User talk:Bigbossfarin
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Neueinsteiger.svg was uncategorized on 16 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Bigbossfarin.svg was uncategorized on 28 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:WebGLChrome9.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:WebGLChrome9.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:WebGLChrome9.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Saibo (Δ) 17:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- I changed the license I hope it is right --Bigbossfarin (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Bigbossfarin, thanks for trying to fix. I do not know if it is right - it is only right if the authors of the 3d model have release it under that license. If you look at the bottom of the screenshot quite the opposite seems to be true: looks like it is fully copyrighted. Maybe you find some other statement on their website, please look for it - otherwise we cannot keep that file. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Bigbossfarin, please have a look at my comment on the image page. You can try contacting Zygote to see if they want to license that image under Creative Commons (via Commons:OTRS). It would make their product's Wikipedia article look better.. Before going to that effort though, I think you should try taking a better screenshot - make the browser window smaller so it doesn't have all that white space. Eug (talk) 23:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Bigbossfarin, thanks for trying to fix. I do not know if it is right - it is only right if the authors of the 3d model have release it under that license. If you look at the bottom of the screenshot quite the opposite seems to be true: looks like it is fully copyrighted. Maybe you find some other statement on their website, please look for it - otherwise we cannot keep that file. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Brechungsindexdetektor.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cepheiden (talk) 21:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
File:DaeGwendoline.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.184.33.173 07:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
File:21-DaeGwendoline2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.184.33.173 07:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
File:GoogleDocs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
83.77.56.181 20:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for uploading the second generation bing logo i.e, File:Bing logo (2013).svg, I have used that image in Wikipedia pages of every language and templates.Himanis Das talk 05:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Don't mention it! --Bigbossfarin (talk) 12:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Entwicklung des VVS Netzplan.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gnom (talk) 04:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Google maps favicon 2013.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Mono 23:23, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Category:Trams in Germany by vehicle
[edit]It has been requested that Category:Trams in Germany by vehicle (a category you created) be moved to Category:Trams in Germany by type. You may discuss this at either: Category talk:Trams in Germany by vehicle or Category talk:Trams in Russia by model (or both if you'd like). Liamdavies (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hey, Category:Trams in Stuttgart by vehicle has also been requested. Liamdavies (talk) 04:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Bigbossfarin⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
1979 erreichte Dschingis Khan Platz 4 und nicht Platz 9 im ESC, wie fälschlich laut Abbildung. Könntest du das ändern? -- MacCambridge (talk) 12:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Natürlich ich mach mich dran! --Bigbossfarin (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Danke. -- MacCambridge (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Bigbossfarin,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:NPO Radio 3 logo 2014.svg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:NPO Radio 3 logo 2014.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NPO Radio 3 logo 2014.svg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Maxxl² - talk 22:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Npo zapp.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Npo zapp.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Maxxl² - talk 22:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Npo zappelin2.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Npo zappelin2.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Npo zappelin2.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Maxxl² - talk 22:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Npo zapp.svg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Npo zapp.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Npo zapp.svg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Maxxl² - talk 22:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
I'm very sorry, but these pictures are copyright infringement : The Gare des Guillemins is under copyright. Yours sincerely, --M0tty (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC) M0tty (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Bigbossfarin, soweit ich sehe hat deine letzte Änderung vor allem die Reihenfolge im Kuchendiagramm und der Legende geändert. Gibt es da einen neuen Konsens, den ich übersehen habe? War etwas in meiner letzten Änderung nicht valide? Habe ebenfalls einen Texteditor verwendet und mich bemüht, nichts an der Form zu ändern. Ich wollte gerade Thüringen auf den neuen Stand bringen, aber würde vorher gerne beide Punkte klären. Grüße, --GluonBall (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi GluonBall! Ich wollte dir gar kein Vorwurf in deiner letzten Änderung machen, nur die Kuchenstücke nach der Größe aufteilen .Die Grafik war davor auch valide ich weiß nicht was bei der Zusammenfassung durch meinen Kopf gegangen ist. Viele Grüße --Bigbossfarin (talk) 01:12, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, nein als Vorwurf habe ich das auch nicht gesehen. Ich war nur etwas verwirrt und hab deshalb einfach mal gefragt. Ich stell die Sortierung der Kuchenstücke mal auf der Diskussionsseite des Bildes zur Diskussion. Beste Grüße --GluonBall (talk) 03:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Bitte noch Rheinland-Pfalz ändern auf SPD-FDP-Grüne (rot-gelb-grün). Dann stimmen die Farben. Danke. --H.A. (talk) 09:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- @H.A., die Änderung erfolgt am 18. Mai -- Grüße --Bigbossfarin (talk) 10:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Dankeschön, BaWü wurde mittlerweile angepasst. --H.A. (talk) 17:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Bei SH hat sich ein kleiner Fehler eingeschlichen: Die Grünen liegen hier vor der FDP. Es müsste also CDU+GRÜNE+FDP heißen.--LiterallySimon (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Dankeschön, BaWü wurde mittlerweile angepasst. --H.A. (talk) 17:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- @H.A., die Änderung erfolgt am 18. Mai -- Grüße --Bigbossfarin (talk) 10:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Bitte noch Rheinland-Pfalz ändern auf SPD-FDP-Grüne (rot-gelb-grün). Dann stimmen die Farben. Danke. --H.A. (talk) 09:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, nein als Vorwurf habe ich das auch nicht gesehen. Ich war nur etwas verwirrt und hab deshalb einfach mal gefragt. Ich stell die Sortierung der Kuchenstücke mal auf der Diskussionsseite des Bildes zur Diskussion. Beste Grüße --GluonBall (talk) 03:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Könntest Du bitte mal ein Blick hierauf werfen? Da ist wohl ein kleiner Fehler unterlaufen. Vielen Dank! --Vogone (talk) 13:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Category:Photographs_by_temperature has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
El Grafo (talk) 09:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 22:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:WFYS2017 logo de.svg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:WFYS2017 logo de.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:WFYS2017 logo de.svg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin K. (talk) 09:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Dazu frage ich dich, du warst der letzte der sie aktualisiert hast. Wäre es nicht sinnvoll, in der Frühphase des Bundestages die Parteien die unter Sonstige gelistet sind, aber damals im Bundestag vertreten waren, wirklich aufzuführen? So wie das jetzt ist hilft das wenig. (Und eig. sollten auch die Farben angeglichen werden.)--Antemister (talk) 19:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, wenn du Zeit hast könntest du mir die konkreten Änderungen (Wahlergebnisse, Farben) schreiben, dann kann ich das machen. --Bigbossfarin (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Stuttgart 2014 (15856315767).jpg
- File:Stuttgart 2014 (16016306236).jpg
- File:Stuttgart 2014 (16040124581).jpg
- File:Stuttgart 2014 (16040125811).jpg
- File:Stuttgart 2014 (16041378192).jpg
- File:Stuttgart 2014 (16042080425).jpg
- File:Stuttgart 2014 (16042081205).jpg
I started a mass deletion request for all interiors of the Stuttgart Stadtbibliothek as they are all unfree h-stt !? 16:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
"Luftbilder"
[edit]Hallo Bigbossfarin, von Türmen aus aufgenommene Fotos werden im Allgemeinen nicht als Luftbilder bezeichnet. Darum habe ich die Category:Aerial photographs of Bonatzbau wieder geleert. Das einzige vermutliche Luftbild darin zeigte nicht den eigentlichen Bonatzbau, sondern nur die Bahnsteige. Meinetwegen kann die Kategorie schnellgelöscht werden. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:14, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Gymnasium Illustre erbaut 1686.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fæ (talk) 15:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Wikidata item creation progress no text.svg
[edit]Could you please update this image please? I ask you as kindly as I can. Thank you. Triplecaña (talk) 20:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- Done sincerely Bigbossfarin (talk) 21:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Landtagswahlkreise BW 2011 Fehler
[edit]WK10 ist falsch eingefärbt, wie WK16.svg. Bitte korrigieren. --2003:C6:3711:CF3C:BD4A:FB5C:84DA:DCB6 00:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done Danke für den Hinweis! Bigbossfarin (talk) 10:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
S-Bahn Liniennetzplan
[edit]Hallo Bigbossfarin, File:SBahn1.svg könnte eine Aktualisierung vertragen. Inzwischen gibt es die zusätzliche Linie S62. Die neue Linie geht von Zuffenhausen bis Weil der Stadt, lässt aber einige Stationen aus. Dazu könnte man noch gestrichelt die geplante Verlängerung der S2 nach Neuhausen a.d.F in den Plan aufnehmen. Große Dinge geschehen auch Richtung Calw, das sollte man im Auge behalten. Vielen Dank. Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Giftzwerg 88: Danke für den Hinweis, ich werde mich die nächsten Tage drum kümmern. Liebe Grüße Bigbossfarin (talk) 09:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Danke dafür. Gruß--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 16:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Gerade noch ein Detail gesehen: In Backnang sollten die beiden Labels für S3 und S4 vertauscht werden.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Giftzwerg 88: Done. Liebe Grüße Bigbossfarin (talk) 18:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Super! Danke!--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 19:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Giftzwerg 88: Done. Liebe Grüße Bigbossfarin (talk) 18:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo, ich hätte zu dem Stuttgarter S-Bahn-Liniennetzplan auch noch eine Anmerkung, die S62 hält nicht in Malmsheim, die Kleinigkeit könnte noch korrigiert werden. Dankeschön und freundliche Grüße! --Max221B (talk) 15:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Max221B: Done. Viele Grüße Bigbossfarin (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Danke sehr! --Max221B (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Max221B: Done. Viele Grüße Bigbossfarin (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Nina Gummich - Klaus im Schrank DD 1 (cropped).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
181.43.4.47 18:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 07:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 21:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Mussklprozz (talk) 09:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)