Wide Coverage Incremental Parsing by Learning Attachment Preferences

1. M. Bader and I. Lasser. German verb-final clauses and sentence processing. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, and K. Reyner, editors, Perspectives on Sentence Processing, pages-. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994.

   Google Scholar 

2. E. Charniak. Statistical parsingw ith a context-free grammar and word statistics. In Proc. of AAAI97, 1997.

   Google Scholar 

3. M. Collins. A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies. In Proc. of 34th ACL, pages 184–191, 1996.

   Google Scholar 

4. K. M. Eberhard, M. J. Spivey-Knowlton, J.C. Sedivy, and M. K. Tanenhaus. Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24:409–436, 1995.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. P. Frasconi, M. Gori, and A. Sperduti. A general framework for adaptive processingo f data structures. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 9(5):768–786, 1998.

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. L. Frazier. Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5:519–559, 1987.

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. U. Hermjakob and R. J. Mooney. Learningp arse and translation decisions from examples with rich context. In Proceedings of ACL97, pages 482–489, 1997.

   Google Scholar 

8. Y. Kamide and D. C. Mitchell. Incremental pre-head attachment in japanese parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5-6):631–662, 1999.

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. P.C.R. Lane and J.B. Henderson. Incremental syntactic parsingof natural language corpora with simple synchrony networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(2):219–231, 2001.

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. V. Lombardo and P. Sturt. Incrementality and lexicalism: A treebank study. In S. Stevenson and P. Merlo, editors, Lexical Representations in Sentence Processing. John Benjamins, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

11. W. Marslen-Wilson. Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244:522–533, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. D. Milward. Dynamic dependency grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17(6), 1994.

    Google Scholar 

13. D.C. Mitchell, F. Cuetos, M.M.B. Corley, and M. Brysbaert. Exposure-based models of human parsing: evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 24, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

14. A. Ratnaparkhi. A linear observed time statistical parser based on maximum entropy models. In Proceedings of EMNLP97, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

15. B. Roark and M. Johnson. Efficient probabilistic top-down and left-corner parsing. In Proc. of ACL99, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

16. E. P. Stabler. The finite connectivity of linguistic structure. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, and K. Reyner, editors, Perspectives on Sentence Processing, pages 303–336. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

17. M. J. Steedman. Grammar, interpretation and processingfrom the lexicon. In W. M. Marslen-Wilson, editor, Lexical Representation and Process, pages 463–504. MIT Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

18. P. Sturt and M. Crocker. Monotonic syntactic processing: a cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(5):449–494, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references