@inproceedings{zalmout-etal-2016-analysis,
title = "Analysis of Foreign Language Teaching Methods: An Automatic Readability Approach",
author = "Zalmout, Nasser and
Saddiki, Hind and
Habash, Nizar",
editor = "Chen, Hsin-Hsi and
Tseng, Yuen-Hsien and
Ng, Vincent and
Lu, Xiaofei",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Natural Language Processing Techniques for Educational Applications ({NLPTEA}2016)",
month = dec,
year = "2016",
address = "Osaka, Japan",
publisher = "The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/W16-4916",
pages = "122--130",
abstract = "Much research in education has been done on the study of different language teaching methods. However, there has been little investigation using computational analysis to compare such methods in terms of readability or complexity progression. In this paper, we make use of existing readability scoring techniques and our own classifiers to analyze the textbooks used in two very different teaching methods for English as a Second Language {--} the grammar-based and the communicative methods. Our analysis indicates that the grammar-based curriculum shows a more coherent readability progression compared to the communicative curriculum. This finding corroborates with the expectations about the differences between these two methods and validates our approach{'}s value in comparing different teaching methods quantitatively.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="zalmout-etal-2016-analysis">
<titleInfo>
<title>Analysis of Foreign Language Teaching Methods: An Automatic Readability Approach</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nasser</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zalmout</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hind</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Saddiki</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nizar</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Habash</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2016-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Natural Language Processing Techniques for Educational Applications (NLPTEA2016)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hsin-Hsi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yuen-Hsien</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tseng</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vincent</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ng</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Xiaofei</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Osaka, Japan</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Much research in education has been done on the study of different language teaching methods. However, there has been little investigation using computational analysis to compare such methods in terms of readability or complexity progression. In this paper, we make use of existing readability scoring techniques and our own classifiers to analyze the textbooks used in two very different teaching methods for English as a Second Language – the grammar-based and the communicative methods. Our analysis indicates that the grammar-based curriculum shows a more coherent readability progression compared to the communicative curriculum. This finding corroborates with the expectations about the differences between these two methods and validates our approach’s value in comparing different teaching methods quantitatively.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">zalmout-etal-2016-analysis</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/W16-4916</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2016-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>122</start>
<end>130</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Analysis of Foreign Language Teaching Methods: An Automatic Readability Approach
%A Zalmout, Nasser
%A Saddiki, Hind
%A Habash, Nizar
%Y Chen, Hsin-Hsi
%Y Tseng, Yuen-Hsien
%Y Ng, Vincent
%Y Lu, Xiaofei
%S Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Natural Language Processing Techniques for Educational Applications (NLPTEA2016)
%D 2016
%8 December
%I The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee
%C Osaka, Japan
%F zalmout-etal-2016-analysis
%X Much research in education has been done on the study of different language teaching methods. However, there has been little investigation using computational analysis to compare such methods in terms of readability or complexity progression. In this paper, we make use of existing readability scoring techniques and our own classifiers to analyze the textbooks used in two very different teaching methods for English as a Second Language – the grammar-based and the communicative methods. Our analysis indicates that the grammar-based curriculum shows a more coherent readability progression compared to the communicative curriculum. This finding corroborates with the expectations about the differences between these two methods and validates our approach’s value in comparing different teaching methods quantitatively.
%U https://aclanthology.org/W16-4916
%P 122-130
Markdown (Informal)
[Analysis of Foreign Language Teaching Methods: An Automatic Readability Approach](https://aclanthology.org/W16-4916) (Zalmout et al., NLP-TEA 2016)
ACL