TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rong, Jian
AU  - Pathiravasan, Chathurangi H
AU  - Zhang, Yuankai
AU  - Faro, Jamie M
AU  - Wang, Xuzhi
AU  - Schramm, Eric
AU  - Borrelli, Belinda
AU  - Benjamin, Emelia J
AU  - Liu, Chunyu
AU  - Murabito, Joanne M
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/12/31
TI  - Baseline Smartphone App Survey Return in the Electronic Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Omni 1 Study: eCohort Study
JO  - JMIR Aging
SP  - e64636
VL  - 7
KW  - mHealth
KW  - mobile health
KW  - mobile application
KW  - smartphone
KW  - digital health
KW  - digital technology
KW  - digital intervention
KW  - gerontology
KW  - geriatric
KW  - older adult
KW  - aging
KW  - eFHS
KW  - eCohort
KW  - smartphone app
KW  - baseline app surveys
KW  - Framingham Heart Study
KW  - health information
KW  - information collection
KW  - mobile phone
AB  - Background: Smartphone apps can be used to monitor chronic conditions and offer opportunities for self-assessment conveniently at home. However, few digital studies include older adults. Objective: We aim to describe a new electronic cohort of older adults embedded in the Framingham Heart Study including baseline smartphone survey return rates and survey completion rates by smartphone type (iPhone [Apple Inc] and Android [Google LLC] users). We also aim to report survey results for selected baseline surveys and participant experience with this study’s app. Methods: Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Omni (multiethnic cohort) participants who owned a smartphone were invited to download this study’s app that contained a range of survey types to report on different aspects of health including self-reported measures from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). iPhone users also completed 4 tasks including 2 cognitive and 2 physical function testing tasks. Baseline survey return and completion rates were calculated for 12 surveys and compared between iPhone and Android users. We calculated standardized scores for the PROMIS surveys. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was deployed 30 days after enrollment to obtain participant feedback on app functionality and aesthetics. Results: We enrolled 611 smartphone users (average age 73.6, SD 6.3 y; n=346, 56.6% women; n=88, 14.4% Omni participants; 478, 78.2% iPhone users) and 596 (97.5%) returned at least 1 baseline survey. iPhone users had higher app survey return rates than Android users for each survey (range 85.5% to 98.3% vs 73.8% to 95.2%, respectively), but survey completion rates did not differ in the 2 smartphone groups. The return rate for the 4 iPhone tasks ranged from 80.9% (380/470) for the gait task to 88.9% (418/470) for the Trail Making Test task. The Electronic Framingham Heart Study participants had better standardized t scores in 6 of 7 PROMIS surveys compared to the general population mean (t score=50) including higher cognitive function (n=55.6) and lower fatigue (n=45.5). Among 469 participants who returned the MARS survey, app functionality and aesthetics was rated high (total MARS score=8.6 on a 1‐10 scale). Conclusions: We effectively engaged community-dwelling older adults to use a smartphone app designed to collect health information relevant to older adults. High app survey return rates and very high app survey completion rates were observed along with high participant rating of this study’s app. 
SN  - 2561-7605
UR  - https://aging.jmir.org/2024/1/e64636
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/64636
DO  - 10.2196/64636
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/64636
ER  -