[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Application of Ontology Modularization for Building a Criminal Domain Ontology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems (AICOL 2015, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2017, AICOL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10791))

Abstract

The Ontology modularization is an essential field in the ontology engineering domain helping to reduce the complexity and the difficulties of building, reusing, managing and reasoning on domain ontologies either by applying partitioning or composition approaches. This paper carries out a survey on ontology modularization and presents a modular approach to build criminal modular domain ontology (CriMOnto) for modelling the legal norms of the Lebanese criminal system. CriMOnto, which will be used later for a legal reasoning system, is composed of four independent modules. The modules will be combined together to compose the whole ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 55.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 69.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Ontological engineering: what are ontologies and how can we build them? In: Jorge, C. (ed.) Semantic Web Services: Theory, Tools and Applications, pp. 44–70. IGI Global, Hershey (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Pathak, J., Johnson, T.M., Chute, C.G.: Modular ontology techniques and their applications in the biomedical domain. Integr. Comput. Aid. Eng. 16(3), 225–242 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. d’Aquin, M., Schlicht, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sabou, M.: Ontology modularization for knowledge selection: experiments and evaluations. In: Wagner, R., Revell, N., Pernul, G. (eds.) DEXA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4653, pp. 874–883. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74469-6_85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Battaglia, M.: Inflammation ontology design pattern: an exercise in building a core biomedical ontology with descriptions and situations. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 102, 64–80 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fürst, F., Trichet, F.: Integrating domain ontologies into knowledge-based systems. In: FLAIRS Conference, pp. 826–827 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Y., Bao, J., Haase, P., Qi, G.: Evaluating formalisms for modular ontologies in distributed information systems. In: marchiori, m, Pan, Jeff Z., Marie, C. (eds.) RR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4524, pp. 178–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72982-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hois, J., Bhatt, M., Kutz, O.: Modular ontologies for architectural design. In: FOMI-09, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 198. IOS Press, Vicenza (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, Z.C., Keet, C.M.: Toward a framework for ontology modularity. In: The 2015 Annual Research Conference on South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists. SAICSIT 2015, Article No. 24 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D.: Integrating a bottom–up and top–down methodology for building semantic resources for the multilingual legal domain. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6036, pp. 95–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Saias, J., Quaresma, P.: A methodology to create legal ontologies in a logic programming information retrieval system. In: Benjamins, V.Richard, Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 185–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Turlapati, V.K.C., Puligundla, S.K.: Efficient module extraction for large ontologies. In: Klinov, P., Mouromtsev, D. (eds.) KESW 2013. CCIS, vol. 394, pp. 162–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41360-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbes, S.B., Scheuermann, A., Meilender, T., d’Aquin, M.: Characterizing modular ontologies. In: 7th International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems (FOIS), pp. 13–25 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: A logical framework for modularity of ontologies. In: IJCAI 2007, pp. 298–303. AAAI Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grau, B.C., Kutz, O.: Modular ontology languages revisited. In: The IJCAI-2007 Workshop on Semantic Web for Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Konev, B., Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Formal properties of modularisation. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. (eds.) Modular Ontologies. LNCS, vol. 5445, pp. 25–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Doran, P.: Ontology reuse via ontology modularization. In: Proceedings of Knowledge Web Ph.D. Symposium, pp. 1–6 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bezerra, C., Freitas, F., Zimmermann, A., Euzenat, J.: ModOnto: a tool for modularizing ontologies. In: WONTO-08, vol. 427 (2008). ceur-ws.org

  18. Grau, B.C., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Kalyanpur, A.: Modularity and web ontologies. In: KR, pp. 198–209 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stuckenschmidt, H., Klein, M.: Reasoning and change management in modular ontologies. Data Knowl. Eng. 63(2), 200–223 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stuckenschmidt, H., Klein, M.: Integrity and change in modular ontologies. In: 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 900–905 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. d’Aquin, M., Schlicht, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sabou, M.: Criteria and evaluation for ontology modularization techniques. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. (eds.) Modular Ontologies. LNCS, vol. 5445, pp. 67–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Del Vescovo, C., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., Schneider, T.: The modular structure of an ontology: an empirical study. Technical report, University of Manchester. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/%7Eschneidt/publ/modstrucreport.pdf

  23. Del Vescovo, C., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., Schneider, T.: The modular structure of an ontology: an empirical study. In: Haarslev, V, Toman, D., Weddell, G. (eds.), DL 2010, vol. 573 (2010). ceur-ws.org

  24. Borgo, S.: Goals of modularity: a voice from the foundational viewpoint. In: Kutz, O., Schneider, T. (eds.) Fifth International Workshop on Modular Ontologies, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 230, pp. 1–6. IOS Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Studer, T.: Privacy preserving modules for ontologies. In: Pnueli, A., Virbitskaite, I., Voronkov, A. (eds.) PSI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5947, pp. 380–387. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11486-1_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Del Vescovo, C., et al.: The modular structure of an ontology: atomic decomposition. In: IJCAI Proceedings-International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cuenca Grau, B., Halaschek-Wiener, C., Kazakov, Y.: History matters: incremental ontology reasoning using modules. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 183–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Guarino, N., Carrara, Giaretta, P.: An ontology of meta-level categories. In: Doyle, J., Sandewall, E., Torasso, P. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of KR94. Morgan Kaufmannn, San Mateo (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Guarino, N.: Understanding, building, and using ontologies. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46(2–3), 293–310 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Heijst, G., Schreiber, A., Th Wielinga, B.G.: Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46, 2–3 (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Stuckenschmidt, H., Christine, P., Spaccapietra, S.: Modular Ontologies: Concepts, Theories and Techniques for Knowledge Modularization. Springer, Berlin (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Ben Mustapha, N., Baazaoui-Zghal, H., Moreno, A., Ben Ghezala, H.: A dynamic composition of ontology modules approach: application to web query reformulation. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. 8(4), 309–321 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bezerra, C., Freitas, F., Euzenat, J., Zimmermann, A.: An approach for ontology modularization (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dmitrieva, J., Verbeek, F.J.: Creating a New Ontology: A Modular Approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1012.1658 (2010)

  35. Steve, G., Gangemi, A., Pisanelli, D.: Integrating medical terminologies with onions methodology (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  36. El Ghosh, M., Naja, H., Abdulrab, H., Khalil, M.: Towards a middle-out approach for building legal domain reference ontology. Int. J. Knowl. Eng. 2(3), 109–114 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pinto, H., Martins, J.: Ontology integration: how to perform the process. In: The International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 71–80 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bontas, E.P., Mochol, M., Tolksdorf, R.: Case studies on ontology reuse. In: IKNOW05 International Conference on Knowledge Management, vol. 74 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Caldarola, E.G., Picariello, A., Rinaldim A.M.: An approach to ontology integration for ontology reuse in knowledge based digital ecosystems. In: 7th International Conference on Management of computational and Collective intElligence in Digital EcoSystems, pp. 1–8. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Modoni, G., Caldarola, E., Terkaj, W., Sacco, M.: The knowledge reuse in an industrial scenario: a case study. In: The Seventh International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management eKNOW 2015, pp. 66–71 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pinto, S.H., Gomez-Perez, A., Martins, J.P.: Some issues on ontology integration. In: IJCAI99’s Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Guizzardi, G.: The role of foundational ontology for conceptual modeling and domain ontology representation. In: 7th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems, pp. 17–25 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Keet, M.: The use of foundational ontologies in ontology development: an empirical assessment. In: 8th Extended Semantic Web Conference, Greece, vol. 6643, pp. 321–335 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rosa, D.E., Carbonera, J.L., Torres, G.M., Abel, M.: Using events from UFO-B in an ontology collaborative construction environment. CEUR-WSX 938, 278–283 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Wonderweb deliverable D18 (ver. 1.0). Ontology Library (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: A unified foundational ontology and some applications of it in business modeling. In: CAiSE Workshops, vol. 3, pp. 129–143 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: Using UFO as a foundation for general conceptual modeling languages. In: Poli, R., Healy, M., Kameas, A. (eds.) Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, pp. 175–196. Springer, Dordrecht (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8847-5_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Melo, S., Almeida, M.B.: Applying foundational ontologies in conceptual modeling: a case study in a Brazilian public company. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2014 Workshops, pp. 577–586. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45550-0_59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: Towards ontological foundations for agent modelling concepts using the unified fundational ontology (UFO). In: Bresciani, P., Giorgini, P., Henderson-Sellers, B., Low, G., Winikoff, M. (eds.) AOIS -2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3508, pp. 110–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11426714_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Ph.D. thesis. Enschede, Telematica Institut, The Netherlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Guerson, J., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A.: OntoUML lightweight editor: a model-based environment to build, evaluate and implement reference ontologies. In: IEEE 19th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW), pp. 144–147 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  52. http://code.google.com/p/ontouml-lightweight-editor/

  53. http://www.sparxsystems.com/products/ea/

  54. Guizzardi, G., Falbo, R. A., Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Grounding software domain ontologies in the unified foundational ontology (UFO): the case of the ODE software process ontology. In: Proceedings of the Ibero American Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Software Environments, pp. 244–251 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Barcelos, P.P.F., dos Santos, V.A., Silva, F.B., Monteiro, M.E., Garcia, A.S.: An automated transformation from OntoUML to OWL and SWRL. In: ONTOBRAS 2013. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1041, CEUR-WS.org, pp. 130–141 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Falbo, A., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: 32th International Conference, ER 2013, pp. 327–341 (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  57. Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Bello, M.D., Boer, A.: The LKIF core ontology of basic legal concepts. In: Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 321, pp. 43–63 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  58. El Ghosh, M., Naja, H., Abdulrab, H., Khalil, M.: Ontology learning process as a bottom-up strategy for building domain-specific ontology from legal texts. In: The 9th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, ICAART, vol. 2, pp. 473–480 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gómez-Pérez, A., Rojas-Amaya, M.D.: Ontological reengineering for reuse. In: Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) EKAW 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1621, pp. 139–156. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48775-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, W.M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. In: Semantic Interoperability and Integration (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Dmitrieva, J., Verbeek, F.: Modular approach for a new ontology. In: 5th International Workshop on Modular Ontologies WoMO (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ghazvinian, A., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Creating mappings for ontologies in biomedicine: simple methods work. In: AMIA 2009 Symposium Proceedings (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Euzenat, J.: Semantic precision and recall for ontology alignment evaluation. In: IJCAI, pp. 348–353 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Borgida, A., Serani, L.: Distributed description logics: assimilating information from peer sources. J. Data Semant. 1, 153–184 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Jimenez-Ruiz, E., Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Berlanga, R.: Ontology integration using mappings: towards getting the right logical consequences. Technical report, Universitat Jaume, University of Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P., Sattler, U.: OWL 2: the next step for OWL. J. Web Semant. 6(4), 309–322 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang, Y., Liu, W., Bell, D.: A concept hierarchy based ontology mapping approach. In: KSEM, pp. 101–113 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hartmann, J., et al.: Methods for ontology evaluation. In: Knowledge Web Deliverable D1.2.3 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernandez-Lopez, A., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. Springer, London (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/b97353

    Book  Google Scholar 

  71. Gómez-Pérez, A.: Evaluation of ontologies. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 16, 391–409 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Legat, C.: Semantics to the shop floor: towards ontology modularization and reuse in the automation domain. In: World Congress (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Thakker, D., Dimitrova, V., Lau, L., Denaux, R., Karanasios, S., Yang Turner, F.: A priori ontology modularisation in ill-defined domains. In: 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-Semantics 2011, pp. 167–170 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bakhshandeh, M., Antunes, G., Mayer, R., Borbinha, J., Caetano, A.: A modular ontology for the enterprise architecture domain. In: 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, EDOCW 2013, pp. 5–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., Mladenic, D.: A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. In: Conference on Data Mining and Data Warehouses (SiKDD) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., Lehmann, J.: Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 140–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  77. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring similarity between ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.Richard (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 251–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_24

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Brewster, C., Alani, H., Dasmahapatra, S., Wilks, Y.: Data driven ontology evaluation. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ding, L., et al.: Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In: CIKM, pp. 652–659 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Porzel, R., Malaka, R.: A task-based approach for ontology evaluation. In: ECAI 2004 Workshop Ontology Learning and Population, Valencia, Spain, pp. 1–6 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Patel, C., Supekar, K., Lee, Y., Park, E.: OntoKhoj: a semantic web portal for ontology searching, ranking and classification. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the European Union with the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Grant Agreement no. HN0002134 in the project CLASSE 2 (“Les Corridors Logistiques: Application a la Vallée de la Seine et son Environnement”), Lebanese University and the National Support from the National Council for Scientific Research in Lebanon (CNRS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LITIS, INSA, Rouen, France

    Mirna El Ghosh & Habib Abdulrab

  2. Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University, Tripoli, Lebanon

    Hala Naja

  3. Faculty of Engineering, CRSI Research Center, Lebanese University, Tripoli, Lebanon

    Mohamad Khalil

Authors
  1. Mirna El Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hala Naja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Habib Abdulrab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohamad Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirna El Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Ugo Pagallo

  2. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Monica Palmirani

  3. La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Pompeu Casanovas

  4. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Giovanni Sartor

  5. Inria - Sophia Antipolis-Méditerranée, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Serena Villata

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

El Ghosh, M., Naja, H., Abdulrab, H., Khalil, M. (2018). Application of Ontology Modularization for Building a Criminal Domain Ontology. In: Pagallo, U., Palmirani, M., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Villata, S. (eds) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. AICOL AICOL AICOL AICOL AICOL 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00177-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00178-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation