[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Archives:
Archive 1 (until October 19, 2008)


File:NygårdstangenPanoramaUtsnitt1.jpg

edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 16:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bergen city centre and surroundings Panorama edited.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergen city centre and surroundings Panorama edited.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

Best regards.--Mywood (talk) 12:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

edit

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see the Meta page about rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Huib talk 12:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. --Aqwis (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


Important proposal

edit

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:TrondheimOlavTryggvasonMonument-improved.jpg

edit

Hei, se slettingsdiskusjonen jeg startet. Hilsen --Kjetil_r 21:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Aqwis!
Tip: Add categories to your files 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Norwegian and Nynorsk translations needed

edit

Hi! I contact you as you speak English, Norwegian and Nynorsk.

Jastrow and I are working on autotranslating {{Meta information museum}}, the meta-template we use for many museums, like {{Information Louvre}}. Could you please help us find Norwegian and Nynorsk translations for every tag name:

   * artist/maker
   * description
   * dimensions
   * credit line
   * accession number
   * location
   * source/photographer
   * references
   * other versions

"Credit line" is mainly about the mode of acquisition: what collection does it come from? Did it join the collections by gift, purchase, on loan, etc.?

Thanks for any help. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 16:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RegentsCanal2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition --Cayambe 09:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have uploaded a new version of this picture! Maybe you would like to change your vote! --Simonizer (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

sunset with pelicans

edit

Hello Aqwis. You've voted on my image foggy sunset with Brown Pelicans. I'd like to let you know please that I've added an alternative in case you have not seen it :). Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

(I've changed your name in purpose after you opposed my possible picture of the year. It was my retaliation to you. ) I am sorry, I did. Please accept my apology. I punished myself by writing your nick name down 100 times   Best wishes, and thank you for the vote!--Mbz1 (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MalaStranaFromHill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What a view! Could you please add camera location?--Mbz1 15:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC) ✓  Done --Aqwis 16:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GamlehaugenGardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice!--Mbz1 17:44, 8 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LodalenPano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. Can you add geolocation? (Geolocation is not QI relevant, but important nevertheless.) --Johannes Robalotoff 20:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC) ✓  Done --Aqwis 23:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LondonMarketScene2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Worthwhile scene of a London street, fine with me -Herbythyme 16:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BriksdalsbreenPano1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good image, very good description. Would be even more valuable with geocode. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC) ✓  Done --Aqwis 12:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Briksdalen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Briksdalen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 07:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NygårdstangenRådhusetSandviken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now. --Cayambe 14:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

RfA?

edit

Hi Aqwis. The backlogs, particularly at DR and CAT:UNKNOWN, are quite significant as of late, so I think it'll be good to have more active sysops. Would you like to run RfA? –Juliancolton | Talk 05:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

It would be an honour. --Aqwis (talk) 13:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Excellent! See Commons:Administrators/Requests/Aqwis. :) –Juliancolton | Talk 15:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

edit

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  हिन्दी  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  العربية  +/−


 
An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Aqwis, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

Best wishes. Please take the advice I gave you in my close on board.... and if you need any help, please ask any of your new colleagues. ++Lar: t/c 04:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
Have a slice!

Congratulations and best wishes. :) Durova (talk) 05:28, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fjærlandsfjorden2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fjærlandsfjorden2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 08:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KjenndalenPano1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Basar 02:38, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

FPC careless reviews

edit

Hi Aqwis,

You may be interested in participating in this_discussion. Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Admin inactivity

edit

Hello Aqwis, you might be interested in this discussion: Commons_talk:Administrators/De-adminship#Activity -- A9 (talk) 18:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copy

edit

hello, I d just like to ask you if I could use and copy one of your pictures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MalaStranaFromHill.jpg Thank you: K.V. kamvon@post.cz

Hi, that's okay as long as you write my name and the license ("CC-BY-SA") somewhere near the picture. --Aqwis (talk) 20:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


Hi Aqwis,
as you seem to be no longer admin on Commons, could you remove the admin-bit from your babel box. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

First of all, I'll have to figure out why I'm no longer an admin... --Aqwis (talk) 23:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oops, of course. I hope, I wasn't the first who notified you. I was simply comparing the cat Commons administrators and the COM:A list, when I detected that you are only on one of them. --Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
In fact you were the first to notify me, so thanks for that. :) --Aqwis (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:World_homosexuality_laws.svg

edit
 
File:World_homosexuality_laws.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Damiens.rf 15:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:NorwegianConstitutionDay2009TorgetBergen.jpg

edit
 
File:NorwegianConstitutionDay2009TorgetBergen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

155.55.60.112 10:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bilde Askøy

edit

Hei,

Fant et bilde på wikipedia av Kleppestø som jeg forstår du har tatt. Vi har laget et planprogram for Kleppestø og har brukt bildet som forside. Det er et dokument som gir noen føringer i forbindelse med oppstart av en områderegulering.

Jeg forstod det sånn på lisensen at det er ok men vi vil gjeren kreditere deg. Så hvis du gir meg navnet ditt skal jeg gjøre mitt for å få det med.

Håper det er ok.

Mvh

Joakim Skajaa

Svar gjerne til joakim(at)eriksenskajaa.no

File:Black_genitalia.jpg

edit
 
File:Black_genitalia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 10:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Which eye is the ocular prosthesis in in your cat photo?

edit

Left or right?

The biggest one (right eye in the picture). --Aqwis (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Gatekart over strandgaten

edit

I artikkelen om Strandgaten, Bergen har du vedlagt et svært oversiktlig bilde av strandgaten. Jeg har prøvd meg litt på programmet du oppnevner som kilde, men jeg får det ikke til. Hvordan lagde du det? Er det muligheter for litt hjelp?

 
OpenStreetMap er en side med fritt lisensierte kart av hele verden. For å lage kartet av Strandgaten tok jeg rett og slett screenshot av kartet, gikk inn i et bilderedigeringsprogram og la på streker. --Aqwis (talk) 22:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 1989 23:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bruk av Nygårdstangen panorama

edit

Vi er en bedrift i Bergen som skal ha printet folie på glassveggene på møterommene. Tema på bildene er knyttet til navnet på møterommet. For møterommet "Store lungegårdsvann" ble bildet ditt stemt enstemmig frem som det foretrukne. Kan vi bruke det ved å kreditere fotografen ihht til retningenlinjene og er det mulig å få en versjon med høyere oppløsning?

Hei! Det går selvfølgelig greit at dere bruker bildet. Hvis jeg skal sjekke om jeg har en versjon med høyere oppløsning må jeg imidlertid vite nøyaktig hvilket bilde du tenker på, ettersom jeg har lastet opp flere bilder av Store lungegårdsvann til Wikimedia Commons. --Aqwis (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Supert. Jeg tenkte på dette: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Nyg%C3%A5rdstangen_panorama.jpg Mvh Eirik

Bruk av bilde

edit

Hei igjen

Jeg mente følgende bilde: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Nyg%C3%A5rdstangen_panorama.jpg

Skulle gjerne hatt større oppløsning hvis du har :-)

Mvh Eirik

Jeg skal sjekke ut saken. Er ikke hjemme på en god stund, så er ikke sikker på om jeg har tilgang til råfilene for øyeblikket. --77.40.174.194 05:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plomin.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

edit
 

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Aqwis,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Update request

edit

Hello.

Can you update File:Bergen Light Rail map-labeled.png?

Bergen Light Rail was expanded in 2022.

Yours sincerely, 31.200.16.201 09:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • That map isn't just out of date now, it's been out of date for nearly a decade! I'm surprised to see it's still used anywhere. I'll update it if I have time, or most likely create a new map. --Aqwis (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Genericusername57 (talk) 23:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply