"Create"or"buy": internal vs. external sources of innovation and firm productivityJieun Choi and
Jieun Choi
No 8121, Policy Research Working Paper Series from The World Bank Abstract: The role of innovation in improving productivity might vary according to a country's relative position in technology advancement. Frontier countries might benefit more from policies that promote firms'internal innovation (create), while follower countries would gain more from policies favoring the adoption of existing technologies through innovation outsourcing (buy). However, in many countries, the government policies to promote innovation narrowly focus on"creating,"regardless of considerations of the level of a country's technological advancement. This paper investigates the effect of different sources of innovation on output via productivity with representative manufacturing firms in Tunisia from 1997 to 2007. It finds that"buying"has a positive effect on productivity whereas"creating"does not, which might imply that Tunisian firms do not invest sufficiently in"creating,"or that"creating"is more difficult for Tunisian firms because they might be too far from the technology frontier. Meanwhile, there is no synergy from using both sources of innovation simultaneously ?- a finding that counters literature suggesting that"creating"could enhance firms'absorptive capacity. The paper considers the possibility that"creating"and"buying"substitute for each other in Tunisia, where resources are limited, assuming the effect of innovation is not linear or requires a certain amount of investment (threshold) to positively affect productivity. The estimation result using the Tobit model supports this assumption. The findings suggest that innovation policy in Tunisia should emphasize adoption and adaptation, rather that creation and innovation. To encourage firms'"buying,"the government can promote exports and workers'skills, whereas incentives that encourage firms to hire more technicians or to acquire foreign investment might not be efficient ways to encourage"buying."Moreover, the fact that there is a minimum requirement (threshold) for innovation investment suggests that policies that aim to reduce this threshold or support firms around this threshold could catalyze the innovation investment. Keywords: Food&Beverage Industry; Common Carriers Industry; Business Cycles and Stabilization Policies; Construction Industry; Plastics&Rubber Industry; Pulp&Paper Industry; Textiles; Apparel&Leather Industry; General Manufacturing; International Trade and Trade Rules; Adaptation to Climate Change; Social Policy; Real&Intellectual Property Law; Regulatory Regimes; Legal Reform; Legal Products; Legislation; Intellectual Property Rights; Judicial System Reform; Common Property Resource Development (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:8121 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Policy Research Working Paper Series from The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.