- â (1955). âCardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.â Journal of Political Economy 63 (4), pp. 309â321.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- â (1977). âMorality and the theory of rational behavior.â Social Research 44 (4), pp. 623â 656.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- â (1979). Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources. Cambridge University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- â (2009). âClimate Economics: A Meta-Review and Some Suggestions for Future Research. â Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3 (1), pp. 4â21.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- â (2011). âComparing the welfare of growing economies.â Revue dâéconomie politique 121 (1), pp. 59â72.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Adler, M. and Treich, N. (2015). âPrioritarianism and Climate Change.â Environmental and Resource Economics 62(2), pp. 279â308.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Adler, M., Anthoff, D., Bosetti, V., Garner, G., Keller, K., and Treich, N. (2017). âPriority for the worse-off and the social cost of carbon.â Nature Climate Change 7, pp. 443â449.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Alvarez-Cuadrado, F. and Long, N. (2009). âA mixed Bentham-Rawls criterion for intergenerational equity: Theory and implications.â Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58 (2), pp. 154â168.
- Anthoff, D. and Emmerling, J. (2019). âInequality and the Social Cost of Carbon.â Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 6 (2), pp. 29â59.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Anthoff, D., Hepburn, C., and Tol, R. S. J. (2009). âEquity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change.â Ecological Economics 68 (3), pp. 836â849.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C., and Pimentel, D. (1995). âEconomic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment.â Ecological Economics 15 (2), pp. 91â95.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Heal, G., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Schneider, S., Starrett, D., and Walker, B. (2004). âAre We Consuming Too Much?â Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3), pp. 147â172.
- Asako, K. (1980). âEconomic growth and environmental pollution under the max-min principle.â Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 7 (3), pp. 157â183.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Asheim, G. B. (2013). âHartwickâs rule.â In: Shogren, J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics, Elsevier Science.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Asheim, G. B. and Ekeland, I. (2016). âResource conservation across generations in a Ramsey-Chichilnisky model.â Economic Theory 61, pp. 611â639.
Asheim, G. B. and Mitra, T. (2010). âSustainability and discounted utilitarianism in models of economic growth.â Mathematical Social Sciences 59 (2), pp. 148â169.
Asheim, G. B. and Nesje, F. (2016). âDestructive Intergenerational Altruism.â Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 3 (4), pp. 957â984.
Asheim, G. B. and Zuber, S. (2014). âEscaping the repugnant conclusion: Rank-discounted utilitarianism with variable population.â Theoretical Economics 9 (3), pp. 629â650.
Asheim, G. B., Banerjee, K., and Mitra, T. (2020). âHow stationarity contradicts intergenerational equity.â Economic Theory, pp. 1â22.
- Atkinson, A. B. (1970). âOn the Measurement of Inequality.â Journal of Economic Theory 2 (3), pp. 244â263.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Baumgärtner, S. and Glotzbach, S. (2012). âThe relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice.â Environmental Values 21 (3), pp. 331â355.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Baumgärtner, S., Drupp, M., and Quaas, M. (2017). âSubsistence, Substitutability and Sustainability in Consumption.â Environmental and Resource Economics 67 (1), pp. 47â 66.
- Baumgärtner, S., Glotzbach, S., Hoberg, N., Quaas, M., and Stumpf, K. (2012). âEconomic Analysis of Trade-offs between Justices.â Intergenerational Justice Review 1, pp. 4â9.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Berger, L. and Emmerling, J. (2020). âWelfare as equity equivalents.â Journal of Economic Surveys 34 (4), pp. 727â752.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Boarini, R., Causa, O., Fleurbaey, M., Grimalda, G., and Woolard, I. (2018). âReducing inequalities and strengthening social cohesion through inclusive growth: a roadmap for action.â Economics 12 (2018-63), pp. 1â26.
Botzen, W. J. W. and Bergh, J. C. J. M. van den (2014). âSpecifications of Social Welfare in Economic Studies of Climate Policy: Overview of Criteria and Related Policy Insights.â Environmental and Resource Economics 58 (1), pp. 1â33.
Bretschger, L. (2017). âIs the Environment Compatible with Growth? Adopting an Integrated Framework for Sustainability.â Annual Review of Resource Economics 9 (1), pp. 185â207.
Burmeister, E. and Hammond, P. J. (1977). âMaximin Paths of Heterogeneous Capital Accumulation and the Instability of Paradoxical Steady States.â Econometrica 45 (4), pp. 853â870.
- By Lemma 1 of Cairns et al. (2019), cR = cP = 0 cannot be solution of the problem.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cairns, R. and Long, N. (2006). âMaximin: a direct approach to sustainability.â Environment and Development Economics 11 (3), pp. 275â300.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cairns, R. and Martinet, V. (2014). âAn environmental-economic measure of sustainable development.â European Economic Review 69, pp. 4â17.
Cairns, R. D., Del Campo, S., and Martinet, V. (2019). âSustainability of an economy relying on two reproducible assets.â Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 101, pp. 145â160.
Chichilnisky, G. (1996). âAn axiomatic approach to sustainable development.â Social Choice and Welfare 13 (2), pp. 231â257.
- dâAutume, A. and Schubert, K. (2008a). âHartwickâs rule and maximin paths when the exhaustible resource has an amenity value.â Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56 (3), pp. 260â274.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
dâAutume, A. and Schubert, K. (2008b). âZero discounting and optimal paths of depletion of an exhaustible resource with an amenity value.â Revue dâÃconomie Politique 118 (6), pp. 827â845.
dâAutume, A., Hartwick, J. M., and Schubert, K. (2010). âThe zero discounting and maximin optimal paths in a simple model of global warming.â Mathematical Social Sciences 59 (2), pp. 193â207.
- Dasgupta, P. and Heal, G. (1974). âThe Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources.â Review of Economic Studies 41, pp. 3â28.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Del Campo, S. (2019). âDistributional considerations during growth toward the golden rule.â EAERE, 25 p.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dennig, F., Budolfson, M. B., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A., and Socolow, R. H. (2015). âInequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices.â Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (52), pp. 15827â15832.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Dietz, S. and Asheim, G. (2012). âClimate policy under sustainable discounted utilitarianism. â Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63, pp. 321â335.
- Dixit, A., Hammond, P., and Hoel, M. (1980). âOn Hartwickâs Rule for Regular Maximin Paths of Capital Accumulation and Resource Depletion.â Review of Economic Studies 47 (3), pp. 551â556.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Drupp, M. (2018). âLimits to Substitution Between Ecosystem Services and Manufactured Goods and Implications for Social Discounting.â Environmental and Resource Economics 69 (1), pp. 135â158.
- Epstein, L. G. (1986). âIntergenerational consumption rules: An axiomatization of utilitarianism and egalitarianism.â Journal of Economic Theory 38 (2), pp. 280â297.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (1999). âA theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation.â Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3), pp. 817â868.
- Fleurbaey, M. (2015a). âOn sustainability and social welfare.â Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 71, pp. 34 â53.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fleurbaey, M. (2015b). âEquality versus Priority: How Relevant is the Distinction?â Economics and Philosophy 31 (2), pp. 203â217.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Harsanyi, J. (1953). âCardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risktaking. â Journal of Political Economy 61 (5), pp. 434â435.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hartwick, J. (1977). âIntergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources.â American Economic Review 67 (5), pp. 972â974.
Heal, G. (1998). Valuing the Future: Economic Theory and Sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York.
Kverndokk, S., Nævdal, E., and Nøstbakken, L. (2014). âThe trade-off between intra- and intergenerational equity in climate policy.â European Economic Review 69, pp. 40â58.
- Lambert, P. (2007). âSerge Kolmâs The Optimal Production of Social Justice.â Journal of Economic Inequality 5 (2), pp. 213â234.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lauwers, L. (1997). âRawlsian equity and generalised utilitarianism with an infinite population. â Economic Theory 9, pp. 143â150.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Llavador, H., Roemer, J., and Silvestre, J. (2011). âA dynamic analysis of human welfare in a warming planet.â Journal of Public Economics 95 (11), pp. 1607â1620.
- Martinet, V. (2012). Economic Theory and Sustainable Development: What Can We Preserve for Future Generations? Routledge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Martinet, V. and Doyen, L. (2007). âSustainability of an economy with an exhaustible resource: A viable control approach.â Resource and Energy Economics 29 (1), pp. 17â 39.
- Mitra, T. (2002). âIntertemporal Equity and Efficient Allocation of Resources.â Journal of Economic Theory 107 (2), pp. 356â376.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Myerson, R. B. (1981). âUtilitarianism, egalitarianism, and the timing effect in social choice problems.â Econometrica, pp. 883â897.
- Parfit, D. (1995). âEquality or Priority?â The Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Piacquadio, P. (2014). âIntergenerational egalitarianism.â Journal of Economic Theory 153, pp. 117â127.
- Quaas, M., Soest, D. van, and Baumgärtner, S. (2013). âComplementarity, impatience, and the resilience of natural-resource-dependent economies.â Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 66 (1), pp. 15â32.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schelling, T. (1992). âSome Economics of Global Warming.â American Economic Review 82 (1), pp. 1â14.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Scovronick, N., Budolfson, M. B., Dennig, F., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A., Socolow, R. H., Spears, D., and Wagner, F. (2017). âImpact of population growth and population ethics on climate change mitigation policy.â Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (46), pp. 12338â12343.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Solow, R. M. (1974). âIntergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources.â Review of Economic Studies 41, pp. 29â45.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sterner, T. (2012). Fuel Taxes and the Poor: the Distributional Effects of Gasoline Taxation and Their Implications for Climate Policy. Routledge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Temkin, L. S. (1993). Inequality. Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- The necessary conditions include, for i = R, P, and for any time t (Cairns and Long, 2006; Cairns et al., 2019): âL âci = 0 â i = ÏWci ; (12) âL âXi = âÌi â â Ìi i = F0 (Xi) . (13) Deriving an expression for Ë i i from eq. (12) and combining the two equations gives â ÏÌ Ï = F0 (Xi) + WÌci Wci . (14) Equation (14) holds for both countries, so we can write WÌcR WcR â WÌcP WcP = F0 (XP ) â F0 (XR) . Since WcR /WcP = (cP /cR)θ , the log-differentiation gives cÌP cP â cÌR cR = F0 (XP ) â F0 (XR) θ . The growth gap depends positively on the productivity gap and negatively on the intragenerational inequality aversion. Stationary states, with cÌi ci = 0 and ci = F(X? i ), are characterized by the no-arbitrage condition F0 (Xâ P ) = F0 (Xâ R). This constitutes the proof of Proposition 3.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Traeger, C. (2011). âSustainability, limited substitutability, and non-constant social discount rates.â Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62 (2), pp. 215â 228.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Vickrey, W. (1945). âMeasuring Marginal Utility by Reactions to Risk.â Econometrica 13 (4), pp. 319â333.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Yamaguchi, R. (2019). âIntergenerational discounting with intragenerational inequality in consumption and the environment.â Environmental and Resource Economics 73, pp. 957â972. A Appendix A.1 Sustaining global consumption: Mathematical details This section solves the problem of Section 3. To make the analysis more general and cover the results presented in the extensions of Section 5, we distinguish the technologies of the two countries. The symmetric case is retrieved by setting FP â¡ FR â¡ F.