[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Shortcut Modification

Adversaries may create or modify shortcuts that can execute a program during system boot or user login. Shortcuts or symbolic links are used to reference other files or programs that will be opened or executed when the shortcut is clicked or executed by a system startup process.

Adversaries may abuse shortcuts in the startup folder to execute their tools and achieve persistence.[1] Although often used as payloads in an infection chain (e.g. Spearphishing Attachment), adversaries may also create a new shortcut as a means of indirection, while also abusing Masquerading to make the malicious shortcut appear as a legitimate program. Adversaries can also edit the target path or entirely replace an existing shortcut so their malware will be executed instead of the intended legitimate program.

Shortcuts can also be abused to establish persistence by implementing other methods. For example, LNK browser extensions may be modified (e.g. Browser Extensions) to persistently launch malware.

ID: T1547.009
Sub-technique of:  T1547
Platforms: Windows
Permissions Required: Administrator, User
Contributors: Bobby, Filar, Elastic; David French, Elastic; Travis Smith, Tripwire
Version: 1.2
Created: 24 January 2020
Last Modified: 15 October 2024

Procedure Examples

ID Name Description
G0087 APT39

APT39 has modified LNK shortcuts.[2]

S0373 Astaroth

Astaroth's initial payload is a malicious .LNK file. [3][4]

S0031 BACKSPACE

BACKSPACE achieves persistence by creating a shortcut to itself in the CSIDL_STARTUP directory.[5]

S0534 Bazar

Bazar can establish persistence by writing shortcuts to the Windows Startup folder.[6][7]

S0089 BlackEnergy

The BlackEnergy 3 variant drops its main DLL component and then creates a .lnk shortcut to that file in the startup folder.[8]

S0244 Comnie

Comnie establishes persistence via a .lnk file in the victim’s startup path.[9]

S0363 Empire

Empire can persist by modifying a .LNK file to include a backdoor.[10]

S0267 FELIXROOT

FELIXROOT creates a .LNK file for persistence.[11]

S0168 Gazer

Gazer can establish persistence by creating a .lnk file in the Start menu or by modifying existing .lnk files to execute the malware through cmd.exe.[12][13]

G0078 Gorgon Group

Gorgon Group malware can create a .lnk file and add a Registry Run key to establish persistence.[14]

S0531 Grandoreiro

Grandoreiro can write or modify browser shortcuts to enable launching of malicious browser extensions.[15]

S0170 Helminth

Helminth establishes persistence by creating a shortcut.[16]

S0260 InvisiMole

InvisiMole can use a .lnk shortcut for the Control Panel to establish persistence.[17]

S0265 Kazuar

Kazuar adds a .lnk file to the Windows startup folder.[18]

S0356 KONNI

A version of KONNI drops a Windows shortcut on the victim’s machine to establish persistence.[19]

G0032 Lazarus Group

Lazarus Group malware has maintained persistence on a system by creating a LNK shortcut in the user’s Startup folder.[20]

G0065 Leviathan

Leviathan has used JavaScript to create a shortcut file in the Startup folder that points to its main backdoor.[21][22]

S0652 MarkiRAT

MarkiRAT can modify the shortcut that launches Telegram by replacing its path with the malicious payload to launch with the legitimate executable.[23]

S0339 Micropsia

Micropsia creates a shortcut to maintain persistence.[24]

S0439 Okrum

Okrum can establish persistence by creating a .lnk shortcut to itself in the Startup folder.[25]

S0172 Reaver

Reaver creates a shortcut file and saves it in a Startup folder to establish persistence.[26]

S0153 RedLeaves

RedLeaves attempts to add a shortcut file in the Startup folder to achieve persistence.[27][28]

S0270 RogueRobin

RogueRobin establishes persistence by creating a shortcut (.LNK file) in the Windows startup folder to run a script each time the user logs in.[29][30]

S0085 S-Type

S-Type may create the file %HOMEPATH%\Start Menu\Programs\Startup\Realtek {Unique Identifier}.lnk, which points to the malicious msdtc.exe file already created in the %CommonFiles% directory.[31]

S0053 SeaDuke

SeaDuke is capable of persisting via a .lnk file stored in the Startup directory.[32]

S0028 SHIPSHAPE

SHIPSHAPE achieves persistence by creating a shortcut in the Startup folder.[5]

S0035 SPACESHIP

SPACESHIP achieves persistence by creating a shortcut in the current user's Startup folder.[5]

S0058 SslMM

To establish persistence, SslMM identifies the Start Menu Startup directory and drops a link to its own executable disguised as an "Office Start," "Yahoo Talk," "MSN Gaming Z0ne," or "MSN Talk" shortcut.[33]

S0004 TinyZBot

TinyZBot can create a shortcut in the Windows startup folder for persistence.[34]

Mitigations

ID Mitigation Description
M1038 Execution Prevention

Prevents malicious shortcuts or LNK files from executing unwanted code by ensuring only authorized applications and scripts are allowed to run.

M1022 Restrict File and Directory Permissions

Applying strict permissions to directories where shortcuts are stored, such as the startup folder, can prevent unauthorized modifications.

M1018 User Account Management

Limit Privileges for Shortcut Creation: While the SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege is not directly related to .lnk file creation, you should still enforce least privilege principles by limiting user rights to create and modify shortcuts, especially in system-critical locations. This can be done through GPO: Computer Configuration > [Policies] > Windows Settings > Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment: Create symbolic links. [35]

Regular User Permissions Review: Regularly review and audit user permissions to ensure that only necessary accounts have write access to startup folders and critical system directories.

Detection

ID Data Source Data Component Detects
DS0022 File File Creation

Monitor for LNK files created with a Zone Identifier value greater than 1, which may indicate that the LNK file originated from outside of the network.[36] Analysis should attempt to relate shortcut creation events to other potentially suspicious events based on known adversary behavior such as process launches of unknown executables that make network connections.

File Modification

Since a shortcut's target path likely will not change, modifications to shortcut files that do not correlate with known software changes, patches, removal, etc., may be suspicious. Analysis should attempt to relate shortcut file change events to other potentially suspicious events based on known adversary behavior such as process launches of unknown executables that make network connections.

DS0009 Process Process Creation

Monitor for newly executed processes that may create or edit shortcuts to run a program during system boot or user login.

References

  1. Elastic. (n.d.). Shortcut File Written or Modified for Persistence. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  2. Hawley et al. (2019, January 29). APT39: An Iranian Cyber Espionage Group Focused on Personal Information. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  3. Doaty, J., Garrett, P.. (2018, September 10). We’re Seeing a Resurgence of the Demonic Astaroth WMIC Trojan. Retrieved September 25, 2024.
  4. Salem, E. (2019, February 13). ASTAROTH MALWARE USES LEGITIMATE OS AND ANTIVIRUS PROCESSES TO STEAL PASSWORDS AND PERSONAL DATA. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
  5. FireEye Labs. (2015, April). APT30 AND THE MECHANICS OF A LONG-RUNNING CYBER ESPIONAGE OPERATION. Retrieved May 1, 2015.
  6. Cybereason Nocturnus. (2020, July 16). A BAZAR OF TRICKS: FOLLOWING TEAM9’S DEVELOPMENT CYCLES. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  7. Pantazopoulos, N. (2020, June 2). In-depth analysis of the new Team9 malware family. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
  8. F-Secure Labs. (2014). BlackEnergy & Quedagh: The convergence of crimeware and APT attacks. Retrieved March 24, 2016.
  9. Grunzweig, J. (2018, January 31). Comnie Continues to Target Organizations in East Asia. Retrieved June 7, 2018.
  10. Schroeder, W., Warner, J., Nelson, M. (n.d.). Github PowerShellEmpire. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  11. Cherepanov, A. (2018, October). GREYENERGY A successor to BlackEnergy. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
  12. ESET. (2017, August). Gazing at Gazer: Turla’s new second stage backdoor. Retrieved September 14, 2017.
  13. Kaspersky Lab's Global Research & Analysis Team. (2017, August 30). Introducing WhiteBear. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  14. Falcone, R., et al. (2018, August 02). The Gorgon Group: Slithering Between Nation State and Cybercrime. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
  15. Abramov, D. (2020, April 13). Grandoreiro Malware Now Targeting Banks in Spain. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  16. Falcone, R. and Lee, B.. (2016, May 26). The OilRig Campaign: Attacks on Saudi Arabian Organizations Deliver Helminth Backdoor. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
  17. Hromcova, Z. and Cherpanov, A. (2020, June). INVISIMOLE: THE HIDDEN PART OF THE STORY. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  18. Levene, B, et al. (2017, May 03). Kazuar: Multiplatform Espionage Backdoor with API Access. Retrieved July 17, 2018.
  1. Rascagneres, P. (2017, May 03). KONNI: A Malware Under The Radar For Years. Retrieved November 5, 2018.
  2. Sherstobitoff, R. (2018, February 12). Lazarus Resurfaces, Targets Global Banks and Bitcoin Users. Retrieved February 19, 2018.
  3. Axel F, Pierre T. (2017, October 16). Leviathan: Espionage actor spearphishes maritime and defense targets. Retrieved February 15, 2018.
  4. FireEye. (2018, March 16). Suspected Chinese Cyber Espionage Group (TEMP.Periscope) Targeting U.S. Engineering and Maritime Industries. Retrieved April 11, 2018.
  5. GReAT. (2021, June 16). Ferocious Kitten: 6 Years of Covert Surveillance in Iran. Retrieved September 22, 2021.
  6. Rascagneres, P., Mercer, W. (2017, June 19). Delphi Used To Score Against Palestine. Retrieved November 13, 2018.
  7. Hromcova, Z. (2019, July). OKRUM AND KETRICAN: AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT KE3CHANG GROUP ACTIVITY. Retrieved May 6, 2020.
  8. Grunzweig, J. and Miller-Osborn, J. (2017, November 10). New Malware with Ties to SunOrcal Discovered. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
  9. PwC and BAE Systems. (2017, April). Operation Cloud Hopper: Technical Annex. Retrieved April 13, 2017.
  10. Accenture Security. (2018, April 23). Hogfish Redleaves Campaign. Retrieved July 2, 2018.
  11. Falcone, R., et al. (2018, July 27). New Threat Actor Group DarkHydrus Targets Middle East Government. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
  12. Lee, B., Falcone, R. (2019, January 18). DarkHydrus delivers new Trojan that can use Google Drive for C2 communications. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
  13. Gross, J. (2016, February 23). Operation Dust Storm. Retrieved December 22, 2021.
  14. Grunzweig, J.. (2015, July 14). Unit 42 Technical Analysis: Seaduke. Retrieved August 3, 2016.
  15. Baumgartner, K., Golovkin, M.. (2015, May). The MsnMM Campaigns: The Earliest Naikon APT Campaigns. Retrieved April 10, 2019.
  16. Cylance. (2014, December). Operation Cleaver. Retrieved September 14, 2017.
  17. UCF. (n.d.). Unauthorized accounts must not have the Create symbolic links user right.. Retrieved December 18, 2017.
  18. French, D., Filar, B.. (2020, March 21). A Chain Is No Stronger Than Its Weakest LNK. Retrieved November 30, 2020.