[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Logo PTI
Polish Information Processing Society
Logo FedCSIS

Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, Volume 9

Position Papers of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems

Electronic Public Procurement for Europe: An Analysis of CEN/WS BII

,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2016F385

Citation: Position Papers of the 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 9, pages 181–188 ()

Full text

Abstract. This position paper discusses the outcome of the standardization initiative CEN/WS BII aiming to support the implementation of a complete end-to-end e-procurement process, that may be used in cross-border business all over Europe and in particular in the public sector. The discussion includes the background of this initiative, its approach, and its outcomes and shall help to understand how the CEN/WS BII worked and if and how these deliverables are appropriate to fulfill the aim of harmonized European-wide e-procurement in the public sector. Furthermore, based on the discussion, implications for future research in Information Systems with respect to standardization of e-procurement and interoperability of information systems are provided.

References

  1. European Commission, “COM(2012) 179: A Strategy for e-pro- curement,” http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52012DC0179, Retrieved 2016-04-16.
  2. European Commission, “COM(2013) 453: End-to-End E-Procurement to Modernise Public Administration,” http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0453, 2013, Retrieved 2016-02-21.
  3. Single Face To Industry, “Svefaktura BIS 5A 2.0,” http://www.sfti.se/standarder/bestallningsprocesssftisvehandel/svefaktura/svefakturabis5a20.2074.html, 2016, Retrieved 2016-02-21.
  4. Direktoratet for forvaltning og IKT, “EHF Invoice and Creditnote 2.0.5,” https://vefa.difi.no/ehf/standard/ehf-invoice-and-creditnote-2.0.5/, 2015, Retrieved 2016-02-21.
  5. Forum elektronische Rechnung Deutschland: “ZUGFeRD-Infop-akete,” http://www.ferd-net.de/front_content.php?idcat=255, 2014, Retrieved 2016-02-21.
  6. F.-D. Dorloff, V. Jahns and V. Schmitz, “E-Business interoperability: A systematization attempt based on the morphology concept,” in Electronic Business Interoperability: Concepts, Opportunities and Challenges, E. Kajan, Ed. Hershey: IGI Global, 2011, pp. 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-485-1.ch001
  7. J. V. Nickerson and M. zur Muehlen, “The ecology of standards processes: Insights from internet standard making,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 467–488, August 2006.
  8. M. L. Markus, C. W. Steinfield, R. T. Wigand and G. Minton, “Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 439–465, August 2006.
  9. J. Backhouse, C. W. Hsu and L. Silva, “Circuits of power in creating de jure standards: Shaping an international information systems security standard,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 413–438, August 2006.
  10. V. Fomin and T. Keil, "Standardization: Bridging the gap between economic and social theory", in Proc. of 21st International Conf. on Information Systems, Atlanta, 2000, pp. 206–217.
  11. CEN and CENELEC, “Internal regulations part 2: Common rules for standardization work”, http://boss.cen.eu/ref/IR2_E.pdf, 2015, Retrieved 2016-02-21.
  12. CEN/ISSS Business Interoperability Interfaces for Public procurement in Europe (CENBII), http://spec.cenbii.eu/IndexBII1.html, Retrieved 2016-03-05.
  13. Object Management Group, “Business Process Model and Notation 2.0,” http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/, Retrieved 2016-04-23.
  14. CEN Workshop on Business Interoperability Interfaces for public procurement in Europe, http://www.cenbii.eu/, Retrieved 2016-05-09.
  15. European Union, “Directive 2014/23/EU on the award of concession contracts," http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.094.01.0001.01.ENG, Retrieved 2016-05-01.
  16. European Union, “Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC,” http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.094.01.0065.01.ENG, Retrieved 2016-05-01.
  17. European Union, "Directive 2014/25/EU on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC,” http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.094.01.0243.01.ENG, Retrieved 2016-05-1.
  18. European Committee for Standardization, “CEN/TC 434 – Electronic Invoicing,” https://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:7:0::::FSP_ORG_ID:1883209&cs=1E81C9C833655EEDC7010C8D0A2FB786C, Retrieved 2016-05-07.
  19. E. Wüstner, T. Hotzel and P. Buxmann, “Converting business documents: A Classification of problems and solutions using XML/XSLT,” in Proc. of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Issues of E-Commerce and Web-Based Information Systems, Newport Beach, 2002, pp. 54–61.
  20. F.-D. Dorloff and E. Kajan, “Balancing of Heterogeneity and Interoperability in E-Business Networks: The Role of Standards and Protocols”, in International Journal of E-Business Research, vol. 8, pp. 15–33, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jebr.2012100102
  21. T. McGrath, “The Reality of Using Standards for Electronic Business Document Formats,” in Handbook of Research on E-Business Standards and Protocols: Documents, Data and Advanced Web Technologies, E. Kajan, F.-D. Dorloff, and I. Bedini, Ed., Hershey: IGI Global, 2012, pp. 21–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0146-8.ch002
  22. European Committee for Standardization, “CEN/TC 440 – Electronic Public Procurement,” https://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:7:0::::FSP_ORG_ID:1976650&cs=175E298F320429229DD35C9E22F4 E8F76, Retrieved 2016-05-08.
  23. European Commission, “EIRA: European Interoperability Reference Architecture,” http://ec.europa.eu/isa/ready-to-use-solutions/eira_en.htm, Retrieved 2016-07-08.
  24. J. Becker, J. vom Brocke, M. Heddier and S. Seidel, “In search of Information Systems (Grand) Challenges: A community of inquirers perspective,” in Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 57, pp. 377–390, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0394-0