 83–87. AAAI Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hönig, W., Preiss, J.A., Kumar, T.K.S., Sukhatme, G.S., Ayanian, N.: Trajectory planning for quadrotor swarms. IEEE Trans. Robotics 34(4), 856–869 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kautz, H.A., Selman, B.: Pushing the envelope: Planning, propositional logic and stochastic search. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Eighth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, AAAI 96, IAAI 96, Portland, Oregon, USA, 4–8 August, 1996, vol. 2, pp. 1194–1201. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, J., Surynek, P., Felner, A., Ma, H., Kumar, T.K.S., Koenig, S.: Multi-agent path finding for large agents. In: The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019, The Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 27 January–1 February, 2019, pp. 7627–7634. AAAI Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, X., Kambhampati, S.: Extracting effective and admissible state space heuristics from the planning graph. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 30 July–2 August, 2000, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 798–805. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharon, G., Stern, R., Felner, A., Sturtevant, N.R.: Conflict-based search for optimal multi-agent pathfinding. Artif. Intell. 219, 40–66 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharon, G., Stern, R., Goldenberg, M., Felner, A.: The increasing cost tree search for optimal multi-agent pathfinding. Artif. Intell. 195, 470–495 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sinz, C.: Towards an optimal CNF encoding of boolean cardinality constraints. In: van Beek, P. (ed.) CP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3709, pp. 827–831. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11564751_73

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sturtevant, N.R.: Benchmarks for grid-based pathfinding. Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 4(2), 144–148 (2012). http://www.movingai.com

  15. Surynek, P.: Time-expanded graph-based propositional encodings for makespan-optimal solving of cooperative path finding problems. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 81(3–4), 329–375 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Surynek, P., Felner, A., Stern, R., Boyarski, E.: Efficient SAT approach to multi-agent path finding under the sum of costs objective. In: ECAI 2016–22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29 August–2 September 2016, The Hague, The Netherlands - Including Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence (PAIS 2016). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 285, pp. 810–818. IOS Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weld, D.S.: Recent advances in AI planning. AI Mag. 20(2), 93–123 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wurman, P.R., D’Andrea, R., Mountz, M.: Coordinating hundreds of cooperative, autonomous vehicles in warehouses. AI Mag. 29(1), 9–20 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, J.: Intractability of optimal multirobot path planning on planar graphs. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 1(1), 33–40 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, H., Li, J., Surynek, P., Koenig, S., Kumar, T.K.S.: Multi-agent path finding with mutex propagation. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Nancy, France, 26–30 October, 2020, pp. 323–332. AAAI Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research at the Czech Technical University in Prague was supported by GAČR - the Czech Science Foundation, under grant number 19-17966S. The research at the University of Southern California was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) under grant numbers 1409987, 1724392, 1817189, 1837779, and 1935712 as well as a gift from Amazon. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing official policies, either expressed or implied, of the sponsoring organizations, agencies, or the U.S. government.

We would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Surynek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Surynek, P., Li, J., Zhang, H., Satish Kumar, T.K., Koenig, S. (2021). Mutex Propagation for SAT-based Multi-agent Path Finding. In: Uchiya, T., Bai, Q., Marsá Maestre, I. (eds) PRIMA 2020: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12568. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69322-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69322-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69321-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69322-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics